HuxleyJ, deBeerG. Elements of Experimental Embryology. Hafner Publishing Co.: New York; 1963.
2.
CannonWB. The wisdom of the body. W. W. Norton & Company: New York; 1932.
3.
GurwitschAG. A Biological Field Theory. Sovetskaya Nauka: Moscow; 1944.
4.
GurwitschAG. Principles of Analytical Biology and the Theory of Cellular Fields. Sovetskaya Nauka: Moscow; 1991.
5.
WaddingtonCH. The strategy of the genes; a discussion of some aspects of theoretical biology. Allen & Unwin: London; 1957.
6.
BonnerJT. Morphogenesis; an essay on development. Atheneum: New York; 1963.
7.
MaturanaHR, VarelaFJ. Autopoiesis and Cognition the Realization of the Living. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht; 1980.
8.
VarelaFG, MaturanaHR, UribeR. Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Curr Mod Biol1974;5(4):187–196.
9.
PiagetJ. Behaviour and Evolution. Routledge: London; 1976.
10.
AshbyWR. An introduction to cybernetics. John Wiley and Sons: New York; 1956.
11.
AshbyWR. Design for a brain. Chapman & Hall: London; 1952.
12.
Farinella-FerruzzaN. The transformation of a tail into a limb after Xenoplastic transformation. Experientia1956;12(8):304–305.
13.
FankhauserG. Maintenance of normal structure in heteroploid salamander larvae, through compensation of changes in cell size by adjustment of cell number and cell shape. J Exp Zool1945;100(3):445–455; doi: 10.1002/jez.1401000310
14.
FankhauserG. The effects of changes in chromosome number on amphibian development. Q Rev Biol1945;20(1):20–78; doi: 10.2307/2809003
15.
BeckerRO, SeldenG. The body electric: electromagnetism and the foundation of life. William Morrow Paperbacks: New York; 1985.
16.
BurrHS, NorthropFSC. The electro-dynamic theory of life. Q Rev Biol1935;10(3):322–333.
17.
BurrHS. Blueprint for immortality; the electric patterns of life. Random House UK Ltd: London; 1972.
18.
LevinM. Revisiting Burr and Northrop’s “The electro-dynamic theory of life” (1935). Biol Theory2020;15(2):83–90; doi: 10.1007/s13752-020-00341-y
19.
ConeCD, TongierM. Control of somatic cell mitosis by simulated changes in the transmembrane potential level. Oncology1971;25(2):168–182.
20.
ConeCD. Unified theory on the basic mechanism of normal mitotic control and oncogenesis. J Theor Biol1971;30(1):151–181.
21.
ConeCD.Jr., Variation of the transmembrane potential level as a basic mechanism of mitosis control. Oncology1970;24(6):438–470.
22.
NuccitelliR, RobinsonK, JaffeL. On electrical currents in development. Bioessays1986;5(6):292–294.
23.
JaffeLF. The role of ionic currents in establishing developmental pattern. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci1981;295(1078):553–566.
24.
JaffeLF, NuccitelliR. Electrical controls of development. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng1977;6:445–476.
25.
NuccitelliR. A two-dimensional extracellular vibrating probe for the detection of trans-cellular ionic currents. J Cell Biol1986;103(5):A519.
26.
NuccitelliR. Ionic currents in development. Alan R. Liss: New York; 1986.
27.
GrulerH, NuccitelliR. Neural crest cell galvanotaxis - New data and a novel-approach to the analysis of both galvanotaxis and chemotaxis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton1991;19(2):121–133.
28.
BorgensRB. Electric fields in vertebrate repair: natural and applied voltages in vertebrate regeneration and healing. Alan R. Liss: New York; 1989.
29.
ShiR, BorgensRB. Three-dimensional gradients of voltage during development of the nervous system as invisible coordinates for the establishment of embryonic pattern. Dev Dyn1995;202(2):101–114.
30.
RobinsonKR, MesserliMA. Electric embryos: The embryonic epithelium as a generator of developmental information. In: Nerve Growth and Guidance. (McCaigCD. ed.) Portland Press: London; 1996; pp. 131–150.
31.
HotaryKB, RobinsonKR. Endogenous electrical currents and voltage gradients in Xenopus embryos and the consequences of their disruption. Dev Biol1994;166(2):789–800.
LundEJ. Bioelectric fields and growth. University of Texas Press: Austin; 1947.
35.
LevinM, ErnstSG. Applied DC magnetic fields cause alterations in the time of cell divisions and developmental abnormalities in early sea urchin embryos. Bioelectromagnetics1997;18(3):255–263; doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1997)18:3<255::AID-BEM9>3.0.CO;2-1
36.
LevinM, ErnstSG. Applied AC and DC magnetic fields cause alterations in the mitotic cycle of early sea urchin embryos. Bioelectromagnetics1995;16(4):231–240; doi: 10.1002/bem.2250160405
37.
LevinM, JohnsonRL, SternCD, et al.A molecular pathway determining left-right asymmetry in chick embryogenesis. Cell1995;82(5):803–814; doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90477-8
38.
LevinM, MercolaM. Gap junction-mediated transfer of left-right patterning signals in the early chick blastoderm is upstream of Shh asymmetry in the node. Development1999;126(21):4703–4714.
39.
LevinM, MercolaM. Gap junctions are involved in the early generation of left-right asymmetry. Dev Biol1998;203(1):90–105; doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9024
40.
MathewsJ, LevinM. Gap junctional signaling in pattern regulation: Physiological network connectivity instructs growth and form. Dev Neurobiol2017;77(5):643–673; doi: 10.1002/dneu.22405
41.
Palacios-PradoN, BukauskasFF. Heterotypic gap junction channels as voltage-sensitive valves for intercellular signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2009;106(35):14855–14860; doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901923106
42.
WeirMP, LoCW. Gap junctional communication compartments in the drosophila wing disk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1982;79(10):3232–3235.
43.
LoCW, GilulaNB. Gap junctional communication in the post-implantation mouse embryo. Cell1979;18(2):411–422.
44.
LevinM, ThorlinT, RobinsonKR, et al.Asymmetries in H+/K+-ATPase and cell membrane potentials comprise a very early step in left-right patterning. Cell2002;111(1):77–89; doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00939-x
45.
AwS, AdamsDS, QiuD, et al.H,K-ATPase protein localization and Kir4.1 function reveal concordance of three axes during early determination of left-right asymmetry. Mech Dev2008;125(3–4):353–372; doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2007.10.011
46.
QiuD, ChengSM, WozniakL, et al.Localization and loss-of-function implicates ciliary proteins in early, cytoplasmic roles in left-right asymmetry. Dev Dyn2005;234(1):176–189; doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20509
47.
AdamsDS, RobinsonKR, FukumotoT, et al.Early, H+-V-ATPase-dependent proton flux is necessary for consistent left-right patterning of non-mammalian vertebrates. Development2006;133(9):1657–1671; doi: 10.1242/dev.02341
48.
VandenbergLN, LevinM. Perspectives and open problems in the early phases of left-right patterning. Semin Cell Dev Biol2009;20(4):456–463; doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.11.010
49.
VandenbergLN, LevinM. Far from solved: A perspective on what we know about early mechanisms of left-right asymmetry. Dev Dyn2010;239(12):3131–3146; doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22450
50.
VandenbergLN, LevinM. Consistent left-right asymmetry cannot be established by late organizers in Xenopus unless the late organizer is a conjoined twin. Development2010;137(7):1095–1105; doi: 10.1242/dev.041798
51.
LevinM. Bioelectric networks: The cognitive glue enabling evolutionary scaling from physiology to mind. Anim Cogn2023;26(6):1865–1891; doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01780-3
52.
LevinM. The computational boundary of a “Self”: Developmental bioelectricity drives multicellularity and scale-free cognition. Front Psychol2019;10(2688):2688; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02688
53.
SullivanKG, LevinM. Inverse drug screening of bioelectric signaling and neurotransmitter roles: Illustrated using a Xenopus tail regeneration assay. Cold Spring Harb Protoc2018;2018(3); doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot099937
54.
SullivanKG, LevinM. Neurotransmitter signaling pathways required for normal development in Xenopus laevis embryos: A pharmacological survey screen. J Anat2016;229(4):483–502; doi: 10.1111/joa.12467
55.
AdamsDS, LevinM. Inverse drug screens: A rapid and inexpensive method for implicating molecular targets. Genesis2006;44(11):530–540; doi: 10.1002/dvg.20246
56.
AdamsDS, MasiA, LevinM. H+ pump-dependent changes in membrane voltage are an early mechanism necessary and sufficient to induce Xenopus tail regeneration. Development2007;134(7):1323–1335; doi: 10.1242/dev.02812
57.
TsengAS, BeaneWS, LemireJM, et al.Induction of vertebrate regeneration by a transient sodium current. J Neurosci2010;30(39):13192–13200; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3315-10.2010
58.
AdamsD, MasiA, LevinM. Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration requires the activity of the proton pump V-ATPase, and proton pumping is sufficient to partially rescue the loss-of-function phenotype. Dev Biol2006;295(1):355–356.
59.
PaiVP, AwS, ShomratT, et al.Transmembrane voltage potential controls embryonic eye patterning in Xenopus laevis. Development2012;139(2):313–323; doi: 10.1242/dev.073759
60.
ChowRL, AltmannCR, LangRA, et al.Pax6 induces ectopic eyes in a vertebrate. Development1999;126(19):4213–4222.
61.
LevinM. The multiscale wisdom of the body: Collective intelligence as a tractable interface for next-generation biomedicine. Bioessays2025;47(3):e202400196; doi: 10.1002/bies.202400196
62.
LagasseE, LevinM. Future medicine: From molecular pathways to the collective intelligence of the body. Trends Mol Med2023;29(9):687–710; doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2023.06.007
BeckerRO, SpadaroJA. Electrical stimulation of partial limb regeneration in mammals. Bull N Y Acad Med1972;48(4):627–641.
65.
BorgensRB, VanableJWJr, JaffeLF. Bioelectricity and regeneration. I. Initiation of frog limb regeneration by minute currents. J Exp Zool1977;200(3):403–416.
66.
TsengA, LevinM. Cracking the bioelectric code: Probing endogenous ionic controls of pattern formation. Commun Integr Biol2013;6(1):e22595–e8; doi: 10.4161/cib.22595
67.
AdamsDS, TsengAS, LevinM. Light-activation of the Archaerhodopsin H(+)-pump reverses age-dependent loss of vertebrate regeneration: Sparking system-level controls in vivo. Biol Open2013;2(3):306–313; doi: 10.1242/bio.20133665
68.
LobikinM, LoboD, BlackistonDJ, et al.Serotonergic regulation of melanocyte conversion: A bioelectrically regulated network for stochastic all-or-none hyperpigmentation. Sci Signal2015;8(397):ra99; doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aac6609
69.
MorokumaJ, BlackistonD, AdamsDS, et al.Modulation of potassium channel function confers a hyperproliferative invasive phenotype on embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2008;105(43):16608–16613; doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808328105
70.
LobikinM, ChernetBT, LoboD, et al.Resting potential, oncogene-induced tumorigenesis, and metastasis: The bioelectric basis of cancer in vivo. Phys Biol2012;9(6):e065002; doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/6/065002
71.
ChernetBT, AdamsDS, LobikinM, et al.Use of genetically encoded, light-gated ion translocators to control tumorigenesis. Oncotarget2016;7(15):19575–19588; doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8036
72.
ChernetBT, FieldsC, LevinM. Long-range gap junctional signaling controls oncogene-mediated tumorigenesis in Xenopus laevis embryos. Front Physiol2014;5:519; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00519
73.
ChernetBT, LevinM. Transmembrane voltage potential of somatic cells controls oncogene-mediated tumorigenesis at long-range. Oncotarget2014;5(10):3287–3306; doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1935
74.
ChernetBT, LevinM. Endogenous voltage potentials and the microenvironment: Bioelectric signals that reveal, induce and normalize cancer. J Clin Exp Oncol2013;Suppl 1:S1–S002; doi: 10.4172/2324-9110.S1-002
75.
ChernetBT, LevinM. Transmembrane voltage potential is an essential cellular parameter for the detection and control of tumor development in a Xenopus model. Dis Model Mech2013;6(3):595–607; doi: 10.1242/dmm.010835
76.
CerveraJ, PietakA, LevinM, et al.Bioelectrical coupling in multicellular domains regulated by gap junctions: A conceptual approach. Bioelectrochemistry2018;123:45–61; doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.04.013
77.
PietakA, LevinM. Exploring instructive physiological signaling with the Bioelectric Tissue Simulation Engine (BETSE). Front Bioeng Biotechnol2016;4:55; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00055
78.
PaiVP, PietakA, WillocqV, et al.HCN2 rescues brain defects by enforcing endogenous voltage pre-patterns. Nat Commun2018;9(1):998; doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03334-5
79.
PaiVP, LevinM. HCN2 channel-induced rescue of brain, eye, heart and gut teratogenesis caused by nicotine, ethanol and aberrant notch signaling. Wound Repair Regen2022;30(6):681–706; doi: 10.1111/wrr.13032
80.
PaiVP, CerveraJ, MafeS, et al.HCN2 channel-induced rescue of brain teratogenesis via local and long-range bioelectric repair. Front Cell Neurosci2020;14(136):136; doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00136
81.
MarshG, BeamsHW. Electrical control of morphogenesis in regenerating dugesia tigrina. I. Relation of axial polarity to field strength. J Cell Comp Physiol1952;39(2):191–213; doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030390203
82.
MarshG, BeamsHW. Electrical control of growth axis in a regenerating annelid. Anat Rec1950;108(3):512.
83.
MarshG, BeamsHW. Electrical control of axial polarity in a regenerating annelid. Anat Rec1949;105(3):513–514.
84.
MarshG, BeamsHW. Electrical control of growth polarity in regenerating dugesia- tigrina. Fed Proc1947;6(1 Pt 2):163–164.
85.
NogiT, LevinM. Characterization of Innexin gene expression and functional roles of gap-junctional communication in planarian regeneration. Dev Biol2005;287(2):314–335; doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.09.002
86.
OviedoNJ, MorokumaJ, WalentekP, et al.Long-range neural and gap junction protein-mediated cues control polarity during planarian regeneration. Dev Biol2010;339(1):188–199; doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.12.012
87.
DurantF, BischofJ, FieldsC, et al.The role of early bioelectric signals in the regeneration of planarian anterior/posterior polarity. Biophys J2019;116(5):948–961; doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.01.029
88.
DurantF, MorokumaJ, FieldsC, et al.Long-term, stochastic editing of regenerative anatomy via targeting endogenous bioelectric gradients. Biophys J2017;112(10):2231–2243; doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.011
89.
SundelacruzS, MoodyAT, LevinM, et al.Membrane potential depolarization alters calcium flux and phosphate signaling during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Bioelectricity2019;1(1):56–66; doi: 10.1089/bioe.2018.0005
90.
SundelacruzS, LevinM, KaplanDL. Comparison of the depolarization response of human mesenchymal stem cells from different donors. Sci Rep2015;5:18279; doi: 10.1038/srep18279
91.
SundelacruzS, LevinM, KaplanDL. Depolarization alters phenotype, maintains plasticity of predifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A2013;19(17–18):1889–1908; doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0425.rev
92.
SundelacruzS, LevinM, KaplanDL. Membrane potential controls adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One2008;3(11):e3737; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003737
93.
HartlB, LevinM. What does evolution make? Learning in living lineages and machines. Trends Genet2025;41(6):480–496; doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2025.04.002
94.
LevinM, MartyniukCJ. The bioelectric code: An ancient computational medium for dynamic control of growth and form. Biosystems2018;164:76–93; doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.08.009
95.
PinotsisDA, MillerEK. In vivo Ephaptic coupling allows memory network formation. Cereb Cortex2023;33(17):9877–9895; doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad251
96.
PinotsisDA, FridmanG, MillerEK. Cytoelectric coupling: Electric fields sculpt neural activity and “tune” the brain’s infrastructure. Prog Neurobiol2023;226:102465; doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102465
97.
PinotsisDA, MillerEK. Beyond dimension reduction: Stable electric fields emerge from and allow representational drift. Neuroimage2022;253:119058; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119058
98.
MooreDG, ValentiniG, WalkerSI, et al.Inform: Efficient information-theoretic analysis of collective behaviors. Front Robot AI2018;5(60):60; doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00060
99.
MooreD, WalkerSI, LevinM. Cancer as a disorder of patterning information: Computational and biophysical perspectives on the cancer problem. Converg Sci Phys Oncol2017;3(4):e043001.
100.
RosenbluethA, WienerN, BigelowJ. Behavior, purpose, and teleology. Philos of Sci1943;10(1):18–24.