This research aimed to map the application of machine learning (ML) methods in the metallurgical industry from 2000 to 2024, identifying key topics, trends, and future directions. A mixed-methods approach, combining bibliometric analysis, text mining, and content analysis, was employed. A total of 341 articles from Scopus and 249 from Taylor & Francis were reviewed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses method and an ad hoc selection of 10 key articles. The analysis revealed five main research areas: (1) Advances in ML and materials science; (2) innovation in additive manufacturing; (3) applications of ML algorithms in steel metallurgy; (4) predictive analytics and modeling; and (5) artificial intelligence and deep learning applied to metallurgy. Based on these findings, five future research directions were proposed, including process optimization using deep learning, prediction of alloy behavior, sustainable waste management, integration of digital twins, and addressing ethical and regulatory challenges.
LangeEF. Bessemer, Göransson and Mushet: A contribution to technical history. (No Title). 1913.
2.
GutiérrezAE. Evolución tecnológica del acero inglés y miner\’\ia vasca (1876-1930), in: Actas Del III Congreso de La Sociedad Española de Historia de Las Ciencias: San Sebastián. 1 al 6 de Octubre de 1984. pp. 165–176. 1986.
3.
KačurJFlegnerPDurdánM, et al.Prediction of temperature and carbon concentration in oxygen steelmaking by machine learning: A comparative study. Appl Sci (Switzerland)2022; 12: 7757. 10.3390/app12157757
4.
SuYWangXYeY, et al.Automation and machine learning augmented by large language models in a catalysis study. Chem Sci2024; 15: 12200–12233.
5.
JinLZhaiXWangK, et al.Big data, machine learning, and digital twin assisted additive manufacturing: A review. Mater Des2024; 244: 113086.
6.
ZhangZMativengaPZhangW, et al.Deep learning-driven prediction of mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel metallographic by Laser powder bed fusion. Micromachines (Basel)2024b; 15: 1167.
7.
ChengJLiXJiangK, et al.Machine-learning-assisted design of high strength steel I-section columns. Eng Struct2024; 308: 118018.
8.
SinghSKMahantaBKRawatP, et al.Machine learning-assisted design of high-entropy alloys for optimal strength and ductility. J Alloys Compd2024; 1007: 176282.
9.
AldhafferiN. Alternative cancer therapy through modeling pteridines photosensitizer quantum yield singlet oxygen production using swarm-based support vector regression and extreme learning machine. Cogent Eng2024; 11: 2301638. 10.1080/23311916.2023.2301638
10.
DasPPandeyPM. Multi-objective optimization and machine learning assisted design and synthesis of magnesium based novel non-equiatomic medium entropy alloy. J Alloys Compd2024; 985: 174066. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174066
11.
CotrinaMMarquinaJMamaniJ. Application of artificial neural networks for the categorization of mineral resources in a copper deposit in Peru. World J Eng2025a. 10.1108/WJE-01-2025-0004
12.
CotrinaMMarquinaJMamaniJ, et al.Predictive model using machine learning to determine fuel consumption in CAT-777F mining equipment. Int J Min Miner Eng2024a; 15: 147–160.
13.
CotrinaMMarquinaJPoloJ. Prediction of unit haulage cost in an underground mine using machine learning techniques. J Sustaina Min2025b; 24: 250–266.
14.
CotrinaMMarquinaJNoriegaE, et al.Predicting open pit mine production using machine learning techniques: A case study in Peru. J Min Environ2024b; 15: 1345–1355.
15.
MarquinaJCotrinaMMamaniJ, et al.Copper ore grade prediction using machine learning techniques in a copper deposit. J Min Environ2024c; 15: 1011–1027.
16.
Marquina-AraujoJJCotrina-TeatinoMACruz-GalvezJA, et al.Application of autoencoders neural network and K-means clustering for the definition of geostatistical estimation domains. Math Model Eng Proble2024d; 11: 1207–1218.
17.
David MoherALTetzlaffJAltmanDG. Res Methodes Report 2009.
18.
SnyderH. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res2019; 104: 333–339.
19.
RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston [WWW Document]. 2020.
20.
van EckNJWaltmanL. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics2010; 84: 523–538.
21.
AggarwalCCZhaiC. A survey of text classification algorithms. In: Mining text data. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012, pp.163–222. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3223-4_6.
22.
FeldmanRSangerJ. The Text Mining Handbook, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press, 2006, 10.1017/CBO9780511546914.
23.
KrippendorffK. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Sage Publications. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781. 2019.
24.
MayringP. Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. J Appl Math Phys2015: 365–380. 10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13
25.
YunJPShinWCKooG, et al.Automated defect inspection system for metal surfaces based on deep learning and data augmentation. J Manuf Syst2020; 55: 317–324.
26.
JohnsonNSVulimiriPSToAC, et al.Invited review: Machine learning for materials developments in metals additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf2020; 36. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101641
27.
ParkJChenZKiliarisL, et al.Intelligent vehicle power control based on machine learning of optimal control parameters and prediction of road type and traffic congestion. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2009; 58: 4741–4756.
28.
DiaoYYanLGaoK. Improvement of the machine learning-based corrosion rate prediction model through the optimization of input features. Mater Des2021; 198. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109326
29.
FangXLuoQZhouB, et al.Research progress of automated visual surface defect detection for industrial metal planar materials. Sensors (Switzerland)2020; 20: 1–35.
30.
MachakaR. Machine learning-based prediction of phases in high-entropy alloys. Comput Mater Sci2021; 188. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110244
31.
AydinF. The investigation of the effect of particle size on wear performance of AA7075/Al2O3 composites using statistical analysis and different machine learning methods. Adv Powder Technol2021; 32: 445–463.
32.
ZhengTHuXHeF, et al.Tailoring nanoprecipitates for ultra-strong high-entropy alloys via machine learning and prestrain aging. J Mater Sci Technol2021; 69: 156–167.
33.
Drissi-DaoudiRPandiyanVLogéR, et al.Differentiation of materials and laser powder bed fusion processing regimes from airborne acoustic emission combined with machine learning. Virtual Phys Prototyp2022; 17: 181–204.
34.
AdnanRMKisiOMostafaRR, et al.The potential of a novel support vector machine trained with modified mayfly optimization algorithm for streamflow prediction. Hydrol Sci J2022; 67: 161–174.
35.
TongSWeiSLiuY, et al.Predicting wear resistance of high-carbon Cr-V alloy steel based on machine learning. Mater Today Commun2024; 40. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110231
36.
DuarteLMde Alencar SantosJDFreitasFNC, et al.A novel approach based on pattern recognition techniques to evaluate magnetic properties of a non-grain oriented electrical steel in the secondary recrystallization process. Measurement (Lond)2020; 167. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108135
37.
PeiZRozmanKADoğanÖN, et al.Machine-Learning Microstructure for Inverse Material Design. Adv Sci2021; 8. 10.1002/advs.202101207
38.
DavidJŠvecPPaskerV, et al.Usage of real time machine vision in rolling mill. Sustainability (Switzerland)2021; 13. 10.3390/su13073851
39.
BasanRMarohnićT. A comprehensive evaluation of conventional methods for estimation of fatigue parameters of steels from their monotonic properties. Int J Fatigue2024; 183. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108244
40.
GanesanGMalayathGMoteRG. A review of cutting tools for ultra-precision machining. Mach Sci Technol2022; 26: 923–976.
41.
AhmedNAldawMAhmedR, et al.Modeling of necking area reduction of carbon steel in hydrogen environment using machine learning approach. Eng Fail Anal2024; 156. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107864
42.
BobbiliRMadhuV. A machine learning approach in drilling of E-glass woven composites. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2022; 50: 1081–1089.
43.
HuangMJiangJWangY, et al.Unraveling hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution, flow stress prediction of powder metallurgy BCC/B2 Al1.8CrCuFeNi2 HEA. J Alloys Compd2024; 972. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172828
44.
RadhaR. Predicting corrosion current density in magnesium alloy battery anodes: Machine learning approach using rapid miner. Can Metall Q2024. 10.1080/00084433.2024.2425497
45.
ChenYWangSXiongJ, et al.Identifying facile material descriptors for charpy impact toughness in low-alloy steel via machine learning. J Mater Sci Technol2023; 132: 213–222.
46.
FinneyLALinJSkrodzkiPJ, et al.Filament-induced breakdown spectroscopy signal enhancement using optical wavefront control. Opt Commun2021; 490. 10.1016/j.optcom.2021.126902
47.
AlarifiIM. Revolutionising fabrication advances and applications of 3D printing with composite materials: A review. Virtual Phys Prototyp2024; 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2024.2390504
48.
GarelEParoutyJ-LVan LandeghemH, et al.Coupling mixture designs, high-throughput experiments and machine learning for accelerated exploration of multinary systems. Mater Des2023; 231. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112055
49.
BhattacharyaSKSaharaRBožićD, et al.Data analytics approach to predict the hardness of copper matrix composites. Metall Mater Eng2020; 26: 357–364.
50.
BalaramanRKHussainSOngJK, et al.Feature-Driven Density Prediction of Maraging Steel Additively Manufactured Samples Using Supervised Machine Learning. IEEE Access2024. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3486731
51.
RamanGSSKlimaMS. Application of statistical and machine learning techniques for laboratory-scale pressure filtration: Modeling and analysis of cake moisture. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev2019; 40: 148–155.
52.
AdkineASBiradarSK. A review of the effects of resistance spot welding on metallurgical and mechanical characteristics. Weld Int2024. 10.1080/09507116.2024.2419551
53.
CuiCCaoGLiX, et al.A strategy combining machine learning and physical metallurgical principles to predict mechanical properties for hot rolled Ti micro-alloyed steels. J Mater Process Technol2023; 311. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117810
54.
WenHJinJTangX, et al.Machine learning-assisted constitutive modeling of a novel powder metallurgy superalloy. Int J Mech Sci2023; 260. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108654
55.
ShenJHuXMiD, et al.Thermomechanical fatigue behavior and lifetime modeling of powder metallurgy superalloy considering phase angle effect. Int J Fatigue2022; 164. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107164
56.
RuizEFerreñoDCuartasM, et al.Machine learning algorithms for the prediction of the strength of steel rods: An example of data-driven manufacturing in steelmaking. Int J Comput Integr Manuf2020; 33: 880–894.
57.
WangXLiXYuanH, et al.Prediction and analysis of mechanical properties of hot-rolled strip steel based on an interpretable machine learning. Mater Today Commun2024; 40. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109997
58.
KamalTGouthama and UpadhyayaA. Machine learning based sintered density prediction of bronze processed by powder metallurgy route. Met Mater Int2023; 29: 1761–1774.
59.
SiSFanBLiuX, et al.Study on strengthening effects of Zr-Ti-Nb-O alloys via high throughput powder metallurgy and data-driven machine learning. Mater Des2021; 206. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109777
60.
RodriguezVACamposTMBarriosGKP, et al.Review of Recent Advances in HPGR Designs. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev2024. 10.1080/08827508.2024.2355632
61.
BotnikovSAKhlybovOSKostychevAN. Development of the metal temperature prediction model for steel-pouring and tundish ladles used at the casting and rolling Complex. Metallurgist2019; 63: 792–803.
62.
BruinsmaOSLBrankenDJLemmerTN, et al.Sodium sulfate splitting as zero brine process in a base metal refinery: Screening and optimization in batch mode. Desalination2021; 511. 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115096
63.
WangXXiongW. Stacking fault energy prediction for austenitic steels: Thermodynamic modeling vs. Machine learning. Sci Technol Adv Mater2020; 21: 626–634.
64.
AnandanBManikandanM. Machine learning approach for predicting the peak temperature of dissimilar AA7050-AA2014A friction stir welding butt joint using various regression models. Mater Lett2022; 325. 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.132879
65.
AmaliaDSinghPZhangW, et al.A Review of Pretreatment Methods for Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries to Produce Black Mass–Comparison of Processes of Asia Pacific Recyclers. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev2024. 10.1080/08827508.2024.2367420
66.
KumaraswamyJAshokASN BS, et al.Research article on thermal evaluation of Al-Si3N4 composites using Machine Learning. Mater Today Commun2024; 41. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110859
67.
LeiningerDSReissnerF-CBaumgartnerJ. New approaches for a reliable fatigue life prediction of powder metallurgy components using machine learning. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2023; 46: 1190–1210.
68.
DengZ-HYinH-QJiangX, et al.Machine-learning-assisted prediction of the mechanical properties of cu—al alloy. Int J Minerals, Metall Mater2020; 27: 362–373.
69.
ZhiYYangTFuD. An improved deep forest model for forecast the outdoor atmospheric corrosion rate of low-alloy steels. J Mater Sci Technol2020; 49: 202–210.
70.
BernickyADavisBBarnesJ, et al.Spectroscopic characterisation of feedstock for copper smelters by machine-learning. Can Metall Q2024; 63: 576–585.
71.
DewanganSKSharmaALeeH, et al.Prediction of nanoindentation creep behavior of tungsten-containing high entropy alloys using artificial neural network trained with Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. J Alloys Compd2023; 958. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170359
72.
ShenCWangCRivera-Díaz-del-CastilloPEJ, et al.Discovery of marageing steels: Machine learning vs. physical metallurgical modelling. J Mater Sci Technol2021; 87: 258–268.
73.
MutelDGélinasSBlaisC. Rheological Characterization Of Water Atomized Tool Steel Powders Developed For Laser Powder Bed Fusion By Supervised And Unsupervised Machine Learning. In: World PM 2022 Congress and Exhibition. European Powder Metallurgy Association (EPMA). 2022.
74.
SarwarUMokhtarAAMuhammadM, et al.Enhancing pipeline integrity: A comprehensive review of deep learning-enabled finite element analysis for stress corrosion cracking prediction. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mechanics2024; 18. 10.1080/19942060.2024.2302906
75.
MuntinAVZhikharevPYZiniaginAG, et al.Artificial intelligence and machine learning in metallurgy. Part 1. Methods and algorithms. Metallurgist2023; 67: 886–894.
76.
RumicheFNoriegaALeanP, et al.Metallurgical failure analysis of a welded drive beam of a vibrating screen. Eng Fail Anal2020; 118. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104936
77.
Hajj ChehadeMSyllaADialloAR, et al.Manufacturing time estimation for offer pricing: A machine learning application in a French metallurgy industry. Eng Appl Artif Intell2024; 137. 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109089
78.
JeonJSeoNJungJ-G, et al.Machine learning prediction for cementite precipitation in austenite of low-alloy steels. Mater Trans2022; 63: 1369–1374.
79.
DasPPandeyPM. Machine learning based phase prediction and powder metallurgy assisted experimental validation of medium entropy compositionally complex alloys. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng2023; 31. 10.1088/1361-651X/ad04f4
80.
QureshiHShahZRajaMAZ, et al.Supervised machine learning computing paradigm to measure melting and dissipative effects in entropy induced Darcy–Forchheimer flow with ternary-hybrid nanofluids. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals2024. 10.1080/10407790.2024.2377794
81.
ChoudhuryAKumarS. Breaking data barriers: Advancing phase prediction in high entropy alloys through a new machine learning framework. Can Metall Q2024. 10.1080/00084433.2024.2395674
82.
GhorbaniYNwailaGTZhangSE, et al.Repurposing legacy metallurgical data part II: Case studies of plant performance optimisation and process simulation. Miner Eng2021; 160. 10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106667
83.
SaramakDSaramakA. Review of High-Pressure Technology in Terms of Technological and Economic Benefits Achieved in Raw Materials Processing. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev2024. 10.1080/08827508.2024.2410288
84.
JeonJSeoNJungJ-G, et al.Analysis of prediction mechanisms and feature importance of martensite start temperature of alloy steel via explainable artificial intelligence. Mater Trans2023; 64: 2237–2245.
85.
YanYRenJSunH, et al.Nondestructive quantitative measurement for precision quality control in additive manufacturing using hyperspectral imagery and machine learning. IEEE Trans Industr Inform2024; 20: 9963–9975.
86.
HodappM. Machine learning is funny but physics makes the money: How machine-learning potentials can advance computer-aided materials design in metallurgy. Comput Mater Sci2024; 233. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112715
87.
SaberDTahaIBMEl-AzizKHA. Wear Behavior Prediction for Cu/TiO2 Nanocomposite Based on Optimal Regression Methods. Mater Res2023; 26. 10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2022-0263
88.
CostaAPOSeabraMRRCésar de SáJMA, et al.Manufacturing process encoding through natural language processing for prediction of material properties. Comput Mater Sci2024; 237. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.112896
89.
HarshaBPPatnaikABanerjeeMK, et al.Triboinformatics modeling of dry sliding wear of high manganese hadfield steel alloys. Int J Metalcast2024; 18: 1750–1769.
90.
LalaouiMEl AfiaAChihebR. A self-tuned simulated annealing algorithm using hidden markov model. Int J Electr Comput Eng2018; 8: 291–298.
91.
TaghaviFNoaparastMPourkarimiZ, et al.Comparison of mechanical and column flotation performances on recovery of phosphate slimes in presence of nano-microbubbles. J Cent South Univ2022; 29: 102–115.
92.
ZhaoFGaoWLuJ, et al.Machine learning-based precise monitoring of aluminium-magnesium alloy dust. J Loss Prev Process Ind2024; 92. 10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105471
93.
KumarEKPatelSSPandaSK, et al.A comprehensive exploration of shape memory alloys: Fundamentals, structural reinforcements, nano-analysis, machine learning perspective, and emerging applications. Mech Adv Mater Struct2024. 10.1080/15376494.2024.2307471
94.
ChaiC-RWangYZhaoS, et al.Machine learning-assisted design of low elastic modulus β-type medical titanium alloys and experimental validation. Comput Mater Sci2024; 238. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.112902
95.
AdeliADowdPEmeryX, et al.Using cokriging to predict metal recovery accounting for non-additivity and preferential sampling designs. Miner Eng2021; 170. 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.106923
96.
DiwakarVSharmaAYusufzaiMZK, et al.Machine learning-based prediction of single clad characteristics and non-destructive characterization of multi-layer deposited FeCoNiCrMo HEA on EN24 via laser cladding. Mater Today Commun2024; 41. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110839
97.
MelnichukMSPetrovGVFokinaSB, et al.Enhancing optimal performance of the platinum concentrates by reduction sulfuric acid. Acta Technica CSAV (Ceskoslovensk Akademie Ved)2018; 63: 467–474.
98.
KantorMMSudinVVSolntsevKA. Analysis of the relationship between the load-displacement curve and characteristics of fracture of low-alloy steel by neural networks. Inorganic Mater: Appl Res2020; 11: 893–902.
99.
XueCMahfoufM. ENCFIS: An exclusionary neural Complex fuzzy inference system for robust regression learning. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst2024; 32: 1539–1552.
100.
GengXMaoXWuH-H, et al.A hybrid machine learning model for predicting continuous cooling transformation diagrams in welding heat-affected zone of low alloy steels. J Mater Sci Technol2022; 107: 207–215.
101.
WuJLongMWangZ, et al.Smoke recognition in steelmaking converter images: Class-distance-based feature selection model. Expert Syst Appl2024; 241. 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122649
102.
XieR-KZhongX-CQinS-H, et al.Predicting multiaxial fatigue life of FGH96 superalloy based on machine learning models by considering failure process and loading paths. Int J Fatigue2023; 175. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107730
103.
MukhamedievRKuchinYYunichevaN, et al.Classification of Logging Data Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Appl Sci (Switzerland)2024; 14. 10.3390/app14177779
104.
PetrikJAliSIFeistleM, et al.CrystalMind: A surrogate model for predicting 3D models with recrystallization in open-die hot forging including an optimization framework. Mech Mater2024; 189. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104875
105.
TamuraROsadaTMinagawaK, et al.Machine learning-driven optimization in powder manufacturing of Ni-Co based superalloy. Mater Des2021; 198. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109290
106.
Jafar-SalehiEGhasempoorAEslamianM. Experimental study and predictive modelling of cold compaction green density in powder metallurgy of stainless steel components. Powder Metall2013; 56: 208–215.
107.
JiYMaSPengW, et al.Research on alloy composition-process-wear properties of medium manganese steel based on machine learning. Tribol Int2024; 200. 10.1016/j.triboint.2024.110164
108.
CaoYChenCXuS, et al.Machine learning assisted prediction and optimization of mechanical properties for laser powder bed fusion of Ti6Al4V alloy. Addit Manuf2024; 91. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.104341
109.
ZhikharevPYMuntinAVBraykoDA, et al.Artificial intelligence and machine learning in metallurgy. Part 2. Application examples. Metallurgist2024; 67: 1545–1560.
110.
DekaSMozafariFMallickA. Microstructural, mechanical, tribological, and corrosion behavior of ultrafine bio-degradable Mg/CeO2 nanocomposites: Machine learning-based modeling and experiment. Tribol Int2023; 190. 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.109063
111.
OrtizRVCAlbujaMVargasEMN, et al.An investigation of the mechanical property behaviour of copper/AA7075 nanocomposites based on machine learning. Math Model Eng Problems2024; 11: 2060–2072.
112.
XuKXuYZhouP, et al.Application of RNAMlet to surface defect identification of steels. Opt Lasers Eng2018; 105: 110–117.
113.
KamalTGouthama and UpadhyayaA. Machine learning aided prediction of sintering induced swelling in powder metallurgical Cu-Sn alloys. Comput Mater Sci2024; 235. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.112827
114.
ParpievORPaizullakhonovM-SNodirmatovEZ, et al.Prospects of extracting metals from technogenic wastes using concentrated solar radiation. Metallurgist2022; 66: 469–474.
115.
MpingaCNEksteenJJAldrichC, et al.A conceptual hybrid process flowsheet for platinum group metals (PGMs) recovery from a chromite-rich cu-Ni PGM bearing ore in oxidized mineralization through a single-stage leach and adsorption onto ion exchange resin. Hydrometallurgy2018; 178: 88–96.
116.
VatsPKumarAGajraniKK. Novel insights into conventional machining of metal additive manufactured components: A comprehensive review. Mach Sci Technol2024; 28: 866–959.
117.
Villa GomezDWhitworthAJVaughanJ, et al.Review on Developments in Technologies for Critical Metal Recovery from Mining and Processing Wastes. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev2024. 10.1080/08827508.2024.2408015
118.
QiL. Effects of electronic structures on mechanical properties of transition metals and alloys. Comput Mater Sci2019; 163: 11–16.
119.
ThakurAKDasBChowdhurySG. A data-driven approach to model the martensitic transformation temperature in strain-induced metastable austenitic steels. Mater Today Commun2024; 39. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109016
120.
KatirciRAktasHZontulM. The prediction of the ZnNi thickness and Ni % of ZnNi alloy electroplating using a machine learning method. Trans Inst Met Finish2021; 99: 162–168.
121.
de Sa da SilvaDPMorimotoMGde Oliveira SilvaD, et al.Effect of Operational and Geometric Variables in Hydrocyclones to Improve Separation Efficiency and Reduce Energy Consumption: A Review and New Insights. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev2024. 10.1080/08827508.2024.2418636
122.
DekaSMozafariFMallickA. A comprehensive experimental and modeling study of the strain rate- and temperature-dependent deformation behavior of bio-degradable Mg-CeO2 nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2024; 177. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107936
