Over the last few decades, India and China have received significant remittances from abroad. However, there is no clear evidence that these remittances positively or negatively impact income distribution. Therefore, this study explores the role of remittances in income inequality in China and India. This study also investigates the factors determining income inequality in two major emerging market economies. Using annual data from 1982 to 2021, this study applies structural break regression models for empirical investigation. The result reveals that remittances positively impacted income inequality until the early 2000s but are statistically insignificant. However, remittances have had a reducing effect on inequalities in recent years for both economies. The results also show that financial development, per capita income and the internationalisation of trade positively contribute to inequality in both countries. In contrast, FDI reduces inequality in China and increases in India. Given the varying impact of remittances on income inequality, this study offers several policy implications for China and India.
AcostaP., CalderonC., FajnzylberP., & LopezH. (2008). What is the impact of international remittances on poverty and inequality in Latin America? World Development, 36(1), 89–114. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.016
2.
AdamsR. H. (1991). The economic uses and impact of international remittances in rural Egypt. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 39(4), 695–722. https://doi.org/10.1086/451904
3.
AdamsR. H. (2006). Remittances and poverty in Ghana (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3838). Washington, DC: World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/8781
4.
AdamsR. H., & PageJ. (2005). Do international migration and remittances reduce poverty in developing countries? World Development, 33(10), 1645–1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.004
5.
AhlburgD. A. (1996). Remittances and the income distribution in Tonga. Population Research and Policy Review, 15(4), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128431
6.
AhmedA. R., & MasihM. (2017). What is the link between financial development and income inequality? Evidence from Malaysia. MPRA Paper, No. 79416. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/79416/1/MPRA_paper_79416.pdf
7.
AitkenB., HarrisonA., & LipseyR. E. (1996). Wages and foreign ownership: A comparative study of Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States. Journal of International Economics, 40(3–4), 345–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01410-1
8.
AnyanwuJ. C. (2011). International remittances and income inequality in Africa. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 4(1), 117–148.
9.
BalciogluH. (2018). The impacts of inward and outward FDI on income inequality in Turkey and selected Turkic republics. Ecoforum Journal, 7(1), 1–8.
10.
BangJ. T., MitraA., & WunnavaP. V. (2016). Do remittances improve income inequality? An instrumental variable quantile analysis of the Kenyan case. Economic Modelling, 58, 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.04.004
11.
BarhamB., & BoucherS. (1998). Migration, remittances, and inequality: Estimating the net effects of migration on income distribution. Journal of Development Economics, 55(2), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(98)90038-4
12.
BayerC., & HanckC. (2013). Combining non-cointegration tests. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 34(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2012.00814.x
13.
BrownR. P., & JimenezE. (2008). Estimating the net effects of migration and remittances on poverty and inequality: Comparison of Fiji and Tonga. Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, 20(4), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1474
14.
BrownR. P. C., & ConnellJ. (1993). Migration and remittances in Tonga and western Samoa, Vol. 1: Main report. Bangkok: ILO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.14217/9781848599239-8
15.
CalderónC., & ChongA. (2001). External sector and income inequality in interdependent economies using a dynamic panel data approach. Economics Letters, 71(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00374-3
16.
ClarkeG. R., XuL. C., & ZouH. F. (2006). Finance and income inequality: What do the data tell us?Southern Economic Journal, 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2006.tb00721
17.
DickeyD. A., & FullerW. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
18.
DuY., ParkA., & WangS. (2005). Migration and rural poverty in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(4), 688–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2005.09.001
19.
FalzoniA. M., & SoldanoK. L. (2014). Remittances and inequality in Eastern European countries. University of Bergamo.
20.
FisherRA (1932) Statistical methods for research works (4th ed), London: Oliver and Boyd.
21.
GalorO., & ZeiraJ. (1993). Income distribution and macroeconomics. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297811
22.
GopinathM., & ChenW. (2003). Foreign direct investment and wages: A cross-country analysis. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 12(3), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963819032000132067
23.
GubertF., LassourdT., & Mesplé-SompsS. (2010). Do remittances affect poverty and inequality?Evidence from Mali. Working Papers DT/2010/08, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
24.
HerzerD., & NunnenkampP. (2011). FDI and income inequality: Evidence from Europe(No. 1675). Kiel Working Paper.
25.
KoechlinV., & LeonG. (2007). International remittances and income inequality: An empirical investigation. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 10(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870701346514
26.
LiangZ. (2006). Financial development and income distribution: A system GMM panel analysis with application to urban China. Journal of Economic Development, 31(2), 1.
27.
LipseyR. E., & SjöholmF. (2004). Foreign direct investment, education and wages in Indonesian manufacturing. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2002.12.004
28.
MarkusenJ. R., & VenablesA. J. (1997). The role of multinational firms in the wage-gap debate. Review of International Economics, 5(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9396.00068
29.
McKenzieD., & RapoportH. (2007). Network effects and the dynamics of migration and inequality: Theory and evidence from Mexico. Journal of Development Economics, 84(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.11.003
30.
OlowaO. W., & AwoyemiT. T. (2012). Determinants of migration and remittances in rural Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 4(7), 191–198.
31.
ParamatiS. R., & NguyenT. P. T. (2019). Does financial market growth improve income distribution? A comparison of developed and emerging market economies of the global sample. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24(1), 629–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1683
32.
PerronP. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57(6), 1361–1401.
33.
PolpibulayaS. (2015). Trade openness and income inequality. All Theses. 2505. https://open.clemson.edu/all_theses/2505
34.
RodriguezE. R. (1998). International migration and income distribution in the Philippines. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46(2), 329–350. https://doi.org/10.1086/452341
35.
SharmaC., & ParamatiS. R. (2018). Measuring inequality of opportunity for the backward communities: Regional evidence from the Indian labour market. Social Indicators Research, 138(2), 479–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1676-3
36.
WahibaN. F. (2015). Trade openness and inequality. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 3(6), 1–12.
37.
World Bank. (2016). Migration and remittances factbook 2016. World Bank. Global Knowledge Partnership on Migration and Development, 3.
38.
ZhangQ., & ChenR. (2015). Financial development and income inequality in China: An application of SVAR approach. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.159
