This article assesses the effectiveness of the employment generation programme for the poorest (EGPP) and its impact on ensuring employment opportunities and employability of targeted beneficiaries in rural areas in Bangladesh. In particular, it examines the appropriateness of targeted beneficiaries, selection, and the impact of the programme on changing their livelihood and economic indicators. Respondents were selected from 12 unions of four districts of the Chattogram division, and data were collected using the interview method and key informant interview. First, the findings suggest that accurately selecting beneficiaries and households was a challenging task owing to inappropriate wage rates, social context and political influences. Besides, misappropriation of the selection process of beneficiaries is one of the main concerns of this programme. Second, the EGPP has improved the income levels of a significant number of beneficiaries and made a positive impact on their certain basic needs and livelihood indicators. Despite drawbacks in the implementation, the study concludes that the provision of adequate measures of employment generation programmes based on equity and geographical demands will notably contribute to ensuring the employability of the unemployed and marginalised sections of the country.
ADB. (2013). The social protection index: Assessing results for Asia and the Pacific. Asian Development Bank.
2.
AhmedA. U., HillR. V., & NaeemF. (2014). The poorest: Who and where they are? In BraunJ. & GatzweilerF. W. (Eds.), Marginality: Addressing the nexus of poverty, exclusion and ecology (pp. 85–100). Springer.
3.
AldermanH., & YemtsovR. (2012). Productive role of safety nets [Social Protection and Labor Discussion Paper No. 1203]. The World Bank.
4.
BalaS. K. (2020). Explaining Bangladesh’s development puzzle: Government’s approaches and civil servants’ accountability. Bangladesh’s economic and social progress (pp. 319–349). Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
Commission of the European Communities. (1999). The European employment strategy: Investing in people; investing in more and better jobs. Author.
6.
ChoY., & RuthbahU. (2018). Does workfare work well? The case of the employment generation program for the poorest in Bangladesh. The World Bank.
7.
delNinnoC., & DoroshP. (2000). In kind transfers and household food consumption: implication for targeted food programs in Bangladesh [FMRSP Working Paper No. 17]. IFPRI.
8.
DevereuxS. (2002). Can social safety nets reduce chronic poverty?Development Policy Review, 20(5), 657–675.
9.
DevereuxS. (2016). Social protection for rural poverty reduction. Rural transformations - Technical papers series 1. Food and Agriculture Organisation.
10.
GiribabuD., MohapatraC., ReddyC. S., & VV Prasada RaoP. (2019). Holistic correlation of world’s largest social safety net and its outcomes with sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(2), 113–128.
11.
Government of Bangladesh. (2009). Steps toward change, national strategy for accelerated poverty reduction 11 (Revised), FY 2009-11. General Economics Division, Planning Commission, Government of Bangladesh.
12.
Government of Bangladesh. (2010). Implementation guideline of employment generation program for the poorest (EGPP). Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief, Government of Bangladesh. (In Bangla)
13.
GroshM. E. (1994). Administering targeted social programs in Latin America: From platitudes to practice. The World Bank.
14.
HaiderM. Z., & MahamudA. (2017). Beneficiary selection and allowance utilisation of social safety net programme in Bangladesh. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 2(1–2), 45–51.
15.
HidroboM., HoddinottJ., KumarN., & OlivieM. (2018). Social protection, food security, and asset formation. World Development, 101, 88–103.
16.
HillageJ., & PollardE. (1998). Employability: developing a framework for policy analysis. DfEE.
17.
HossainK. Z, & AliM. I. (2017). Social safety net programs in Bangladesh: An empirical study on the Employment Generation Program for the Poorest (EGPP) project. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 2(3), 72–94
18.
International Labour Organisation [ILO]. (2000). Training for employment: Social inclusion, productivity and youth employment (Report V). Author.
19.
ILO. (2008). Can low-income countries afford basic social security? (Social Security Policy Briefings, Paper No 3). Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/2008/108B09_73_engl.pdf
20.
ILO. (2010). Mitigating a jobs crisis: Innovations in public employment programmes (IPEP). Author.
21.
ILO. (2014). World social protection report 2014–15. Author.
22.
KaginJ., TaylorJ. E., AlfaniF., & DavisB. (2014). Local economy-wide impact evaluation (LEWIE) of Ethiopia’s social cash transfer pilot programme [From Protection to Production Report]. FAO and the World Bank.
23.
KhatunF., KhanT. I., & NabiA. (2010). Employment generation for the hardcore poor and national service: Challenges of effective implementation [Paper presentation]. Independent Review of Bangladesh Development, Centre for Policy Dialogue.
24.
KhudaB. (2011). Social safety net programmes in Bangladesh: A review. Bangladesh Development Studies, 44(2), 87–108.
25.
KiddS. (2017). Social exclusion and access to social protection schemes. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9(2), 212–244.
26.
KrapelsJ., HafnerM., BaruchB., & StolkC. (2015). Employability of the poor. RAND Corporation, Cambridge and the World Bank.
27.
MajumdarP. P., & BegumS. (2008). The old age allowance program for the poor elderly in Bangladesh [Research Report No. 182]. Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies.
28.
MannanM. A., ChowdhuryS. Z. I., HoqueM. M., & MozumderG. N. (2018). Implication of Employment Generation Programme for the Poorest (EGPP) to reduce disaster and gender vulnerability. Think-Asia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11540/9677
29.
Manusher Jonno Foundation. (2016). Enhancing accountability and transparency of government social protection system in Bangladesh. Manusher Jonno Foundation and READ.
30.
MatinI., & HulmeD. (2003). Programs for the poorest: Learning from the IGVGD programme in Bangladesh. World Development, 31(3), 647–665.
31.
Masud-All-KamalM., & SahaC. K. (2014). Targeting social policy and poverty reduction: The case of social safety nets in Bangladesh. Poverty & Public Policy, 6(2), 195–211.
32.
MerrienF. (2013). Social protection as development policy: A new international agenda for action. The Graduate Institute, International Development Policy.
33.
MorshedK. A. M. (2009). Social safety net programmes in Bangladesh. UNDP.
34.
MurgaiR., & ZaidiS. (2005). Effectiveness of food assistance programs in Bangladesh, Journal of Developing Societies, 21(1–2), 121–142.
35.
OECD. (1998). Human capital investment: An international comparison. Author.
36.
RahmanH. Z., & Choudhury L.I. (2012). Social safety nets in Bangladesh: Ground realities and policy challenges (Vol. 2). Power and Participation Research Centre (PPRC) and UNDP.
37.
TaylorJ., ThomeK., & FilipskM. (2014). Evaluating local general equilibrium impacts of Lesotho’s child grants programme [From Protection to Production Report]. FAO and the World Bank.
38.
TaylorJ. E., KaginJ., FilipskiM., ThomeK., & HandaS. (2013). Evaluating general equilibrium impacts of Kenya’s cash transfer program for orphans and vulnerable children (CT-OVC) [From Protection to Production Report]. FAO and the World Bank.
39.
ThomeK., TaylorJ. E., DavisB., HandaS., SeidenfeldD., & TemboG. (2014a). Local economy-wide impact evaluation (LEWIE) of Zambia’s child grant program [Draft from Protection to Production Report]. FAO and the World Bank.
40.
ThomeK., TaylorJ. E., DavisB., SeidenfeldD., HandaS., & MatundiP. (2014b). Evaluating local general equilibrium impacts of Zimbabwe’s harmonized social cash transfer (HSCT) Program [From Protection to Production Report]. FAO and the World Bank.
41.
ThomeK., TaylorJ. E., KaginJ., DavisB., DarkoOseiR., Osei-AkotoI., & HandaS. (2014c). Localeconomy-wide impact evaluation (LEWIE) of Ghana’s livelihood empowerment against poverty (leap) program [From Protection to Production Report]. FAO and the World Bank.
42.
United Nations. (2001). Recommendations of the high level panel of the youth employment network. Author.
43.
VasudevaV. N. (2010). Legal intervention in poverty alleviation: Enriching the poor through law. NUJS Law Review, 3(4), 447–463.
44.
World Bank. (2006). Social safety nets in Bangladesh: An assessment(Bangladesh Development Series Paper No. 9).
45.
World Bank. (2015). The state of social safety nets2015. Author.
46.
World Bank. (2018). The state of social safety nets 2018. Author.
47.
ZamanH. (2011). Assessing the impact of employment generation programs in challenging rural poverty: A comparative study on Bangladesh and India. Journal of Poverty, 15(3), 259–276.
