This article addresses the complexities and dynamics of promoting social change with marginalised communities in the Global South. It builds empirically on a social work ethnographic study about the change process(es) and development of women’s social position in rural Nepalese communities. The research results suggest that the tools to promote ethically sustainable social change are based on decolonial and transnational feminist solidarity and its different, overlapping forms: solidarity through dialogue, alliance and exchange. The study argues that international social work and community development need to strengthen the approaches that recognise and deconstruct white and economic power dominance within their research, theory and practice. The research produces knowledge on a context-sensitive transnational solidarity praxis, which contributes to the discussion on social justice and ethicality in international development and social work paradigms.
AhmedS. (2004). Declarations of whiteness: The non-performativity of anti-racism. Borderlands E-journal, 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.borderlands.net.au/vol3no2_2004/ahmed_declarations.htm
2.
BanerjeeP. (2006). The acts and facts of women’s autonomy in India. Diogenes, 53(4), 85–101.
3.
BanksS. (2004). Ethics, accountability and the social professions. Houndmills, Basingstoke and Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BeharR. (1993). Translated woman: Crossing the border with Esperansa’s story. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
5.
BulbeckC. (1998). Re-orienting Western feminisms: Women’s diversity in a postcolonial world. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
ChannaS. M. (2013). Gender in South Asia. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CoffeyA. (1999). The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: SAGE Publications.
DeepakA. C. (2011). Globalization, power and resistance: Postcolonial and transnational feminist perspectives for social work practice. International Social Work, 55(6), 779–793.
10.
DeoN. (2012). Indian women activists and transnational feminism over the twentieth century. Journal of Women’s History, 24(4), 149–174.
11.
DominelliL. (2010). Social work in a globalising world. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
12.
DroletJ. (2010). Feminist perspectives in development: Implications for women and microcredit. Journal of Women and Social Work, 25(3), 212–223.
13.
EnguixB. (2014). Negotiating the field: Rethinking ethnographic authority, experience and the frontiers of research. Qualitative Research, 14(1), 79–94.
14.
GopalkrishnanN. (2019). Cultural competence and beyond: Working across cultures in culturally dynamic partnerships. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 1(1), 28–41.
15.
HietalahtiJ. (2011). Trade-offs, rights and responsibilities in the business of microcredit: A case study from South Africa. Helsinki: Unigrafia.
16.
HöckertE. (2015). Ethics of hospitality: Participatory tourism encounters in the Northern Highlands of Nicaragua(Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 312). Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press.
17.
JönssonJ. H. (2010). Beyond empowerment: Changing local communities. International Social Work, 53(3), 393–406.
18.
KhapungS. (2016). Transnational feminism and women’s activism: Building resilience to climate change impact through women’s empowerment in climate smart agriculture. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 22(4), 497–506.
19.
MikkonenE. (2017). Bridges over the mountain ranges: Ethnography on the complexities of transition in women’s social position in Nepalese rural communities. PhD Thesis, University of Lapland, Finland.
20.
MikkonenE.LaitinenM.HillC. (2017). Hierarchies of knowledge: Analyzing inequalities within the social work ethnographic process as ethical notions in knowledge production. Qualitative Social Work, 16(4), 515–532.
21.
MohantyC. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonising theory, practicing solidarity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
22.
MookherjeeM. (2011). Women’s rights as multicultural claims: Reconfiguring gender and diversity in political philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
23.
Moosa-MithaM.Ross-SheriffF. (2010). Transnational social work and lessons learned from transnational feminism. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 25(2), 105–109.
24.
MorseJ. M. (1994). Emerging from the data: The cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In MorseM. (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 23–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
25.
MottaS. (2015). Becoming woman: On exile and belonging to the borderlands. In ArashiroZ.BarahonaM. (Eds.), Women in academia crossing North–South borders: Gender, race and displacement (pp. 89–116). London: Lexington Books.
PokharelN.NiroulaS. (2016). They are sufferers too: Women victims of sexual violence during the Maoist conflict must get due priority. The Kathmandu Post. Retrieved from http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/printedition/news/2016-04-27/they-are-sufferers-too.html
28.
Ranta-TyrkköS. (2010). At the intersection of theatre and social work in Orissa, India: Natya Chetana and its theatre. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
29.
SeppäläT. (2016). Feminising resistance, decolonising solidarity: Contesting neoliberal development in the Global South. Journal of Resistance Studies, 2(1), 12–47.
30.
ShahR. (2017). Feminism in the margins: A Madhesi perspective. The Kathmandu Post. Retrieved from http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com.np/printedition/news/2017-02-18/feminism-in-the-margins-a-madhesi-perspective.html
31.
SmithT. S.TuckE.YangK. W. (2019). Introduction. In SmithT. S.TuckE.YangK. W. (Eds.), Indigenous and decolonizing studies in education: Mapping the long view (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
SpivakG. (1998). Can the subaltern speak. In NelsonC.GrossbergL. (Eds.), Marxism and interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
33.
SpivakG. (2005). The use and abuse of human rights: A revised version of an essay in South Atlantic Quarterly under the title ‘Righting Wrongs’. Boundary, 232(1), 131–191.
34.
UN Women. (2015). UN women to address gender-based violence in the aftermath of the earthquake in Nepal. ReliefWeb. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/nepal/un-women-address-gender-based-violence-aftermath-earthquake-nepal
35.
WehbiS.ParadaH.GeorgeP.LessaI. (2016). Going home: Social work across and about borders. International Social Work, 59(2), 284–292.
36.
YadavP. (2016). Social transformation in post-conflict Nepal: A gender perspective. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
