The present study tests power as a resident, a Japanese measure of empowerment, as a predictor of neighbourhood activism in a sample of Americans. Confirmatory factor analysis identified two factors that comprise the power as a resident scale: the perceived ability and desire to create change, and a shared responsibility for problems. Results from multiple regression analyses show that social cohesion and self-efficacy are predictors of both factors. Further, both factors of the power as a resident scale were significantly associated with neighbourhood activism. Findings suggest that building relationships in communities plays a critical role in empowering communities to participate in neighbourhood activism.
AlinskyS. D. (1971). Rules for radicals: A pragmatic primer for realistic radicals. Random House.
2.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
3.
BoleyB. B., AyscueE., MaruyamaN., & WoosnamK. M. (2017). Gender and empowerment: Assessing discrepancies using the resident empowerment through tourism scale. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1177065
4.
BrowneM. W., & CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A. & LongJ. S. (Eds), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage Publications.
5.
Cabinet Office. (2007). White paper on the national lifestyle 2007: A comfortable way of life for the Japanese people, founded on personal relationships.
6.
CarboneJ. T., & McMillinS. E. (2019). Neighborhood collective efficacy and collective action: The role of civic engagement. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(2), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22122
7.
ChenC. F., & TsaiD. (2007). How destination image and evaluative factors affect behavioral intentions?Tourism Management, 28(4), 1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.07.007
8.
ChristensB. D. (2012). Toward relational empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(1–2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9483-5
9.
CoppensT., Van DoorenW., & ThijssenP. (2018). Public opposition and the neighborhood effect: How social interaction explains protest against a large infrastructure project. Land Use Policy, 79, 633–640.
10.
DaltonJ., EliasM., & WandersmanA. (2001). Community psychology: Linking individuals with communities. Wadsworth.
11.
DinesenP. T., & SønderskovK. M. (2015). Ethnic diversity and social trust: Evidence from the micro-context. American Sociological Review, 80(3), 550–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415577989
12.
FettermanD. M. (2017). Empowerment evaluation: Linking theories, principles and concepts to practical steps. In SecolskyC. & DenisonD. B. (Eds), Handbook on measurement, assessment, and evaluation in higher education (pp. 529–541). Routledge.
13.
FigueroaR., GagoC. M., Beckerman-HsuJ., Aftosmes-TobioA., YuX., DavisonK. K., & JurkowskiJ. J. (2020). Development and validation of a parental health-related empowerment scale with low income parents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228645
14.
GearhartM. C. (2019). Preventing neighborhood disorder: Comparing alternative models of collective efficacy theory using structural equation modeling. American Journal of Community Psychology, 63(1–2), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12317
15.
GearhartM. C. (2022a). A psychometric evaluation of the mutual efficacy scale: Factor structure, convergent, and divergent validity. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 49(1), 125–147. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol49/iss1/7/
16.
GearhartM. C. (2022b). Mutual efficacy and social cohesion: Predictors of neighboring and organisational participation. Australian Community Psychologist, 31(2), 39–55.
17.
GearhartM. C. (2022c). Social cohesion, mutual efficacy and informal social control: Collective efficacy and community-based crime prevention. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2002.100548
18.
GearhartM. (2023). Empowerment and collective efficacy: Insights for community-based crime prevention. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 33(5), 698–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2022.2083742
19.
GearhartM. C., BulgerM., JosephM., & LiuB. (2020). Patterns of neighboring and predictors of neighboring across race: A latent class analysis. Housing, Theory, and Society37(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1633399
20.
GearhartM. C., & JosephM. L. (2019). Social cohesion, mutual efficacy, and informal social control: Enhancing the conceptualization of collective efficacy. Community Development, 50(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2018.1545793
21.
GilsterM. E. (2012). Comparing neighborhood-focused activism and volunteerism: Psychological well-being and social connectedness. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(7), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20528
22.
GilsterM. E. (2014). Putting activism in its place: The neighborhood context of participation in neighborhood-focused activism. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12013
23.
GrahamJ. W., OlchowskiA. E., & GilreathT. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8(3), 206–213.
24.
HippJ. R. (2016). Collective efficacy: How is it conceptualized, how is it measured, and does it really matter for understanding perceived neighborhood crime and disorder?Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.016
25.
HomsyG. C., & HartS. (2021). Sustainability backfire: The unintended consequences of failing to engage neighborhood residents in policymaking. Journal of Urban Affairs, 43(3), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1607746
26.
HsuH. Y. (2011). Testing the effectiveness of various commonly used fit indices for detecting misspecifications in multilevel structure equation models [Doctoral dissertation]. Texas A&M University.
27.
HuL. T., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
28.
HullandJ. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2%3C195::AID-SMJ13%3E3.0.CO;2-7
29.
Japanese Society of Community Psychology. (2007). Japanese handbook of community psychology. University of Tokyo Press.
30.
JohnsonL. (2021). Increasing financial empowerment among survivors of intimate partner violence: A growth curve analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 68(1–2), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12491
31.
KretzmannJ. P., & McKnightJ. (1993). Building communities from the inside out. Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Neighborhood Innovations Network.
32.
KrivoL. J., WashingtonH. M., PetersonR. D., BrowningC. R., CalderC. A., & KwanM. P. (2013). Social isolation of disadvantage and advantage: The reproduction of inequality in urban space. Social Forces, 92(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot043
33.
MaruyamaN., WoosnamK. M., & BoleyB. B. (2017). Residents’ attitudes toward ethnic neighborhood tourism (ENT): Perspectives of ethnicity and empowerment. Tourism Geographies, 19(2), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2016.1258432
34.
MatonK. I. (2008). Empowering community settings: Agents of individual development, community betterment, and positive social change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9148-6
35.
MatsuedaR. L. (2010). Seattle neighborhoods and crime survey, 2002–2003. ICPSR28701-v1. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2010-12-10. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28701.v1
36.
MatsukawaA., & TatsukiS. (2018). Crime prevention through community empowerment: An empirical study of social capital in Kyoto, Japan. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 54, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.03.007
37.
Maydeu-OlivaresA. (2017). Maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models for continuous data: Standard errors and goodness of fit. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(3), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1269606
38.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2008). The report of the future community welfare.
39.
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2020). Final report from the survey on the situation of the villages in depopulating areas. https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000678496.pdf
40.
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2021). Statistics on older adults in Japan. https://www.stat.go.jp/data/topics/pdf/topics129.pdf
41.
MiuraM. (2021). Flowers for sexual assault victims: Collective empowerment through empathy in Japan’s# MeToo movement. Politics & Gender, 17(4), 521–527. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000258
42.
MuthénL. K., & MuthénB. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
43.
NagaiK., & KajitaE. (2018). “Coming out” with a mental disorder in Japan: How self-stigma and empowerment affect this decision. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 39(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2017.1354102
44.
NishideY. (2009). Social capital and civil society in Japan. Tohoku University Press.
45.
OhmerM. L. (2016). Strategies for preventing youth violence: Facilitating collective efficacy among young adults. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 7(4), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1086/689407
46.
PalanS., & SchitterC. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
47.
PeerE., BrandimarteL., SamatS., & AcquistiA. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
48.
PetersonN. A., LardierD. T., PowellK. G., MankopfE., RashidM., MortonC. M., & BorysS. (2021). Psychometric properties of a recovery empowerment scale: Testing emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and relational domains. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(7), 2874–2891. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22592
49.
PiggK. E. (2002). Three faces of empowerment: Expanding the theory of empowerment in community development. Community Development, 33(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330209490145
50.
PitnerR., & SakamotoI. (2016). Cultural competence and critical consciousness in social work pedagogy. Encyclopedia of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.888
51.
RahmanA., HardingA., TantonR., & LiuS. (2013). Simulating the characteristics of populations at the small area level: New validation techniques for a spatial microsimulation model in Australia. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 57(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2012.06.018
52.
RappaportJ. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00896357
53.
RappaportJ., & SeidmanE. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of community psychology. Springer Science & Business Media.
54.
RaudenbushS. W., & BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. In Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences Series/SAGE. Sage Publications.
55.
ReichS. M., BishopB., CarolissenR., DzidicP., PortilloN., SasaoT., & StarkW. (2017). Catalysts and connections: The (brief) history of community psychology throughout the world. In BondM. A., Serrano-GarcíaI., KeysC. B., & ShinnM. (Eds.), APA handbook of community psychology: Theoretical foundations, core concepts, and emerging challenges (pp. 21–66). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14953-002
56.
RodriguesM., MenezesI., & & FerreiraP. D. (2018). Validating the formative nature of psychological empowerment construct: Testing cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and relational empowerment components. Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1),58–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21916
57.
SakamotoI., & PitnerR. O. (2005). Use of critical consciousness in anti-oppressive social work practice: Disentangling power dynamics at personal and structural levels. The British Journal of Social Work, 35(4), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch190
58.
SampsonR. J., RaudenbushS. W., & EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918
59.
SampsonR. J., SchachnerJ. N., & MareR. D. (2017). Urban income inequality and the great recession in Sunbelt form: Disentangling individual and neighborhood-level change in Los Angeles. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3(2), 102–128.
60.
SchwarzerR., & JerusalemM. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs, 1(1), 35–37.
61.
SukJ., AbhishekA., ZhangY., AhnS. Y., CorreaT., GarloughC., & ShahD. V. (2021). #MeToo, networked acknowledgment, and connective action: How “empowerment through empathy” launched a social movement. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0894439319864882
62.
SouthS. J., HuangY., SpringA., & CrowderK. (2016). Neighborhood attainment over the adult life course. American Sociological Review, 81(6), 1276–1304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416673029
63.
TachL. M. (2014). Diversity, inequality, and microsegregation: Dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in a racially and economically diverse community. Cityscape, 16(3), 13–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26326904
64.
TanakaH. (2021). Development of the Ibasho concept in Japanese education and youth work: Ibasho as a place of refuge and empowerment for excluded people. Educational Studies in Japan, 15, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.15.3
65.
TruongY., & McCollR. (2011). Intrinsic motivations, self-esteem, and luxury goods consumption. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(6), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.08.004
66.
TuckerR., & GearhartM. C. (2022). Social ties and collective efficacy as predictors of volunteering. Community Development, 53(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2021.1943697
67.
UemuraK. (2008). An introduction to community psychology. Nakanishiya.
68.
WatanabeY. (2004). Aiming for an empirical study of empowering residents’ participation in community development—A trial for measuring residents’ power, by which the residents aim to work on improving their community welfare. Critique of Social Welfare, 4, 7–17.
69.
WatanabeY. (2006). Empowerment for community residents. Hoppo Shinsha.
70.
WatanabeY. (2008). Examining the validity of factors in the scale which measures the power of the community residents’ support for the elderly. Study of Human Relations (Otsuma Women’s University), 10, 181–186.
71.
WatanabeY. (2012). Relationship between the desire for permanent living in the marginal community and the power of the community to support the elderly. Japanese Journal of Human Sciences of Health-Social Services, 18(2), 11–20.
72.
WatanabeY. (2013a). Creation of the elderly support power scale of community residents and their significance on health and welfare. Japanese Society of Human Services of Health-Social Services, 19(2), 59–63.
73.
WatanabeY. (2013b). Relationship between power as a resident for problem solving and expectation of support by internal/external family/friend in marginal community. The Annual Bulletin of Musashino University Institute of Human Sciences, 3, 71–77.
74.
WhittM. S. (2016). Other people’s problems: Student distancing, epistemic responsibility, and injustice. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35(5), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9484-1
75.
ZaccaroS. J., BlairV., PetersonC., & ZazanisM. (1995). Collective efficacy. In Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment (pp. 305–328). Springer.
