Purpose is a key protective factor for well-being, resilience, and satisfaction with life. The Claremont Purpose Scale (CPS) was developed by Bronk and colleagues with adolescents and emerging adults to measure three dimensions of purpose: Meaning, Goal-Directedness, and Beyond-the-Self. The psychometric properties examined in the original scale development paper were replicated with our independent, emerging adult college student sample: confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of a 3-factor model, good-to-excellent internal consistency, convergent validity with a measure of general perceived meaning in life (MLQ-P), and discriminant validity with a measure of self-reported depression (DASS-21-D). Additional psychometrics examined in this study were test–retest reliability, a 1-factor CFA model, correlations with stress and anxiety, and descriptive statistics that had not yet been reported in the literature. Beyond-the-self items did not load well onto the overall factor in the 1-factor model, and their correlations with other scales (MLQ-S, DASS-21 subscales) differed significantly from the correlations between these other scales and the CPS total, General Meaning, and Goal-Directedness scores. Implications of these data include strong support for the use of each subscale as a distinct, psychometric index, and we recommend the total scale score not be used as a measure of overall purpose. Clearly, there are separate, but related, facets to this measure that, while positive, undermine the utility of a global purpose score. A slightly changed naming of the CPS to the “Claremont Purpose Scales” could promote their use as three separate scales instead of a single, total scale score.
AkaikeH. (2011). Akaike’s Information Criterion. In LovricM. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of statistical science (p. 25). Springer.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text revision).
3.
American Psychological Association. (2014). Guidelines for prevention in psychology. American Psychologist, 69(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034569
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
Azevedo Da SilvaM.Singh-ManouxA.BrunnerE. J.KaffashianS.ShipleyM. J.KivimäkiM.NabiH. (2012). Bidirectional association between physical activity and symptoms of anxiety and depression: The Whitehall II study. European Journal of Epidemiology, 27(7), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-012-9692-8
BodnerE.BergmanY. S.Cohen-FridelS. (2014). Do attachment styles affect the presence and search for meaning in life?Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(5), 1041–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9462-7
9.
BokhourB. G.HaunJ. N.HydeJ.CharnsM.KliglerB. (2020). Transforming the Veterans Affairs to a whole health system of care: Time for action and research. Medical Care, 58(4), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001316
BozdoganH. (1987). Model selection and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52(3), 345–370.
12.
BronkK. C.DamonW.MenonJ. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 119–128.
BronkK. C.LeontopoulouS.McConchieJ. (2019). Youth purpose during the great recession: A mixed-methods study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(4), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1484942
15.
BronkK. C.RichesB. R.ManganS. A. (2018). Claremont Purpose Scale: A measure that assesses the three dimensions of purpose among adolescents. Research in Human Development, 15(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2018.1441577
16.
BundickM. J.YeagerD. S. (2009). The role of purposeful work goals in promoting meaning in life and in schoolwork during adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24(4), 423–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558409336749
17.
ChenF. F.WestS. G.SousaK. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189–225.
18.
CoteJ. E. (2014). The dangerous myth of emerging adulthood: An evidence-based critique of a flawed developmental theory. Applied Developmental Science, 18(4), 177–188. https://doi:10.1080/10888691.2014.954451
19.
CrumbaughJ. C.MaholickL. T. (1964). An experimental study in existentialism: The psychometric approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(196404)20:2<200::aid-jclp2270200203>3.0.co;2-u
20.
DeVellisR. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). SAGE.
21.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton & Co.
22.
FranklV. E. (2006). Man’s search for meaning. Beacon Press (Original work published 1959).
23.
GlanzerP. L.HillJ. P.RobinsonJ. A. (2018). Emerging adults’ conceptions of purpose and the good life: A classification and comparison. Youth & Society, 50(6), 715–733. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0044118X15602918
24.
GrychJ.HambyS.BanyardV. (2015). The resilience portfolio model: Understanding healthy adaptation in victims of violence. Psychology of Violence, 5(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039671
25.
HengM. A.BlauI.FulmerG.BiX.PereiraA. (2017). Adolescents finding purpose: Comparing purpose and life satisfaction in the context of Singaporean and Israeli moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 46(3), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1345724
26.
HoM. Y.CheungF. M.CheungS. F. (2010). The role of meaning in life and optimism in promoting well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 658–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.008
27.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
28.
IBM Corporation. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version25.0.
29.
KashdanT. B.McKnightP. E.GoodmanF. R. (2022). Evolving positive psychology: A blueprint for advancing the study of purpose in life, psychological strengths, and resilience. Journal of Positive Psychology, 17(2), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.2016906
30.
KobauR.SeligmanM. E.PetersonC.DienerE.ZackM. M.ChapmanD.ThompsonW. (2011). Mental health promotion in public health: Perspectives and strategies from positive psychology. American Journal of Public Health, 101(8), e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.300083
31.
LarsonR. W.OrsonC.BowersJ. (2017). Positive youth development: How intrinsic motivation amplifies adolescents’ social-emotional learning. In WarrenM.DonaldsonS. (Eds.), Scientific advances in positive psychology (pp. 165–194). Praeger.
32.
LiJ. B.DouK.LiangY. (2021). The relationship between presence of meaning, search for meaning, and subjective well-being: A three-level meta-analysis based on the Meaning in Life Questionnaire. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(1), 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00230-y
33.
LovibondS. H.LovibondP. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.
34.
MancoN.HambyS. (2021). A meta-analytic review of interventions that promote meaning in life. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(6), 866–873. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0890117121995736
35.
ManganS.BaumsteigerR.BronkK. C. (2020). Recommendations for positive psychology interventions in school settings. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(5), 653–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789709
36.
MartelaF.StegerM. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623
37.
McKnightP. E.KashdanT. B. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: An integrative, testable theory. Review of General Psychology, 13(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017152
38.
MeyersL. S.GamstG.GuarinoA. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. SAGE.
39.
MundfromD. J.ShawD. G.KeT. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
40.
MurrayJ. L.ArnettJ. J. (Eds.). (2018). Emerging adulthood and higher education: A new student development paradigm. Routledge.
41.
ParkC. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301
42.
PfundG. N.LewisN. A. (2020). Aging with purpose: Developmental changes and benefits of purpose in life throughout the lifespan. In HillP.AllemandM. (Eds.), Personality and healthy aging in adulthood: International perspectives on aging (Vol. 26, pp. 27–42). Springer.
43.
ResnickS. G.RosenheckR. A. (2006). Recovery and positive psychology: Parallel themes and potential synergies. Psychiatric Services, 57(1), 120–122. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.1.120
RushA.Brown UrbanJ.DavisW. J.LinverM. R. (2022). Exploring pathways to purpose in Scouts. Journal of Adolescent Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584221091488
46.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
47.
RyffC. D.KeyesC. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
48.
ScholtenS.VeltenJ.BiedaA.ZhangX. C.MargrafJ. (2017). Testing measurement invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21) across four countries. Psychological Assessment, 29(11), 1376–1390. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000440
SchulenbergS. E.MeltonA. M. A. (2010). A confirmatory factor-analytic evaluation of the Purpose in Life test: Preliminary psychometric support for a replicable two-factor model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9124-3
51.
SchulenbergS. E.SchnetzerL. W.BuchananE. M. (2011). The purpose in life test-short form: Development and psychometric support. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9231-9
52.
SchulenbergS. E.StrackK.BuchananE. M. (2011). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Psychometric properties with individuals with serious mental illness in an inpatient setting. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(12), 1210–1219. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20841
53.
SeligmanM. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press.
54.
SouthwickS.CharneyD. (2018). Resilience: The science of mastering life’s greatest challenges (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
55.
StegerM. F.FrazierP.OishiS.KalerM. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
WangM. C.LightseyO.PietruszkaT.UrukA.WellsA. (2007). Purpose in life and reasons for living as mediators of the relationship between stress, coping, and suicidal behavior. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701228920
58.
WeberM. C.SchulenbergS. E. (2022). The curvilinear relationships between posttraumatic growth and posttraumatic stress, depression, and anxiety. Traumatology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000398
59.
WiltJ.BleidornW.RevelleW. (2016). Finding a life worth living: Meaning in life and graduation from college. European Journal of Personality, 30(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2046
60.
WoodD.CrapnellT.LauL.BennettA.LotsteinD.FerrisM.KuoA. (2018). Emerging adulthood as a critical stage in the life course. In HalfonN.ForrestC.LernerR.FaustmanE. (Eds.), Handbook of life course health development (pp. 123–143). Springer.
