This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the various development approaches employed by government agencies in Malaysia in relation to the Orang Asli/indigenous populations. The research utilised a quantitative approach, employing questionnaires for data collection. The study’s sample comprises 390 participants who were chosen through the convenience sampling technique. The participants in this study belong to the following three tribes of the Orang Asli Laut community: the Orang Kuala, the Orang Seletar and the Mah Meri. The findings indicate that government agencies persist in considering the traditional identities of various Orang Asli groups during the implementation of development strategies. Although there is no universally adopted prevailing development approach, it has been noted that the top-down technique is frequently utilised. Therefore, this study suggests the incorporation of an indigenous worldview framework and community mapping as crucial instruments to provide predevelopment data to all stakeholders involved in the progress of Orang Asli communities throughout Malaysia.
AbuA. R., & YusopM. S. (2014). Attitude towards the mastering of Malay language as a second language among aboriginal children in Kuala Lumpur. Malay Language Education Journal, 4(2), 57–66.
2.
AdeebM. N. A., KumarasamyK., HamidS. A., MahatN. A., ArumugamK., & ShukorS. H. A. (2016). Knowledge and attitude of neonatal jaundice: Orang Asli perspective. Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia, 14(2), 65–68.
3.
AguiñagaE., HenriquesI., ScheelC., & ScheelA. (2018). Building resilience: A self-sustainable community approach to the triple bottom line. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.094
4.
AikenS. R., & LeighC. H. (2011). In the way of development: Indigenous land-rights issues in Malaysia. Geographical Review, 101(4), 471–496. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23208635
5.
Amir ZalW. A., OmarM., & SallehH. (2016). The terminologies associated with development and marginalisation for Orang Asli in Malaysia. Development in Practice, 26(7), 933–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2016.1211093
6.
AndersonI. (2007). The end of aboriginal self-determination?Futures, 39(2–3), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.01.002
7.
AndersonR. B., DanaL. P., & DanaT. E. (2006). Indigenous land rights, entrepreneurship, and economic development in Canada: “Opting-In” to the global economy. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.005
8.
AwangM. M., KhairuddinK. F., AhmadA. R., Ab GhaniS., Abdul WahabJ. L., & Raja MamatR. M. S. (2022). School absenteeism: Contributing factors, activities during truancy and learning culture aspiration among native pupils. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 277–308. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.10
9.
BowenJ., & AcciaioliG. (2009). Improving the success of “bottom-up” development work by acknowledging the dynamics among stakeholders: A case study from an Engineers Without Borders water supply project in Tenganan, Indonesia. Water Science and Technology, 59(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.862
10.
CernaL. (2013). The nature of policy change and implementation: A review of different theoretical approaches. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
11.
ChoA. (2014). Post-Tsunami recovery and reconstruction: Governance issues and implications of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Disasters, 38(S2), S157–S178.
12.
CoxS., Birdsall-JonesC., JonesR., KerrT., & MicklerS. (2016). Indigenous persistence and entitlement: Noongar occupations in central Perth, 1988–1989 and 2012. Journal of Historical Geography, 54, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2016.07.002
13.
DiansyahM. W., AbasA., & SakawiZ. (2022). Exploring the relevance of engaging the Orang Asli in Malaysia’s forest management. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 5, 1019994. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.1019994
El AsmarJ.-P., EbohonJ. O., & TakiA. (2012). Bottom-up approach to sustainable urban development in Lebanon: The case of Zouk Mosbeh. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2011.10.002
16.
FerreiraA., SeixasS., & MarquesJ. C. (2015). Bottom-up management approach to coastal marine protected areas in Portugal. Ocean & Coastal Management, 118, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.008
17.
GirardC., Pulido-VelazquezM., RinaudoJ.-D., PagéC., & CaballeroY. (2015). Integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches to design global change adaptation at the river basin scale. Global Environmental Change, 34, 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.002
18.
GouldingC., KelemenM., & KiyomiyaT. (2018). Community based response to the Japanese Tsunami: A bottom-up approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.066
19.
HassanM. S., UmarK., & Mohamad RazaliM. (2022). Pembangunan Ekonomi Orang Asli di Semenanjung Malaysia: Pengajaran yang Boleh Dipelajari Daripada Masyarakat Maori Di New Zealand. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 13(1), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.17
20.
HeenanD. (2004). A partnership approach to health promotion: A case study from Northern Ireland. Health Promotion International, 19(1), 105–113.
21.
HowlettC., & HartwigL. D. (2017). The friction of fracking: Discursive constraints on aboriginal participation in coal seam gas in northern NSW. The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(2), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.01.010
22.
KhirA. M., RedzuanM., HamsanH. H., & ShahriminM. I. (2016). Nilai Pencapaian dan Orientasi Masa Hadapan Remaja Orang Asli di Negeri Pahang dan Perak, Malaysia. Al-Hikmah, 8(2), 97–109.
23.
KimY. H., StingF. J., & LochC. H. (2014). Top-down, bottom-up, or both? Toward an integrative perspective on operations strategy formation. Journal of Operations Management, 32(7–8), 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.005
24.
LiY., WestlundH., ZhengX., & LiuY. (2016). Bottom-up initiatives and revival in the face of rural decline: Case studies from China and Sweden. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 506–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.004
25.
LiuP., & RavenscroftN. (2017). Collective action in implementing top-down land policy: The case of Chengdu, China. Land Use Policy, 65, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.031
26.
LyndonN., JaliM. F. M., & RoseR. A. C. (2020). Indigenous knowledge and socio-economic development of a Malaysian rural indigenous community (2020). JATI–Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 25(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.22452/jati.vol25no2.6
27.
MansorN. A., IbrahimM. S., RusliA., SimpongD. B., RazakN. F. A., SamengonH., RidzuanN. A., & OthmanN. A. (2019). Empowering indigenous communities through participation in tourism. International Journal of Tourism Anthropology, 7(3/4), 309. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijta.2019.107323
28.
MccourtW. (2012). Can top-down and bottom-up be reconciled? Electoral competition and service delivery in Malaysia. World Development, 40(11), 2329–2341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.023
29.
NordinaN. A., & WahabN. A. (2021). Kertas Konsep Pembangunan Modul Sekolah Rimba Berasaskan Pengetahuan Peribumi Bagi Mengekalkan Kelestarian Masyarakat Orang Asli. Asian Pendidikan, 1(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v1i1.2.2021
30.
NordinR., WitbrodtM. A, & HassanM. S. (2016). Paternalistic approach towards the Orang Asli in Malaysia: Tracing its origin and justifications. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(6), 51–59.
31.
NorhayatiA. M., & RamleA. (2021). Challenges of Orang Asli community participation in social development programs: A case study in Sungai Pergam Village, Kemaman, Terengganu. Jurnal Dunia Pengurusan, 3(1), 9–22.
32.
Nursey-BrayM., & PalmerR. (2018). Country, climate change adaptation and colonisation: Insights from an indigenous adaptation planning process, Australia. Heliyon, 4(3), e00565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00565
33.
PengY., ShenL., ZhangX., & OchoaJ. J. (2014). The feasibility of concentrated rural settlement in a context of post-disaster reconstruction: A study of China. Disasters, 38(1), 108–124.
34.
PetkoD., EggerN., CantieniA., & WespiB. (2015). Digital media adoption in schools: Bottom-up, top-down, complementary or optional? Computers & Education, 84, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.019
35.
PhillipsA. (2003). Turning ideas on their head: The new paradigm for protected areas. George Wright Forum, 20(2), 1–25.
36.
PoirierR., & SchartmuellerD. (2012). Indigenous water rights in Australia. The Social Science Journal, 49(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2011.11.002
37.
QuitianA. S, & RodríguezG. A. (2016). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring indigenous peoples’ involvement in water planning processes across South Eastern Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 542, 828–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.050
38.
ShiX., & WuY. (2017). The effect of internal and external factors on innovative behaviour of Chinese manufacturing firms. China Economic Review, 46, S50–S64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.08.010
39.
SinwellL. (2012). Transformative left-wing parties and grassroots organisations: Unpacking the politics of “top-down” and “bottom-up” development. Geoforum, 43(2), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.10.008
40.
SmithN. R. (2014). Beyond top-down/bottom-up: Village transformation on China’s urban edge. Cities, 41, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.01.006
41.
SubhiN., MohamadM. S., SulehanJ., AliM., & BakarN. R. A. (2016). The importance of motivation in education in empowering indigenous community. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 30(2), 153–161.
42.
TisdellC. (2018). The sustainability and desirability of the traditional economies of Australian Aborigines: Controversial issues. Economic Analysis and Policy, 57, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.11.001
43.
VivienW. C. Y., Mal-KongS., LamK. C., SarmilaM. S., & SivapalanS. (2015). Education and awareness of modern health care amongst Aboriginal people: The case of the Jakuns of peninsular Malaysia. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11(13), 79–85.
44.
WahabN. A., MustaphaR., & TalibJ. A. (2016). Developing the Orang Asli human capital: A case study on the roles and determination of educational goals among Orang Asli parents in Kuantan, Pahang. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(3), 1–10.
45.
WookI. (2023). Indigenous peoples in protected areas and equitable conservation: Recent legal and policy development in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Law and Policy, 3(2), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.33093/ajlp.2023.4
46.
YanM. C., & GaoJ. G. (2007). Social engineering of community building: Examination of policy process and characteristics of community construction in China. Community Development Journal, 42(2), 222–236.
