Market Orientation and Export Performance under ASEAN–India Free Trade Agreement: The Case of India’s Rubber and Rubber Products

Abstract

The countries involved in the ASEAN–India Free Trade Agreement (AIFTA) are major producers/exporters of tropical commodities including natural rubber (NR). India is the sixth largest producer and second largest consumer of NR in the world. The country is also a major importer of NR and exporter of rubber products. The import of NR worth US$ 785.44 million and export earnings of rubber products worth US $244.17 million from ASEAN region during the year 2017–18 indicated the importance of AIFTA in the rubber sector of India. Therefore, an in-depth analysis on the pattern and specialisation of rubber and rubber products exported from India is done using trade indicators such as revealed comparative advantage, regional orientation, intra-industry trade and Galtonian regression. The results indicate no considerable change after the establishment of AIFTA in the pattern and specialisation in exports of rubber and rubber products from India to ASEAN.

Keywords

Natural rubber rubber products ASEAN–India free trade agreement export inverted duty regional orientation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balassa

(1965). ‘Trade liberalization and “revealed” comparative advantage’. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies , 33(2): 99–123.

Chandran

B. P. S.

(2009). Economic impact of regional trade agreements: A study of ASEAN and its implications on India (PhD Thesis). Goa University, Goa, India.

Dalum

Laursen

Villumsen

(1998). ‘Structural change in OECD export specialization patterns: De-specialization and ‘stickiness’. International Review of Applied Economics , 12(3): 423–443.

George

K T.

Joseph

(2014). ‘Rubber and rubber products tariffs and protection in the ASEAN-India agreement’. Economic and Political Weekly , XLIX (1): 22–25.

Harilal

K. N.

(2010). ASEAN-India free trade area: Noises of dissent from deep south (Occasional Paper). Kerala State Planning Board, Kerala, India.

IRSG. (2017). Rubber Statistical Bulletin Oct-Dec 2017 . Singapore: International Rubber Study Group.

Jha

(2017). ‘Competitiveness in agricultural trade under India ASEAN Trade Agreement’, in Sharma

Sachin Kumar

Bathla

Seema

(Eds.). Indian agriculture under multilateral and regional trade agreements (pp. 71–89). New Delhi: Bookwell Publishers.

Joseph

Jacob

(2018). ‘Over-dependence of Indian rubber industry on imported natural rubber: The question of long-term sustainability’. Rubber Science , 31(1): 1–9.

Joseph

George

K. T.

(2016a). ‘ASEAN-India free trade agreement and India’s balance of trade in rubber and rubber products: A preliminary assessment’. Rubber Science , 29(1): 1–6.

10.

Joseph

George

K. T.

(2016b). ‘Exclusion list under AIFTA: Priorities and strategies of ASEAN and India on rubber and rubber products’. Rubber Asia , 31(1): 70–74.

11.

Pal

Dasgupta

(2009). ‘The ASEAN-India free trade agreement: An assessment’. Economic and Political Weekly , 44(38): 11–15.

12.

Plummer

M. G.

Cheong

Hamanaka

(2010). Methodology for impact assessment of free trade agreements . Manila: Asian Development Bank.

13.

Rubber Board. (2018). Monthly Rubber Statistical News . Rubber Board, 76(9): 1–4.

14.

Shinoj

Matur

V. C.

(2008). ‘Comparative advantage of India in agricultural exports vis-á-vis Asia: A post-reforms analysis’. Agricultural Economics Research Review , 21(1): 60–66.

15.

Veeramani

Saini

G. K.

(2010). Impact of ASEAN-India preferential trade agreement on plantation commodities: A simulation analysis (NRPPD Discussion Paper 2). Kerala: Centre for Development Studies.

16.

Viner

(1950). The Customs Union Issue . New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

17.

WITS. World Integrate Trade Solutions . Retrieved from https://wits.worldbank.org (accessed on 3 August 2018).