Abstract

An international audience of 122 delegates attended the ‘Public Health Research in Palliative Care: Towards Solutions for Global Challenges’ seminar hosted online by All-Ireland Institute of Hospice and Palliative Care (AIIHPC) on November 17 and 18, 2020. This was the second International Research Seminar of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Research Network and EAPC Reference Group on Public Health and Palliative Care. This major international event included live presentations from leading researchers in the area of public health and palliative care including from the island of Ireland, Scotland, Belgium, Australia, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Event organisation was overseen by a scientific committee which included leading researchers from public health and palliative care. The seminar was supported by the Irish Hospice Foundation. The scientific committee is pleased that seminar abstracts accepted are being published in the journal Palliative Care and Social Practice. Abstracts were invited over a range of topics including: public health palliative care and the response to COVID-19, compassionate communities, caregiving and bereavement, health promotion and palliative care, population health models for palliative care, and issues of equity.
Professor Joanne Reid, Queen’s University, Belfast, and Chair of EAPC Public Health 2020 International Seminar Scientific Committee
Abstract 1
Covid-19 and Compassionate Communities: Renewed Opportunities for Connection
Jon Devlin1, Heather Richardson2, Kate Heaps1 and Libby Sallnow2,3*
1Greenwich and Bexley Community Hospice, London, UK
2St Christopher’s Hospice, London, UK
3Central and North West NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
The Compassionate Neighbours movement did not step back during Covid-19 and in fact grew in numbers of volunteers and connections. This presentation will describe the experiences of one Compassionate Neighbours hub in south-east London and how Covid-19 has altered the landscape for connections at the end of life.
- Rapid reassessment of risk which led to routine volunteering being superseded by new flexible, responsive, and safe roles.
- Overcoming barriers such as the need for face to face training, identification badges.
- New models of connecting such as ‘furlongteering’ (short, time-limited volunteering options), virtual and telephone communication, deliveries, and practical support for vulnerable.
- Early integration with local groups such as the grassroots mutual aid organisations.
- Capitalising on the groundswell of interest in volunteering to grow numbers of Compassionate Neighbours.
- Bringing a compassionate and experienced response to the fearful narrative on death and dying.
Abstract 2
The Contribution of and Support for Volunteer Palliative Care: A Survey of Volunteers Across the Health Care System
Steven Vanderstichelen*,1, Joachim Cohen2, Yanna Van Wesemael3, Luc Deliens1 and Kenneth Chambaere1
1End-of-Life Care Research Group (Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University) & Department of Public Health and Primary Care (Ghent University), Brussels, Belgium
2End-of-Life Care Research Group (Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University), Brussels, Belgium
3Palliabru, Brussels, Belgium
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 3
Embeddedness of Volunteers in Belgian Palliative Care Services: A Survey of Volunteers Across the Health Care System
Kenneth Chambaere1, Steven Vanderstichelen1*, Yanna Van Wesemael2, Luc Deliens1 and Joachim Cohen3
1End-of-Life Care Research Group (Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University) & Department of Public Health and Primary Care (Ghent University), Brussels, Belgium
2Palliabru, Brussels, Belgium
3End-of-Life Care Research Group (Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University), Brussels, Belgium
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 4
Transition From Children’s to Adult Services for Adolescents/Young Adults With Life-limiting Conditions: Developing Realist Programme Theory Through an International Comparison
Dr Helen Kerr PhD, RN1*, Dr Kimberely Widger PhD2, Geraldine Cullen-Dean MSc3, Professor Jayne Price4 and Dr Peter O’Halloran1
1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast (QUB), Belfast, UK
2University of Toronto, Lawrence S Bloomberg John Hopkins University Baetjer Memorial Library, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
3The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
4Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston and St George’s University, London, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
The TASYL study was funded by the All-Ireland Institute of Hospice and Palliative Care (AIIHPC). The research collaboration with Toronto, Canada, was supported with the finance from the Martha McMenamin scholarship, School of Nursing and Midwifery, QUB.
Abstract 5
Idiolectics in Palliative Care
Marcelo Caballero, Department of Palliative Care, Medizin Clinic of the Hospital Center Biel, Switzerland
Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 6
Health Policy Guiding Palliative Care for Patients with Noncancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Scoping Review
Sara Ribeiro1* and Tracy Long-Sutehall2
1University Hospital of Southampton, Southampton, UK
2University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to: Sara Ribeiro
Responding to the evidenced inequalities in access to services, the World Health Organisation (WHO) (1) stated that a major obstacle to the implementation of PC worldwide was the lack of health policy (HP). In response to the WHO commentary, influential organisations developed statements (2-4) urging governments to develop HP that ensures equality of access to PC.
This scoping review aims to map current HP in the EU that specifically respond to the PC needs of patients with COPD, dementia, heart failure, and Parkinson’s disease.
1. To map current HP across the EU that specifically refers to the provision of PC for patients with COPD, dementia, heart failure, and Parkinson’s disease.
2. To identify recommendations in current HP that aim to influence the availability and quality of PC for the selected diagnosis.
The concepts: HP (C1), PC (C2), COPD (C3), dementia (C4), heart failure (C5), Parkinson’s disease (C6) were expanded into search terms and combined using Boolean operators, truncation, and mesh terms.
The following combinations: C1& C2& C3; C1& C2& C4; C1& C2& C5; C1& C2& C6 were entered in databases (Medline (EBSCO), PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Web of Science) in April 2017. Relevant journals (BMC Palliative Care, Progress in Palliative Care, European Journal of Heart Failure, Journal of COPD, Journal of Parkinson’s Disease and Alzheimer’s and Dementia Journal) were searched in the same period.
Published health policies developed after 2008 in countries of the EU (including the United Kingdom) written in English or Portuguese were included.
The search retrieved a total of 5269 results, of which 5179 were excluded by title and abstract. Out of the 92 articles included for full-text screening, 43 were duplicates and a further 28 were excluded.
Results were assessed as discussing/not discussing the following (2-4):
(a) PC integration into health care systems.
(b) Health professional’s training in PC and pain management.
(c) Drug availability.
1. COPD:
(a) Two HPs encouraged the integration of PC in the disease management but do not expand on how and when this integration ought to be achieved or by whom.
(b) No recommendations regarding the need for specific training in PC or symptom control.
(c) Two HPs advised on the use of opioids for the management of pain and breathlessness.
2. Dementia:
(a) All HPs discussed the integration of PC in dementia care, with a general agreement that it should be part of dementia care. There was no consensus as to when PC should start in the course of disease.
(b) Six HPs discussed training of health care professionals, with advice that staff should be trained in both PC and dementia, communication skills, and pain management.
(c) Two HPs recommend the use of opioids for pain and breathlessness.
3. Heart failure:
(a) Six HP advocate the integration of PC in the heart failure journey through contact between the specialist PC team and the heart failure team and/or the primary care physician, the development of PC programmes in heart failure, and the commissioning of PC services in heart failure.
(b) Three HPs discussed staff’s training, highlighting the need for communication skills training, postgraduate training in PC specifically directed at heart failure and joint educational opportunities.
(c) Two HPs recommend opioids for the symptomatic relief of anxiety, breathlessness, congestion and thirst, depressive symptoms, dyspnoea, and pain.
4. Parkinson’s disease:
(a) One HP discusses the integration and commissioning of PC services and how these could be achieved in line with the end-of-life care strategy.
(b) Both HPs discuss health staff training with different levels of detail which extends from both PC teams and neurology teams having a degree of knowledge of each other’s competencies to specifying that training can take the form of e-learning modules, study days, formal teaching, interdisciplinary education between teams and ‘informal’ initiatives with information being cascaded through teams. Training needs should focus on the end-of-life pathway with special focus on communication, assessment/care planning, symptom management, and advanced care planning and the understanding of neurological conditions.
(c) Both recommend opioids for the relief of pain.
Abstract 7
Care in the Interstices: Exploring the Outcomes and Significance of Interactions Occurring Outside of the Formal Clinical Consultation
Matthew P Grant1,2,3,4*, Jennifer AM Philip1,2, Luc Deliens3 and Paul A Komesaroff4
1Palliative Medicine Research Group, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
2Department of Palliative Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
3End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
4School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 8
Developing a Model of Bereavement Care in an Acute Tertiary Hospital
Matthew Grant1,2,3*, Peter Hudson1,4,5, Annie Forrest6, Anna Collins3 and Fiona Israel1
1The Centre for Palliative Care, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
2Department of Palliative Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
3Palliative Medicine Research Group, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
4Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
5The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
6Department of Social Work, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 9
Collaboration Between Family and Professional Health Carer in Home Care at the End of Life: An Interview Study
Maarten Vermorgen1, Isabel Vandenbogaerde1*, Chantal Van Audenhove2, Peter Hudson1,3, Luc Deliens1,4, Joachim Cohen1 and Aline De Vleminck1
1End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
2LUCAS Center for Care Research and Consultancy, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
3Centre for Palliative Care, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
4Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
*Correspondence should be addressed to: Isabel.
Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship (Strategic Basic Research SBO-IWT grant no. 140009)
Abstract 10
Application of Health Behaviour Change Theory to Understand Barriers and Facilitators to Talking About Death and Dying
Lisa Graham-Wisener1*, Janine Geddis1, Craig Harrison2, Annmarie Nelson3, Anthony Bryne3, Ishrat Islam3 and Emma Berry1
1Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, David Keir Building, 18-30 Malone Road, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
2Marie Curie Northern Ireland, 1A Kensington Road, Belfast BT5 6NF, UK
3Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, 8th floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 11
Physical Activity and Pain in Patients with Bone Metastases (Ex-Met study)
Kate Devenney1*, Lucy Balding 2, John Kennedy3, Ray McDermott4, Louise O’Connor1, Gráinne Sheill1 and Emer Guinan1
1School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
2Academic Department of Palliative Medicine, Our Lady’s Hospice & Care Services, Dublin, Ireland
3Department of Medical Oncology, St James’s Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
4Department of Medical Oncology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin D24, Ireland
*Correspondence should be addressed to: Kate Devenney at
This work received grant funding from the All-Ireland Institute of Hospice and Palliative Care and the Irish Cancer Society (grant no. PAL17GUI).
Abstract 12
Identifying the Most Important Behavioural Determinants of Starting a Conversation About Palliative Care with the Physician: A Cross-Sectional Structured Interview Study in People With Cancer
Anne-Lore Scherrens*1, Kim Beernaert1, Luc Deliens1, Lore Lapeire2, Martine De Laat2, Christine Biebuyck3, Karen Geboes4, Charles Van Praet5, Ine Moors6, Benedicte Deforche7,# and Joachim Cohen8,#
1End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
2Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
3Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
4Department of Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
5Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
6Department of Haematology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
7Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Physical activity, nutrition and health research unit, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
8End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
#Equal contribution of the last authors.
Research Foundation Flanders.
Abstract 13
Health Care Professionals’ Views of Palliative Care for American War Veterans With Nonmalignant Respiratory Disease Living in a Rural Area: A Qualitative Study
Dr Clare Mc Veigh1 Professor Joanne Reid1* and Professor Paula Carvalho2,3
1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
2Pulmonary and MICU, Boise VA Medical Centre, Boise, ID, USA
3Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Florence Nightingale Travel Scholarship.
Abstract 14
Compassionate Communities as a Therapeutic Landscape
Manjula Patel, PhD Student, University of Warwick, Medical School, Division of Health Sciences
Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 15
International COVID-19 Palliative Care Guidance for Nursing Homes Leaves Key Themes Unaddressed
Joni Gilissen (PhD)1,2*, Lara Pivodic (PhD)2, Kathleen T. Unroe (MD, MHA)3 and Lieve Van den Block (PhD)2,4
1Atlantic Fellow For Equity in Brain Health, Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
2End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
3IU Center for Aging Research, Indiana University of Medicine & Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
4Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Joni Gilissen is supported by the Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI) – Atlantic Philanthropies (USA). Lara Pivodic is a Postdoctoral Fellow of the Research Foundation – Flanders, Belgium.
Abstract 16
How to Educate Citizens About Death and Dying? Lessons Learned From the Implementation of Last Aid courses in 16 Countries
Georg Bollig1,2,3
1Palliative Care Team, Medical Department Sønderborg/Tønder, South Jutland Hospital, Sønderborg, Denmark
2Palliative Care Research Group, Medical Research Unit, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
3Last Aid International
Correspondence should be addressed to:
The main goals of the international Last Aid Course project are to empower citizens to participate in end-of-life care.
Abstract 17
Development of the ‘Care & Inform’ Information and Support Hub
Alice Anderson1, Dr Siobán O’Brien Green1*, Kate Steele1 and Deirdre Shanagher1
1Irish Hospice Foundation, Dublin, Ireland
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Each resource was developed in collaboration with subject specialists, and underwent a plain English review. Consultation with those the resources were aimed at also took place.
The Care&Inform hub contains 6 sections: Resources for Healthcare Professionals; Caring for Others; Grief and Loss; Planning Ahead; Latest Research and Information and Bereavement Support Line information.
Resources are available via PDF, videos, and webinar.
Qualitative feedback: Hospital Group DON: ‘I was assured that I was assisting the staff at the front line to ensure that their patients were receiving a high standard of care in difficult times’.
Abstract 18
Exploring Change in a Series of Workshops About End-of-Life Conversations Among Elder Care Staff in Sweden
Therese Johansson1*, Carol Tishelman1,2,3, Joachim Cohen4, Lars E. Eriksson1,5,6 and Ida Goliath1
1Division of Innovative Care, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
2Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden
3School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
4End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
5School of Health Sciences at University of London City, London, UK
6Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 19
The Representation of Palliative Care by Practice, Policy and Advocacy Organisations: Definitional Variations and Discursive Tensions
Matthys Marjolein*,1,2, Dhollander Naomi1,3, Van Brussel Leen4, Beernaert Kim1,2, Deforche Benedicte2,5, Cohen Joachim1,3, Chambaere Kenneth1,2 and Deliens Luc1,2
1End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
2Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
3Department of Medicine & Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
4Brussels Discourse Theory Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
5Health Promotion Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
This study is part of the project ‘CAPACITY: Flanders Project to Develop Capacity in Palliative Care Across Society’, a collaboration between the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Ghent University, and the Catholic University Leuven, Belgium. This study is supported by a grant from the Research Foundation – Flanders, file number S002219N.
Abstract 20
Compassionate Communities – From Frailty to Community Resilience
Sharon Williams, Project Facilitator, Compassionate Communities
All correspondence should be addressed to:
Our challenge is to further facilitate ways people can reach out to others by connecting resources, removing obstacles, educating and developing resilience. Taking the learning forward, a ‘Compassionate Watch’ model has been developed.
Opening the dialogue on death through ‘Death Cafés’ has been rebranded as ‘Dying to Talk Cafés’ to encourage increased participation.
COVID has brought into sharp focus the importance of palliative care and end-of-life care and empowered deployment of local resources and collaborative working. The learning has potential to accelerate community development to support people during times of health crisis and loss.
Abstract 21
Bereavement Care After In-Hospital Death: A Systematic Review
Charlotte Boven*1, MSc, Let Dillen2, MA, PhD, Nele Van Den Noortgate1, MD, PhD and Liesbeth Van Humbeeck1, RN, MSc, PhD
1Department of Geriatric Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
2Palliative Care Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
*Correspondence should be address to:
This research received funding from ‘Kom op tegen Kanker’.
Abstract 22
The Impact of Poverty on End of Life and Bereavement Experiences: Lived Experience of Bereaved Individuals and Professionals Working in Low-Income Communities in the United Kingdom
Lorraine Hansford, Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health, University of Exeter, UK
Correspondence should be addressed to:
This research is being conducted as part of a fellowship funded by the Wellcome Trust.
Abstract 23
A Framework for Adult Bereavement Care in Ireland. Policy and Planning Response in a COVID and Post-COVID-19 Ireland
Amanda Roberts1* and Orla Keegan1
1Irish Hospice Foundation, Dublin, Ireland
*Correspondence should be addressed to
The IHF has set out 7 policy pillars to shape an approach to policy on end of life and bereavement issues in Ireland. They advocate for the development of a new robust strategy taking into consideration the views of the public, the State, and those dealing professionally with end of life in all care settings, in palliative and bereavement care.
Abstract 24
Responding to Covid-19 Bereavement in Southern Ireland: An Approach for the Whole Population
Orla Keegan, MA Head of Bereavement1*, Ursula Bates D.Psych Chartered Clinical Psychologist1 and Joanne Brennan MSc Psychologist in Clinical Training2
1Irish Hospice Foundation, Dublin, Ireland
2Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Social support is a strong determinant of psychosocial adjustment following bereavement.1 In a recent study of bereaved people in Australia and Ireland, the majority of respondents (94-80%) reported that family and friends were their main source of support.2 Only between 5% and 19% sought support from professional services. A public health approach to loss recognises that that the normal resources of family, friends, and community are adequate to support the majority of bereaved people in normal circumstances.3
Bereavement guidance recommends a tiered approach to service development.4,5 Level 1/Universal corresponds to an approach that educates and strengthens public knowledge of bereavement and signposts those in need of intervention to assessment and treatment services. The BSL was designed as an innovative, level 1 service based on Psychological First Aid principles and knowledge of bereavement theory and reactions.6 Its aim was to provide a supportive compassionate listening service, education advice, and signposting to practical, community, and mental health resources.
Abstract 25
Wellness Together Project
Mary Jo Meehan, Milford Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland
Correspondence should be addressed to:
To build awareness among staff about their well-being.
To provide staff with a common language to discuss well-being.
To empower staff to return to the solid self when ‘pulled away’.
Design, method, and approaches taken: Wellness is introduced using artwork – the image is a mature tree, with various parts of the tree having significance to our emotional wellness. Feedback from staff has indicated how the image of a tree supports them to recognise where they are in their own process of wellness. For example, solid like the trunk or stressed and triggered like the branches.
There are 10 different daily practices (of 5-min duration). Each is practised for 5 weeks. Every practice has an audio piece that you can follow at home or at work.
When staff have engaged in this process, it has very quickly given us a shared language to easily and informally discuss and practice well-being.
Abstract 26
Co-design and Implementation of an Exercise Intervention for Women With Ovarian Cancer
Deirdre McGrath1*, Professor Joanne Reid1, Dr Peter O’Halloran1, Dr Gillian Prue1, Dr Malcolm Brown1, Dr Dominic O’Connor1, Adrina O’Donnell (CNS)2, Dr Joanne Millar2, Dr Gwyneth Hinds2 and Claire Murphy3
1Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
2Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, UK
3Macmillan, Belfast, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 27
A Public Health Hazard: If in Jurisdictions Permitting Assisted Dying (AD) Palliative Care (PC) Rejects AD, all End-of-Life Care May Suffer
Jan L Bernheim MD PhD1* and Marie-José HE Gijsberts MD PhD1*
End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 28
Improving End-of-Life Care in the Hospital Setting
1Macmillan End of Life Care Facilitator, Northern Health & Social Care Trust, Antrim, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
This work is supported by an implementation plan, measurement plan, and an on-line resource pack including supporting tools.
These patients have an average length of stay of 5.0 days, and an average cost of care of £2,577 per patient. This is compared to 7.2 days length of stay and £4,829 cost of care per patient for those patients who have not been identified through the EoL care model.
The average monthly avoided bed days and costs are as a result of implementation of the EoL care model, respectively, are – 57.2 days and £58,552. Per annum, this equates to 686 days and £702,624
Abstract 29
Rehabilitative Palliative Care as a Health-Promoting Approach
Dr Karen Clarke, Chief Executive, St Michael’s Hospice, East Sussex, UK
Correspondence should be addressed to:
1. Participatory action research: a co-operative inquiry group (CIG) planned and implemented ways to integrate RPC.
2. Thematic analysis: to examine the facilitators and barriers to implementation of RPC.
3. Literature review: assessed whether these factors were present in other studies.
The alignment and dissonance between HPPC and RPC were also examined.
Rosenberg and Yates’ (2010) model was expanded to illustrate how the components of health promotion are also applicable to RPC.
Alignment between HPPC and RPC was presented:
• Democratic, empowering, participatory.
• Focused on enablement, control, choice, and independence.
• Emphasising social interaction.
• Encouraging individuals to become active participants in their care.
• Interdisciplinary and inclusive: professionals, patients, families, communities, and volunteers.
Discord between the 2 approaches was examined and alternative perspectives presented.
Abstract 30
Reflections From Children and Older Adults Participating in Community-Based Arts Initiatives About Dying, Death, and Loss in Sweden
Max Kleijberg1*, Beth Maina Ahlberg2.3, Rebecca Hilton4 and Carol Tishelman1,5
1Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2Skaraborg Institute for Research and Development, Skövde, Sweden
3Department of Sociology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
4Research Centre, Stockholm University of the Arts, Stockholm, Sweden
5Stockholm Health Care Services (SLSO), Region Stockholm, Sweden
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
FORTE 2014-4071; Investor AB 2-2314/2013; Stockholm City Elder Care Bureau 243-662/2015
Abstract 31
Using Elements of Play in Arts Activities to Engage Communities With End-of-Life Issues
Max Kleijberg1*, Rebecca Hilton2,3, Beth Maina Ahlberg3,4 and Carol Tishelman1,5
1Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2Research Centre, Stockholm University of the Arts, Stockholm, Sweden
3Skaraborg Institute for Research and Development, Skövde, Sweden
4Department of Sociology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
5Stockholm Health Care Services (SLSO), Region Stockholm, Sweden
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
FORTE 2014-4071; Investor AB 2-2314/2013; Stockholm City Elder Care Bureau 243-662/2015
Abstract 32
Maintaining Palliative Care Through COVID by Resourcing Doctors
Sarinah Hanna*,1, Jayne McAuley1 and Mary-Ann McCann1
1Macmillan Unit, Antrim Area Hospital, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
COVID-related service disruption led to a greater proportion of specialist palliative care being undertaken in the acute hospital. Medical staff managed an increased volume and complexity of palliative care patients; therefore, remote teaching programme was initiated for newly started interimFY1 doctors (iFY1s).
They completed online learning resources in palliative care including symptom control, emergencies, and COVID-19. Doctors undertook ward-based experience and were offered a small group Zoom session with the Specialist Palliative Care Team (SPCT).
Online questionnaires were completed and results analysed.
Main areas of improvement were prescribing, managing symptoms at EOL, accessing resources and the role of the SPCT in addition to managing emergencies.
Doctors maximised their exposure in a protected setting and learned to treat as well as advocate for their patients, particularly in the absence of family members. Palliative care comes into its own in adversity and the lessons learned early shape a doctors’ future practice. Using opportunities to instil professional awareness around palliative care benefits patients and improves overall delivery of the service.
Abstract 33
Evaluating the Availability, Quality, and Feasibility of Death Certificate Data to Study Place of Death in Latin America: a Study of 19 Countries
Katja Seitz*,1, Luc Deliens2, Joachim Cohen2 and Tania Pastrana*,1
1Department of Palliative Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
2End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 34
Exploring Young Adults Understanding of Palliative Care: A Mixed-Methods Study Employing an Integrated Theoretical Model
Dr. Anita Mallon1* PhD Research Associate, Professor Sonja McIlfatrick1, PhD Professor of Nursing/Head of School of Nursing, Dr. Felicity Hasson1, PhD Senior Lecturer, Dr. Karen Casson1, PhD Lecturer in Health Promotion and Public Health and Dr. Paul Slater1, PhD Lecturer/Statistician
1Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Shore Road Newtownabbey, Belfast, Co., Antrim BT37 0QB, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
This study was funded by the Department for Employment and Learning in Northern Ireland as a PhD study.
Abstract 35
Same, Same But Different? Changes in Community-Dwelling, Older Adults’ End-of-Life Preferences Over Time
Malin Eneslätt*1,2, Gert Helgesson1 and Carol Tishelman1
1Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2Department of Health Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
The main source of funding for this study was the Swedish Research Council for Health, Welfare, and Working Life.
Abstract 36
Incorporating Virtual Reality Into a Physical Exercise Programme for Patients With Parkinson’s Disease in an Outpatient Palliative Care Setting
Dr Mary Armstrong1* and Chris Thomas2
1Marie Curie Hospice, Belfast, UK
2Propeer Solutions
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 37
Could Kinesiology Taping Help Mitigate Pain in Palliative Care Patients?
Lauren Green1* and Dr Mary Armstrong1
1Marie Curie Hospice, Belfast, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 38
Challenges in Qualitative Research With Adults With Migration Background at the End of Life
Marco Hajart1* and Tania Pastrana1*
1Department of Palliative Medicine, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 39
Economic Analysis Shows Value of Volunteering in Palliative Care Day Services
W George Kernohan, Ulster University, on behalf of Day Services Research Group†*
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
†Day Services research group: Paul Mark Mitchell1, Joanna Coast1, Gareth Myring1, Federico Ricciardi2, Victoria Vickerstaff3, Louise Jones3, Shazia Zafar4, Sarah Cudmore5,6, Joanne Jordan7, Laurie McKibben8, Lisa Graham-Wisener9, Anne M. Finucane10, Alistair Hewison4, Erna Haraldsdottir5,11, Kevin Brazil12, Felicity Hasson8, Sonja McIlfatrick8, W. George Kernohan8
1Health Economics Bristol, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
3Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK
4School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
5Division of Nursing, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
6Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
7School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
8Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK
9Marie Curie Hospice, Belfast and School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
10Marie Curie Hospice, Edinburgh and Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
11St Columba’s Hospice, Edinburgh, UK
12School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
This work was supported by the Marie Curie Research Grants Scheme (grant no. A17114).
Abstract 40
Survey of Palliative Care Provision by Faith-Based Health Facilities in India and Nepal During Covid-19
Daniel Munday1*, Jenifer Jeba2, Kirsty Boyd1, Savita Duomai3, Priya John4, Ruby Karl5, Ruth Powys6, Ashita Singh7, Liz Grant1 and Scott Murray1
1Primary Palliative Care Research Group, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
2Palliative Care Team, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
3Emmanuel Hospitals Association, New Delhi, India
4Christian Medical Association of India, New Delhi, India
5Low Cost Effective Care Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
6Palliative Care Team, INF Green Pastures Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal
7Chinchpada Christian Hospital, Navapur, Nandurbar, Maharashtra, India
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
(a) Effects of Covid-19 on patients and families with PC needs.
(b) FBO preparedness for responding to the crisis.
(c) Impact of the pandemic on PC provision, including challenges and solutions that strengthen PC interventions.
Abstract 41
Delivering Community Home-Based Palliative Care in Bangladesh During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Nezamuddin Ahmad*1, Mostofa Kamal Chowdhury2, Md. Julhash Uddin3, Shafiquejjaman Saikot3, Md. Saiful Hoque3 and Rachel Crosby4
1(Retired) Department of Palliative Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
2Department of Palliative Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
3Compassionate Narayanganj, Narayanganj, Bangladesh
4Worldwide Hospice Palliative Care Alliance, London, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
UKAID Direct funding.
Abstract 42
EAPC Research Network International Seminar
Julie Goss1, Dr. Norma O’Leary1, Jide Afolabi1, Gillian McHugh1*, Dr. Amanda Drury2 and Prof. Anne-Marie Brady3
1Palliative Care, Our Lady’s Hospice & Care Services, Harold’s Cross, Dublin 6W, Ireland
2Research Fellow, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
3Professor of Nursing and Chronic Illness, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 43
Psychosocial and Educational Interventions for People With Advanced Cancer and Their Informal Caregivers (Diadic): Protocol for a Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial
Orphé Matthys1,2*, Aline De Vleminck1,3, Sigrid Dierickx1,2,3, Luc Deliens1,2,3, Vincent Vangoethem1,2, Peter Hudson1,3 and Joachim Cohen1,3
1End-Of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
2Department Of Public Health And Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
3Department Of Medicine & Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
*Correspondence should be sent to:
Population: in each country, 156 dyads (936 in total) of people with advanced cancer and their family caregiver will be randomised to one of the 3 study arms.
Intervention: the 2 interventions offer tailored psychosocial and educational support for the patient-family caregiver dyad: (1) nurse-led face-to-face intervention consisting of 2 home visits and one telephone session, and (2) web-based intervention, independently completed by the patient-family caregiver dyad in 4 sessions. Both interventions will be compared to standard care. The interventions are based on the American FOCUS intervention which consists of 5 components: family involvement, optimistic outlook, coping effectiveness, uncertainty reduction, and symptom management. The FOCUS intervention will be adapted to the European context.
Outcome: primary outcome is self-efficacy and social function of the patient and the family caregiver.
Abstract 44
The Impact of COVID-19 on an Inpatient Palliative Care Service in a Tertiary Referral Centre
Sheena E Geoghegan1,2*, Clare McAleer1,2 and Regina McQuillan1,2
1Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland
2St. Francis Hospice, Raheny, Dublin 5, Ireland
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
Abstract 45
Evaluation of a Palliative Care Team Hospital Performance During the Pandemic
Céu Rocha*1, Rita Guedes1 and Hugo Oliveira1,2
1Palliative Care Unit, Local Health Unit of Matosinhos–Hospital Pedro Hispano, Senhora da Hora, Portugal
2Internal Medicine Unit, Local Health Unit of Matosinhos–Hospital Pedro Hispano, Senhora da Hora, Portugal
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
During this period, one of the main problems was the lack of health care professionals, as they were infected by the virus or because their primary focus was with COVID-19 patients. Another problem was the necessary use of personal protecting equipment and the need to avoid dissemination of the virus. Therefore, direct patient evaluation has decreased. Regarding the necessary deliver of palliative care the team has assessed and provided for the extra need of drugs and materials, provided electronic devices as an alternative method of communication, established protocols regarding prevalent symptoms, referenced a palliative care professional in the COVID wards, provided psychological support to all patients and families and provided 24-h palliative care consultation.
Abstract 46
Performance of a Palliative Care Team During the COVID-19 Emergency
Céu Rocha1, Hugo Oliveira*1,2, Eliana Frias1, Miguel Pereira1, Rui Ramos1,3 and Rita Guedes1
1Palliative Care Unit, Local Health Unit of Matosinhos–Hospital Pedro Hispano, Senhora da Hora, Portugal
2Internal Medicine Unit, Local Health Unit of Matosinhos–Hospital Pedro Hispano, Senhora da Hora, Portugal
3Mental Health Department, Local Health Unit of Matosinhos–Hospital Pedro Hispano, Senhora da Hora, Portugal
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
There are more teleconsultations (0% vs 32%, P = .001) and psychological support (23% vs 51.6%, P = .012). The change in rate of hospital deaths was not significant (48.8% vs 61%, P = .205).
In domiciliary care, patient’s average age was similar (75 vs 74, P = .595) with no difference in gender (P = .289). The main disease remains oncological (63.2% vs 66.2%, P = .438). Teleconsultations increased (0% vs 27.7%, P = .003) and there was a reduction in face-to-face consultations (47.4% vs16.9%, P = .028). Mortality rate was similar (15.8% vs 18.5%, P = .812), but deaths at home decreased (66.7% vs 50%, P = .66). The psychological support was similar (15.8% vs 12.3%, P = .885).
Abstract 47
COVID-19: Communities And Organisations: Strange Or Natural Bedfellows?
Mary Hodgson1*, Heather Richardson1 and Libby Sallnow1
1St Christopher’s Hospice, London SE26 6DZ, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
How has COVID shown us communities can work in partnership with organisations? This paper will share reflections from a COVID project in a hospice in the United Kingdom that aimed to ensure that people in the community remained as connected as possible to others and felt the ‘presence’ of care around them despite physical distancing measures.
In the paper, we will explore how necessity and restrictions presented by COVID actually offered us an opportunity to trial a new partnership approach to working together to ensure that people at home or shielding were connected to the community.
The challenges and speed of COVID measures and their impact on every day work meant certain principles of reciprocity and agency that underpin relationship building between organisations and community members became a default rather than were hard won. We will reflect on how the learning and opportunities arising from this project have helped us all learn about community action, including the challenges of innovating between communities and organisations.
Abstract 48 Conference Keynote Address
Public Health Approaches To Bereavement Care: Through the Lens of the Pandemic
Prof Samar Aoun, La Trobe University, Victoria, and, Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Western Australia
All correspondence should be addressed to: S.
Until recently, we had surprisingly little data about bereavement as it is lived out in everyday life. We were well informed about the minority who seek support from professional services, but not about the majority who do not. Bereavement was understood as a problem to be solved rather than an experience to be engaged. Our perceptions/strategies for all were largely shaped by the complications that can arise for some, and we paid correspondingly less attention to the experience and resources used by the majority, those who learn to live with their loss.
The public health model of bereavement support has changed this landscape, in terms of knowing who needs bereavement support, who is perceived by bereaved people to have offered them support and was it helpful. Informal care is the bedrock, with formal services supplementing this support. This presentation describes this ‘evidence-based’ approach focusing on how the findings of a population-based survey has challenged conventional practices around bereavement care and provided evidence that supported public health strategies and policy in countries such as United Kingdom and Ireland and for a traumatic fast progressing terminal illness such as MND. Empirical indicators/directions have encouraged a compassionate community approach to future bereavement support practice and policy.
COVID-19 has brought the focus more acutely on grief, bereavement, and mental health. Many conventional memorialisation practices/rituals have been modified or taken away from the bereaved. However, they were replaced by creative and viable grieving strategies including improved grief literacy and death literacy. Nevertheless, many of the projections of increased complicated grief may be over-estimating the importance of professional support, and under-estimating what family, friends, and neighbours can provide.
Public health approaches to bereavement care are essential if we are to develop relevant, coherent, and comprehensive end-of-life care policies and practices.
Abstract 49 Conference Keynote Address
Public Health and Palliative Care: What do the Public Know and What Lessons can be Learnt?
Professor Sonja McIlfatrick*1, Dr Deborah Muldrew1 and Dr Felicity Hasson1
1School of Nursing, Ulster University, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, UK
*Correspondence should be addressed to:
HSC R&D Office and Department of Health NI
Abstract 50 Conference Keynote Address
Promoting Palliative Care in Schools
Sally Paul
School of Social Work and Social Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
Correspondence should be addressed to:
