Abstract
This study involves the petrographic and geochemical assessment of Neoproterozoic metasandstones associated with the Buem Structural Unit (BSU) ophiolite in northwest Benin Republic in order to infer their tectonic setting, provenance history, and weathering in the source area. Petrographically, the metasandstones are quartz-rich with subordinate K-feldspar content and classified as quartz-rich and sublitharenite on the relevant geochemical scheme. The REE spider diagram of the rocks exhibits positive peaks for Ba, Hf and Zr and a negative peak for Sr on the chondrite profile. The chemical indexes of alteration, including CIA (23.06–80.92), PIA (16.07–62.64) and K2O/Na2O (average: 18.89) values, suggest minor to moderate weathering for the metasandstones of the BSU. On the provenance discrimination diagrams of La/Yb versus Ce, La/Th versus Hf and La/Sc versus Th/Co, BSU metasandstone samples plot predominantly in the felsic parentage field. This implies that the sediments mainly derive from felsic igneous rocks with a minor contribution from intermediate and mafic igneous sources. Tectonic setting discrimination diagrams suggest a passive continental margin in a collisional setting. The paleoclimatic condition evaluation based on major elements indicates semihumid to humid conditions. The petrographic and geochemical features of the metasandstones are consistent with siliciclastic rocks formed in a passive continental margin, similar to the West African Craton terrane. The deposition of these sediments may have started from the early stage of rifting until the Pan-African collision involving the WAC, Sahara metacraton, and Benin-Nigerian Shield, from which the Dahomeyide orogenic belt formed. These results place positive constraints on the rift–subduction–collision geodynamic model proposed for the evolution of the Dahomeyide orogen.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
