Since the early 2000s, a number of Western capitalist states, including Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom, have enacted criminal laws aimed at holding corporations to account for negligently killing workers or members of the public. In the United States, however, the existing respondeat superior (vicarious liability) regime remains intact. Drawing insight from semistructured interviews with corporate lawyers, nongovernmental representatives, union/labor leaders, and academics, I argue the relative impunity for corporate killing in the United States has its roots in corporate power and related beliefs in law and economics scholarship. This article documents how corporate offending is downplayed through hegemonic ideals that corporations are inherently good and law-abiding and any “bad apples” can be dealt with through existing law and market forces. In this respect, the recent rollback of various social protections is not simply a result of Trump’s presidency but instead a product of the neoliberal political, economic, and moral order.
AinslieE. (2006). Indicting corporations revisited: Lessons of the Arthur Andersen prosecution. American Criminal Law Review, 43(107), 107–142.
2.
BarakG. (2017). Unchecked corporate power: Why the crimes of multinational corporations are routinized away and what we can do about it. Routledge.
3.
BittleS. (2012). Still dying for a living: Corporate criminal liability after the Westray mine disaster. UBC Press.
4.
BittleS. (2013). Cracking down on corporate crime? The disappearance of corporate criminal liability legislation in Canada. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 11(2), 45–62.
5.
BittleS.StinsonL. (2018). Corporate killing law reform: A spatiotemporal fix to a crisis of capitalism?Capital and Class, 43(2), 251–270.
6.
BoxS. (1983). Power, crime and mystification. Tavistock.
7.
BruffI. (2019). Overcoming the allure of neoliberalism’s Market Myth. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 118 (2), 363–379.
8.
BucyP. H. (2009). Corporate criminal liability: When does it make sense?American Criminal Law Review, 46, 1437–1457.
9.
ButlerB. E. (n.d.). Law and economics. Internet encyclopedia of philosophy: A peer-reviewed. Academic Resource. https://www.iep.utm.edu/law-econ/
CoplandJ. (2010). Regulation by prosecution: The problems with treating corporations as criminals (Civil Justice Rep. No. 13). Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.
12.
DriesenD. M.MalloyR. P. (2015). Critiques of law and economy. In ParisiF. (Ed.), Oxford handbook on law and economics (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.
13.
FischelD. R.SykesA. O. (1996). Corporate crime. Journal of Legal Studies, 25(2), 319–349.
14.
FrauleyJ.PearceF. (2007). Critical realism and the social sciences: Methodological and epistemological preliminaries. In FrauleyJ.PearceF. (Eds.), Critical realism and the social sciences: Heterodox elaborations. University of Toronto Press.
15.
GlasbeekH. (2002). Wealth by stealth: Corporate crime, corporate law, and the perversion of democracy. Between the Lines.
16.
GlasbeekH. (2007). The corporation as a legally created site of irresponsibility. In PontellH. N.GeisG. (Eds.), International handbook of white-collar and corporate crime. Springer.
17.
GlasbeekH. (2013). Missing the targets—Bill C-45: Reforming the status quo to maintain the status quo. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 11(2), 10–23.
18.
GlasbeekH. (2017). Class privilege: How law shelters shareholders and coddles capitalism. Between the Lines.
19.
GlasbeekH. (2018). Capitalism: A crime story. Between the Lines.
GreenbergJ.BrotmanE. (2014). Strict vicarious criminal liability for corporations and corporate executives: Stretching the boundaries of criminalization. American Criminal Law Review, 51, 79–98.
22.
HébertJ.BittleS.TombsS. (2019). Obscuring corporate violence: Corporate manslaughter in action. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 58(4), 554–579.
23.
HorwitzM. J. (1980). Law and economics: Science or politics?Hofstra Law Review, 8(4), 905–912.
24.
KhannaV. S. (1996). Corporate criminal liability: What purpose does it serve?Harvard Law Review, 109(7), 1477–1534.
25.
KramerR. C. (1984). Corporate criminality: The development of an idea. In HochstedlerE. (Ed.), Corporate criminals (pp. 13–37). Sage Publications.
26.
LauferW. (2006). Corporate bodies and guilty minds: The failure of corporate criminal liability. The University of Chicago Press.
27.
LynchM. J.BarrettK. L.StreteskyP. B.LongM. A. (2016). The weak probability of punishment for environmental offenses and deterrence of environmental offenders: A discussion based on US EPA criminal cases, 1983–2013. Deviant Behavior, 37(10), 1095–1109.
28.
MayerJ. (2016). Dark money: The hidden history of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right. Anchor Books.
29.
McKennaB. (2004). Critical discourse studies: Where to from here?Critical Discourse Studies, 1(1), 9–39.
30.
NaderR. (2018). To the ramparts: How bush and Obama paved the way for the Trump presidency, and why it isn’t too late to reverse the course. Seven Stories Press.
31.
PalermoG. (2017). Competition: A Marxist view. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2017, 41(6), 1559–1585.
32.
PaternosterR. (2016). Deterring corporate crime: Evidence and outlook. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(2): 383–386.
33.
PearceF. (1976). Crimes of the powerful: Marxism, crime and deviance. Pluto Press.
34.
PearceF.TombsS. (1998). Toxic capitalism: Corporate crime in the chemical industry. Ashgate.
35.
PeckJ. (2010). Constructions of neoliberal reasoning. Oxford University Press.
Schell-BuseyN.SimpsonS. S.RorieM.AlperM. (2016). What works? A systematic review of corporate crime deterrence. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(2), 387–416.
39.
SniderL. (2000). The sociology of corporate crime: An obituary (or: whose knowledge claims have legs?). Theoretical Criminology, 4(2), 196–206.
40.
SniderL. (2015). About Canada: Corporate crime. Fernwood.
41.
TombsS. (2016). The UK’s corporate killing law: Un/fit for purpose?Criminology and Criminal Justice, 18(4), 488–507.
42.
TombsS.WhyteD. (2015). The corporate criminal: Why corporations must be abolished. Routledge.
43.
WeissmannA.ZieglerR.McLoughlinL.McFaddenJ. (2008). Reforming corporate criminal liability to promote responsible corporate behaviour. Prepared for the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform.
44.
WellsC. (2001). Corporations and criminal responsibility. Clarendon.
45.
WhyteD. (2018). The autonomous corporation: The acceptable mask of capitalism. King’s Law Journal, 29(1), 88–110.
46.
WhyteD.WiegratzJ. (Eds.) (2016). Neoliberalism and the moral economy of fraud. Routledge.
