Abstract
Background:
Dating apps are a common way to meet partners, yet little is known about how autistic adults use and experience these platforms. Existing studies are few, consist of small samples, and none have specifically focused on disclosure decisions, responses to disclosure, or experiences of victimization. This study examined autistic adults’ use of dating apps, focusing on the connections formed, decisions about disclosing an autistic identity, responses received, and experiences of victimization.
Methods:
We employed a convergent mixed-methods design, using an online survey to collect quantitative and qualitative data. Eligible participants were autistic adults (professionally diagnosed or self-identified) with experience using dating apps or websites. In total, 102 participants completed the survey. We analyzed quantitative data using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests. We analyzed qualitative open-text responses through conventional content analysis.
Results:
Most participants (83.3%) had met someone in person through dating apps, forming long-term (49%), short-term (41.2%), or casual connections (43.1%). More than half (54.5%) chose not to disclose their autistic identity in their profiles, although some disclosed later in interactions. Disclosure was motivated by authenticity, filtering for compatible partners, and avoiding misunderstandings. Reasons for nondisclosure included fear of stigma and safety concerns. Responses to disclosure ranged from acceptance and reciprocal disclosure to stereotyping, ghosting, and stigma. Victimization was widespread: 40% received unwanted sexually explicit messages, and 43% reported verbal abuse. Women and nonheterosexual participants reported significantly higher rates and a greater variety of victimization experiences than men and heterosexual participants.
Conclusion:
Dating apps provide autistic adults with meaningful opportunities for connection but also expose them to stigma and victimization. Disclosure decisions are shaped by weighing authenticity and safety. Findings highlight the need for safer, more inclusive online dating environments and broader societal efforts to reduce autism stigma.
Community Brief
Why is this an important issue?
Many autistic adults want meaningful relationships yet face barriers to forming them. Dating apps are now one of the most common ways people meet partners, but little is known about how autistic adults experience these platforms. Dating apps may offer real benefits for autistic people seeking connection, but there are also possible pitfalls, such as how safe the platforms feel to use, how others respond to disclosure of being autistic, and experiences of harassment or exploitation. Understanding these experiences is important for autistic adults and their families, as well as for the people and services that support them, so that online spaces can be made safer and more inclusive.
What was the purpose of this study?
This study set out to learn about autistic adults’ use of dating apps: The types of connections they make, how they decide whether or not to disclose they are autistic, how others respond when they do disclose, and what kinds of negative experiences they face, such as harassment or abuse.
What did the researchers do?
The research team, which included autistic researchers and family members of autistic people, designed an online survey with both multiple-choice and open-ended questions. A total of 102 autistic adults (57 women, 34 men, 9 nonbinary participants, and 2 agender) completed the survey. We asked participants about the dating apps they used, the kinds of relationships they were seeking, if and when they disclosed, responses they received, and whether they had faced harassment or other harmful experiences.
What were the results and conclusions of the study?
Most participants (over 80%) had met someone in person through dating apps, and many had formed long-term or short-term relationships or casual connections such as hook-ups or friendships. Negative experiences were common: Around 40% received unwanted sexually explicit messages, and many reported verbal abuse. Women and nonheterosexual participants faced higher rates and a wider variety of victimization compared with men and heterosexual participants. Just over half chose not to disclose that they were autistic on their profiles, though some chose to disclose later on. Reasons for disclosing included wanting to be authentic, filtering for compatible partners, and preventing misunderstandings. Reasons for not disclosing included fear of stigma, rejection, or exploitation. Responses to disclosure were mixed: While some received curiosity, respect, or support, others reported ghosting, stereotyping, or dismissive reactions.
What is new or controversial about these findings?
This is the first study to specifically focus on autistic adults’ disclosure decisions, responses to disclosure, and online victimization when using dating apps. The results show that autistic adults are forming a wide range of relationships online, while also pointing to some difficulties they may face in digital spaces.
What are potential weaknesses in the study?
Most participants were from Australia, and many were White and college-educated, so the findings may not reflect the experiences of all autistic adults. The study also relied on people’s own reports, which can be shaped by memory and personal perspective.
How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?
These findings can help autistic adults by showing that dating apps can be a real way to meet people and build connections, while also making clear what challenges might come up. Knowing both the positives and the difficulties can help autistic people decide how, when, and whether to use dating apps. The study may also encourage app designers and services to create safer, more supportive spaces. In the longer term, it points to the need for greater understanding and acceptance of autism so that online dating becomes more welcoming and inclusive for everyone.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
