The Role of Objectification in College Women’s Substance Misuse and Sexual Risk

Abstract

Sexism and objectification present major challenges for mental and physical health among women. Scholars have called for research to identify mechanisms that underlie these associations as well as to delineate factors to target in prevention and intervention efforts. This study aimed to build on central tenets of objectification theory through its examination of sexist experiences in relation to body surveillance, body shame, depressive symptoms, and the health risk behaviors of substance use (i.e., alcohol and drug misuse) and sexual risk (i.e., condom use and number of sexual partners) among a large sample of college student women. We also examined whether body surveillance, body shame, and depressive symptoms would mediate theorized pathways extended to substance use and sexual risk. A sample of 505 full-time college student women ages 18–26 completed an online survey that assessed their health and behaviors. We used structural equation modeling to test mediation hypotheses. Results largely supported hypotheses, extended objectification theory to sexual risk, and expanded upon past research on objectification in relation to substance use. Notably, results of this study provided a more nuanced knowledge of how objectification may lead to increases in sexual risk when assessed by number of sexual partners (but not condom use). Further research is warranted to understand potential explanatory pathways between sexism, objectification, and sexual risk. Findings can inform prevention and intervention efforts to target body surveillance, body shame, and depressive symptoms to attempt to reduce the burden of sexist experiences on women’s health.

Keywords

substance abuse and use sexual health college students women sexism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American College Health Association (2016). American College Health Association national college health assessment II: Undergraduate student reference group data report spring 2016. ACHA.

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th Ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.

American Psychological Association (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf.

Ashenhurst

Wilhite

E. R.

Harden

K. P.

Fromme

(2017). Number of sexual partners and relationship status are associated with unprotected sex across emerging adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0692-8.

Bosson

J. K.

Kuchynka

S. L.

Parrott

D. J.

Swan

S. C.

Schramm

A. T.

(2020). Injunctive norms, sexism, and misogyny network activation among men. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000217.

Bowleg

Neilands

T. B.

Choi

K. H.

(2008). Evaluating the validity and reliability of a modified schedule of sexist events: Implications for public health research on women's HIV risk behaviors. Women & Health, 47(2), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630240802092175.

Burnes

T. R.

Singh

A. A.

Witherspoon

R. G.

(2017). Sex positivity and counseling psychology: An introduction to the major contribution. The Counseling Psychologist, 45(4), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000017710216.

Carr

E. R.

Szymanski

D. M.

(2011). Sexual objectification and substance abuse in young adult women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378449.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (1997). Youth risk behavior surveillance: National college health risk behavior survey. Surveillance Summaries, 46(SS-6), 1–54. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00049859.htm.

10.

Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (2017). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats16/CDC_2016_STDS_Report-for508WebSep21_2017_1644.pdf.

11.

Choi

K. H.

Bowleg

Neilands

T. B.

(2011). The effects of sexism, psychological distress, and difficult sexual situations on U.S. women's sexual risk behaviors. AIDS Education and Prevention, 23(5), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2011.23.5.397.

12.

Davis

S. E.

(2018). Objectification, sexualization, and misrepresentation: Social media and the college experience. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118786727.

13.

Eaton

W. W.

Smith

Ybarra

Muntaner

Tien

(2004). Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In Maruish

M. E.

(Ed), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Instruments for adults (pp. 363–377). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

14.

Eisenberg

M. H.

Johnson

C. C.

Zucker

A. N.

(2018). Starving for a drink: Sexual objectification is associated with food-restricted alcohol consumption among college women, but not among men. Women & Health, 58(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2017.1292342.

15.

Enders

C. K.

Bandalos

D. L.

(2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0803_5.

16.

Fair

C. D.

Vanyur

(2011). Sexual coercion, verbal aggression, and condom use consistency among college students. Journal of American College Health, 59(4), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.508085.

17.

Fitz

C. C.

Zucker

A. N.

(2014). Feminist with benefits: College women’s feminist beliefs buffer sexual well-being amid hostile (not benevolent) sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313504736.

18.

Fredrickson

B. L.

Roberts

T. A.

(1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.

19.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

20.

Impett

E. A.

Schooler

Tolman

D. L.

(2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-9016-0.

21.

Kline

R. B.

(2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

22.

Klonoff

E. A.

Landrine

(1995). The schedule of sexist events: A measure of lifetime and recent sexist discrimination in women's lives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(4), 439–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00086.x.

23.

Lewis

M. A.

Granato

Blayney

J. A.

Lostutter

T. W.

Kilmer

J. R.

(2012). Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among US college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(5), 1219–1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2.

24.

Lewis

Marine

Kenney

(2018). I get together with my friends and try to change it’. Young feminist students resist ‘laddism,’‘rape culture’ and ‘everyday sexism. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1175925.

25.

Lipari

Van Horn

S. L.

Hughes

Williams

(2017). Underage binge drinking varies within and across states. Substance abuse and mental health Services administration. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/report_3185/ShortReport-3185.html.

26.

Little

T. D.

Cunningham

W. A.

Shahar

(2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.

27.

Littleton

Breitkopf

C. R.

Berenson

(2005). Body image and risky sexual behaviors: An investigation in a tri-ethnic sample. Body Image, 2(2), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.02.003.

28.

Lustig

(2012). Objectification theory and sexual health among women. Graduate Doctoral Dissertations. Paper 73.

29.

Mallinckrodt

Abraham

W. T.

Wei

Russell

D. W.

(2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.372.

30.

Martens

M. P.

(2005). The use of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 33(3), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000004272260.

31.

McCabe

S. E.

(2008). Screening for drug abuse among medical and nonmedical users of prescription drugs in a probability sample of college students. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 162(3), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.41.

32.

McCabe

S. E.

Boyd

C. J.

Cranford

J. A.

Morales

Slayden

(2006). A modified version of the drug abuse screening test among undergraduate students. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31(3), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2006.04.010.

33.

McKinley

N. M.

(1995). Women and objectified body consciousness: A feminist psychological analysis. Doctoral dissertation: University of Wisconsin-Madison (Dissertation Abstracts International, 56,05B, 9527111.

34.

McKinley

N. M.

Hyde

J. S.

(1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(2), 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.

35.

McMahon

Banyard

V. L.

(2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 13(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838011426015.

36.

Moradi

Huang

Y. P.

(2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.

37.

Moradi

Subich

L. M.

(2002). Perceived sexist events and feminist identity development attitudes: Links to women's psychological distress. The Counseling Psychologist, 30(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000002301003.

38.

Muehlenkamp

J. J.

Swanson

J. D.

Brausch

A. M.

(2005). Self-objectification, risk taking, and self-harm in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00164.x.

39.

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2019). CollegeAim: Planning alcohol intervention using NIAAA's CollegeAIM alcohol intervention matrix. www.collegedrinkingprevention.gove/collegeaim.

40.

National Institutes on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2002). A call to action: Changing the culture of drinking at U.S. colleges . Task Force of the National Advisory Council. https://www.collegedrinkingprevention.gov/media/taskforcereport.pdf.

41.

Noll

S. M.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(1998). A mediational model linking self‐objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(4), 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x.

42.

O'Hare

Sheerer

M. V.

(1999). Validating the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test with college first-offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 17(1–2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(98)00063-4.

43.

Osborne

J. W.

Waters

(2002). Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 8(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.7275/r222-hv23.2

44.

Parent

M. C.

(2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(4), 568–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012445176.

45.

Parent

M. C.

Moradi

(2015). Self-objectification and condom use self-efficacy in women university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(4), 971–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0384-1.

46.

Parkes

S. A.

Saewyc

E. M.

Cox

D. N.

MacKay

L. J.

(2008). Relationship between body image and stimulant use among Canadian adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(6), 616–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.04.006.

47.

Piran

Robinson

S. R.

(2006). Associations between disordered eating behaviors and licit and illicit substance use and abuse in a university sample. Addictive Behaviors, 31(10), 1761–1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.12.021.

48.

Satorra

Bentler

P.M.

(2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.

49.

Saunders

J. B.

Aasland

O. G.

Babor

T. F.

De la Fuente

J. R.

Grant

(1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption‐II. Addiction, 88(6), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.

50.

Schlomer

G. L.

Bauman

Card

N. A.

(2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082.

51.

Schooler

Ward

L. M.

Merriwether

Caruthers

A. S.

(2005). Cycles of shame: Menstrual shame, body shame, and sexual decision‐making. Journal of Sex Research, 42(4), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552288.

52.

Schwartz

S. J.

Weisskirch

R. S.

Zamboanga

B. L.

Castillo

L. G.

Ham

L. S.

Huynh

Q. L.

Park

I. J.

Donovan

Kim

S. Y.

Vernon

Davis

M. J.

Cano

M. A.

(2011). Dimensions of acculturation: Associations with health risk behaviors among college students from immigrant families. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021356.

53.

Shrout

P. E.

Bolger

(2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422.

54.

Sinclair

S. L.

Myers

J. E.

(2004). The relationship between objectified body consciousness and wellness in a group of college women. Journal of College Counseling, 7(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2004.tb00246.x.

55.

Skinner

H. A.

(1982). The drug abuse screening test. Addictive Behaviors, 7(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(82)90005-3.

56.

Smith

T. M. E.

Skaggs

G. E.

Redican

K. J.

(2008). A comparison of health risk behaviors among college students enrolled in a required personal health course vs. an elective personal health course. Health Educator, 40(2), 90–97.

57.

Stake

J. E.

(2007). Predictors of change in feminist activism through women’s and gender studies. Sex Roles, 57(1-2), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9227-z.

58.

Streiner

D. L.

(2003). Being inconsistent about consistency: When coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(3), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_01.

59.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2020). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/reports/rpt29393/2019NSDUHFFRPDFWHTML/2019NSDUHFFR090120.htm.

60.

Swim

J. K.

Hyers

L. L.

Cohen

L. L.

Ferguson

M. J.

(2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00200.

61.

Szymanski

D. M.

Carr

E. R.

(2011). Underscoring the need for social justice initiatives concerning the sexual objectification of women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(1), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010384512.

62.

Szymanski

D. M.

Moffitt

L. B.

Carr

E. R.

(2011). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(1), 6–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378402.

63.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed). Allyn & Bacon.

64.

Tiggemann

(2011). Mental health risks of self-objectification: A review of the empirical evidence for disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual dysfunction. In Calogero

R. M.

Tantleff-Dunn

Thompson

J. K.

(Eds), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 139–159). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12304-007.

65.

Turchik

J. A.

Garske

J. P.

Probst

D. R.

Irvin

C. R.

(2010). Personality, sexuality, and substance use as predictors of sexual risk taking in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 47(5), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903161621.

66.

Tylka

T. L.

Augustus-Horvath

C. L.

(2011). Fighting self-objectification in prevention and intervention contexts. In Calogero

R. M.

Tantleff-Dunn

Thompson

J. K.

(Eds), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 187–214). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12304-009.

67.

Van Dam

Earleywine

(2011). Validation of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale-revised: Pragmatic depression assessment in the general population. Psychiatry Research, 186(1), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.08.018.

68.

Wannamethee

S. G.

Field

A. E.

Colditz

G. A.

Rimm

E. B.

(2004). Alcohol intake and 8‐year weight gain in women: A prospective study. Obesity Research, 12(9), 1386–1396.

69.

Watson

L. B.

Matheny

K. B.

Gagné

Brack

Ancis

J. R.

(2013). A model linking diverse women’s child sexual abuse history with sexual risk taking. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312454535.

70.

Zucker

A. N.

Landry

L. J.

(2007). Embodied discrimination: The relation of sexism and distress to women’s drinking and smoking behaviors. Sex Roles, 56(3–4), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312454535.