The social and economic empowerment of women using digital technology is critical to global development. This article presents an expanded theory of change to explain how digital technology could augment pathways to women’s empowerment in self-help groups (SHGs), developed through an application of social capital theories to two existing theories of change. Drawing on the analysis of secondary data, it discusses SHGs in India, the determinants of mobile phone use among women in India, particularly patriarchal gender norms, and select theories of change for women’s empowerment in SHGs. The proposed enhanced theory of change has the potential to assist implementers, policymakers, researchers and SHGs themselves to more effectively leverage the empowering potential of digital technology to improve the economic and social opportunities for women in the context of global development strategies.
AhmedA., HasanA. R., IslamD., & RahmanN. J. (2006June). Measuring the impact of ICT on women in Bangladesh. International Conference on E-Learning, E-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, E-Government, & Outsourcing, Las Vegas. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Durdana-Islam/publication/221186377_Measuring_The_Impact_Of_ICT_On_Women_In_Bangladesh/links/569faee708aee4d26ad27614/Measuring-The-Impact-Of-ICT-On-Women-In-Bangladesh.pdf
2.
AjjanH., BeningerS., MostafaR., & CrittendenV. L. (2014). Empowering women entrepreneurs in emerging economies: A conceptual model. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 5(1), 16–30.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
4.
BanduraA. (1994). Self-efficacy. In RamachaudranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behaviour (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). Academic Press.
5.
BarboniG., FieldE., PandeR., RigolN., SchanerS., & MooreC. T. (2018). A tough call: Understanding barriers to and impacts of women’s mobile phone adoption in India (pp. 1–49). Evidence for Policy Design.
6.
BarooahB., Chin`oyS. L., DubeyP., SarkarR., BagaiA., & RathinamF. (2019). Improving and sustaining livelihoods through group-based interventions: Mapping the evidence(Evidence Gap Map No. 13; 2019th ed.). International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie). https://doi.org/10.23846/EGM013
7.
BashingwaJ. J. H., ShahN., MohanD., ScottK., ChamberlainS., MulderN., RahulS., AroraS., ChakrabortyA., UmmerO., VedR., & LeFevreA. E. (2021). Examining the reach and exposure of a mobile phone-based training programme for frontline health workers (ASHAs) in 13 states across India. BMJ Global Health, 6(Suppl 5), e005299.
8.
BBC Media Action. (2021). Learning from Bharpoor Academy: A proof of concept to provide remote digital learning to marginalized women farmers in Bihar, India, during the pandemic. ahttps://www.genderhealthhub.org/articles/gender-and-phone-surveys-methodological-considerationsbig-data-and-ai-for-gender-equity-in-health/
9.
BBC Media Action. (2022). Accelerating digital adoption in women’s collectives: A proof of concept. https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaaction/where-we-work/asia/india/digital/wee/chatbot-concept/)
10.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (2017). Domain No 1: Women’s economic empowerment: Full assessment.
11.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (2018). Women’s empowerment collectives: Digital innovation and learning agenda.
12.
BiscayeP., TrueZ., ClarkC., HarrisK. P., AndersonC. L., & GugertyM. K. (2014). Self-help groups in development: A review of evidence from South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa(Evidence Review Brief No. 283). Evans School of Policy Analysis and Research, University of Washington. https://evans.uw.edu/sites/default/files/EPAR_283_SHG%20Evidence%20Review%20Brief_12.5.14_0.pdf
13.
BlakeJ., & DavisK. (1964). Norms, values and sanctions. In FarisR. E. L. (Ed.), Handbook of modern sociology (pp. 456–484). Rand McNally.
14.
BrodyC., De HoopT., VojtkovaM., WarnockR., DunbarM., MurthyP., & DworkinS. L. (2016). Economic self-help group programmes for improving women’s empowerment: A systematic review(3ie Grantee Final Review). International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).
15.
CampbellD. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30(12), 1103–1126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.30.12.1103
De HoopT., BrodyC., TripathiS., VojktovaM., & WarnockR. (2019). Economic self-help group programmes for improving women’s empowerment(No. 11; 3ie Systematic Review Summary). International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie). https://www.3ieimpact.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/SRS11-SHGs-report.pdf
18.
Digital Empowerment Foundation. Online report. https://www.defindia.org/soochnapreneur-6/
19.
DwarakiB. R., NarayanaswamyN., & RameshN. (1996). Towards creating a participatory self-help credit cooperative. Rediscovering Co-operation, Indian Institute of Management, 2, 216–235.
20.
EllisonN. B., SteinfieldC., & LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.
21.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
22.
GashM., Jahns-HarmsE., OdellK., CarmichaelJ., & PanettaD. (2017). Learning brief: Understanding the impact of savings groups. Arlington: SEEP Network. https://seepnetwork.org/files/galleries/Understanding.pdf
23.
Gram Vaani. (2022). The Mobile Vaani Manifesto. https://gramvaani.org/the-mobilevaani-manifesto/
24.
GSMA. (2017a). Triggering mobile internet use among men and women in South Asia. https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/GSMA-Triggering-Mobile-Internet-Use_Web.pdf
25.
GSMA. (2017b). Accelerating affordable smartphone ownership in emerging markets. https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Accelerating-affordable-smartphone-ownership-in-emerging-markets-2017_we.pdf
26.
GSMA. (2019). The mobile economy 2019.
27.
GSMA. (2021). The mobile gender gap report 2021. https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/GSMA-Connected-Women-The-Mobile-Gender-Gap-Report-2019.pdf
28.
GurumurthyA., & ChamiN. (2018). Digital India through a gender lens. IT for Change. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328761115_Digital_India_through_a_Gender_Lens
29.
GurumurthyA., VasudevanA., & ChamiN. (2019). Born digital, born free? A socio-legal study on young women’s experiences of online violence in South India. IT for Change. https://itforchange.net/sites/default/files/1662/Born-Digital_Born-Free_SynthesisReport.pdf
30.
Haqdarshak. (2022). https://haqdarshak.com/
31.
HilbertM. (2011). Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics(SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2039116). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2039116
32.
JakimowT., & KilbyP. (2006). Empowering women: A critique of the blueprint for self-help groups in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 13(3), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152150601300303)
33.
JayachandranS., GuarnieriE., Diaz-MartinL., & GopalanA. (2019). Greater than the sum of its parts? Evidence on mechanisms operating in women’s groups[Landscaping Note]. Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.
34.
KabeerN. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
35.
KabeerN. (2005). Is microfinance a ’magic bullet’ for women’s empowerment? Analysis of findings from South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 4709–4718.
36.
KempS. (2021). Digital 2021: India. WeAreSocial and Hootsuite. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-india
37.
KumarN., ScottS., MenonP., KannanS., CunninghamK., TyagiP., WableG., RaghunathanK., & QuisumbingA. (2018). Pathways from women’s group-based programs to nutrition change in South Asia: A conceptual framework and literature review. Global Food Security, 17, 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.11.002
38.
LinN. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 467–487.
39.
LIRNEasia. (2019). AfterAccess: ICT access and use in Asia and the global south(version 3). https://lirneasia.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/LIRNEasia-AfterAccess-Asia-3.0-update-28.05.2019.pdf
40.
MandleK. (2020, October12). Delivering citizens’ rights to their doorsteps. India Development Review. https://idronline.org/delivering-citizens-rights-to-their-doorsteps-government-welfare-schemes-chhattisgarh/
41.
Microsave. (2020). Aspiring youths in self-help-groups: Can they become change agents in their communities?https://www.microsave.net/2020/05/27/aspiring-youths-in-self-help-groups-can-they-become-change-agents-in-their-communities/
42.
MohanD., BashingwaJ. J. H., TiffinN., DharD., MulderN., GeorgeA., & LeFevreA. E. (2020). Does having a mobile phone matter? Linking phone access among women to health in India: An exploratory analysis of the National Family Health Survey. PloS One, 15(7), e0236078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236078
43.
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD). (1995). Report of the Working Group on Non-Governmental Organisations and Self-Help-Groups, Mumbai.
44.
National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development. (2021). Status of microfinance in India 2020–21(status of microfinancing in India). National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development. https://www.nabard.org/auth/writereaddata/tender/SoMFI-2020-21.pdf
45.
NicholsC. (2021). Self-help groups as platforms for development: The role of social capital. World Development, 146, 105575.
46.
PattersonM. L., & ZandtD. (2015). Is social media causing social harm?New Internationalist. https://newint.org/argument/2015/11/01/social-media-social-harm.
47.
PaulS., SinghR. J., DesaiS., De HoopT., & SiwachG. (2019). A rapid review on federations in India. The Consortium for Evidence on Women’s Empowerment Collectives.
48.
PepitoneA. (1976). Toward a normative and comparative biocultural social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 641.
49.
PoortingaW. (2012). Community resilience and health: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital. Health & Place, 18(2), 286–295.
ReddyC.S. (2019). SHG Federation: An Institutional Innovation to Sustain SHGs, PRADAN.https://www.pradan.net/sampark/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/SHG-Federation-An-Institutional-Innovation-to-Sustain-SHGs.pdf
54.
ReissK., AndersenK., PearsonE., BiswasK., TalebF., NgoT. D., HossainA., BarnardS., SmithC., CarpenterJ., MenzelJ., FootmanK., KeenanK., DouthwaiteM., ReenaY., MahmoodH. R., TabbassumT., ColombiniM., BacchusL., & ChurchK. (2019). Unintended consequences of mHealth interactive voice messages promoting contraceptive use after menstrual regulation in Bangladesh: Intimate partner violence results from a randomized controlled trial. Global Health, Science and Practice, 7(3), 386–403. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00015
55.
RiceE., & ChamberlainS. (2021). Connecting empowerment: How social network expansion in women’s collectives helps bridge the gender digital divide. BBC Media Action. https://downloads.bbc.co.uk/mediaaction/pdf/india-research-study-connecting-empowerment-2021.pdf
56.
RogersP. (2014). Theory of change. Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation, 2(16), 1–14.
57.
RuthvenO. (2018). Digital women’s economic empowerment: A research and learning agenda, proposal narrative. BBC Media Action.
58.
SatishP. (2001). Some issues in the formation of self-help groups. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(3), 410–418.
59.
SchradieJ. (2018). The digital activism gap: How class and costs shape online collective action. Social Problems, 65(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx042.
60.
SchwartzS. H. (1977). Normative influences on Altruism. InBerkowitzL.(Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
61.
ScottK., ShindeA., UmmerO., YadavS., SharmaM., PurtyN., JairathA., ChamberlainS., & LeFevreA. E. (2021). Freedom within a cage: How patriarchal gender norms limit women’s use of mobile phones in rural central India. BMJ Global Health, 6(Suppl 5), e005596. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005596
62.
ScottK., UmmerO., ChamberlainS., SharmaM., GharaiD., MishraB., ChoudhuryN., & LeFevreA. E. (2022). “[We] learned how to speak with love”: A qualitative exploration of ASHA community health worker experiences of the Mobile Academy refresher training in Rajasthan, India. BMJ Open, 12(6), e050363.
63.
SherifM. (1936). The psychology of social norms(pp. xii, 210). Harper.
64.
SinghA., JoseJ., ChouhanK., AgarwalP., & KurianV. (2019). Digitisation of self help groups in India: Roadmap for state rural livelihoods mission-led initatives. Initiative for what works to advance women and girls in the economy. https://iwwage.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IWWAGE-SHG-Digitization-June-25.pdf
65.
TankhaA. (2012). Banking on self-help groups: Twenty years on. Sage Publications. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=DV6JCwAAQBAJ
66.
ThorpR., StewartF., & HeyerA. (2005). When and how far is group formation a route out of chronic poverty? World Development, 33(6), 907–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.09.016
67.
United States Agency for International Development. (2018). 2017 digital download. https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/15396/2017-Digital-Download.pdf
68.
WamalaC. (2012). Empowering women through ICT(No. 4; Spider ICT4D Series). The Swedish programme for ICT in developing regions. https://spidercenter.org/files/2017/01/Spider-ICT4D-series-4-Empowering-women-through-ICT.pdf
69.
WarschauerM. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
70.
WheelerD. L. (2007). Empowerment zones? Women, internet cafés, and life transformations in Egypt. Information Technologies & International Development, 4(2), 89.
71.
World Bank Group. (2021). World Bank Group and CES announce winners of global tech challenge: Solutions for women. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/01/11/world-bank-group-ces-announce-winners-of-global-tech-challenge-solutions-for-women
