A white-collar offender’s role and the organizational culture in which the crime occurs affects subjective evaluations of offender culpability. However, how they affect responsibility attributions and punitiveness is unclear. We examine attribution processes by conducting a factorial experiment to test a proposed model. We test attribution theory derived predictions using innovative methods of scale creation and nonparametric analyses. Participants attribute more responsibility and are more punitive of individuals and offenders in organizational cultures where illegality is atypical. Our five proposed dimensions of responsibility are predictive of responsibility attributions, and path analysis shows offender role and offense environment affect how the five dimensions of responsibility affect attributions. Our findings have implications for criminal justice and adjudication processes and corporate regulation.
ApplegateB. K.CullenF. T.FisherB. S.Vander VenT. (2000). Forgiveness and fundamentalism: Reconsidering the relationship between correctional attitudes and religion. Criminology, 38, 719–754.
2.
AshforthB. E.GioiaD. A.RobinsonS. L.TrevinoL. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33, 670–684.
3.
AshforthB. E.VikasA. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.
4.
BlumsteinA.CohnJ. (1980). Sentencing of convicted offenders: An analysis of the public’s view. Law & Society Review, 14, 233–261.
5.
CochranJ. K.BootsD. P.ChamlinM. B. (2006). Political identity and support for capital punishment: A test of attribution theory. Journal of Crime and Justice, 29, 45–79.
6.
DaneF. C.WrightsmanL. S. (1982). Effects of defendants’ and victims’ characteristics on jurors’ verdicts. In KerrN. L.BrayR. M. (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 83–111). Academic Press.
7.
El ZeinM.SeikusC.De-WitL.BahramiB. (2019). Punishing the individual or the group for norm violation. Wellcome Open Research, 4, 139.
8.
GaileyJ. A. (2013). Attribution of responsibility for organizational wrongdoing: A partial test of an integrated model. Journal of Criminology, 2013, 1–10.
9.
GaileyJ. A.FalkR. F. (2008). Attribution of responsibility as multidimensional concept. Sociological Spectrum, 28, 659–680.
10.
GaileyJ. A.LeeM. T. (2005a). An integrated model of attribution of responsibility for wrongdoing in organizations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 338–358.
11.
GaileyJ. A.LeeM. T. (2005b). The impact of roles and frames on attributions of responsibility: The case of cold war human radiation experiments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1067–1088.
12.
GaileyJ. A.LeeM. T. (2008). Influences and the assignment of responsibility for wrongdoing in organizational settings. Sociological Focus, 41, 71–86.
13.
GottschalkP. (2012). Rotten apple or rotten barrel: An empirical study of white-collar criminals in Norway. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 3, 167–177.
14.
GuisoL.SapienzaP.ZingalesL. (2015). The value of corporate culture. Journal of Financial Economics, 117, 60–76.
15.
HamiltonV. L. (1978). Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology, 41, 316–328.
16.
HamiltonV. L. (1986). Chains of command: Responsibility attribution in hierarchies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 118–138.
17.
HamiltonV. L.SandersJ. (1981). The effects of roles and deeds on responsibility judgements: The normative structure of wrongdoing. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 237–254.
18.
HamiltonV. L.SandersJ. (1995). Crimes of obedience and conformity in the workplace: Surveys of Americans, Russians, and Japanese. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 67–89.
19.
HamiltonV. L.SandersJ. (1996). Corporate crime through citizens’ eyes: Stratification and responsibility in the United States, Russia, and Japan. Law and Society Review, 30, 513–547.
20.
HamiltonV. L.HagiwaraS. (1992). Roles, responsibility, and accounts across cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 156–179.
21.
HamiltonV. L.RytinaS. (1980). Social consensus on norms of justice. Should the punishment fit the crime?American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1117–1144.
22.
HansV. P.ErmannM. D. (1989) Responses to corporate versus individual wrongdoing. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 151–166.
23.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
24.
JonesE. E.DavisK. (1965). From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 220–226). Academic Press.
25.
KelleyH. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–240). University of Nebraska Press.
26.
McIverJ. P.CarminesE. G. (1981). Unidimensional scaling. Sage.
27.
MichelC. (2017). Was it justified? Applying attribution theory to corporate violence. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40, 155–172.
28.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill.
29.
O’ReillyC. (1989). Corporations, culture and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31, 9–25.
30.
O’ReillyC.ChatmanJ. (1996). Culture as social controls: Corporations, cults, and commitment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 157–200.
31.
SandersJ.HamiltonL. V.DenisovskyG.KatoN.KawaiM.KozyrevaP.KuboT.MatskovskyM.NishimuraH.TokoroK. (1996). Distributing responsibility for wrongdoing inside corporate hierarchies: Public judgements in three societies. Law and Social Inquiry, 21, 815–855.
32.
Schell-BuseyN.SimpsonS. S.RorieM.AlperM. (2016). What works? A systematic review of corporate crime deterrence. Criminology & Public Policy, 15, 387–416.
33.
ScholtenW.EllemersN. (2016). Bad apples or corrupting barrels? Preventing traders’ misconduct. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 24, 366–382.
34.
ShapiroS. P. (1990). Collaring the crime, not the criminal: Liberating the concept of white-collar crime. American Sociological Review, 55, 346–365.
35.
ShaverK. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. Springer-Verlag.
36.
SimsB. (2003). The impact of causal attribution on correctional ideology: A national study. Criminal Justice Review, 28, 1–25.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ. H. (1982). Sex-based differences in the sentencing of adult criminal defendants: An empirical test and theoretical overview. Sociology and Social Research, 66, 289–304.
39.
SutherlandE. H. (1940). White-collar criminality. American Sociological Review, 5, 1–12.
40.
Van RoojiB.FineA. (2018). Toxic corporate culture: Assessing organizational processes of deviancy. Administrative Sciences, 8, 23–61.
41.
WhyteD. (2016). It’s common sense, stupid! Corporate crime and techniques of neutralization in the automobile industry. Crime, Law and Social Change, 66, 165–181.
42.
WobbrockJ. O.FindlaterL.GergleD.HigginsJ. J. (2011, May7–12). The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11), Vancouver, British Columbia. ACM Press, pp. 143–146.
43.
WoolfolkR. L.DorisJ. M.DarleyJ. M. (2006). Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition, 100, 283–301.
44.
WuenschK. L.CampbellM. W.KeslerF. C.MooreC. H., (2002). Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 587–600.
