Current immigration policies of “prevention through deterrence” have been shown to increase fatalities at the US/Mexico border. These strategies are designed to remove access to safe areas of the border with the aim of reducing border crossings. One consequence of these deterrents is that they force undocumented border crossers into areas that are more desolate and treacherous. Such policies also come at a time when government officials have openly stated that its facilities to process and identify the remains of unidentified border crossers are overwhelmed. This paper discusses the current state of the identification and repatriation of the remains of undocumented border crossers in South Texas and the formation of the Center for the Study of Undocumented Border Crossers (CSUBC) at Texas A&M International University. CSUBC is a multidisciplinary, collaborative research and teaching center with the goal of assisting the community, academics, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in recording, reporting, and identifying border crosser remains. The hope is that this center will ultimately lead to the repatriation of decedents. This paper outlines the structure of the center, and aims for working with established NGOs and university centers, to bring together subject-matter experts and alleviate the pressures they face.
AndersonBEParksBO (2008) Symposium on border crossing deaths: introduction. Journal of Forensic Sciences53: 6–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00608.x.
2.
AndersonBESpradleyMK (2016) The role of the anthropologist in the identification of migrant remains in the American Southwest. Academic Forensic Pathology6(3): 432–438. DOI: 10.23907/2016.044.
3.
BeatriceJSSolerA (2016) Skeletal indicators of stress: a component of the biocultural profile of undocumented migrants in southern Arizona. Journal of Forensic Sciences61: 1164–1172. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13131.
BoyceGAChambersSN (2021) The corral apparatus: counterinsurgency and the architecture of death and deterrence along the Mexico/United States border. Geoforum120: 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.007.
De LéonJ (2015) The Land of Open Graves: Living and Dying on the Migrant Trail. 1st edition Vol. 36. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
DirkmaatDC (2012) Forensic Anthropology at the mass fatality incident (commercial airliner) crash scene. In: DirkmaatDC (ed) A Companion to Forensic Anthropology. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 136–156.
GAO-22-105053 (2022a) Southwest Border: CBP Should Improve Data Collection, Reporting, and Evaluation for the Missing Migrant Program. Washington: U.S. Government Accountability Office Report. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-105053April (accessed 26 May 2024).
22.
GAO-23-106007 (2022b) Southwest Border: Border Patrol’s Missing Migrant Program. Washington: U.S. Government Accountability Office Report. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-106007 (accessed 13 July 2023).
GochaTPSpradleyMKStrandR (2018) Bodies in limbo: issues in identification and repatriation of migrant remains in South Texas. In: LathamKO’DanielA (eds) Sociopolitics of Migrant Death and Repatriation: Perspectives from Forensic Science. Cham: Springer International Press, 143–156.
26.
Golash‐BozaT (2009) The immigration industrial complex: why we enforce immigration policies destined to fail. Sociology Compass3(2): 295–309.
HiemstraN (2019) Detain and deport: The chaotic US immigration enforcement regime. Athens: University of Georgia Press, Vol. 43.
30.
HuddlestonK (2016) Border Checkpoints and Substantive Due Process: Abortion Rights in the Border Zone. New Haven: Yale Law Journal, Vol. 125, 1744.
31.
KovicC (2018) Naming state crimes, naming the dead: immigration policy and “the new disappeared” in the United States and Mexico. In: LathamKO’DanielA (eds) Sociopolitics of Migrant Death and Repatriation: Perspectives from Forensic Science. Cham: Springer International Press, 39–51.
32.
LathamKEStrandR (2018) Digging, dollars, and drama: the economics of foresnic archeology and migrant exhumation. In: LathamKO’DanielA (eds) Sociopolitics of Migrant Death and Repatriation: Perspectives from Forensic Science. Cham: Springer International Press, 99–114.
National Missing and Unidentified Persons System, NAMUS (2024) https://namus.nij.ojp.gov/ (accessed 27 May 2024).
40.
NevinsJ (2010) Operation Gatekeeper and beyond: The War on “Illegals” and the Remaking of the U.S. – Mexico Boundary. New York: Routledge.
41.
O’DanielAJLathamKE (2018) Introduction. In: LathamKO’DanielA (eds) Sociopolitics of Migrant Death and Repatriation: Perspectives from Forensic Science. Cham: Springer International Press, 3–12.
42.
PayanTCruzPL (2017) Managing the U.S.-Mexico Border First Requires Defining it. Issue Brief, Center for the U.S. And Mexico, Baker Institute for Public Policy. Houston: Rice University. https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/defining-us-mexico-border-area (accessed 25 September 2024).
43.
ReinekeR (2016) Naming the Dead: Identification and Ambiguity along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Tucson: University of Arizona. PhD Dissertation.
SlackJMartínezDE (2019) The geography of migrant death: violence on the US-Mexico border. In: Handbook on Critical Geographies of Migration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 142–152.
47.
SlackJMartínezDE (2020) Postremoval geographies: immigration enforcement and organized crime on the U.S.–Mexico border. Annals of the American Association of Geographers111(4): 1062–1078. DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1791039.
48.
SlackJMartínezDELeeAE, et al. (2016) The geography of border militarization: violence, death and health in Mexico and the United States. Journal of Latin American Geography15: 7–32. DOI: 10.1353/lag.2016.0009.
49.
SotoG (2018) Banal materiality and the idea of sovereignty: the migration funnel effect and the policing of the U.S.-Mexico border, 2000–2016. Political Geography66: 113–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.08.003.
SpradleyKMGochaTP (2020) Migrant deaths along the Texas/Mexico border: a collaborative approach to forensic identification of human remains. In: ParraRCZapicoSCUbelakerDC (eds) Forensic Science and Humanitarian Action: Interacting with the Dead and the Living. 1st edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 535–548.
52.
SpradleyMKHerrmannNPSiegertCB, et al. (2019) Identifying migrant remains in South Texas: policy and practice. Forensic Sciences Research4(1): 60–68. DOI: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1497437.
53.
SymesSAL’AbbéENChapmanEN, et al. (2012) Interpreting traumatic injury to bone in medicolegal investigations. In: DirkmaatDC (ed) A Companion to Forensic Anthropology. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 340–398.
WilderMGarfinGGansterP, et al. (2013) Climate change and U.S.-Mexico border communities. In: GarfinGJardineAMeridethR, et al. (eds) Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States. NCA Regional Input Reports. Washington, DC: Island Press. DOI: 10.5822/978-1-61091-484-0_16.
