Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Despite the great individual and societal burden associated with multimorbidity, little is known about how to effectively manage it.

Objective

The aim of this multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to investigate the 12-month effects of a personalized exercise therapy and self-management support program in addition to usual care in people with multimorbidity.

Design

This is a protocol for a pragmatic, parallel-group (1:1 ratio), superiority RCT conducted at five intervention sites (two hospitals, a private practice physiotherapy clinic and two municipal rehabilitation centers) in Region Zealand, Denmark. A total of 228 persons with multimorbidity aged 18 years or older, will be randomly allocated to one of two groups. Both groups will receive usual care, defined as routine care for multimorbidity at the discretion of the treating doctor, while the intervention group will also participate in a 12-week exercise therapy and self-management support program tailored to people with multimorbidity at one of the intervention sites. The primary outcome will be the between-group difference in change in EQ-5D-5L from baseline to the follow-up at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include objectively-measured physical function and physical activity, inflammatory markers, disease and treatment burden, anxiety, depression, stress, sleep, pain and other self-reported parameters. In parallel with the RCT, an observational cohort will follow persons aged ≥18 years with multimorbidity not adhering to all eligibility criteria, as well as people fulfilling all eligibility criteria, but unwilling to participate in the RCT. This study was approved by the Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics for Region Zealand (SJ-857) and results will be communicated in scientific papers, at relevant conferences and to a broader audience.

Discussion

Exercise therapy and self-management support is safe and effective in people with single conditions. However, it is still unclear whether this holds true for individuals with multimorbidity. This pragmatic, multicenter RCT will provide high-quality evidence on the benefits and harms of exercise therapy and self-management support and, if the results support it, lead to the development of a plan for implementation in clinical practice.

Background

Multimorbidity, often defined as the coexistence of two or more conditions in the same individual,¹ affects approximately one-third of the adult population with large variations in the estimated prevalence.² Multimorbidity is associated with decreased quality of life, physical and cognitive function and increased health-care utilization.^1,3-9 As such, people living with multimorbidity account for 78% of all consultations in primary care¹⁰ and are more likely to be admitted to hospital, have an increased length of stay and risk of premature death as compared to those with only one condition.^11,12 Altogether, this highlights the burden of multimorbidity for both the individual and society.

Although more than half of people with any chronic condition have multimorbidity,¹³ most research on chronic conditions so far has excluded multimorbidity,^14,15 and large parts of the health-care sector treat each individual condition on its own instead of person-centered care,¹ thus highlighting the negative impact of the current disease-based curative models on multimorbidity.¹ With an ageing population, and a significant number of people with multimorbidity younger than 65 years of age,¹³ the proportion of people with multimorbidity is increasing rapidly.^1,16 This emphasizes the need to take action to deal with the increasing burden of multimorbidity through prevention, treatment and facilitation of self-management.

Unfortunately, despite the considerable burden of multimorbidity, little is known about how to effectively manage it.^1,17 A promising management option is exercise therapy, which addresses functional limitations and is able to improve symptoms in people with chronic conditions.¹⁸ Exercise therapy is effective, safe and supported by substantial evidence in at least 26 different chronic conditions.¹⁸ This includes knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA),^19,20 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),²¹ heart failure (HF) or coronary heart disease (CHD),^22,23 hypertension,²⁴ type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM),²⁵ and depression,²⁶ which are among the leading causes of global disability, affect several hundred million people around the world and often co-exist.¹⁶ Although evidence on the effects of exercise therapy in multimorbidity is limited, a recent systematic review found that exercise appears safe and effective in people with multimorbidity.²⁷ Furthermore, self-management is increasingly recognized as an essential component of intervention to improve outcomes and reduce health-care utilization.^1,28 Self-management support focuses on enabling persons to develop a set of behavioral skills and abilities to help them navigate a range of disease management tasks across different chronic conditions.²⁸ However, evidence of the effect in multimorbidity is sharse.¹⁷

Overall, this highlights exercise therapy and self-management support as viable treatment options for people with multimorbidity, but the quality of the evidence supporting this is of low quality and high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCT) on different combinations of chronic conditions are needed.²⁷ This is also reflected in clinical guidelines for multimorbidity that do not have specific recommendations on exercise therapy.²⁹

The aim of this RCT is to investigate the effects of a personalized exercise therapy and self-management support in addition to usual care, on self-reported, objectively measured and physiological outcomes in people with multimorbidity (i.e. at least two of the following diseases: knee and hip OA, COPD, heart disease (HF or CHD), hypertension, T2DM, depression). We hypothesize that a personalized exercise therapy and self-management program in addition to usual care is superior to usual care in improving quality of life at the 12 months follow-up.

Methods

Study design

This study protocol (version 1.6, 10 August, 2022) describes the design of a pragmatic, assessor-blinded, multicenter, parallel-group RCT (1:1 ratio) conducted at five intervention sites across the health care Region of Zealand, one of five health-care regions in Denmark.

The RCT was approved by the Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics for Region Zealand (SJ-857) on May 28, 2020 and is conducted in agreement with the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent material is available in Danish with the approved protocol. If a participant sustains any trial-related harm, he or she will be covered by Danish law. Furthermore, the RCT was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency of the Region of Zealand (REG-015-2020) and was pre-registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04645732). The current report adheres to the SPIRIT statement.³⁰

Participants

A total of 228 participants with multimorbidity fulfilling the eligibility criteria listed below will be included in the RCT:

Inclusion criteria

1. At least two of the following conditions: knee or hip OA, COPD, heart disease (HF or CHD), hypertension, T2DM, depression (having other comorbidities does not exclude a person from participating)

2. Adults aged 18 years or above

3. Ability to walk 3 meters without assistance

4. A score of at least 3 on the Bayliss Disease Burden: Morbidity Assessment by Self-Report scale³¹ for at least one of the conditions listed above and a score of ≥ 2 for at least one of the other listed conditions

5. Willingness and ability to participate in a 12-week supervised exercise therapy- and self-management program twice a week

Exclusion criteria

1. Participation in supervised systematic exercise for one of their diseases within the last 3 months

2. Persons with an unstable health condition or at risk of serious adverse events as assessed by a medical specialist

3. Terminal patients and persons with a life expectancy of less than 12 months

4. Persons categorized as Class IV on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification scale

5. Persons with psychosis disorders, post-traumatic stressdisorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, attentiondeficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, anorexianervosa/bulimia nervosa and/or persons with dependency disorders

6. Other reasons for exclusion (unable to understandDanish, mentally unable to participate, etc.)

Recruitment procedure

The overall trial flow is outlined in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Trial flow. Abbreviations: OA: osteoarthritis; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HF: heart failure; CHD: coronary heart disease; T2DM; type 2 diabetes mellitus; RCT: Randomized, controlled trial. *aged 18 years or above, at least two of the relevant conditions and not having psychosis disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, anorexia nervosa/bulimia nervosa or a dependency disorder or Other reasons for exclusion.

The recruitment procedure was adapted and improved through a systematic review performed in MOBILIZE to identify strategies to improve recruitment and retention in exercise trials for people with multimorbidity.³³ Additionally, we consulted the latest Cochrane systematic review on recruitment and retention.^32,34

Participants will be recruited from six general practitioners, three psychiatric facilities, and seven hospital departments in the Region of Zealand, Denmark, through direct consultations, Facebook ads and local newspaper articles as well as other advertisement and posters/handouts. Recruitment began in November 2021.

Persons visiting one of the recruitment sites and who comply with the eligibility criteria are invited to participate in the RCT. Oral information about the study will be provided by a local health professional in an undisturbed room during or right after a usual care consultation or via telephone. Staff at the recruitment sites have been instructed in the recruitment procedure to maximize the recruitment rate, following evidence-based strategies.^33–34 Patient lists will also be screened for eligible participants, who will be contacted by phone. Persons showing interest are referred to the MOBILIZE project team and a member of the project team will subsequently contact them to determine final inclusion.

Self-referrals who have seen the Facebook posts or newspaper articles/advertisements will be contacted by a member of the project team by phone with thorough information about the study and to determine eligibility for study enrollment. A MOBILIZE-associated medical specialist will assess the exclusion criterion regarding unstable health conditions and risk of serious adverse events for all self-referrals.

Potential participants will receive written information via e-mail or by post and are recommended to take at least 24 hours to consider and discuss their potential enrolment with others (e.g. spouse, relatives or similar). Following oral agreement to participate, a written informed consent will be obtained by study personnel prior to study enrollment.

Blinding

Only outcome assessors and the statistician will be blinded to randomization. Furthermore, a blinded interpretation of the study results will be conducted.³⁵

Randomization procedure

People willing to participate and fulfilling the eligibility criteria will be randomized (1:1 allocation ratio) after baseline assessment. A priori, an independent statistician have prepared a computer-generated randomization schedule in randomized, permuted blocks of four or six persons stratified by the number of chronic conditions the individual suffers from (2 or 3+) and recruitment centres (hospitals, general practitioners and self-referrals). Allocation numbers will be concealed in opaque sealed envelopes, which are only accessible by a study coordinator opening them after informed consent and baseline assessment have been completed.

Observational cohort

People who only fulfil inclusion criteria 1 and 2 and do not fulfil exclusion criteria 5 or 6 and those fulfilling all eligibility criteria, but unwilling to participate in the RCT, will be offered participation in an observational cohort study where only the self-reported outcomes are completed. They will be contacted by a member of the project team and receive a separate participant information sheet and consent form. Provided they agree, written consent will be obtained. This group will provide data that can be compared to the more extensively followed participants in the RCT and act as an observational cohort. Recruitment for observational cohort will proceed as long as we are recruiting for the RCT.

Interventions

Participants will be randomized to one of two treatments: a personalized exercise therapy and self-management program on top of usual care or usual care alone. The participants in both groups will continue their current treatment as provided by their general practitioner or specialist, including pharmacological treatment.

Personalized exercise therapy and self-management program

Participants randomized to the personalized exercise therapy and self-management program will twice weekly participate in a 12-week program tailored to people with multimorbidity at one of the intervention sites.

The program will consist of an individual introduction (60 minutes) with a physiotherapist followed by 24 self-management sessions (30 minutes/session) and 24 supervised exercise sessions (60 minutes/session).

There is increasing evidence that effective management of multimorbidity requires the patient´s active participation in the care process.³⁶ The self-management program in the current study was developed in close collaboration with persons affected by multimorbidity, patient partners, health-care providers, and other relevant stakeholders. It aims to equip the participants with better self-management skills and build motivation and capability to sustain an active life and better quality of life following the 12-week intervention.³⁷

The content of the exercise therapy program was guided by existing recommendations for exercise in people with chronic diseases and healthy adults and developed in close collaboration with experienced physical therapists, participants from the feasibility study, patient partners and other relevant stakeholders.^37,38

Each exercise session includes five phases:

• Warm up (8 minutes)

• Balance exercises (5 minutes)

• Strengthening exercises (20 minutes)

• The participant’s choice: The participant can choose between more strengthening exercises, aerobic esxercise, or functional exercises (20 minutes)

• Cool down (7 minutes)

The exercises are personalized based on 1-5 levels of difficulty. The strengthening exercises are performed with 10-15 repetitions in 2-3 sets following recommendations from the American College of Sports Medicine,³⁹ and progressed based on the ONMI scale.⁴⁰ The level of difficulty of the aerobic exercises is adjusted by intervals and progressed based on the Borg rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (a rating of 14-15).⁴¹

A draft of the self-management and exercise therapy program was tested in a feasibility study with 20 persons with multimorbidity fulfilling the same eligibility criteria as for the RCT.³⁸ The feasibility study showed that self-management and exercise therapy was feasible in people with multimorbidity, and the intervention was found acceptable by both participants and physiotherapists. However, some amendments to increase adherence and improvement were done before proceeding to the RCT.³⁸

Details of the self-management and exercise therapy program are reported according to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) in Table 1.⁴²

Table 1.

Details of the self-management and exercise therapy program*.

Item	Description
1. Brief name	MOBILIZE self-management and exercise therapy program
2. Why	The program builds on available evidence on exercise therapy and self-management that are known to have positive effects on health and quality of life of people with the conditions in focus in the current study. The program was adapted through reviews and interviews with persons affected by multimorbidity, patient partners, health-care providers and other stakeholders. The program aims to support behavioral change and self-management and build motivation and capability to sustain the exercise and behavioral change after the 12-week program ends.
3. What-materials	For the exercise therapy sessions, elastic bands, treadmills, stationary bikes, kettlebells, gym balls, step boards and mats will be used. For the self-management program, a PowerPoint presentation supported by a manual for health-care providers describing the intervention, including links, references and materials for participants to support self-management as well as a step counter to encourage more daily physical activity will be used. The material will be made publicly available, when finalized and evaluated in the RCT.
4. What-procedures	The program will consist of a 60-minute individual introduction with a physiotherapist to set goals and determine exercise level. This will be followed by 24 sessions including a 30-minute self-management program and a 60-minute supervised exercise therapy session during the 12-week intervention. The 12-week program will be supervised by the physiotherapist to ensure that the participants learn a certain skill set to be able to self-manage their conditions and to initiate the behavioral change in terms of e.g. exercise. Furthermore, this will support them in understanding how and why they should continue exercising and being physically active. The self-management program will combine individual and group activities and include educational materials and videos, experiential exercises, group discussions and homework to equip participants with knowledge about chronic conditions and enable them to develop better self-management skills, set personal goals and action plans, identify challenges and barriers and how to overcome them. Examples of the content of the self-management sessions include mindfulness, self-monitoring, breathing exercises, mental symptoms, healthy eating and pain mechanisms. Three of the sessions are designed to involve both participants and their carers (goal setting, Carers and After MOBILIZE). At the end of the 12 weeks, a strong focus will be on sustaining the motivation for continuous exercise and self-management of conditions, and activities and future goals will be discussed. The exercise therapy session will combine aerobic and strengthening exercises and will consist of a warm-up phase (e.g. on a stationary bike), a central conditioning exercise phase and a cool-down phase.
5. Who-provided	The self-management and exercise therapy program will be delivered by physiotherapists, supported, and trained for delivering the intervention by the MOBILIZE project team.
6. How	Delivered face to face in small (up to 5 persons) groups and individually by using different materials and videos as described under section 4.
7. Where	At two hospitals, a private practice physiotherapy clinic and two municipalities across Region Zealand. The program will only require exercise equipment available in most gyms, hospitals and municipalities, ensuring feasibility of the future replication and implementation of the intervention.
8. When and how much	The self-management program will consist of 24 sessions, each with a duration of approximately 30 minutes, delivered before each supervised exercise session. A total of 24 supervised exercise therapy sessions will be delivered, each with a duration of approximately 60 minutes, distributed across the 12 weeks. Dosage (e.g. frequency, duration, intensity, level of severity) of the exercises will be adapted to the participant’s abilities throughout the program to support progression and continuous improvements in symptoms during the 12 weeks. The progression will be guided using established tools such as the Borg scale of perceived exertion for aerobic exercise and the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines for strengthening exercise and the OMNI scale.^39–41 During the exercise program, participants and physiotherapists will discuss subjects related to self-management and individual participant goals, including a session to support long-term self-management and behavioral change.
9. Tailoring	The program will be tailored to the conditions, characteristics, preferences, progression, and improvements of the participant. Furthermore, the participants together with the health-care providers involved in the program will set individual goals (using the Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound—SMART--principles) that will be followed-up during the 12-week program. Participants will complete exercise diaries recording attendance, level of difficulty, number of sets, number of repetitions (balance, strengthening and functional exercises), good control (balance exercises), duration (aerobic exercises), activity (aerobic exercises), perceived exertion
10. Modifications	Modifications will be reported (if any).
11. How well (planned)	Health-care providers delivering the program will attend a specific one-day course to be certified to deliver the treatment program to ensure program fidelity. The one-day course will focus on how to not only deliver and supervise the self-management and exercise therapy program but also how to support self-management and behavioral change in the participant. Additionally, oversight and in-person fidelity meetings will take place during the study (at least one per site) and a template to evaluate fidelity will be compiled (see Appendix 1). Further in-person or online fidelity meetings will be scheduled if deemed necessary by the project team or the physiotherapists delivering the intervention.
12. How well (actual)	This will be reported in the primary paper and focus on adherence to the program and fidelity in the delivery of the program during the 12 weeks as well as post-program self-management and behavior among participants.

Described according to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR).⁴²

The self-management and exercise therapy program will be delivered at one of the intervention sites at the hospitals of Næstved and Slagelse, a private practice physiotherapy clinic in Holbæk and at rehabilitation centers in the municipalities of Roskilde and Lolland. All MOBILIZE physiotherapists will attend a specific one-day course to be certified to deliver the personalised treatment program

Attendance and progression of the exercises will be registered in a diary for the participants in the group randomized to self-management education and exercise therapy. Adherence is considered satisfactory if participants attend at least 18 out of the 24 (75%) proposed self-management and exercise sessions, respectively. Enrolled persons participating in less than 18 sessions will be included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, but excluded from the per-protocol analysis due to insufficient adherence.

Usual care

Usual care is the care that the participants would receive had they not participated in the study, i.e. treatments or services that are provided routinely in the settings from which the participants are recruited. Participants will continue their current treatment, if needed, and receive supplementary treatments if their general practitioner or specialist find it relevant for their comorbidities. The Danish healthcare system is mainly tax-financed and based on the egalitarian principle of equal healthcare access for equal healthcare needs. Clinic visits are free of charge and expenditures for prescribed drugs are partly reimbursed and to some degree also expenditures for e.g. physiotherapy. In Denmark, the general practitioner usually provides diagnosis and routine care for people suffering from the most common chronic conditions and functions as a gatekeeper for specialist care.

Data collection procedure and outcomes

Data will be collected using online-based self-reported questionnaires (EasyTrial ApS, Aalborg, Denmark) at baseline and at 4 months (approx. 16 weeks; immediately after the treatment program), 6, and 12 months after baseline and objectively measured outcomes collected at the intervention sites by project staff specifically trained at a one-day course in the test protocol at baseline, 4-, and 12 months. Outcomes were chosen to reflect the expected impact of the intervention as well as to include most of the recommended core outcomes in trials of multimorbidity.⁴³ Please see Table 2 for an overview of measures and outcomes.

Table 2.

Overview of measures and outcomes.

Outcome	Baseline	4-month follow-up	6-month follow-up	12-month follow-up
Participant characteristics
Age (years), Sex, Height (cm), Educational level, Marital status, Cohabitation, Place of residence	X
Work status	X	X	X	X
Smoking	X	X	X	X
Spirometry test (FVC, FEV1, FEV1%)	X
Primary outcome
EQ-5D-5L, the descriptive index	X	X	X	X
Secondary outcomes
Objectively measured
6-minute walk test (m)	X	X		X
30-second chair-stand test (number of chair stands in 30 sec)	X	X		X
Minutes/day spent being physically active with at least light intensity^a	X	X		X
Steps/day^a	X	X		X
Self-reported measures and other measures
The Bayliss burden of illness measure	X	X	X	X
Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)	X	X	X	X
General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)	X	X	X	X
Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-item Scale (SEMCD6)	X	X	X	X
Overall functioning and disability. WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0, 12 items)	X	X	X	X
Adverse events (self-reported and from medical record review)		X	X	X
EQ VAS	X	X	X	X
Mortality				X
Other outcomes
Objectively measured
Isometric knee-extension strength (Nm)	X	X		X
Sedentary activity^a	X	X		X
Light physical activity^a	X	X		X
Moderate physical activity^a	X	X		X
Vigorous physical activity^a	X	X		X
Moderate to vigorous physical activity^a	X	X		X
Adherence to the WHO physical activity recommendations^a	X	X		X
Sleep^a	X	X		X
Isometric handgrip strength (kg)	X	X		X
Weight (kg)	X	X		X
Guralnik 30-second balance test (score between 0-30)	X	X		X
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure after 5 minutes of rest	X	X		X
Cholesterol (HDL and LDL) and triglyceride	X	X
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting glucose and fasting insulin levels	X	X
Inflammatory marker levels (hs-CRP, TNF and IL-6)	X	X
Self-reported measures and other measures
Left/right knee/hip pain + most affected joint if more than one	X	X	X	X
Only for persons with yes to knee/hip pain Knee/hip pain VAS for most affected joint (VAS 0-100)	X	X	X	X
Bodily pain, body chart	X	X	X	X
Perceived Stress Scale	X	X	X	X
Adapted Fried Frailty and pre-frailty criteria	X	X		X
Modified Karolinska Sleep Questionnaire + self-reported average sleep quantity	X	X	X	X
Fatigue	X	X	X	X
Global perceived effect		X	X	X
Patient acceptable symptom state		X	X	X
Treatment failure		X		X
Adherence to intervention protocol of the study		X
Other treatment during follow-up		X	X	X
Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire	X	X	X	X
Short form of Patient Activation Measure	X	X	X	X
Sedentary behavior and two items on physical activity	X	X	X	X
Individual items from the 12-item WHODAS 2.0	X	X	X	X
Falls and fear of falling		X	X	X

Abbreviations: cm: centimeters; FVC: Forced Expiratory Volume; FEV1: Forced Expired Volume in the first second; FEV1%: Percent predicted of Forced Expired Volume in the first second; Nm: Newton meters; kg: kilograms; HDL: High Density Lipoproteins-cholesterol; LDL: Low Density Lipoprotein-cholesterol; HbA1c: hemoglobin A1c; CRP: C-reactive protein; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; IL-6: Interleukin 6; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; WHO: World Health Organization.

^aEvaluated using combined wearable thigh and wrist accelerometers (Axivity AX3).

Participant characteristics

Participant characteristics such as educational level, work status, marital status, smoking habits, address place of residence and if living alone or with others will be evaluated by self-report., Age and sex will be extracted from the participants social security number (CPR), height will be measured and lung function will be evaluated at baseline using the Medikro Pro spirometer (Medikro Oy, Kuopio, Finland).

Outcomes

Primary outcome

The primary outcome is the descriptive index of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (5-level version, ranging from -0.624 to 1, higher is better) at 12 months. Itis a reliable and valid measure of general health/quality of life⁴⁴ and will be self-reported at baseline, 4, 6 and 12 months.

Secondary outcomes

Secondary outcomes will also be reported in the primary paper with the 12-month follow-up as the primary endpoint unless stated otherwise. These include objectively measured outcomes as well as self-reported measures (Table 2).

Objectively measured outcomes

Functional performance will be assessed by two frequently used tests, both performed at baseline and at follow-up at 4-and 12 months. The 6-minute walk test is an extensively used valid and reliable measure of functional capacity,⁴⁵ also in trials of people with multimorbidity.²⁷ The 30-second chair-stand test is a commonly used, valid and reliable measure of lower extremity strength and endurance in older adults.⁴⁶

Objectively measured physical activity and sleep will be measured at baseline, and at the 4- 12 months follow-up using two Axivity AX3 (Axivity, Newcastle UK) accelerometers placed on the front of the right thigh and the wrist of the non-dominant. Physical activity intensity are generated using ActiGraph counts⁴⁷ and step counts using a recently developed algorithm.⁴⁸ Sleep parameters are estimated with the GGIR package based on the wrist acceleration using the method proposed by Van Hees et al.⁴⁹ Participants are instructed to wear the accelerometers for seven consecutive days (24 hours/day), including during sleep and any land-based or water activity. A threshold of minimum 22 hours of wear time out of 24 hours/day in at least 3 weekdays and 1 weekend will be considered valid.⁵⁰ Non-wear is determined using both acceleration and temperature.⁵¹ To calculate total daily physical activity, data will be weighted by 5/7 for weekdays and 2/7 for weekends.

The following physical activity and sleep entities will be evaluated:

- Steps per day (Secondary outcome)

- Minutes/day spent being physically active with at least light intensity (Secondary outcome)

- Sedentary activity: Time spent on sedentary activities (Other outcome)

- Light physical activity: Time spent on light intensity activities (Other outcome)

- Moderate physical activity: Time spent on moderate intensity activities (Other outcome)

- Vigorous physical activity: Time spent on vigorous intensity activities (Other outcome)

- Moderate to vigorous physical activity: Time spent on moderate to vigorous intensity activities (Other outcome)

- Adherence to the World Health Organization (WHO) physical activity recommendations, i.e. ≥150 min. MVPA or ≥75 min. VPA weekly (Other outcome)

- Sleep (Other outcome)

Self-reported measures and other measures

Participants will self-report secondary outcomes via online questionnaires. The outcomes used to collect such data from the participants are listed in Table 2 and will be collected at baseline, 4, 6 and 12 months unless stated otherwise.

Burden of illness and current treatment for the individual conditions will be measured using the Bayliss burden of illness measure that assesses how much illness affects the individual's daily activities (on a 1-5 scale for each individual condition, summed to a total score for all conditions (higher is worse)).

The Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8, ranging from 0-24 points, higher is more severe depression), excluding the ninth PHQ item on self-harm, and the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7, ranging from 0-21, higher is more severe anxiety) are valid and reliable measures of depression and anxiety in the population that is sensitive to change.^52,53

Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease is a 6-item scale (ranging from 1 to 10, higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy) that is a reliable and valid measure of self-efficacy.⁵⁴

Overall functioning and disability will be measured using the 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0, ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (full disability). The WHODAS 2.0 has been found valid and reliable in the general population and in people with a range of chronic conditions.^55,56

Participants will be asked to self-report adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE). Furthermore, medical records will be inspected for any AEs and SAEs occurring during the follow-up period. An AE is defined as any undesirable experience during follow-up leading to contact with the health-care system. If an AE results in death, hospitalization, prolonged inpatient hospital care, permanent disability or damage, or if an AE is life-threatening, it will be categorized as an SAE.⁵⁷ If available, date of healthcare system contact, duration and potential consequences of SAEs will be registered and reported.

The EQ-VAS of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (ranging from 0-100, higher is better) will be evaluated alongside the descriptive index as a measure of overall self-rated health.⁴⁴

Mortality during the 12-month follow-up period will be recorded, as mortality is one of the core outcomes in multimorbidity.⁴³

Other outcomes

Other outcomes will be reported in secondary publications and will be collected at baseline, 4, 6 and 12 months unless stated otherwise.

Objectively measured outcomes

Isometric knee-extension strength will be measured as the highest score out of three attempts using the EASYFORCE digital dynamometer (Meloq AB, Stockholm, Sweden) at baseline and at follow-up at 4 months and 12 months. The EasyForce dynamometer can be considered a reliable tool for assessing knee extension strength.⁵⁸

Isometric handgrip strength: will be performed using the Jamar Smart digital hand dynamometer (Patterson Medical, Warrenville, IL, USA) at baseline and at follow-up at 4 months and 12 months and will be measured as the highest score out of three attempts. The Jamar Smart digital hand dynamometer has been validated and has proven excellent inter-instrument reliability and strong concurrent validity.⁵⁹

Weight in kilograms (kg) will be assessed at baseline and at follow-up at 4 and 12 months using a digital floor scale.

The Guralnik 30-second balance test will be performed at baseline and at follow-up at 4 months and 12 months. It assesses balance in 30 seconds with 10 seconds in each of the 3 different positions (parallel feet, semi-tandem and tandem stand) resulting in a score from 0-30, higher is better. The 30-second balance test is reliable to assess balance.⁶⁰

Systolic and diastolic blood pressures after 5 minutes of rest will be measured as the mean of three consecutive measurements using the Rossmax X5 blood pressure monitor (Rossmax, Heerbrugg, Switzerland) at baseline and at follow-up at 4 months and 12 months.

Blood samples will be collected at the hospitals at baseline and follow-up at 4 months for measurement of inflammation, glycated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose and fasting insulin levels, cholesterol and triglyceride levels. All participants will provide written informed consent before blood samples are withdrawn. The samples will be stored at the local Departments of Clinical Biochemistry in Holbæk, Roskilde, Næstved, Slagelse, Nykøbing Falster as well as at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, prior to analysis.

Self-reported measures and other measures

The participants will self-report whether they have pain in their left or right knee or hip, and, in case of pain in several joint, which joint that is the most affected. Participants who answer yes to knee or hip pain at any assessment, will self-report pain intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; ranging from 0-100, higher is more pain) for the most affected joint. The VAS scale is generally well accepted by patients and is reliable and validated.⁶¹

Pain from the musculoskeletal system within the previous 24 hours will be self-reported on a region-divided body chart of the front and back sides of the body. Classification of pain using the number of self-reported body sites with pain is a well-known and supported approach to assess bodily pain.⁶²

Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) 4-item version is an easy-to-use questionnaire with established acceptable psychometric properties.⁶³ Scores on the PSS range from 0-16 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.⁶⁴

Adapted Fried Frailty and pre-frailty criteria is assessed on five domains (weight loss, exhaustion, grip strength, low physical activity, slow walking pace).⁶⁵ The adapted version of the Fried Frailty questionnaire has shown good validity.^65,66 People with multimorbidity are deemed frail if they meet at least three criteria; pre-frail, if they fulfill one or two criteria, and not frail if no criteria are met.

Sleep quality will be assessed at baseline, 4, 6 and 12 months with the Modified Karolinska Sleep Questionnaire (4 items),⁶⁷ ranging from 4 to 24, lower is worse sleep quality. In addition to the accelerometer-based measurement, Sleep quantity will also be measured at baseline, 4, 6 and 12 months asking the patients “on a normal week, how many hours do you sleep on average per night in the weekdays? And “On a normal week, how many hours do you sleep on average per night in the weekend?”. These questions have been used in previous studies to assess sleep quantity.⁶⁸

Fatigue will be self-reported by one-item from the PROMIS Global Health short form.⁶⁹ The participants rate their fatigue on a 5-point scale from None (1) to Very severe (5) in response to the question “How would you rate your fatigue on average in the past 7 days?”

Global perceived effect (GPE) for physical activity level, activities of daily living and quality of life will also be reported. GPE has excellent test-retest reliability.⁷⁰ GPE will be assessed on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from (1) “Much better, an important improvement” to (7) “Much worse, an important deterioration”, higher score is worse.⁷⁰ The GPE scales provide reliable assessments of health transition.⁷⁰

Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) will be assessed by asking the person “Thinking about your quality of life, would you consider your current health as satisfying? With quality of life, you should consider your activities of daily living, sport and recreational activities, personal care, level of pain, and any anxiety or depression.”. Answered by “yes” or “no”. The PASS has shown good validity and reliability.⁷¹

Treatment failure will be assessed at the 4- and 12-months follow-up only by persons answering “no” to PASS.^72,73 Treatment failure will be assessed with the question “Would you consider your current state as being so unsatisfactory that you consider the treatment to have failed?”. Answered by “yes” or “no”.⁷²

Adherence to intervention will be assessed at the 4-month follow-up as the number of exercise and self-management support sessions attended out of the total number of sessions available. Satisfactory adherence will be attained when completing 18 out of 24 sessions (75%).

Other treatment(s) during follow-up will be reported by asking the person about changes in their pharmacological treatment as well as any other treatments that they have received outside the study since the last assessment in the study. If the person answers yes, elaborative questions will be asked.

Furthermore, the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ 10-item version) will be collected. It has proven content validity, construct validity, reliability and responsiveness.⁷⁴ Answers range from 0-100, the higher scores being worse.⁷⁴

Also, the Short form of Patient Activation Measure (PAM) will be reported. The measure is both reliable and valid.⁷⁵ Answers range from 0-100, higher scores indicate higher levels of patient activation. PAM assesses patient self-reported knowledge, skills, and confidence in self-management of one's health or chronic condition and can provide insight into behavioural change.⁷⁵

One item on sedentary behavior (hours spent sitting per day) and two items on physical activity (minutes a week spent on physical activity causing shortness of breath and physical activity during activities of daily living) will be self-reported.⁷⁶

Individual items from the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 will be assessed with answers ranging from 1 to 5, higher score is worse.^55,56

Falls will be assessed by asking the person “Have you fallen in the last 4 months? “2 months” at 6-month follow-up and “6 months” at the 12-month follow-up. A fall is defined as an event resulting in you inadvertently coming to rest on the ground or another lower level, with or without loss of consciousness or injury. Never; Once; Twice; Three times or more.

Fear of falling will be assessed by asking the person “How concerned are you that you might fall? Response categories include: Not at all concerned, somewhat concerned, fairly concerned, very concerned.”

Patient involvement

Patient involvement is crucial in the MOBILIZE project. Throughout all phases of the project at least two persons with multimorbidity and one partner to a patient with multimorbidity have been involved in important meetings and decisions in the project sharing their experiences, needs and preferences, corresponding to Collaborate level on the IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation.⁷⁷

Data management

Data collection and management procedures have been approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency in Region Zealand (REG-015-2020). Secure, protected and approved electronic platforms will be used for data collection and data storage to ensure that missing data are kept to a minimum and that privacy and confidentiality of personal data are maintained.

Data monitoring and auditing

The study will not have a formal data monitoring committee, but the central trial management group (STS, MD, MN, AB) will closely monitor the trial and discuss any unforeseen circumstances or concerns and unexpected SAEs with the rest of the co-authors of the trial and involve external experts if needed. Additionally, the author group will monitor recruitment, treatment, and attrition rates.

The Danish Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics are regularly selecting a number of studies for auditing, a process independent of investigators and sponsors.

Adjudication committee

An independent adjudication committee comprising two to three members with prior adjudication experience will categorize AEs into serious or non-serious, based on the FDA criteria.⁵⁷ The committee will receive the adverse events in raw format after all participants have undergone the 12-month follow-up and independently conduct the adjudication followed by a consensus process within the committee. If needed, additional information will be requested from the hospitals.

Sample size calculation

The RCT study will be powered to detect a difference in change of 0.074 points between the two groups in the primary outcome (EQ-5D) from baseline to the follow-up at 12 months. This difference has previously been found to be the minimally important difference in persons with varying comorbidities.⁷⁸ To detect this difference, 95 participants in each intervention group are needed (assuming a common SD of 0.156, power=90%, alpha level=0.05). A total of 228 participants will be recruited to account for a potential loss to follow up of 20%, which has previously been involved in trials involving exercise therapy and self-management support.^79,80

Statistical analysis

Between-group comparisons of change from baseline to the follow-up at 12 months in continuous outcomes (including the primary outcome) will be analysed using a repeated measures mixed-effects model with participants as random effect, visit (baseline, 4, 6, and 12 months) and treatment arm (Usual care, personalized exercise therapy and self-management program) as fixed effects, and with adjustment for randomization stratification factor, i.e. number of chronic conditions and recruitment centre.

Between-group comparisons of change from baseline to the follow-up at 4 months in continuous outcomes only evaluated at the 4-month follow-up will be analysed using analysis of covariance with adjustment for baseline scores in the dependent variable and randomization stratification factor, i.e. number of chronic conditions and recruitment centre.

All randomized participants will be included in the ITT analysis. In the per-protocol analysis, the following participants will be excluded: 1) participants in the exercise and self-management group participating in less than 18 out of the 24 self-management and exercise sessions;^79,80 2) participants in both groups undergoing major surgery during follow-up affecting their ability to perform activities of daily living (e.g. joint replacement or open heart surgery); and 3) participants in the usual care group participating in 12 or more supervised exercise therapy sessions for one of their diseases during follow-up.

A detailed statistical analysis plan will be published online before unblinding the data and before any analyses are performed.

Furthermore, an analysis of predictors of responders and non-responders to the personalized program, and of the working mechanisms behind the effects from the program, will be conducted and published in a separate publication based on measures such as physical activity level, glycated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose and fasting insulin levels, cholesterol and triglyceride, inflammation, depression, socioeconomic status, and combinations of physical and mental health conditions. The definition of a responder will be based on the global perceived effect outcome by subtracting the mean score on quality of life and physical function of participants reporting ‘unchanged’ symptom status from participants reporting ‘better’ symptom status.⁸¹

Finally, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted following recommended methods as previously applied by the authors.^82,83

Dissemination and protocol amendments

The results, regardless of whether they are in favor of the intervention or comparator group, or inconclusive in relation to the study hypothesis, will be communicated in scientific papers, at relevant conferences, to a broader audience in the news and social media, through online support tools including multimedia and print education resources, in oral presentations and popular science magazines. Authorship eligibility will be based on the recommendations from the International Committees of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). All authors will have access to the data.

Any important protocol amendments will be reported to the Committee on Health Research Ethics for Region Zealand, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov and presented in the primary RCT report.

Discussion

Given the small and often negligible effects on important outcomes for people with multimorbidity, such as health-related quality of life and function, demonstrated in prior RCTs of interventions for people with multimorbidity,^1,17 it is important to identify effective and cost-effective treatments to address the major burden of multimorbidity.¹

Substantial evidence highlights exercise therapy as a safe and effective treatment of at least 26 different chronic conditions,¹⁸ and while it also appears safe and effective in people with multimorbidity,²⁷ high-quality evidence supporting it is sparse. Furthermore, evidence on the effects of self-management in multimorbidity is limited.¹⁷ Interestingly, evidence on effective, cost-effective, and acceptable forms of exercise therapy for people with multimorbidity was identified as being in the top 10 most important research priorities in a recent James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.⁸⁴ Our feasibility study highlighted that the current MOBILIZE intervention was feasible and acceptable,³⁸ while the ongoing RCT described in this protocol will hopefully provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the exercise therapy and self-management support program.

In a systematic review of the few existing multimorbidity guidelines,²⁹ regular physical activity as part of a healthy lifestyle is encouraged, but the guidelines do not include specific recommendations for exercise therapy.²⁹ Therefore, the findings of our RCT will either provide high-quality evidence supporting the continuation of current practice (i.e. with limited use of exercise therapy) or provide the foundation for integrating self-management and exercise therapy into clinical guidelines and treatment plans of people with multimorbidity.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - Study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial of personalized exercise therapy and self-management support for people with multimorbidity: The MOBILIZE study

Supplemental Material for Study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial of personalized exercise therapy and self-management support for people with multimorbidity: The MOBILIZE study by Søren T Skou, Mette Nyberg, Mette Dideriksen, Jan A Overgaard, Christine Bodilsen4, Anne MB Soja, Amir P Attarzadeh, Manuel J Bieder, Nadia P Dridi, Andreas Heltberg, Peter H Gæde, Johan L Reventlow, Sidse Arnfred, Uffe Bodtger, Lau C Thygesen, Madalina Jäger and Alessio Bricca in Journal of Multimorbidity and Comorbidity

Footnotes

Author’s note

Open Science Framework .

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Gregers Aagaard and Margit Dybkjær, two people living with multiple chronic conditions, and Tue Dybkjær a partner of a person with multimorbidity, for their feedback on MOBILIZE, including study design, methods and conduct. We would also like to thank the recruitment centres, health-care providers and persons involved in the study conduct. Finally, we owe gratitude to the MOBILIZE scientific advisory board consisting of Prof. Susan Smith, Prof. Sallie Lamb, Prof. Alan Silman, Prof. Bente Klarlund Pedersen, Prof. Ewa M. Roos and Prof. Rod Taylor.

Declaration of conflicting interests

STS is associate editor of the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy and has received personal fees from Munksgaard, TrustMe-Ed and Nestlé Health Science, all of which are outside the submitted work. He is co-founder of Good Life with Osteoarthritis in Denmark (GLA:D®), a not-for profit initiative hosted at University of Southern Denmark aiming at implementing clinical guidelines for persons with osteoarthritis in clinical practice. The authors declare that there is no other conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (MOBILIZE; grant agreement No 801790), a research program grant from Region Zealand (Exercise First), Næstved, Slagelse and Ringsted Hospitals’ Research Fund, The Danish Regions and The Danish Health Confederation through the Development and Research Fund (project no. 2703) and The Association of Danish Physiotherapists Research Fund. Furthermore, STS is the recipient of an ongoing, unrelated grant from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (ESCAPE; grant agreement No 945377). The funders did not have any role in the study other than to provide funding and they were not involved in the decision to submit the report for publication, nor do they have ultimate authority over any study activities.

ClinicalTrials.gov registration

NCT04645732.

ORCID iDs

Søren T Skou

Alessio Bricca

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Skou

Mair

Fortin

, et al. Multimorbidity. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2022; 8: 48. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-022-00376-4.

Nguyen

Manolova

Daskalopoulou

, et al. Prevalence of multimorbidity in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Comorb 2019; 9: 2235042x19870934. DOI: 10.1177/2235042x19870934.

Fortin

Bravo

Hudon

, et al. Psychological distress and multimorbidity in primary care. Annals of family medicine 2006; 4: 417-422. DOI: 10.1370/afm.528.

Fortin

Lapointe

Hudon

, et al. Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 51. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-51.

Bayliss

Ware

Jr , et al. Predicting declines in physical function in persons with multiple chronic medical conditions: what we can learn from the medical problem list. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 47. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-47.

Marengoni

Angleman

Melis

, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev 2011; 10: 430-439. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003.

Lehnert

Heider

Leicht

, et al. Review: health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Medical care research and review : MCRR 2011; 68: 387-420. DOI: 10.1177/1077558711399580.

Townsend

Hunt

Wyke

. Managing multiple morbidity in mid-life: a qualitative study of attitudes to drug use. Bmj 2003; 327: 837. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7419.837.

Ryan

Wallace

O'Hara

, et al. Multimorbidity and functional decline in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015; 13: 168. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-015-0355-9.

10.

Salisbury

Johnson

Purdy

, et al. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 2011; 61: e12-21. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X548929.

11.

Menotti

Mulder

Nissinen

, et al. Prevalence of morbidity and multimorbidity in elderly male populations and their impact on 10-year all-cause mortality: The FINE study (Finland, Italy, Netherlands, Elderly). J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 680-686.

12.

Vogeli

Shields

Lee

, et al. Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. Journal of general internal medicine 2007; 22(Suppl 3): 391-395. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0322-1.

13.

Barnett

Mercer

Norbury

, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2012; 380: 37-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60240-2.

14.

Van Spall

Toren

Kiss

, et al. Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. Jama 2007; 297: 1233-1240. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.11.1233.

15.

Morales

Guthrie

. Exclusion rates in randomized controlled trials of treatments for physical conditions: a systematic review. Trials 2020; 21: 228. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-4139-0.

16.

Vos

Lim

Abbafati

, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet 2020; 396: 1204-1222. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.

17.

Smith

Wallace

Clyne

, et al. Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community setting: A systematic review. Syst Rev 2021; 10.

18.

Pedersen

Saltin

. Exercise as medicine - evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 2015; 25(Suppl 3): 1-72. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12581.

19.

Fransen

McConnell

Harmer

, et al. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2015; 1: CD004376. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004376.

20.

Fransen

McConnell

Hernandez-Molina

, et al. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 4: Cd007912. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007912.pub2.

21.

McCarthy

Casey

Devane

, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015: Cd003793. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3.

22.

Dibben

Faulkner

Oldridge

, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 11: Cd001800. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.

23.

Taylor

Long

Mordi

, et al. Exercise-Based Rehabilitation for Heart Failure: Cochrane Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis. JACC Heart Fail 2019; 7: 691-705. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.023.

24.

Cornelissen

Smart

. Exercise training for blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2013; 2: e004473. DOI: 10.1161/jaha.112.004473.

25.

Thomas

Elliott

Naughton

. Exercise for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 2006: Cd002968. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002968.pub2.

26.

Catalan-Matamoros

Gomez-Conesa

Stubbs

, et al. Exercise improves depressive symptoms in older adults: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Psychiatry research 2016; 244: 202-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.07.028.

27.

Bricca

Harris

Jäger

, et al. Benefits and harms of exercise therapy in people with multimorbidity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ageing Res Rev 2020; 63: 101166. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101166.

28.

Allegrante

Wells

Peterson

. Interventions to Support Behavioral Self-Management of Chronic Diseases. Annu Rev Public Health 2019; 40: 127-146. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044008.

29.

Muth

Blom

Smith

, et al. Evidence supporting the best clinical management of patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a systematic guideline review and expert consensus. J Intern Med 2019; 285: 272-288. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12842.

30.

Chan

Tetzlaff

Gotzsche

, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. Bmj 2013; 346: e7586. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.

31.

Bayliss

Ellis

Steiner

. Seniors' self-reported multimorbidity captured biopsychosocial factors not incorporated into two other data-based morbidity measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 550-557.e551. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.002.

32.

Harris

Skou

Juhl

, et al. Recruitment and retention rates in randomised controlled trials of exercise therapy in people with multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trials 2021; 22: 396. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05346-x.

33.

Treweek

Pitkethly

Cook

, et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 2: Mr000013. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6.

34.

Gillies

Kearney

Keenan

, et al. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 3: Mr000032. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub3.

35.

Jarvinen

Sihvonen

Bhandari

, et al. Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2014; 67: 769-772. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.011.

36.

Koch

Wakefield

. Barriers and facilitators to managing multiple chronic conditions: a systematic literature review. West J Nurs Res 2015; 37: 498-516. DOI: 10.1177/0193945914549058.

37.

Bricca

Jäger

Dideriksen

, et al. Personalised exercise therapy and self-management support for people with multimorbidity: Development of the MOBILIZE intervention. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8(1): 244.

38.

Skou

Brødsgaard

Nyberg

et al. Personalised exercise therapy and self-management support for people with multimorbidity: Feasibility of the MOBILIZE intervention. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9(1): 12.

39.

Garber

Blissmer

Deschenes

, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 1334-1359. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb.

40.

Robertson

Goss

Rutkowski

, et al. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 333-341. DOI: 10.1249/01.Mss.0000048831.15016.2a.

41.

Borg

. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health 1990; 16(Suppl 1): 55-58. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1815.

42.

Hoffmann

Glasziou

Boutron

, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Bmj 2014; 348: g1687. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.

43.

Smith

Wallace

Salisbury

, et al. A Core Outcome Set for Multimorbidity Research (COSmm). Annals of family medicine 2018; 16: 132-138. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2178.

44.

Janssen

Pickard

Golicki

, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation 2013; 22: 1717-1727. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4.

45.

Newton

Salamonson

, et al. A review of the six-minute walk test: its implication as a self-administered assessment tool. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2009; 8: 2-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2008.07.001.

46.

Jones

Rikli

Beam

. A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Research quarterly for exercise and sport 1999; 70: 113-119.

47.

Brønd

Andersen

Arvidsson

. Generating ActiGraph Counts from Raw Acceleration Recorded by an Alternative Monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017; 49: 2351-2360. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000001344.

48.

Gustafsson

MEaK

Schiøttz-Christensen

Wedderkopp

, et al. Step Count in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Accuracy During Walking and Nonwalking Activities. Spine 2022; 47.

49.

van Hees

Sabia

Jones

, et al. Estimating sleep parameters using an accelerometer without sleep diary. Scientific reports 2018; 8: 12975. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31266-z.

50.

Aadland

Nilsen

AKO

Ylvisåker

, et al. Reproducibility of objectively measured physical activity: Reconsideration needed. J Sports Sci 2020; 38: 1132-1139. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1743054.

51.

Rasmussen

MGB

Pedersen

Olesen

, et al. Short-term efficacy of reducing screen media use on physical activity, sleep, and physiological stress in families with children aged 4–14: study protocol for the SCREENS randomized controlled trial. BMC public health 2020; 20: 380. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-8458-6.

52.

Kroenke

Strine

Spitzer

, et al. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord 2009; 114: 163-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026.

53.

Kroenke

Spitzer

Williams

, et al. The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2010; 32: 345-359. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006.

54.

Ritter

Lorig

. The English and Spanish Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale measures were validated using multiple studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 1265-1273. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.009.

55.

Federici

Bracalenti

Meloni

, et al. World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review. Disability and rehabilitation 2017; 39: 2347-2380. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177.

56.

Saltychev

Katajapuu

Bärlund

, et al. Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability - systematic review. Disability and rehabilitation 2021; 43: 789-794. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1643416.

57.

U. S. Food Drug Administration . What is a Serious Adverse Event? http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/HowToReport/ucm053087.htm (2014, accessed 15 Feb 2017).

58.

Trajkovic

Kozinc

Smajla

, et al. Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the EasyForce Dynamometer for Assessment of Maximal Shoulder, Knee and Hip Strength. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020442.

59.

Mathiowetz

. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength. Occup Ther Int 2002; 9: 201-209. DOI: 10.1002/oti.165.

60.

Ritchie

Trost

Brown

, et al. Reliability and validity of physical fitness field tests for adults aged 55 to 70 years. J Sci Med Sport 2005; 8: 61-70. 2005/05/13. DOI: 10.1016/s1440-2440(05)80025-8.

61.

Hawker

Mian

Kendzerska

, et al. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care & Research 2011; 63: S240-S252. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20543.

62.

Coggon

Ntani

Palmer

, et al. Patterns of multisite pain and associations with risk factors. Pain 2013; 154: 1769-1777. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.05.039.

63.

Lee

. Review of the Psychometric Evidence of the Perceived Stress Scale (vol 6, pg 121, 2012). Asian Nurs Res 2013; 7: 160. DOI: 10.1016/j.anr.2013.08.001.

64.

Eskildsen

Dalgaard

Nielsen

, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish consensus version of the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale. Scand J Work Environ Health 2015; 41: 486-490. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3510.

65.

Hanlon

Nicholl

Jani

, et al. Frailty and pre-frailty in middle-aged and older adults and its association with multimorbidity and mortality: a prospective analysis of 493 737 UK Biobank participants. Lancet Public Health 2018; 3: e323-e332. DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30091-4.

66.

Theou

Cann

Blodgett

, et al. Modifications to the frailty phenotype criteria: Systematic review of the current literature and investigation of 262 frailty phenotypes in the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe. Ageing Research Reviews 2015; 21: 78-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.04.001.

67.

Nordin

Åkerstedt

Nordin

. Psychometric evaluation and normative data for the Karolinska Sleep Questionnaire. Sleep and Biological Rhythms 2013; 11: 216-226. DOI: 10.1111/sbr.12024.

68.

Robbins

Quan

Barger

, et al. Self-reported sleep duration and timing: A methodological review of event definitions, context, and timeframe of related questions. Sleep Epidemiol 2021; 1: 20211125. DOI: 10.1016/j.sleepe.2021.100016.

69.

Hays

Bjorner

Revicki

, et al. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation 2009; 18: 873-880. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9.

70.

Kamper

Ostelo

Knol

, et al. Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 760-766 e761. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009.

71.

Pham

Tubach

. Patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS). Joint Bone Spine 2009; 76: 321-323. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2009.03.008.

72.

Ingelsrud

Granan

Terwee

, et al. Proportion of Patients Reporting Acceptable Symptoms or Treatment Failure and Their Associated KOOS Values at 6 to 24 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Study From the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sport Med 2015; 43: 1902-1907. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515584041.

73.

Skou

Lind

Holmich

, et al. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of meniscal surgery compared with exercise and patient education for treatment of meniscal tears in young adults. Bmj Open 2017; 7: e017436. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017436.

74.

Duncan

Murphy

Man

, et al. Development and validation of the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ). Bmj Open 2018; 8: e019413. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019413.

75.

Hibbard

Mahoney

Stockard

, et al. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res 2005; 40: 1918-1930. 2005/12/13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x.

76.

Kallings

Ekström

, et al. Subjective reports of physical activity levels and sedentary time prior to hospital admission can predict utilization of hospital care and all-cause mortality among patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2020; 19: 691-701. DOI: 10.1177/1474515120921986.

77.

International Association for Public Participation . IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation, https://www.iap2.org/mpage/Home (2018, accessed 22 February 2022).

78.

Walters

Brazier

. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation 2005; 14: 1523-1532.

79.

Skou

Roos

Laursen

, et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Total Knee Replacement. The New England Journal of Medicine 2015; 373: 1597-1606.

80.

Skou

Hölmich

Lind

et al. Early surgery or exercise and education for meniscal tears in young adults. NEJM Evidence 2022; 1(2).

81.

Kise

Risberg

Stensrud

, et al. Exercise therapy versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscal tear in middle aged patients: randomised controlled trial with two year follow-up. Bmj 2016; 354: i3740. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i3740.

82.

Skou

Roos

Laursen

, et al. Cost-effectiveness of total knee replacement in addition to non-surgical treatment: a 2-year outcome from a randomised trial in secondary care in Denmark. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e033495. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033495.

83.

Skou

Roos

Laursen

, et al. Cost-effectiveness of 12 weeks of supervised treatment compared to written advice in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a secondary analysis of the 2-year outcome from a randomized trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2020; 28: 907-916. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.03.009.

84.

Parker

Corner

Laing

, et al. Priorities for research in multiple conditions in later life (multi-morbidity): findings from a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. Age and Ageing 2019; 48: 401-406. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz014.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB