Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Deep eutectic solvents are a new class of biodegradable, inexpensive and environmentally friendly solvents. These solvents are created by combining quaternary ammonium salts, which can be converted into liquids at temperatures lower than their melting points. Recently, researchers in various fields have shown increased interest in deep eutectic solvents as alternatives for dissolving oxides in metal extraction processes. Electrochemical studies have demonstrated successful dissolution of some oxide minerals in these solvents, while results have been less consistent for others. This review focuses on the dissolution of sulphide ores in deep eutectic solvents. Arsenopyrite and pyrite exhibit similar thermodynamic properties, as well as comparable stability and solubility in aqueous solutions. Pyrite has been successfully dissolved using choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents; however, challenges have been noted in dissolving arsenopyrite with these solvents. The review also proposes that successful dissolution of arsenopyrite in deep eutectic solvents can occur at atmospheric pressure and relatively low temperatures through direct leaching.

Graphical Abstract

This is a visual representation of the abstract.

Keywords

Arsenopyrite deep eutectic solvents leaching sulphide ores ionic liquids

Introduction

Precious metals such as gold, silver, platinum group metals and non-precious metals such as copper, lead, nickel and zinc are indispensable industrial raw materials due to their special properties, such as corrosion resistance, high density and excellent ductility. The demand for these metals continues to rise despite the near depletion of the high-grade ore sources globally for applications in technology, the medical industry, construction and many more.¹ Consequently, secondary-bearing ore sources are gradually becoming the alternative to primary-bearing ore sources, which contain reasonably higher concentrations that are easily processed. Additionally, low-grade ore reserves are abundant; however, they are characterised by complex mineral compositions and the metals in the sulphide ores are finely dispersed and locked up in the minerals with other precious metal associations, leading to the need for traditional methods.^2,3 Conventional techniques often give better recovery yields and are effective at concentrating low-grade ores. They do, however, present serious environmental problems, such as high energy prices, acid mine water drainage and SO₂ emissions. Additionally, aqueous solution hydrometallurgy is a more ecologically benign option, but it has slow leaching rates.⁴

Techniques currently employed include pressure oxidation, bioleaching, heap leaching, electrochemical dissolution and bench leaching, among many. However, these techniques are associated with the release of toxic gas emissions, acidic water and high energy consumption. Therefore, it is of paramount importance for researchers to explore or bring innovations to greener non-toxic processes which are non-toxic, energy efficient and harmless to both humans and the environment.⁵

Common secondary sources for precious and non-precious metals are pyrite, arsenopyrite and chalcopyrite. Mostly these ores are associated with gold, silver, platinum group metals and non-precious metals as finely dispersed particles within the matrix of the ore. Previously, a substantial number of researchers have invested in studying the dissolution of these ores in aqueous, alkaline and acidic solutions in the quest to understand the mechanism of dissolution. It has been reported that pyrite and arsenopyrite have similar thermodynamic properties and values of stability and solubility in aqueous solutions. However, arsenopyrite has been successfully leached through roasting, smelting, pressure oxidation and bioleaching. Moreover, this type of ore releases arsenic as its byproduct at higher temperatures.¹^6–8

Among these techniques, autoclaves for pressure oxidation and bioleaching are relatively safer compared to others, but their disadvantages are higher pressures and energies for the former and relatively lower recoveries for the latter.^1,8

Researchers have shown great interest recently, in exploring deep eutectic solvents as alternative solvents in dissolution of ores. These types of solvents emanate from a combination of quaternary salts of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors which are natural, non-toxic and biocompatible sources, including choline chloride, glycerol, lactic acid, sugars, urea and amino acids. Furthermore, it is reported that they can be reusable, resulting in a deep eutectic solvent solution that is biodegradable. Additionally, these solvents have very little volatility, which lowers air pollution, making them safer for the environment and people.^9–12

Studies have reported successful results in metal extraction from e-waste and wastewater and ores using deep eutectic solvents through different techniques such as electrodeposition, electropolishing and leaching. However, some techniques have been applied substantially relative to others, triggering the need for their optimisation.

A choline chloride–oxalic acid-based deep eutectic solvent was employed by Reyers et al. and Oke et al. in separate works. They both reported successful results, with the former achieving substantial gold recovery from a refractory gold ore, and the latter reported a successful 89.2% copper and 92.4% cobalt yield, respectively. Furthermore, Aragon-Tobar et al. (2024) carried out a solubility investigation on a variety of metal sulphates, oxides and sulphides, culminating in a successful dissolution from sulphides and recommending the inclusion of iodine. Similar conditions were followed by Karen et al. (2024), with the inclusion of iodine at different pH levels to ethylene glycol and choline chloride to dissolve sulphidic ores in DESs. The study discovered that neutral conditions yielded better results, followed by basic and acidic media. Moreover, S. Karimi and colleagues (2025) examined the electrochemical breakdown of chalcocite in a DES with the development of a sulphur passivation layer. Bidari et al. (2024) effectively investigated the leaching of sulphide flotation concentrate in oxidative and non-oxidative ethaline conditions, finding that chalcocite exhibited high oxidation rates, whereas pyrite oxidation was relatively low. However, the kind of oxidant utilised had a big impact on the rate of dissolution.^13–17

Consequently, the novel solvents have shown potential as an effective and sustainable replacement for conventional extraction techniques in the gold mining sector. Several studies indicate that the high solubility, low volatility, good conductivity, as well as the thermal and chemical stability of deep eutectic solvents have made them beneficial in a variety of applications, including hydrometallurgy processes. Furthermore, these solvents have been proven promising in removing valuable metals from mine and industrial waste, despite their primary disadvantages of high viscosity, poor chemical stability, challenges with recycling and reuse.^18–20 Although there is still much to learn about the development of deep eutectic solvents in gold extraction, the initial findings are encouraging. However, to completely comprehend the potential and constraints of deep eutectic solvents in gold extraction, more research and developments are necessary as this field of study develops. In addition, determining whether they are viable for extensive industrial application will require investigating their environmental impact and economic viability. Moreover, this review aims to address the possibility of solubilising arsenopyrite in deep eutectic solvents at atmospheric pressure and low temperatures.

Deep eutectic solvent background

Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) started with the innovative works of Abbott and his group and are now widely accepted as a revolutionary class of ionic liquids (ILs). They are the results of a eutectic mixture of Lewis or Brønsted acids and bases able to contain diverse species of anions and cations. DESs are systems including non-symmetric ions with a large size, low lattice energy, and low melting point. They are generally formed by a composite including a quaternary ammonium salt with a hydrogen bond donor (HBD), which can be a metal salt, while the melting point of the system must be lower than that of the individual components, as shown in Figure 1. The decrease in the melting point in DES systems is the result of charge delocalisation happening through hydrogen bonding.¹²

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of a eutectic point on a binary mixture for choline chloride–urea DESs (A + B).

DESs exhibit many properties compared to Ionic Liquid (IL) solvents and share several characteristics. However, they were named deep eutectic solvents to distinct them from ILs, because DESs refer to the liquid phase at room temperature of the eutectic composite caused by the mixtures, whereas ILs consist of the liquid phase at room temperature of solvent-free molten salts caused by their low melting temperatures. Several species of anions and cations can be used in DES systems; however, in IL systems, only discrete anions and cations are allowed, confirming that DESs and ILs are two different kinds of solvents.^21–23

Synthesis of deep eutectic solvents

The synthesis of DESs is done by mixing two or three cost-effective and safe components that can be self-associated through hydrogen bond interaction, followed by moderate heating with constant stirring. The components frequently used in the preparation of DESs are cheap and non-toxic, e.g., hydrogen bond acceptors (HBAs), such as choline chloride (2-hydroxyethyltrimethylammonium), which is vitamin B4, and diverse hydrogen bond donors (HBDs), such as urea, ethylene glycol and glycerol.^22,24

The viscosity and conductivity of DESs are strongly dependent on the mixture and the nature of the HBD. That is why their properties can easily be designed for a specific application. In 2014, Abbott et al. described the general formula for DESs:^22,24,25

C a t + X - z Y

(1)

where Cat⁺ is any ammonium, phosphonium or sulphonium cation and X is a Lewis base (halide anion). The interaction between X⁻ and either a Lewis or Brønsted acid Y forms the complex anionic species (z is related to the number of Y molecules interacting with the anion).

The general formula described by Abbott et al. revealed that DESs are categorised into four classes, which are according to the nature of components used.²⁵ Additionally, Table 1 shows the distinction of the classes given below.

Table 1.

Differences between classes I, II, III and IV.

Differences among deep eutectic solvent classes
Class I	Class II	Class III	Class IV
A combination of metal chlorides and organic salts	A combination of metal chlorides and ammonium salts	A combination of ammonium salts and organic hydrogen donors	A combination of metal halides and organic hydrogen bond donors
High melting points	Low melting points from water inclusion	Low melting point	High melting point
Choline chloride + ZnCl₂	Choline chloride + CoCl₂·6H₂O	Choline chloride + urea	Urea + ZnCl₂

_v Class I : Cat⁺X⁻ _z MCl _x

v Class II : Cat⁺X⁻ _z MCl _x _y H₂O

v Class III : Cat⁺X⁻ _z RZ

Class IV : MCl _x + RZ = MCl⁺ _x ₋ ₁·RZ + MCl⁻ _x ₊ ₁

Class I refers to an analogous type of DES formed with metal halide and imidazolium salts. However, the drawback is that the number of non-hydrated metal halides with a low melting point to generate Class I DESs is limited. That is why Class II emerged.

The difference between Class II and Class I is that the presence of the inherent water in Class II allows the system to accommodate various hydrated metal halides as HBDs to prepare DESs. Thus, many DESs based on choline chloride with many hydrated metal halides as HBDs were synthesised. Class II is aimed at solving the issue observed in Class I related to the limited number of non-hydrated metal halides. The availability and the low cost of hydrated metal halides used in Class II have permitted their large-scale industrial preparation.

Class III allows the usage of a large range of transition metal species, among which are chlorides and oxides as hydrogen bond donors (HBDs), along with choline chloride as a hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA).^24,25

Most of the IL solvents in the liquid form at room temperature are prepared using organic cations, among which are ammonium, phosphonium and sulphonium moieties. The use of inorganic cations was unsuccessful due to the high charge density of the majority of inorganic cations, causing them not to form low-melting-point eutectics.²⁵ Moreover, it was unbelievable for them to normally ionise in non-aqueous media. Surprisingly, certain studies have reported that it is feasible to form eutectic melting points of <150 °C from the complex of metal halides with urea. On the other hand, it was shown that ZnCl₂ could form eutectics with urea, acetamide, ethylene glycol and 1,6-hexanediol. Relying on these studies, Abbott et al. have confirmed that certain transition metals can be blended into room-temperature eutectics. Thus, they termed this DES system as Class IV .²⁶

Properties of deep eutectic solvents

Generally, it is highly desired that DESs be in a liquid form at ambient temperature so they can be used as solvents for various applications; nevertheless, this is not always the case. The liquid phase of DESs is the result of their freezing point.²²

Freezing point (ΔTf)

The eutectic point of many synthesised DESs is identified by the freezing point (ΔTf). The freezing point (ΔTf) is known as the temperature at which the liquid becomes a solid at ambient atmospheric pressure. It is the most crucial factor for the expansion of the usage of DESs in various applications. However, it can be measured by the use of Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC).²⁷ The freezing point (ΔTf) of DESs is lower than that of the components they are made of. They are strongly linked to the magnitude of the interactions between components. For instance, for a complex made of a binary mixture (A + B); the stronger the interaction between A and B, the better the freezing point. However, those interactions occur differently depending on the DES classes. This section discusses only three of them (classes I, II and III).

In Class I, the interactions are affected by the melting point of the metal halide used. It was observed that, in this system, the eutectic can be produced at room temperature if the metal halide possesses a melting point of about 300 °C or less. In such cases, interactions occur between the quaternary ammonium salts (especially metal halides and halide anions), which will all yield the same halometallate species with the same enthalpies of formation. That is why most of the metal halides able to produce room temperature eutectics in this system have a melting point of approximately or less than 300 °C. In addition, when the quaternary ammonium salts possess a lower melting point, they yield a lower eutectic point as well. For instance, imidazolium halides C₂mimCl (mp = 87 °C) and C₄mimCl (mp = 65 °C) exhibit a superior phase behaviour and mass transport when they are used with ChCl (301 °C).²³

The metal halide hydrates are used to synthesise Class II DESs. The waters of hydration in this system play an important role in decreasing the melting point of metal salts, since they also decrease the lattice energy. Therefore, the interactions are affected by the hydrophobic state of the system.²⁸ For example, Jhong et al. have used water to decrease the melting point of a system composed of choline iodide and glycerol below the ambient temperature.

In Class III , the depression of the freezing point is linked to the mass fraction of the hydrogen bond donor (HBD), because in this system, the eutectic point relies on the formation of hydrogen bonds between the hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA) and the hydrogen bond donor (HBD) (halide anion of the salt and the HBD). Thus, the interaction is affected by the molar ratio of the components used (e.g., a complex made of ChCl and urea at a molar ratio of 1 : 2 produces a freezing point of 12 °C.²²

Density

Density is a substantial physical property that permits the identification of the nature of elements in the environment. It is one of the most crucial physical property of solvents. However, most of the DESs display higher densities than water, which can be attributed to several factors, among which are the molar ratio used to make the complex, the molecular organisation of the DES system, and the hole theory (the hole theory is discussed in detail below). The DES density is usually measured by the use of a special gravity meter. Moreover, the experimental determination of the density of DESs as a function of temperature is sometimes a difficult goal to achieve. Therefore, some other methods were developed to record the measured results with more accuracy, among which the Rackett equation was used to determine the density of DESs with an error of ±1.9%.²⁹

d s a t = d c \times B - (1 - T / T c) N

(2)

where d_sat is the liquid phase for the Rackett equation and T_c and d_c are the critical temperature and critical density, respectively.

Viscosity

Viscosity is the most important property of a solvent, which describes its fluidity and its resistance to flow. DESs exhibiting low viscosities are highly desired. However, apart from DESs made of ChCl–ethylene glycol (EG), the viscosities of most of the DESs are relatively high (>100 cP) at ambient temperature, limiting their use in some cases. Generally, these high viscosities are attributed to many factors, among which are: the existence of many hydrogen bond networks between components within DESs reducing the mobility of free species, the electrostatic forces or van der Waals interactions, the chemical nature of the DES complex (the types of ammonium salts and hydrogen bond donors, organic salt/hydrogen bond donor's molar ratio, etc.), the water content and the temperature. The viscosities of many DESs are functions of the temperature; when it increases, the viscosity decreases. The viscosity–temperature relationship can be explicated by using the Arrhenius model (see equation (3)).²⁸ Nevertheless, DESs with low viscosity can also be designed by the use of small cations or fluorinated HBD, the molar ratio of the complex and by the use of the hole theory.²⁵ Moreover, the viscosity of the binary eutectic complex is principally affected by the HBD and the electrostatic and van der Waals interactions.²² The viscosity of DESs can be measured by using a Brookfield R/S rheometer.²⁷

μ = μ^{\circ} e^{[\frac{E_{μ}}{R T}]}

(3)

where $μ °$ is the viscosity, µe is a pre-exponential factor, E_μ is the viscosity activation energy, R is the gas constant and T is the temperature in centigrade.

Ionic conductivity

Ionic conductivity is a crucial parameter for the choice of solvents for diverse applications. It indicates the existing chemicals dissolved in the solution, which means, the higher the conductivity is, the more dissolved ionic species are present and moving freely within the solution.²⁸ In the DES system, the ionic conductivity is proportional to the inverse of the viscosity, which means that when one increases, one decreases, and vice versa. However, most of the DESs display lower ionic conductivities at ambient temperature (2 mS cm⁻¹), since they exhibit higher viscosities at room temperature. Nevertheless, considering the great impact that certain factors discussed above, such as the molar ratio of the complex and the temperature, might have to decrease the viscosities, it can also be concluded that the ionic conductivity can also be influenced at the same time. For instance, it was reported that the increase in the ionic conductivity of DESs increases as the ChCl content increases in a complex.³⁰ Moreover, the ionic conductivity behaviour as a function of temperature can also be determined by using an Arrhenius-like equation (see equation (4)).²³

S = S^{\circ} e^{[\frac{- E_{S}}{R T}]}

(4)

where S is the conductivity in μs/cm,

S^{\circ}

e is the pre-exponential factor, E_S is the activation energy of electrical conduction, R is the gas constant and T is the temperature in K.

Hole theory

The main drawback of a lot of DESs is their viscosity, which is relatively higher at ambient temperature, causing lower ionic conductivities. This situation limits their usage in certain cases. However, among several factors discussed above that can be applied to decrease the viscosity, the hole theory is also recognised as one of the important factors due to the ability to design low viscosity DESs by applying it. Some studies have been done to understand the fluid properties of DESs. Thus, it was assumed that the ionic material includes empty spaces (holes) which emerge due to the temperature during the melting and allow the ions to move effortlessly, passing each other. However, those holes comprise random sizes and locations and undergo constant flux. Moreover, the sizes of holes in the molten salts possess the same dimensions as those of the corresponding ions, making it difficult for the ions to enter the vacant holes, impeding the mobility of the ions. That is why high viscosity is recorded (101–103 Pa).^30–32 It is generally easy for ions with small sizes to get access into the holes, resulting in DESs with low viscosities. Nevertheless, the size of the hole can also be influenced by the thermal temperature, which means, a lower temperature system produces smaller holes. In addition, the radius of the average-sized hole is linked to the surface tension of the liquid (see equation (5)).^33,34 Moreover, the use of small ions can also help to design DESs with low viscosities.³⁵

4 π (r^{2}) = \frac{3.5 k T}{γ}

(5)

where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature and γ is the surface tension of the liquid.

Surface tension

Surface tension is an important physical factor to be addressed in diverse types of industrial and chemical applications, especially when those applications depend on the wettability of their systems.³⁶ The surface tension can reveal the intermolecular forces between molecules in the complex.³⁷ However, studies related to the surface tension of DESs are still scarce. Nevertheless, Abbott et al. have shown that the surface tension of DESs follows the direction of viscosity because it depends on the strength of intermolecular interactions, which favours the formation. In addition, the authors confirmed that in certain cases, the surface tension displays a linear correlation with the temperature, which can be verified through equation (6), and can also be measured by the use of an automated tensiometer.^23,30

σ = a + b T

(6)

where σ is the surface tension, T is the temperature (K) and a and b are constants.

DESs were previously used as alternative reaction media in chemical synthesis (especially in organic preparation).³⁸ Thereafter, they were used for electrochemical applications, whereby they were aimed at studying the physico-chemical properties. Then, in electroplating, electrodeposition, environmentally hazardous processes, electrocatalysis, batteries, supercapacitors and hydrometallurgy.^20,^39–45

Application of deep eutectic solvents in hydrometallurgy

The application of deep eutectic solvents started with the works of Abbott and his group with the solubility of metal oxides and electropolishing of stainless steels in choline chloride-based DESs.³¹ Consequently, these solvents gained attention in applications and have since been investigated in various metal oxides under different technologies for the extraction and purification of metals, particularly non-ferrous and rare earth metals.^46,47 Their low melting points and great solubility make them effective solvents for the extraction of metals, offering a more sustainable and environmentally benign alternative to traditional methods.⁴⁵

Electrochemical dissolution

Electrochemical dissolution is a process in which an ore or material is disassociated in a solvent due to an electrochemical reaction. The process emanates from an applied current into the solvent, resulting in the material breaking down and dissolving. The application can be either electrodeposition, electroplating or electropolishing. Several investigations have been conducted on the solubility of metal oxides in a range of deep eutectic solvents, and a growing number of groups are currently adopting DESs and ILs for solvometallurgy processing. Type III DESs have been shown to dissolve several metal oxides; ligands that can be utilised in these DESs include urea, thiourea and oxalate, which are well-known complexants for a range of metals.^48,49

The original matrix determines the extraction technique for metal oxides, which are generally only soluble in an aqueous acid or alkali and insoluble in most molecular solvents, requiring high purity as well as the final product's worth. Precipitation, ion exchange, electrodeposition, and cementation are the four basic techniques used to recover metals from solution. Under the current environmental protection requirements, all solutes must be eliminated before a solvent – typically water – is released into the environment. The most widely used technology for metals like copper, silver and gold is electrowinning or electrodeposition.⁵⁰ However, the disadvantage of the deposition process is the requirement of pH maintenance; complexing agents, like cyanide or ammonia, are used to regulate the solubility and properties of the deposit, and hydrogen gas and oxygen evolution may cause the metal deposit to become embrittled, reducing its quality and resulting in low current efficiencies. Although precipitation is an additional option, it typically yields deposits of salts such as hydroxides, sulphides or carbonates rather than the pure metal. Aluminium and chromium must be recovered through chemical or electrochemical reduction, which requires high temperatures and a lot of energy.^50,51

The drawback of these liquids is that they are all completely miscible with water and cannot be utilised for biphasic extraction, even though electrochemistry can be employed to separate metals from a complicated combination. In three DESs based on choline chloride, the solubility of 17 metal oxides in the elemental mass series Ti through to Zn has been reported.^49,51 Selectivity for extracting specific metals from complicated matrices is achieved by carefully selecting the hydrogen bond donor.⁵² Redox potentials in aqueous solutions can be selectively shifted by carefully selecting an appropriate ligand, and in theory, the same could be done in DESs with the same ligands: the relative strengths of potential metal–anion complexes are largely unknown and continue to be an important parameter to quantify.

Abbott et al. have just constructed the first such electrochemical series in two deep eutectic solvents. Using copper/zinc combinations as a model experiment, the scientists have demonstrated how the differential in redox potentials of the metals may be used to electrowin metals into their composite materials. Since copper has a higher redox potential than zinc, copper must be deposited first before zinc can be deposited, the cathode is modified, and the voltage is increased. The authors also show how to dissolve a variety of metals using iodine as a stable, reversible electrocatalyst. I²/I⁻ in a choline chloride : ethylene glycol DES was found to have a redox potential that is more positive than most known metals, and it was demonstrated to be able to oxidise and recover gold.⁵¹

The extraction of lead and zinc from electric arc furnace (EAF) dust has been done on a wide scale using a hybrid DES consisting of choline chloride, ethylene glycol and urea. Iron and aluminium oxides were insoluble in EAF dust, while only zinc and lead oxides were selectively absorbed by the DES. According to the electrochemical series in DESs, Pb would electrowin first over Zn; Pb was cemented using Zn dust because it was not economically worthwhile to extract it. According to tests, Zn could then be electrodeposited with a 75% current efficiency. The most cost-effective method, therefore, was to precipitate ZnCl using ammonia, filter off the precipitate, boil away the ammonia, and leave the DES behind to be used again. However, this is not a very efficient use of such a cheap metal. To evaluate the effectiveness of employing DESs for large-scale metal extraction, a pilot plant was built. It has been demonstrated that choline chloride : urea and choline chloride : malonic acid are efficient in eliminating copper oxides and fluorides from post-etch residues. Additionally, malonic acid-based liquids are effective in eliminating residues from the CF₄/O₂ etching of a copper-coated DUV photoresist. The removal of organic sulphides from fuels has also demonstrated potential for DESs.^51,53,54

The primary drawbacks of aqueous-based systems are their electrochemical stability, which is caused by constrained potential windows that cause gas evolution and hydrogen embrittlement, as well as passivation of deposits, electrodes, and substrates. DESs offer an advantage over aqueous and organic-based electrolytes because of their high solubility for metal salts, which strangely also includes metal oxides and hydroxides. Since non-soluble oxides and/or hydroxides can accumulate on the electrode surface, obstructing the target metal's ability to deposit and creating issues when thick metal films need to be deposited, passivation is frequently an issue in aqueous solutions. The high solubility of metal oxides and hydroxides in DESs prevents the passivation effect, allowing for easier deposition of thicker metal layers.⁵⁴

Electrodeposition application

DES has also shown great promise in electrodeposition procedures, where they can be used as electrolytes to deposit metals and alloys onto a range of substrates. They are suitable for electrodeposition applications due to their excellent conductivity and ability to dissolve a wide range of metal salts, which offer enhanced control over the deposition process and the quality of the materials deposited.^45–47

Sulphide ores

Arsenopyrite

Arsenopyrite has the chemical formula FeAsS, and it is rich in iron, sulphur and arsenic and bears gold. In solid solutions including other minerals such as sulphides and other base metal complexes, arsenic and antimony, gold can be found as submicroscopic inclusions or small particles. Arsenopyrite is monoclinic, resembling marcasite, according to Bueger et al. Each iron atom is encircled by a warped octahedron, with a triangle of three sulphur and three arsenic atoms on one side. The structure of arsenopyrite is intricate, made even more so by the mineral's near-constant twin distribution. Arsenopyrite frequently encapsulates gold.^55,56 Figure 2 shows a typical structure of arsenopyrite.

Figure 2.

Crystal structure of arsenopyrite.⁵⁷

According to Zadra et al., this kind of ore can be leached using cyanide to extract gold; however, recoveries are extremely low, below 70%, and pre-oxidation treatment is necessary to increase recoveries. According to Zadra et al., US Dept. of the Interior Bureau of Mines, R.I. 4843, arsenopyrite is a semiconducting mineral.

Pyrite

Gold is linked to pyrite in three different ways, as opposed to arsenopyrite:

finely distributed metallic gold particles, ranging from micro- to nano-sized, scattered throughout the heterogeneous zones of the pyrite crystal;

auriferous arsenopyrite micro-inclusions, primarily concentrated along fractures and inside arsenic-enriched zones; and

chemically blended gold with pyrite's crystal structure.

The presence of submicroscopic metallic gold particles (about 200 Å in diameter) in pyrite grains of an unoxidised ore of type ‘Carlin’ was discovered by Bakken et al. (1989) through high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Additionally, analyses conducted using an electronic microprobe on arsenic-rich gold-bearing zones revealed that the correlation line As [at.-%]–Au [wt-%] coincides well with that of gold-bearing arsenopyrites with invisible gold, which could indicate the presence of only these submicroscopic auriferous arsenopyrite particles within the pyrite grains. Nevertheless, the spectra obtained by Môssbauer spectroscopy of 197 Au revealed a distinct nature of ‘invisible’ gold in pyrite compared to metallic gold or ‘invisible’ gold in arsenopyrite. Therefore, these Môssbauer spectra support the occurrence of coupled gold with pyrite chemically, while the precise nature of the bond type is yet unknown.^55,56,58

The presence of arsenic in the sulphide crystal lattice, with a complex and heterogeneous distribution within crystals, is one of the primary properties of pyrite linked to gold mineralisation. The presence of various zonations, most commonly in the form of overgrowth bands created by complex arsenic enrichments, or else in the form of grains with a second phase, sometimes with a collomorphic texture, surrounding a ‘core’ of pyrite that is low in arsenic, reveals this distribution. Arsenic and gold concentrations in pyrite are often positively correlated, regardless of the type of zonation. Figure 3 displays a pyrite's crystal structure.^6,56,58

Figure 3.

Crystal structure of pyrite.⁵⁹

Dissolution

The solid-state reaction kinetics are described by using the shrinking core model. According to this concept, the reaction proceeds inward from the surface of the solid reactant in a sequence of steps as shown in Figure 4. The solid reactant gets smaller as the reaction goes on because reactants are consumed and products are formed. The mass transfer rate of reactants through the product layer determines the reaction's overall rate, which is governed by the rate-limiting step. Solid-state reaction behaviour is frequently analysed and predicted using this model in a variety of industrial processes:

A solvent diffuses from the main fluid to the solid surface via the diffusion layer encircling the particle;

Solvent adsorption onto the mineral's (solid) surface and desorption of the product from the mineral surface;

A chemical or electrochemical reaction between the reagent and the mineral grains involving dissolution reactions; and

Transmission of the product through the diffusion layer or product layer formed as a result of the reaction with the reagent.⁶⁰

Figure 4.

Illustration of the steps occurring in the dissolution of metals from the mineral bearing ore.

The rate of a dissolution reaction can be enhanced through several physicochemical factors such as particle size, agitating speed, solid/liquid ratio, temperature, pH and the leaching solvent. Additionally, the surface area of the particles plays a crucial role in maximising the exposure of ore in the solvent. Reducing the particle size in a well-mixed system could cause the reaction rate to increase.⁶⁰ Moreover, the pulp density or the solid/liquid ratio may have an impact on the solution's thickness, which in turn may have an impact on the kinetics of the reaction or gold leaching.

It has been discovered that excessively high or low pulp densities might have an unfavourable effect on the efficacy of the gold leaching process. It is clear that overly thick pulps (solids) impede mass transfer and that diluted pulps cause high reagent addition rates and a loss of ore leaching residence time. The application of the shrinking core model for the solid–liquid systems in hydrometallurgy has been thoroughly studied.^61,62 Therefore, prior studies have acknowledged that in leaching trials using concentrated gold ores and gold-bearing ores, the kinetics of the gold leaching match the decreasing core model. Under the assumption that the ore is composed of uniform, spherical solid particles that react isothermally with the solvent, the dissolving rates of a sulphidic gold ore can thus be investigated using the shrinking core model.⁶³

The fundamental tenets of the shrinking core model are that the rate of reaction can be regulated by a chemical reaction occurring at the solid/solution interface; the rate can be regulated by diffusion of a dissolved reactant or product through the product layer of an inert mineral or the solid product formed during the reaction and the rate can be regulated by some chemical reactions occurring at the solid/solution interface.^64,65

Solubility

Solubility is the most crucial parameter in the extraction of precious minerals and metals from ores. The chemical makeup of the ore, the solution's temperature and pressure and the solvent's concentration are some of the variables that affect an ore's solubility in a solvent. Certain ores can dissolve easily in a specific solvent; however, others need specific solvents or circumstances to dissolve.⁶⁶

An ore's solubility plays a critical role in deciding how profitable and efficient the extraction process is. Greater extraction yields and faster dissolving are typically associated with higher solubility, whereas low solubility may call for extra processing steps or more aggressive solvents to obtain a good extraction process. For the purpose of creating efficient extraction procedures and maximising the recovery of important metals and minerals from natural deposits, it is imperative to comprehend the solubility of ores.^66,67

Moreover, it affects environmental and regulatory issues since some the solubility of metals and minerals may affect how likely it is that they are to leach into the nearby soil and water. Furthermore, very little research has attempted to simulate the solubility of metal oxides. A modified solution theory was employed by Shin et al.¹⁷ to forecast the solubility of a variety of inorganic compounds in supercritical water. It was demonstrated that the solubility of a solid solute may be expressed as follows:

Ln y = \frac{Δ H_{2}^{m}}{R T} (\frac{T}{T_{2}^{m}} - 1) - \frac{V_{2}}{R T} (δ_{1} - δ_{2}) (1 + \frac{V_{2}}{V_{1}}) Ln \frac{V_{2}}{V_{1}} – 1

(7)

where υ and δ stand for the molar volume and solubility parameters, and ΔH₂^m and T₂^m are the solute's melting and temperatures of fusion, respectively. However, due to the lack of other species, it was simplified according to equation (2).

Ln y = \frac{Δ H_{2}^{m}}{R T} (\frac{T}{T_{2}^{m}} - 1) + Constant

(8)

The dissolution mechanism of pyrite

The dissolution of pyrite in deep eutectic solvents is a multifaceted process involving both physical interactions between the solvent and the mineral surface and chemical reactions. To completely comprehend the mechanisms at work, more research is required. The process of pyrite dissolving in nitric acid is made up of both cathodic and anodic processes.⁵⁸ On the surface of the pyrite particle, anodic pyrite dissolution and cathodic oxidant reduction occur simultaneously. The potential difference across the interface between pyrite and the solution is what propels these reactions. The assumed general equation in a nitric acid dissolution process is shown in the equation below:^58,68

F e S_{2} (s) + 8 H N O_{3} (a q) \to F e_{2} + (a q) + S O_{4}^{2 -} (a q) + S_{0} (s) + 8 N O_{2} (g) + 4 H_{2} O (a q) .

(9)

Oxidation of pyrite is expressed as:

F e S_{2} + 4 H_{2} O \to F e^{2 +} + S O_{4}^{2 -} + S_{0} + 8 H^{+} + 8 e^{-} .

(10)

Reduction in the oxidant is expressed as:

N O^{3 -} + 2 H^{+} + e^{-} \to N O_{2} + H_{2} O .

(11)

Figure 5(a) and (b) depicts the proposed mechanism and thermodynamic dissolution of pyrite in an acid solution. It shows the ions at the pyrite mineral's surface, the species Fe²⁺ (aq.), SO (s), and SO₄²⁻ (aq.) being released into the bulk solution, and the oxidant (NO³⁻) absorbing the electrons released by S to form NOx_(g) or NO_2(g). Pyrite undergoes a redox process during the thermodynamic dissolution of pyrite in nitric acid, losing electrons and generating ferrous Fe²⁺ and ferric Fe³⁺ at a lower pH level. Sulphur is released as elemental sulphur, which eventually oxidises into sulphate (SO₄²⁻) at a higher potential.⁶⁸

Figure 5.

(a) Proposed mechanism for pyrite dissolution in a nitric acid solution.⁶⁸ (b) E_h versus pH diagram of the dissolution of pyrite.

The oxidation number of iron (Fe²⁺) remains unchanged in pyrite upon breaking of the connection between Fe²⁺ and S₂²⁻. Iron is the electropositive element in FeS₂, which explains why it transfers to the solution in its original form (without releasing an electron). Consequently, the pyrite lattice's iron oxidation number was +2, and the iron species that were liberated into the solution (Fe²⁺_(aq.)) were also +2. In an oxidative medium, it can, nevertheless, further oxidise to (Fe³⁺_(aq)). However, the electronegative element sulphur experiences recombining processes after losing one or more electrons.⁵⁵

Moreover, S. Temouri studied the kinetics of dissolving pyrite in nitric acid at atmospheric pressure. Changes in significant leaching parameters were used to study the oxidative dissolution of pyrite in a nitric acid solution. Pyrite dissolved between 72% and 95% in 3 M HNO₃ after 120 min of leaching at temperatures above 45 °C and up to 85 °C, according to the study. The strong oxidising capacity of HNO₃ produced a sufficient pyrite dissolution between 74% and 95% at nitric acid concentrations of 2.5 M to 4 M. Increased iron extraction from 75% to roughly 92% resulted from pyrite fraction size reduction from +150–212 µm to +53–75 µm. Fe extraction of 80% to 98% was obtained by increasing the stirring speed from 1000 rpm to 4000 rpm. Moreover, in deep eutectic solvents, certain DESs, like oxalic acid and choline chloride, have acidic characteristics that can cause the production of hydronium ions (H₃O⁺), which react with the pyrite surface to release sulphur and iron ions into the solvent. The chemical reaction of the dissolution of pyrite (FeS₂) in deep eutectic solvents (DESs) can be expressed as follows:^49,51,68

F e S_{2} (s) + 4 H + (a q) \to F e_{2} + (a q) + 2 H S - (a q) + 2 H_{2} S (g)

(12)

Hydrosulphide ions (HS⁻), hydrogen sulphide gas (H₂S) and ferrous ions (Fe²⁺) are the products of this interaction between the pyrite (FeS₂) solid and hydrogen ions (H⁺) in the deep eutectic solvent. Teimouri et al. (2023) investigated the dissolution of pyrite in a deep eutectic solvent from choline chloride and glycerin glycol at various pH and solid/liquid ratios to determine Fe extraction as a sign of any pyrite dissolution. Both oxidative and reductive principles are seen in the electrochemical behaviour of sulphide ore dissolving in DESs. The structure decomposes into sulphate and ferric ions. Furthermore, iron in pyrite undergoes oxidation to Fe³⁺, while sulphur undergoes oxidation to elemental sulphur (S⁰) or, at higher potentials, to sulphate (SO₄²⁻). Additionally, using density functional theory, Teimouri et al. looked into whether either of the two ligands supplied by DESs (Cl^– and/or [C₂H₄O₂]²⁻) could combine with Fe²⁺ or Fe³⁺ to produce the most stable combination. Consequently, the most likely and stable combination was determined to be the tetrahedral complex [Fe(C₂H₄O₂)₂]⁻ with the ligand [C₂H₄O₂]²⁻ by O-donor chelating with Fe³⁺.⁶⁸

Moreover, the Abbott group conducted research on pyrite in an ethaline DES; however, their main focus was on the feasibility of dissolving it using the electrolysis method with iodine acting as the oxidant. The other study investigated a unique electrochemical technique for determining the dissolving mechanism of a pyrite–ethaline paste on the Pt electrode. Figure 6 illustrates the dissolution rate from choline chloride and ethylene glycol, which shows the feasibility of deep eutectic solvent application in electrodeposition of metals, metallurgical extraction of ores under atmospheric conditions, and electrochemical techniques.^49,51

Figure 6.

Comparison of pyrite dissolution in 1 M HNO₃ and DESs.⁶⁹

The dissolution mechanism of arsenopyrite

According to Abbot et al. (2006), the first step in the dissolution of arsenopyrite (FeAsS) occurs when the mineral comes into contact with water or an acidic solution. This can result in the oxidation of Fe²⁺ in the mineral to form Fe³⁺ and the release of As³⁺ ions. The oxidation of Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺ can be represented by using the following equation:

F e A s S + 7 / 2 O_{2} + 3 H_{2} O \to F e^{3 +} + 2 S O_{4}^{2 -} + 2 H^{+} + A s^{3 +} .

(13)

Once the FeAsS mineral has been oxidised, the release of the As³⁺ ions can occur. This can lead to the formation of arsenic-bearing compounds or the release of arsenic into the surrounding environment. The overall dissolution reaction can be represented by the sum of the individual oxidation reactions according to the equation below:

F e A s S + 7 / 2 O_{2} + 3 H_{2} O \to F e^{3 +} + 2 S O_{4}^{2 -} + 2 H + + A s^{3 +} .

(14)

The reaction of dissolution of arsenopyrite can release toxic arsenic compounds into the environment, posing serious environmental and health risks. Therefore, the management of arsenopyrite waste is crucial to prevent the release of arsenic and its contamination of water sources and ecosystems.

Kuzas et al. studied the kinetics of dissolving arsenopyrite in nitric acid utilising the rotating disk method. The increase in temperature from 318 K to 333 K and nitric acid concentration from 4 M to 5 M was shown to significantly accelerate the rate at which arsenopyrite dissolves. Concurrently, the dissolving rates of iron and arsenic in the arsenopyrite composition increased by 30.1–30.4 times, respectively, from 0.26–0.27 × 10^–6 mol dm⁻² s⁻¹ to 7.83–8.21 × 10^–6 mol dm⁻² s⁻¹. The temperature is more important than the concentration of nitric acid. There is no discernible impact from the disk rotation frequency. The rate of dissolution is not significantly increased by increasing the temperature to 348 K.¹ The dissolution results are illustrated in Figure 7(a) to (d).

Figure 7.

Dependencies of the dissolution rates of iron (a and c) and arsenic (b and d) obtained by graphical differentiation on the nitric acid concentration (from 2 M to 5 M) and temperature (from 303 K to 348 K) at a disk rotation frequency of 10 rps after 3000 s.¹

However, DESs offer advantages relative to acid solvents with the potential of offering a similar mechanism. The chemical reaction for the dissolution of arsenopyrite (FeAsS) in deep eutectic solvents (DESs) can be expressed as follows:

F e A s S + 7 H^{+} + 6 C l^{-} \to F e^{2 +} + A s (I I I) + 3 H S^{-} + 3 S + 3 H_{2} O

(15)

Ferrous ions (Fe²⁺), trivalent arsenic (As(III)), hydrogen sulphide ions (HS⁻), elemental sulphur (S) and water (H₂O) are formed in this reaction when arsenopyrite (FeAsS) is dissolved in the DES. The precise process and products of the dissolving reaction can be influenced by the particular composition⁷⁰ of the deep eutectic solvent as well as the reaction conditions.

Deep eutectic solvents have often been favourable for the dissolution of pyrite compared to arsenopyrite. Consequently, a variety of scientific reports demonstrated its dissolution in DESs using various techniques of extraction, and had revealed that the dissolution of all minerals results in the formation of Fe(III); thus, the yellowish colour to orange confirms the presence of ferric iron as shown in Figure 8. The authors stated that for pyrite, it was assumed that both sulphur and Fe(III) were dissolved. However, the dissolution of arsenopyrite only resulted in arsenic and not sulphur or Fe(III). In the same direction, Jennifer et al. disclosed the colours of different solutions obtained after the bulk electrochemical dissolution of 2 g of mineral powder in a choline chloride-based DES. The depicted colours of pyrite and arsenopyrite in this work were those reported (see Figure 9). The work also denoted that the dissolution of arsenopyrite was considerably slower compared to the other oxide minerals.^25,70

Figure 8.

Image displaying a sample of ethaline before electrolysis (centre), after both reduction of pyrite (left) and oxidation of pyrite (right) at a constant potential of 2 V.⁴⁹

Figure 9.

Solution colour after bulk anodic dissolution of 2 g of mineral powder in 1ChCl : 2EG, at a constant current of 10 mA (except for loellingite-1, which was 5 mA) over 24 h at 50 °C.⁷⁰

The successful dissolution of arsenopyrite in DESs mostly occurred through the electrochemical process; though in many cases, the dissolution was reported to be very slow or did not occur at all. This could probably be attributed to the composition of DESs and the reaction conditions. In contrast, pyrite has been successfully dissolved in choline chloride-based DESs.

We recently started investigating the possibility of dissolving arsenopyrite in DESs through a direct leaching process at atmospheric pressure and low temperature, as revealed in Figure 10. Although the study is still ongoing, and many characterisation techniques are still being carried out to better understand the findings, we are delighted to disclose that the obtained DESs were favourable for the dissolution of arsenopyrite, as displayed in Figure 10(f), showing the photograph of different samples obtained after a direct leaching process of the received ore in DESs. Since the composition of DESs is crucial for a successful dissolution process, various physical parameters were selected and varied during the preparation of DESs. DESs were prepared by varying the molar ratios of the hydrogen donor. The hydrogen acceptor and donor were mixed into a beaker under vigorous stirring and aged for 30 min at 50 °C until a homogeneous liquid was obtained. Consequently, three types of DESs were prepared. Afterwards, a certain amount of arsenopyrite was put into each of the obtained DESs and kept under continuous stirring and at a constant temperature for different time periods ranging from 1 to 3 h. Abbott et al. demonstrated that the formation of Fe(III) occurs during the dissolution of all minerals, resulting in a yellowish to orange colour that confirms the presence of ferric iron.⁴⁹ Considering Abbott's statement, it is obvious that some samples shown in Figure 10(f) indicate the presence of ferric iron, which is depicted by the colour. This indicates that the obtained DESs are promising for the dissolution of arsenopyrite. However, more insights will be revealed after completing the characterisation process. Meanwhile, Figure 10(a) displays the mineralogical composition of the received ore recorded using an XRD Rigaku SmartLab X-ray diffractometer with CuKα (λ = 1.5418 Å) radiation. The XRD patterns indicate the presence of arsenopyrite, a high concentration of quartz, and a low concentration of pyrite.⁷¹ Furthermore, Figure 10(b) shows the SEM image captured by using a JEOL JSM-7800F FE-SEM coupled with an EDS Thermo Fisher Scientific, revealing the arsenopyrite spheres layered with crystal particles, presumably quartz. Meanwhile, Figure 10(c), along with Figure 10(d), displays the elemental composition of the received ore, disclosing the chemical elements such as Si, S, Fe, As, Ag and Au, which were identified by the XRD results earlier. However, the presence of carbon is attributed to the sample preparation before analysing to stabilise the particles from scattering. Figure 10(e) shows the mapping images of the received ore showing the elemental distribution within the ore. It was observed that a high concentration of quartz present as silica was seen, which was also witnessed in the XRD results. Moreover, the presence of gold in fine particles spread throughout the ore, iron, arsenic and sulphur was also observed. This proved that the received ore was that of arsenopyrite.

Figure 10.

(a) XRD patterns, (b) SEM image, (c) EDS spectrum, (d) mapping images of the received ore, (e) elemental composition and (f) the photograph of different samples obtained after direct leaching of the received ore in DESs.

Conclusion

This work aims to display the possible dissolution of arsenopyrite through direct leaching in deep eutectic solvents. Although arsenopyrite has shown partial to no dissolution in other previous works relative to pyrite, this current work has displayed partial results favouring the possible solubility of the sulphide ore in choline chloride-based DESs. The identity of the ore used in this work was confirmed by XRD and EDS. Although the current study is still underway due to other characterisation processes for a better insight into the findings, the preliminary results ensure that DESs are also promising for the dissolution of arsenopyrite through direct leaching.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Tshwane University of Technology, Department of Chemical, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering and the staffs for providing necessary supporting materials during the write-up of this review.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Endazenaw Bizuneh Chemere

References

Kuzas

Rogozhnikov

Dizer

, et al. Kinetic study on arsenopyrite dissolution in nitric acid media by the rotating disk method. Miner Eng [Internet] 2022; 187: 107770.

Youlton

Kinnaird

Youlton

. Depositional environment - The original control on gold processing. J South African Inst Min Metall 2021; 121: 267–276.

Ghorbani

Nwaila

Zhang

, et al. Moving towards deep underground mineral resources: Drivers, challenges and potential solutions. Resour Policy 2023; 80: 103222.

Baloyi

Ramdhani

Mbhele

, et al. Acid mine drainage from gold mining in South Africa: Remediation, reuse, and resource recovery. Mine Water Environ 2024; 43: 418–430.

Feng

Sun

Rui

, et al. Study of the “oxidation-complexation” coordination composite ionic liquid system for dissolving precious metals. Appl Sci 2020; 10: 3625.

Cardenas-vera

Macdonald

Lentz

. Trace element characteristics of pyrite and arsenopyrite from the golden ridge gold deposit. New Brunswick, Canada: Implications for Ore Genesis, 2023.

Tauson

Lipko

Kravtsova

, et al. Distribution of “invisible” noble metals between pyrite and arsenopyrite exemplified by minerals coexisting in orogenic Au deposits of North-eastern Russia. Minerals 2019; 9: 660.

Zhang

Yang

, et al. Column bio-oxidation of low-grade refractory gold ore containing high-arsenic and high-sulfur: Insight on change in microbial community structure and sulfide surface corrosion. Miner Eng [Internet] 2022; 175: 107201.

Ijardar

Singh

Gardas

. Revisiting the physicochemical properties and applications of deep eutectic solvents. Molecules 2022; 27: 1368.

10.

Husain

Abu-jdayil

. Natural deep eutectic solvent for exclusive and assured green enhanced oil recovery and other oil and gas applications : A review. J Mol Liq [Internet] 2025; 434: 128019.

11.

Torres-cornejo

Gerardo

Mendiola

. Applied sciences Deep Eutectic Solvents for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Natural Sources and Agricultural By-Products. 2021.

12.

Abbott

Boothby

Capper

, et al. Deep eutectic solvents formed between choline chloride and carboxylic acids: versatile alternatives to ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 2004; 126: 9142–9147.

13.

Oke

Fedai

Potgieter

. Hydrometallurgical Leaching of Copper and Cobalt from a Copper – Cobalt Ore by Aqueous Choline Chloride-Based Deep Eutectic Solvent Solutions. 2025.

14.

Faigal

JKA

Ferrer

CWB

Villalobos

LJM

, et al. Application of ethaline deep eutectic solvent for dissolution of gold in sulfidic refractory ore under varying pH. Met - Int Conf Metall Mater Conf Proc 2024; 2024: 479–490.

15.

Aragón-Tobar

Endara

de la Torre

. Dissolution of metals (Cu, Fe, Pb, and Zn) from different metal-bearing Species (sulfides, oxides, and sulfates) using three deep eutectic solvents based on choline chloride. Molecules 2024; 29: 290.

16.

Karimi

Mohammadpour

Izadi

. Investigation of electrochemical dissolution mechanism of chalcopyrite in choline chloride-urea deep eutectic solvent. Int J Eng Trans B Appl 2025; 38: 997–1009.

17.

Reyes

Bernard

Iii

, et al. Solvometallurgical extraction of refractory gold using deep eutectic solvents. Philippine Eng J 2025; 46: 1–14.

18.

Carlesi

Harris

Abbott

, et al. Chemical dissolution of chalcopyrite concentrate in choline chloride ethylene glycol deep eutectic solvent. Minerals 2022; 12: 65.

19.

Wang

Zhang

, et al. Deep eutectic solvents eutectogels: progress and challenges. Green Chem Eng [Internet] 2021; 2: 359–367.

20.

Smith

Abbott

Ryder

. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and their applications. Chem Rev 2014; 114: 11060–11082.

21.

Binnemans

Tom

. Ionic liquids and deep - eutectic solvents in extractive metallurgy : Mismatch between academic research and industrial applicability. J Sustain Metall [Internet] 2023; 9: 423–438.

22.

Richter

Ruck

. Synthesis and dissolution of metal oxides in ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents. Molecules 2020; 25: 78.

23.

Chakrabarti

Mjalli

Alnashef

, et al. Prospects of applying ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents for renewable energy storage by means of redox flow batteries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev [Internet] 2014; 30: 254–270.

24.

Mannu

Ferro

Colombo

, et al. From deep eutectic solvents to deep band gap systems. J Mol Liq [Internet] 2020; 301: 112441.

25.

Lomba

Ribate

Sangüesa

, et al. Applied sciences Deep Eutectic Solvents : Are They Safe ? 2021.

26.

Mgxadeni

Kabane

Bahadur

, et al. Deep eutectic solvents as sustainable solvents for industrial separation problems : A recent update. J Ion Liq [Internet] 2023; 3: 100065.

27.

Mukesh

Gupta

Srivastava

, et al. Preparation of a natural deep eutectic solvent mediated self polymerized highly flexible transparent gel having super capacitive behaviour. RSC Adv 2016; 6: 28586–28592.

28.

Tolmachev

Lukasheva

Ramazanov

, et al. Computer Simulations of Deep Eutectic Solvents : Challenges, Solutions, and Perspectives. 2022.

29.

Ibrahim

Hayyan

AlSaadi

, et al. Physical properties of ethylene glycol-based deep eutectic solvents. J Mol Liq [Internet] 2019; 276: 794–800.

30.

Abbott

. Model for the conductivity of ionic liquids based on an infinite dilution of holes. ChemPhysChem 2005; 6: 2502–2505.

31.

Abbott

Capper

Gray

. Design of improved deep eutectic solvents using hole theory. ChemPhysChem 2006; 7: 803–806.

32.

Abbott

Harris

Ryder

. Application of hole theory to define ionic liquids by their transport properties. J Phys Chem B 2007; 111: 4910–4913.

33.

Liu

Friesen

Mcalpine

, et al. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents: Properties, Applications, and Perspectives. 2018.

34.

Hammond

Westermann

, et al. Nanostructure of the deep eutectic solvent/platinum electrode interface as a function of potential and water content. Nanoscale Horiz 2019; 4: 158–168.

35.

Yusof

Abdulmalek

Sirat

, et al. Tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBABr)-based deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and their physical properties. Molecules 2014; 19: 8011–8026.

36.

Karbowiak

Debeaufort

Voilley

. Importance of surface tension characterization for food, pharmaceutical and packaging products: A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2006; 46: 391–407.

37.

Shahbaz

Mjalli

Hashim

, et al. Prediction of the surface tension of deep eutectic solvents. Fluid Phase Equilib [Internet] 2012; 319: 48–54.

38.

Abbott

Barron

Ryder

, et al. Eutectic-based ionic liquids with metal-containing anions and cations. Chem - A Eur J 2007; 13: 6495–6501.

39.

Liu

Hao

, et al. Recent advances in the application of deep eutectic solvents as sustainable media as well as catalysts in organic reactions. RSC Adv [Internet] 2015; 5: 48675–48704.

40.

Bahadori

Abdul Manan

Chakrabarti

, et al. The electrochemical behaviour of ferrocene in deep eutectic solvents based on quaternary ammonium and phosphonium salts. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2013; 15: 1707–1714.

41.

Sakita

AMP

Della Noce

Fugivara

, et al. On the cobalt and cobalt oxide electrodeposition from a glyceline deep eutectic solvent. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2016; 18: 25048–25057.

42.

Miller

Wainright

Savinell

. Iron electrodeposition in a deep eutectic solvent for flow batteries. J Electrochem Soc 2017; 164: A796–A803.

43.

Mondal

Sharma

Wang

, et al. Deep eutectic solvent promoted one step sustainable conversion of fresh seaweed biomass to functionalized graphene as a potential electrocatalyst. Green Chem 2016; 18: 2819–2826.

44.

Bhatt

Mondal

Bhojani

, et al. Preparation of bio-deep eutectic solvent triggered cephalopod shaped silver chloride-DNA hybrid material having antibacterial and bactericidal activity. Mater Sci Eng C [Internet] 2015; 56: 125–131.

45.

Jenkin

GRT

Al-Bassam

AZM

Harris

, et al. The application of deep eutectic solvent ionic liquids for environmentally-friendly dissolution and recovery of precious metals. Miner Eng 2016; 87: 18–24.

46.

Söldner

Zach

König

. Deep eutectic solvents as extraction media for metal salts and oxides exemplarily shown for phosphates from incinerated sewage sludge ash. Green Chem 2019; 21: 321–328.

47.

Migliorati

Sessa

D’Angelo

. Deep eutectic solvents: A structural point of view on the role of the cation. Chem Phys Lett X [Internet] 2019; 2: 100001.

48.

Abo-Hamad

Hayyan

AlSaadi

MAH

, et al. Potential applications of deep eutectic solvents in nanotechnology. Chem Eng J [Internet] 2015; 273: 551–567.

49.

Abbott

Al-Bassam

AZM

Goddard

, et al. Dissolution of pyrite and other Fe-S-As minerals using deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem 2017; 19: 2225–2233.

50.

Koll

DDB

Abbot

. Temperature structure and atmospheric circulation of dry tidally locked rocky exoplanets. Astrophys J [Internet] 2016; 825: 99.

51.

Abbott

Harris

Holyoak

, et al. Electrocatalytic recovery of elements from complex mixtures using deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem 2015; 17: 2172–2179.

52.

Häkkinen

Abbott

. Deep eutectic solvents—Teaching nature lessons that it knew already. Adv Bot Res 2021; 97: 1–16.

53.

Bystrzanowska

Tobiszewski

. Assessment and design of greener deep eutectic solvents – A multicriteria decision analysis. J Mol Liq [Internet] 2021; 321: 114878.

54.

Jafari

Fatemi

Estellé

. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs): A short overview of the thermophysical properties and current use as base fluid for heat transfer nanofluids. J Mol Liq 2021; 321: 114752.

55.

Park

Baltazar

Seno

, et al. Carrier-microencapsulation of arsenopyrite using Al-catecholate complex: Nature of oxidation products, effects on anodic and cathodic reactions, and coating stability under simulated weathering conditions. Heliyon [Internet] 2020; 6: e03189.

56.

Sazonov

Silyanov

Bayukov

, et al. Composition and ligand microstructure of arsenopyrite from gold ore deposits of the Yenisei ridge (Eastern Siberia, Russia). Minerals 2019; 9: 737.

57.

Fuess

Kratz

. Crystal structure refinement and electron microscopy of arsenopyrite. Z Kristallogr 1987; 346: 335–346.

58.

Zhang

Zhu

. Textural, trace elemental and sulfur isotopic signatures of arsenopyrite and pyrite from the Mandongshan gold deposit (west Junggar, NW China): Implications for the conditions of gold mineralization. Ore Geol Rev [Internet] 2021; 129: 103938.

59.

Arrouvel

Guillaume

Sorocaba

. Understanding the surfaces and crystal growth of pyrite FeS₂. Mat Res 2019; 22: 1–9.

60.

Baba

Ayinla

Adekola

, et al. A review on novel techniques for chalcopyrite ore processing. Int J Min Eng Miner Process 2012; 1: 1–16.

61.

Ferrier

Cai

Lin

, et al. Hydrometallurgy models for apparent reaction kinetics in heap leaching: A new semi-empirical approach and its comparison to shrinking core and other particle-scale models. Hydrometallurgy [Internet] 2016; 166: 22–33.

62.

Mashifana

Ntuli

Okonta

. Leaching kinetics on the removal of phosphorus from waste phosphogypsum by application of shrinking core model. South African J Chem Eng [Internet] 2019; 27: 1–6.

63.

Kianinia

Khalesi

Abdollahy

, et al. Predicting cyanide consumption in gold leaching: A kinetic and thermodynamic modeling approach. Minerals 2018; 8: 1–13.

64.

Dong

Mazzarino

Alexiadis

. Development of Solid – Fluid Reaction Models — A Literature Review. 2021.

65.

Moreno

Olwande

Myers

, et al. Approximate solutions to the shrinking core model.

66.

Selective

Methods

Applications

, et al. Efficient metal extraction from dilute solutions: A review of novel selective separation methods and their applications. Metals 2024; 14: 605.

67.

Rotich

Herdzik-koniecko

Smolinski

, et al. Recovery of Metals from Titanium Ore Using Solvent Extraction Process: Part 1 — Transition Metals. 2024.

68.

Teimouri

Potgieter

van Dyk

, et al. The kinetics of pyrite dissolution in nitric acid solution. Materials (Basel) 2022; 15: 4181.

69.

Teimouri

Potgieter

Billing

, et al. The feasibility of pyrite dissolution in the deep eutectic solvent ethaline: Experimental and theoretical study. J Mol Liq [Internet] 2023; 392: 123468.

70.

Hartley

Al-Bassam

AZM

Harris

, et al. Investigating the dissolution of iron sulfide and arsenide minerals in deep eutectic solvents. Hydrometallurgy [Internet] 2020; 198: 105511.

71.

Rogozhnikov

Karimov

Shoppert

, et al. Kinetics and mechanism of arsenopyrite leaching in nitric acid solutions in the presence of pyrite and Fe(III) ions. Hydrometallurgy [Internet] 2021; 199: 105525.

Application of deep eutectic solvents for dissolution of sulphide ores: Review

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Deep eutectic solvent background

Synthesis of deep eutectic solvents

Properties of deep eutectic solvents

Freezing point (ΔTf)

Density

Viscosity

Ionic conductivity

Hole theory

Surface tension

Application of deep eutectic solvents in hydrometallurgy

Electrochemical dissolution

Electrodeposition application

Sulphide ores

Arsenopyrite

Pyrite

Dissolution

Solubility

The dissolution mechanism of pyrite

The dissolution mechanism of arsenopyrite

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Funding

Declaration of conflicting interests

ORCID iD

References