GabbayRAKendallDBeebeC, et al. Addressing therapeutic inertia in 2020 and beyond: a 3-year initia-tive of the American Diabetes Association. Clin Diabetes. 2020;38(4):371-381.
2.
HarbisonRHechtMMacLeodJ.Building a data-driven multiple daily insulin therapy model using smart insulin pens. J Diabetes Sci Technol. Published online Augst 24, 2020. doi:10.1177/1932296820951225
3.
American Diabetes Association. Diabetes technology: standards of medical care in diabetes – 2021; Diabetes Care. 2021;44(S1):S85-S99.
4.
KerrDWarshawH.Clouds and silver lin-ing: COVID-19 pandemic is an opportune moment to democratize diabetes care through telehealth. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020;14(6):1107-1110. doi:10.1177/1932296820963630
5.
AgarwalSKanapkaLGRaymondJK, et al. Racial-eth-nic inequity in young adults with type 1 diabetes. J Clin En-docrinol Metab. 2020;105:e2960-e2969. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa236
6.
AgarwalSCrespo-RamosGLongJAMillerVA.“I didn’t really have a choice”: qualitative analysis of racial-ethnic disparities in diabetes technology use among adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. Published online March 24, 2021. doi:10.1089/dia.2021.0075
7.
AddalaAAuzanneauMMillerK, et al. A decade of disparities in diabetes technology use and HbA1c in pedi-atric type 1 diabetes: a transatlantic comparison. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:133-140.
8.
EbekozienOANoorNGallaherMPAlonsoGT.Equitable post-COVID-19 care: a practical framework to integrate health equity in diabetes management. J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2020;27(6):256-259. doi:10.12788/ jcom.0031
9.
GreenwoodDAHowellFScherL, et al. A framework for optimizing technology-enabled diabetes and cardiometa-bolic care and education: the role of the diabetes care and education specialist. Diabetes Educator. 2020;46(4):323-doi:10.1177/0145721720935125
10.
IsaacsDGreenwoodDCoxC, et al. From the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists: The role of the diabetes care and education specialist as a champion of technology integration.. Sci Diabetes Self-Manage Care. 2021;47(2): doi:10.1177/0145721721995478.
11.
GreenwoodDAGeePMFatkinDjPeeplesM.A systematic review of reviews evaluating technology-enabled diabetes self-management and support. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(5):1012-1027.
12.
PratleyREKanapkaLGRickelsMR, et al. Wireless Innovation for Seniors with Diabetes Mellitus (WISDM) Study Group. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes: a ran-domized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(23):2397-2406. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6928
13.
VolcanšekŠLunderMJanežA. Acceptability of continuous glucose monitoring in elderly diabetes patients using multiple daily insulin injections. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(10):566-574. doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0131
14.
TanenbaumMLAdamsRNLanningMS, et al. Using cluster analysis to understand clinician readi-ness to promote continuous glucose monitoring adop-tion. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018;12(6):1108-1115. doi:10.1177/1932296818786486
15.
PeekMGorawar-BhatRQuinnMT, et al. Patient trust in physicians and shared decision-making among African Americans with diabetes. Health Commun. 2013;28(6):616-623. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.710873
16.
KrebsPDuncanDT.Health app use among US mobile phone owners: a national survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(4):e101. doi:10.2196/mhealth.4924
17.
TranVBarnesCMontoriV, et al. Taxonomy of the burden of treatment: a multi-country web-based qualita-tive study of patients with chronic conditions. BMC Med. 2015;13:115 doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0356-x
