This article discusses the initiation and implementation of a total quality management (TQM) approach in local governments (LGs) in Kerala, India, with a view to promote its replication in similar contexts. Drawing on the secondary data and authors’ experiences of and reflections on conceptualising and implementing the TQM, it presents the initial process of TQM on pilot basis, the front office management (FOM) and scaling up of the FOM, and experience to implement TQM involving 14 steps in LGs. Their observations and reflections suggest that the TQM approach in LGs enhances citizens’ satisfaction and engagement. However, physical infrastructure aspect of the TQM is relatively easier to achieve than the soft aspects of the TQM. It argues that though TQM is important, it is a means and not an end. Continuous capacity building, simultaneous focus on hard and soft elements, presence of change agent and peer learning are necessary in LGs to ensure quality service delivery and citizen satisfaction. Experiences and insights shared in this article may be of help to enhance quality service delivery and citizen satisfaction in similar LG contexts and communities.
BagchiT. P. (1994). ISO 9000—Concepts, methods and implementation. Wheeler Publishing.
2.
BeckfordJ. (1998). Quality: A critical introduction. Routledge.
3.
BesterfieldD. H., MichnaC. B., & BesterfieldG. H. (2011). Total quality management. Dorling Kindersley.
4.
BlackS. A., & PorterL. J. (1996). Identification of the critical factors of TQM. Winter, 27(1), 1–21.
5.
BoyneG. A., Gould-WilliamsJ. S., LawJ., & WalkerR. M. (2010). Best value—Total quality management for local government?Public Money & Management, 22(3), 9–16. https://tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9302.00313
6.
BowenG. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
7.
CelikM., & SasicD. (2021). Implementation of TQM in local government using quality management system in accordance with ISO 9001 and CAF self-assessment model. International Burch University, pp. 263–274. https://doi.org/10.14706/icesos1717
8.
ChinK. S., PunK. F., & HuaH. M. (2001). Consolidation of China’s quality transformation efforts: A review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(8), 836–853.
9.
EvansJ. R., & LindsayW. M. (1999). The management and control of quality (4th ed.). South-Western College Publishing.
10.
FotopoulosC. B., & PsomasE. L. (2009). The impact of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ TQM elements on quality management results. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 26(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710910928798
11.
FrannieL. A. (2006). Local governance in developing countries. S. Anwar (Ed.). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
12.
Government of India. (1993a). Constitution (Seventy-Third Amendment) Act, 1992 of India.
13.
Government of India. (1993b). Constitution (Seventy-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1992 of India.
14.
Government of Kerala. (2009, July 02). Guideline for implementing Front Office Management in Grama Panchayats (G.O. (MS) No. 123/2009/LSGD). Local Self Government Department.
15.
Government of Kerala. (2013a, December 02). Guideline for availing ISO 9001:2008 through total quality management in Grama Panchayats (G.O. (MS) No. 373/2013/LSGD). Local Self Government Department (LSGD).
16.
Government of Kerala. (2013b, March 15). Budget for the year 2013–14. Finance Department, Government Secretariat.
17.
Government of Kerala. (2015, January 29). Revised guideline for availing ISO 9001:2008 through total quality management in Grama Panchayats (G.O. (MS) No. 18/2015/LSGD). Local Self Government Department (LSGD).
18.
Government of Kerala. (2020). Thatheshakam 2020. (Malayalam). Local Self Government Department (LSGD).
19.
Government of Nepal. (2004). Policy paper on decentralisation in Nepal and policy paper on service delivery. HMG/Nepal: Ministry of Local Self Government.
20.
ImT., & LeeS. J. (2012). Does management performance impact citizen satisfaction?American Review of Public Administration, 42(4), 419–436.
21.
IslamN. U. (2006). Developing insights from the Total Quality Management (TQM) principles for local governments in Pakistan. https://civilica.com/doc/39925/
22.
KILA. (2015). Annual report 2016–17. Kerala Institute of Local Administration.
23.
KILA. (2016). Annual report 2015–16. Kerala Institute of Local Administration.
24.
KILA. (2020, July 22). Activity summary report of KILA—2019–20. Kerala Institute of Local Administration.
25.
KumarA. (2019). Effective local self-governance through gram panchayats: A case study from rural India. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 1(2), 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/2516602619844147
26.
LahiriS., & RajanJ. B. (2020). Local governments and sustainable development: Nurturing best practices through horizontal learning process (HLP) across countries. Teaching Public Administration, 20(10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420963161
27.
LascellesD. M., & DaleB. G. (1990). The key issues of a quality improvement process. International Journal of Production Research, 28(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207549008942688
28.
LewisW. G., PunK. F., & LallaT. R. M. (2006). International journal of productivity and performance management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 539–554.
29.
LOGIN Asia. (2015). Introduction to horizontal learning program (Workshop Report). WSP-World Bank.
30.
MabeleB. L., & SinghS. (2018). An investigation into benefits and challenges of total quality management: The case of a Gauteng Municipality. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 6(2), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0602005
31.
OaklandJ. (2000). Total quality management: Text with cases (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.
32.
OaklandJ. (2011). Leadership and policy development—The back bone of TQM—Total Quality Management, text with cases (3rd ed.). Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann.
33.
OlumY. (2014). Decentralisation in developing countries: Preconditions for successful implementation. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 23–38. https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/cjlg/article/view/4061
34.
PawarM. (2006). ‘Social’ ‘capital’? Social Science Journal, 43(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2006.02.002
35.
PawarM. (2014). Social work practice with local communities in developing countries: Imperatives for political engagement. SAGE Open, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014538640
36.
PawarM. (Ed.). (2004). Data collecting methods and experiences: A guide for social researchers. New Dawn Press.
37.
PawarM., HugmanR., AnscombeA. W. B., & AlexandraA. (2020). Searching for virtue ethics: A survey of social work ethics curriculum and educators. British Journal of Social Work, 50(6), 1816–1833. https://doi.org/10.1093/BJSW/BCZ106
38.
PsomasE., VouzasF., BourantaN., & TasiouM. (2017). Effects of total quality management in local authorities. Internal Journal of Quality Service Sciences, 9(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-0402016-0035
39.
PunK. F. (2002). Development of an integrated TQM and performance measurement system for self-assessment: A method. Total Quality Management, 13(6), 759–777.
40.
QuaziH. A., JemanginJ., LowW. K., & ChinL. K. (1998). Critical factors in quality management and guidelines for self-assessment: The case of Singapore. Total Quality Management, 9(1), 35–55.
41.
RajanJ. B. (2008a). If there is a will, there is a way: A case of Cheruvannur-Nallalam Panchayat, VoxPopuli. A Sasanet Monthly, 1(4), 2–3.
42.
RajanJ. B. (2008b). Aiming 100% quality. Kerala calling (Monthly of Government of Kerala, 3–4). Publications Division, Government of Kerala.
43.
RajanJ. B., & BijuS. K. (2013). Front office management of Grama Panchayats in Kerala: Issues and challenges (No. 16). Kerala Institute of Local Administration.
44.
RajanJ. B., & BijuS. K. (2015). People-friendly Panchayat: ISO 9001:2008 through TQM. Kerala Institute of Local Administration.
45.
RajanJ. B. (2006). Certificate course in local governance—Curriculum. Kerala Institute of Local Administration.
46.
RobertK. S., & LeightonR. (1993). Implementing total quality management in the United States. Public Productivity and Management Review, 17(1), 69–82.
47.
ShinD., KalinowskiJ. K., & El-EnerinG. A. (1998). Critical implementation issues in total quality management. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 63, 10–15.
48.
SinghJ., RastogiV., & SharmaR. (2014). Implementation of 5S practices: A review. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 2(3), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2014.5.002
49.
Sisnuhadi. (2014). The relationship between soft factors and hard factors of TQM practices and organizational learning. European Scientific Journal, 10(7), 85–99.
50.
SmokeP. (2015). Accountability and service delivery in decentralising environments: Understanding con-text and strategically advancing reform. In A. Whaites, E. Gonzalez, S. Fyson, & G. Teskey (Eds.), A governance practitioner’s notebook: Alternative ideas and approaches (pp. 220–232). OECD.
51.
SpitzerR. D. (1993). Valuing TQM through rigorous financial analysis. Quality Progress. American Society for Quality, 26(7), 49–54.
52.
VijayanandS. M. (2016). Kerala—A case study of classical democratic decentralization. Kerala Institute of Local Administration.
53.
WestJ. P., BermanE. M., & MilakovichM. E. (1993). Implementing TQM in local government: The leadership challenge. Productivity & Management Review, 17(2), 175–189.
54.
WilkinsonA., RedmanT., SnapeE., & MarchingtonM. (1998). Citizens as customers: The politics of quality in local government. In A. Wilkinson, T. Redman, E. Snape, & M. Marchington (Eds.), Managing with total quality management. Management, work and organisations. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26153-6_6
