Criminal record checking is now widespread in Australia. Aboriginal people are disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system, for a range of reasons including historic levels of disadvantage due to colonisation. They are therefore disproportionately likely to be negatively affected by criminal record checking when seeking employment, when taking on community governance roles, when being considered as kinship carers and so on. At the same time, productive and rewarding employment, and engagement in governance roles, are vital aspects of Aboriginal people's participation, contribution and engagement across all parts of the Australian community. This article examines practices, protocols and experiences of employers, employment agencies and government organisations in Western Australia and the Northern Territory managing the potential impact of a criminal record on Aboriginal employment. The article identifies four fields that can give rise to good employment practice: Background Checking; Recruitment; Risk Management; and Support and Engagement.
ALRC (2018). Pathways to justice–inquiry into the incarceration rate of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, final report No 133. Commonwealth of Australia.
3.
AthertonP.BuckG. (2021). Employing with conviction: The experiences of employers who actively recruit criminalised people. Probation Journal,68(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505211010942
CherneyA.FitzgeraldR. (2016). Finding and keeping a job: The value and meaning of employment for parolees. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,60(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14548858
CunneenC.GoldsonB.RussellS. (2016). Juvenile justice, young people and human rights in Australia. Current Issues in Criminal Justice,28(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2016.12036067
11.
DenverM.SiwachG.BushwayS. D. (2017). A new look at the employment and recidivism relationship through the lens of a criminal background check. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal,55(1), 174–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12130
12.
GoldsonB.CunneenC.RussellS.BrownD.BaldryE.SchwartzM.BriggsD. (2020). Youth justice and penality in comparative context. Routledge.
13.
GoodsteinJ. D.PetrichD. M. (2019). Hiring and retaining formerly incarcerated persons: An employer-based perspective. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation,58(3), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2019.1582572
14.
GraffamJ.ShinkfieldA.HardcastleL. (2007). The perceived employability of ex-prisoners and offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,52(6), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X07307783
15.
GraffamJ.ShinkfieldA. J.LavelleB. (2014). Recidivism among participants of an employment assistance program for prisoners and offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,58(3), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12470526
16.
Herzog-EvansM. (2011). Judicial rehabilitation in France: Helping with the desisting process and acknowledging achieved desistance. European Journal of Probation,3(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/206622031100300102
17.
HeydonG. (2012). Risk and rehabilitation in criminal records checking: What employers are doing and why. Employment Law Bulletin,18(8), 129–135.
18.
HeydonG.NaylorB. (2018). Criminal record checking and employment: the importance of policy and proximity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology,51(3), 372–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865817723410
19.
JacobsJ. (2015). The eternal criminal record. Harvard University Press.
20.
LockwoodS.NallyJ. M.HoT.KnutsonK. (2012). The effect of correctional education on postrelease employment and recidivism: A 5-year follow-up study in the state of Indiana. Crime & Delinquency,58(3), 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712441695
21.
LukiesJ.GraffamJ.ShinkfieldA. J. (2011). The effect of organisational context variables on employer attitudes toward the employability of ex-offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,53(3), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09359933
22.
Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association.https://doi.org/10.1037/10430-000
McCannW.KowalskiM. A.HemmensC.StohrM. K. (2021). An analysis of certificates of rehabilitation in the United States. Corrections,6(1), 18–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2018.1559002
NaylorB. (2012). Living down the past: Why a criminal record should not be a barrier to successful employment. Employment Law Bulletin,18(8), 115–119.
27.
NaylorB.PatersonM.PittardM. (2008). In the shadow of a criminal record: Proposing a just model of criminal record employment checks. Melbourne University Law Review,32(1), 171–198.
28.
PagerD. (2007). Marked: race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. University of Chicago Press.
29.
RamakersA.NieuwbeertaP.Van WilsemJ.DirkzwagerA. (2016). Not just any job will do: A study on employment characteristics and recidivism risks after release. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,61(16), 1795–1818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16636141
30.
Reich, S. (2017) An exception to the rule: Belief in redeemability, desistance signals, and the employer's decision to hire a job applicant with a criminal record, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(2), 110-136.https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2016.1268235
31.
SampsonR.LaubJ. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In T. P. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 133-161). Transaction Publishers.
32.
The Senate, Finance and Public Administration References Committee (2016). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander experience of law enforcement and justice services. Commonwealth of Australia.
33.
UggenC. (1999). Ex-offenders and the conformist alternative: A job quality model of work and crime. Social Problems,46(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097165
34.
UmezC.GainesJ. (2021). After the sentence, more consequences: A national report of barriers to work. The Council of State Governments Justice Center.
