This study aimed to investigate the experiences of Danish help-seeking stalking victims who had been in contact with the police, or decided not to contact them, within the timeframe of 2015–2023.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study used two datasets collected by the Danish Stalking Center in 2015–2020 and 2020–2023, respectively. In total, 1,019 respondents were included in the analyses.
Results:
Most stalking victims were women (88.8 per cent), a mean age of 38.9 years (SD = 11.34). Most had been in contact with the police (56.3 per cent), but a large number did not report stalking, fearing escalation (35 per cent), lack of energy (30.9 per cent) or due to the belief that the police could not help (34 per cent). Overall, 45.9 per cent of participants were satisfied with law enforcement’s competence in handling their stalking case. Linear regression analysis showed that those stalked by an acquaintance or a stranger reported a more positive perception of the police’s competence (p < .05) compared to victims of intimate partner stalking. Logistic regression uncovered regional differences in the types of stalking behaviours experienced by victims.
Conclusion:
This study highlights an important issue that has received relatively little attention in Denmark. The findings suggest there is a need for improved police responses and support services for stalking victims in Denmark.
BaumK., CatalanoS. M., RandM. R., & RoseK. (2009). National crime victimization survey: Stalking victimization in the United States. DIANE Publishing Company.
2.
BelfrageH., & StrandS. (2008). Structured spousal violence risk assessment: Combining risk factors and victim vulnerability factors. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2008.9914402
3.
BelfrageH., StrandS., StoreyJ. E., GibasA. L., KroppP. R., & HartS. D. (2012). Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. Law and Human Behavior, 36(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093948
4.
BrandtC., & VoermanB. (2020). The Dutch model: A new approach to policing stalking. InPsycho-criminological approaches to stalking behavior: An international perspective (pp. 247–268). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
5.
BuddT., & MattinsonJ. (2000). The extent and nature of stalking: Findings from the 1998 British crime survey. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/extent-and-nature-stalking-findings-1998-british-crime-survey
6.
ColemanF. L. (1997). Stalking behavior and the cycle of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626097012003007
7.
Dansk Stalking Center. (2021). Hvad er stalking?https://danskstalkingcenter.dk/hvad-er-stalking/
8.
De FazioL. (2009). The legal situation on stalking among the European member states. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(3), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-009-9101-3
9.
FinneganH. A., & FritzP. A. T. (2012). Differential effects of gender on perceptions of stalking and harassment behavior. Violence and Victims, 27(6), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.27.6.895
10.
GonçalvesM., FerreiraC., MachadoA., & MatosM. (2022). Men victims of stalking in Portugal: Predictors of help-seeking behaviours. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-021-09481-8
11.
HehemannK., van NobelenD., BrandtC., & McEwanT. (2017). The reliability and predictive validity of the screening assessment for stalking and harassment (SASH). Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 4(3), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000085
12.
HurwitzS., & JustitsministerietS. (1971). Straffelovrådets betænkning om privatlivets fred (Vol. nr. 601). Kbh.
13.
JørgensenT. T. (2013). The extent of stalking: A population-based study. http://www.justitsministeriet.dk/sites/default/files/media/Arbejdsomraader/Forskning/Forskningsrapporter/2013/stalkingrapport.pdf
14.
Justitsministeriet. (2003). Forslag til lov om ændring af straffeloven, retsplejeloven, markedsføringsloven og ophavsretsloven [Press release]. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/ft/200312L00055
15.
Justitsministeriet. (2011). Forslag til Lov om tilhold, opholdsforbud og bortvisning [Press release]. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/ft/200312L00055
16.
Justitsministeriet. (2020). Bred flerårsaftale for politiet og anklagemyndigheden på plads [Press release]. https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.justitsministeriet.dk%2Fpressemeddelelse%2Fbred-fleraarsaftale-for-politiet-og-anklagemyndigheden-paa-plads%2F&data=05%7C02%7CSangeeta.Gupta%40sagepub.in%7C153047fdccd84ba7121508dd3c53364e%7C866b3abd7515461abdb412b4a1857f04%7C0%7C0%7C638733050309030915%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=RW8wR0v8oRZOoEVwIloumEI3fTvVuWdFgbUPeg1%2Bpus%3D&reserved=0
17.
Justitsministeriet. (2021). LOV nr 2600 af 28/12/2021, Penal Code §242 C.F.R. (2021).
18.
KorkodeilouJ. (2014). Dealing with the unknown: Learning from stalking victims’ experiences. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 16(4), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2014.10
19.
KroppP. R., HartS. D., LyonD. R., StoreyJ. E. J.SB.., & LawT. (2011). The development and validation of the guidelines for stalking assessment and management. Behavior Science Law, 29(2), 302–316.
20.
Kyvsgaard. (2007). National chapter on Denmark. In Modena Group (Ed.), Protecting women from the new crime of stalking: A comparison of legislative approaches within the European Union. University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.
21.
LoganT. K., WalkerR., StewartC., & AllenJ. (2006). Victim service and justice system representative responses about partner stalking: What do professionals recommend?Violence and Victims, 21(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1891/088667006780927376
22.
LynchK. R., & LoganT. K. (2015). Police officers’ attitudes and challenges with charging stalking. Violence and Victims, 30(6), 1037–1048. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.Vv-d-13-00085
23.
McEwanT. (2019). Screening assessment for stalking and harassment (SASH) Guidelines for application and interpretation. Stalk Inc.
24.
McEwanT. E., MacKenzieR. D., MullenP. E., & JamesD. V. (2012). Approach and escalation in stalking. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 23(3), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2012.679008
25.
McEwanT. E., MullenP. E., & MackenzieR. (2007). Anti-stalking legislation in practice: Are we meeting community needs?Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 14(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.14.2.207
26.
McEwanT. E., SimmonsM., ClothierT., & SenkansS. (2021). Measuring stalking: The development and evaluation of the stalking assessment indices (SAI). Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 28(3), 435–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1787904
27.
MeltonH. C. (2004). Stalking in the context of domestic violence. Women & Criminal Justice, 15(3–4), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v15n03_02
28.
Monckton-SmithJ., SzymanskaK., & A HaileS. (2017). Exploring the Relationship between stalking and homicide. Cheltenham. https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/4553/
29.
MullenP. E., PathéM., & PurcellR. (2009). Stalkers and their victims (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
30.
Rigsdagen. (1930). Lov om ikrafttræden af borgerlig straffelov m.m., 127, §15 C.F.R. (1930).
31.
Rigspolitiet. (2020). Kriminalitetsramte borgeres tilfredshed med politiet. https://politi.dk/-/media/mediefiler/landsdaekkende-dokumenter/nyheder/kriminalitetsramte-borgernes-tilfredshed-med-politiet.pdf?la=da&hash=965AA43BC12B3126F7010027C83EB8BE7C66EA69
32.
SheridanL., DaviesG., & BoonJ. (2001). The course and nature of stalking: A victim perspective. The Howard journal of criminal justice, 40(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2311.00204
33.
SpitzbergB. H., & CupachW. R. (2004). The dark side of relationship pursuit: From attraction to obsession and stalking. Routledge.
34.
StrandS. (2020). Risk assessment and management of stalking in Sweden: The Importance of fear as a victim vulnerability factor. In ChanH. C. & SheridanL. (Eds.), Psycho-criminological approaches to stalking behavior: An international perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
35.
StrandS. J. M., & StoreyJ. E. (2019). Intimate partner violence in urban, rural, and remote areas: An investigation of offense severity and risk factors. Violence Against Women, 25(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218766611
36.
Taylor-DunnH., BowenE., & GilchristE. A. (2017). The victim journey: A participatory research project seeking the views and experiences of victims of stalking and harassment. National Joint Thematic Stalking and Harassment Inspection. https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/wp-content/uploads/the-victim-journey.pdf
37.
Taylor-DunnH., BowenE., & GilchristE. A. (2021). Reporting harassment and stalking to the police: A qualitative study of victims’ experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11–12), NP5965-NP5992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518811423
38.
van der AaS., & GroenenA. (2010). Identifying the needs of stalking victims and the responsiveness of the criminal justice system: A qualitative study in Belgium and the Netherlands. Victims & Offenders, 6(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2011.534006
39.
VillacampaC., & PujolsA. (2019). Effects of and coping strategies for stalking victimisation in Spain: Consequences for its criminalisation. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 56, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.11.002
40.
WellerM., HopeL., & SheridanL. (2013). Police and public perceptions of stalking: The role of prior victim–offender relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(2), 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512454718
41.
WigmanS. A. (2009). Male victims of former-intimate stalking: A selected review. International Journal of Men’s Health, 8(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.3149/jmh.0802.101
