Chemomechanical magnetorheological finishing (CMMRF) has emerged as a nanofinishing method that combines the characteristics of chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) and magneto-rheological finishing (MRF). The CMMRF process was designed to take into account both the chemical and mechanical effects that occur during the finishing process. In the field of material processing science, this article delves into the fundamentals of the CMMRF method. The potential research patterns linked to CMMRF are assessed and their benefits are determined. Furthermore, the challenges of improving CMMRF process capabilities, as well as the wide futuristic opportunities of the research sector, are emphasised, along with meeting all industrial needs. The findings of this analysis paper will also aid researchers in the field of advanced finishing in identifying process realisation for better results.
McKeownPA.The role of precision engineering in manufacturing of the future. CIRP Ann—Manuf Technol1987; 36: 495–501.
2.
KomanduriR, LuccaDA, TaniY.Technological advances in fine abrasive processes. CIRP Ann—Manuf Technol1997; 46: 545–596.
3.
JainVK, SidparaA, SankarMR, . Nano-finishing techniques: A review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci2012; 226: 327–346.
4.
DasM, JainVK, GhoshdastidarPS.Nanofinishing of flat workpieces using rotational-magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (R-MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2012; 62: 405–420.
5.
HatefiS and Abou-El-HosseinK.Review of single-point diamond turning process in terms of ultra-precision optical surface roughness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 106: 2167–2187.
6.
KasaiT.Lapping and polishing technology. In: SomiyaS (ed)Handbook of advanced ceramics. 2nd ed. Academic Press 2003. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012654640-8/50017-1
7.
ZhaoD and LuX.Chemical mechanical polishing: Theory and experiment. Friction2013; 1: 306–326.
8.
GhoshG, SidparaA, and BandyopadhyayPP.Review of several precision finishing processes for optics manufacturing. J Micromanuf2018; 1: 170–188.
9.
SinghH and JainPK.Developments in electro-chemical honing (ECH): A review on experimental investigation of precision finishing of mechanical parts. Int J Precis Technol2016; 6: 17.
10.
KumariC and ChakSK.A review on magnetically assisted abrasive finishing and their critical process parameters. Manuf Rev2018; 5: 16. DOI: 10.1051/mfreview/2018010
11.
PateK and SafierP.Chemical metrology methods for CMP quality. Adv Chem Mech Planarization (CMP)2016; 1–325. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100165-3.00012-7
12.
YuhM, JangS, KimH, . Development of green CMP by slurry reduction through controlling platen coolant temperature. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol2015; 2: 339–344.
13.
SallagoityP, GaillardF, RivoireM, . STI process steps for sub-quarter micron CMOS. Microelectron Reliab1998; 38: 271–276.
14.
XuQ and ChenL.A material removal rate model for aluminum gate chemical mechanical planarization. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol2015; 4: P101–P107.
15.
LeeH, ParkB and JeongH.Influence of slurry components on uniformity in copper chemical mechanical planarization. Microelectron Eng2008; 85: 689–696.
16.
BanerjeeG and RhoadesRL.Chemical mechanical planarization historical review and future direction. ECS Trans2019; 13: 1–19.
17.
LeeD, LeeH and JeongH.Slurry components in metal chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) process: A review. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2016; 17: 1751–1762.
18.
LeeH, JooS, KimH, . Chemical mechanical planarization method for thick copper films of micro-electro-mechanical systems and integrated circuits. Jpn J Appl Phys2008; 47: 5708–5711.
19.
LeeH, WangH, ParkJ, . Experimental investigation of process parameters for roll-type linear chemical mechanical polishing (Roll-CMP) system. Precis Eng2014; 38: 928–934.
20.
JangS, JeongH, YuhM, . Effect of surfactant on package substrate in chemical mechanical planarization. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol2015; 2: 59–63.
21.
ZantyePB, KumarA and SikderAK.Chemical mechanical planarization for microelectronics applications. Mater Sci Eng R Rep2004; 45: 89–220.
22.
LeeH, LeeD and JeongH.Mechanical aspects of the chemical mechanical polishing process: A review. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2016; 17: 525–536.
23.
XuG, LiangH, ZhaoJ, . Investigation of copper removal mechanisms during CMP. J Electrochem Soc2004; 151: G688.
24.
W-T.TsengA comparative study on the roles of velocity in the material removal rate during chemical mechanical polishing. J Electrochem Soc1999; 146: 1952.
25.
ParkSJ, LeeHS, JeongH.Signal analysis of CMP process based on AE monitoring system. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol2015; 2: 15–19.
26.
ChenH, GuoD, XieG, . Mechanical model of nanoparticles for material removal in chemical mechanical polishing process. Friction2016; 4: 153–164.
27.
TerrellEJ, HiggsCF.Hydrodynamics of slurry flow in chemical mechanical polishing. J Electrochem Soc2006; 153: K15.
28.
HongJ, NiuX, LiuY, . Effect of a novel chelating agent on defect removal during post-CMP cleaning. Appl Surf Sci2016; 378: 239–244.
29.
GuoL and SubramanianRS.Mechanical removal in CMP of copper using alumina abrasives. J Electrochem Soc2004; 151: G104.
30.
KulkarniM, GaoF and LiangH.Chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP): A controlled tribocorrosion process. Tribocorrosion Passive Met Coat2011; 498–516. DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-84569-966-6.50018-X
31.
SeoJ and PaikU.Preparation and characterization of slurry for chemical mechanical planarization (CMP). In: BabuS (ed)Advances in chemical mechanical planarization (CMP). Woodhead Publishing, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100165-3.00011-5
32.
ShoreyAB, KordonskiW and TricardM.Magnetorheological finishing of large and lightweight optics. In: Advances in mirror technology for X-ray, EUV lithography, laser, and other applications II2004; 5533: 99. DOI: 10.1117/12.559814
33.
KordonskiW and JacobsS.Model of magnetorheological finishing. J Int Mater Sys Struct1996; 7: 131–137.
34.
ShafrirSN, LambropoulosJC, JacobsSD.Toward magnetorheological finishing of magnetic materials. J Manuf Sci Eng, Trans ASME2007; 129: 961–964.
35.
ShoreyAB, JacobsSD, KordonskiWI, . Experiments and observations regarding the mechanisms of glass removal in magnetorheological finishing. Appl Opt2001; 40: 20.
36.
BarmanA and DasM.Magnetic field assisted finishing process for super-finished Ti alloy implant and its 3D surface characterization. J Micromanuf2018; 1: 154–169.
37.
JhaS and JainVK.Rheological characterization of magnetorheological polishing fluid for MRAFF. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2009; 42: 656–668.
38.
JainJVK.Analysis of finishing forces and surface finish during magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing of asymmetric workpieces. J Micromanuf2019; 2: 133–151.
39.
HarrisDC.History of magnetorheological finishing. In: Window and Dome Technologies and Materials XII2011; 8016: 80160N. DOI: 10.1117/12.882557
40.
SidparaA, DasM and JainVK.Rheological characterization of magnetorheological finishing fluid. Mater Manuf Proc2009; 24: 1467–1478.
41.
JainVK, RanjanP, SuriVK, . Chemo-mechanical magneto-rheological finishing (CMMRF) of silicon for microelectronics applications. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol2010; 59: 323–328.
42.
RaoT and KumarA.Research journal of pharmaceutical, biological and chemical sciences: Studies on complexation of aluminium by some natural amino acids. https://www.rjpbcs.com/pdf/2014_5(4)/[43].pdf
43.
JangS, JeongH, YuhM, . Effect of glycine on copper CMP. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol2016; 3: 155–159.
44.
RanjanP, BalasubramaniamR, SuriVK, . Chemomechanical magnetorheological finishing (CMMRF). In: JainVK (ed)Nanofinishing science and technology: Basic and advanced finishing and polishing processes. 1 ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2016. DOI: 10.1201/9781315404103
45.
ClaracqJ, SarrazinJ and MontfortJP.Viscoelastic properties of magnetorheological fluids. Rheol Acta2004; 43: 38–49.
46.
de VicenteJ and BerliCLA.Aging, rejuvenation, and thixotropy in yielding magnetorheological fluids. Rheol Acta2013; 52: 467–483.
47.
WangC and ChenSH.Factors influencing particle agglomeration during solid-state sintering. Acta Mech Sin/Lixue Xuebao2012; 28: 711–719.
48.
RanjanP, BalasubramaniamR and JainVK.Analysis, design and synthesis of water-based magnetorheological fluid for CMMRF process. J Micromanuf2018; 1: 45–52.
49.
RanjanP, BalasubramaniamR and JainVK.Mechanism of material removal during nanofinishing of aluminium in aqueous KOH: A reactive molecular dynamics simulation study. Comput Mater Sci2019; 156: 35–46.
50.
RanjanP, BalasubramaniamR and JainVK.Analysis of magnetorheological fluid behavior in chemo-mechanical magnetorheological finishing (CMMRF) process. Precis Eng2017; 49: 122–135.
51.
SeokJ, LeeSO, JangKI, . Tribological properties of a magnetorheological (MR) fluid in a finishing process. Tribol Trans2009; 52: 460–469.
52.
GhaiV, RanjanP, BatishA, . Atomic-level finishing of aluminum alloy by chemo-mechanical magneto-rheological finishing (CMMRF) for optical applications. J Manuf Proc2018; 32: 635–643.
53.
RanjanP, BalasubramaniamR and SuriVK.Modelling and simulation of chemo-mechanical magnetorheological finishing (CMMRF) process. Int J Precis Technol2014; 4: 230.
54.
KimWB, LeeSH, MinBK.Surface finishing and evaluation of three-dimensional silicon microchannel using magnetorheological fluid. J Manuf Sci Eng, Trans ASME2004; 126: 772–778.
55.
SihagN, KalaP and PandeyPM.Experimental investigations of chemo-ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing process. Int J Precis Technol2015; 5: 246.
56.
SidparaA and JainVK.Effect of fluid composition on nanofinishing of single-crystal silicon by magnetic field-assisted finishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2011; 55: 243–252.
57.
BarmanA and DasM.Simulation and experimental investigation of finishing forces in magnetic field assisted finishing process. Mater Manuf Proc2018; 33: 1223–1232.
58.
OlabiAG, GrunwaldA.Design and application of magneto-rheological fluid. Mater Des2007; 28: 2658–2664.
59.
KordonskiW and GoliniD.Multiple application of magnetorheological effect in high precision finishing. J Int Mater Sys Struct2002; 13: 401–404.
60.
MiaoC, LambropoulosJC, JacobsSD.Process parameter effects on material removal in magnetorheological finishing of borosilicate glass. Appl Opt2010; 49: 1951–1963.
61.
SaraswathammaK.Magnetorheological finishing: A review. Int J Curr Eng Technol2013; 2: 168–173.
62.
SaraswathammaK, JhaS and RaoPV.Rheological characterization of MR polishing fluid used for silicon polishing in BEMRF process. Mater Manuf Proc2015; 30: 661–668.
63.
MaanS and SinghAK.Nano-surface finishing of hardened AISI 52100 steel using magnetorheological solid core rotating tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018; 95: 513–526.
64.
NagdeveL, JainVK, RamkumarJ.Development of inverse replica fixture for nano-finishing of knee joint using R-MRAFF process. J Micromanuf2019; 2: 35–41.
65.
KumarY and SinghH.Optimum design of magnetic field assisted finishing tool: A finite element study. In: SharanVH and MishraRK (eds)Advances in systems engineering. Springer, 2019, pp. 245–250.
66.
PhuléPP.Synthesis of novel magnetorheological fluids. MRS Bulletin1998; 23: 23–25.
67.
XiuS, WangR, SunB, . Preparation and experiment of magnetorheological polishing fluid in reciprocating magnetorheological polishing process. J Int Mater Sys Struct2018; 29: 125–136.
68.
BediTS, SinghAK.Magnetorheological methods for nanofinishing—A review. Part Sci Technol2016; 34: 412–422.
69.
LiuX, LuH, ChenQ, . Study on the preparation and properties of silicone oil-based magnetorheological fluids. Mater Manuf Proc2013; 28: 631–636.
70.
López-LópezMT, De VicenteJ, González-CaballeroF, . Stability of magnetizable colloidal suspensions by addition of oleic acid and silica nanoparticles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2005; 264: 75–81.
71.
De VicenteJ, KlingenbergDJ and Hidalgo-AlvarezR.Magnetorheological fluids: A review. Soft Matter2011; 7: 3701–3710.
72.
ShafrirSN, RomanofskyHJ, SkarlinskiM, . Zirconia-coated carbonyl-iron-particle-based magnetorheological fluid for polishing optical glasses and ceramics. Appl Opt2009; 48: 6797–6810.
73.
RanjanP, BalasubramaniamR and SuriVK.Development of chemo-mechanical magnetorheological finishing process for super finishing of copper alloy. Int J Manuf Technol Manag2013; 27: 130–141.
74.
RanjanP, BalasubramaniamR and JainVK.Investigations into the mechanism of material removal and surface modification at atomic scale on stainless steel using molecular dynamics simulation. Philos Mag2018; 98: 1437–1469.
75.
LiangH, LuJ, PanJ, . Material removal process of single-crystal SiC in chemical-magnetorheological compound finishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018; 94: 2939–2948.
76.
ZhuJT, BinLu J, PanJS, . Study of cluster magnetorheological-chemical mechanical polishing technology for the atomic scale ultra-smooth surface planarization of SiC. Adv Mater Res2013; 797: 284–290.
77.
YinS, WangY, LiY, . Experimental study on magnetorheological chemical polishing for sapphire substrate. Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/J Mech Eng2016; 52: 80–87.
78.
MiaoC, ShafrirSN, LambropoulosJC, . Shear stress in magnetorheological finishing for glasses. Appl Opt2009; 48: 2585–2594.
79.
MiaoC, ShafrirSN, LambropoulosJC, . Normal force and drag force in magnetorheological finishing. Opt Manuf Testing VIII2009; 7426: 74260C.
80.
SinghAK, JhaS and PandeyPM.Magnetorheological ball end finishing process. Mater Manuf Proc2012; 27: 389–394.
81.
SihagN, KalaP and PandeyPM.Analysis of surface finish improvement during ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing on chemically treated tungsten substrate. Proc Manuf2017; 10: 136–146.
82.
PandeyK and PandeyPM.Chemically assisted polishing of monocrystalline silicon wafer Si (100) by DDMAF. Proc Eng2017; 184: 178–184.
83.
KhanDA, JhaS.Selection of optimum polishing fluid composition for ball end magnetorheological finishing (BEMRF) of copper. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 100: 1093–1103.
84.
AlamZ, KhanDA, JhaS.A study on the effect of polishing fluid volume in ball end magnetorheological finishing process. Mater Manuf Proc2018; 33: 1197–1204.
85.
TaniguchiN.Current status in, and future trends of, ultraprecision machining and ultrafine materials processing. Ann ClRP1983; 32: 573–582.
86.
RaynaudC, TournierD, MorelH, . Comparison of high voltage and high temperature performances of wide bandgap semiconductors for vertical power devices. Diam Relat Mater2010; 19: 1–6.
87.
OkumuraH.Present status and future prospect of widegap semiconductor high-power devices. Jpn J Appl Phy Part 1 Reg Papers Short Notes Rev Papers2006; 45: 7565–7586.
88.
JhaS and JainVK.Nanofinishing of silicon nitride workpieces using magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing. Int J Nanomanuf2006; 1: 17–25.
89.
SidparaA and JainVK.Rheological properties and their correlation with surface finish quality in MR fluid-based finishing process. Mach Sci Technol2014; 18: 367–385.
90.
SihagN, KalaP and PandeyPM.Chemo assisted magnetic abrasive finishing: Experimental investigations. Proc CIRP2015; 26: 539–543.
91.
KordonskiWI, GoliniD.Fundamentals of magnetorheological fluid utilization in high precision finishing. J Int Mat Sys Struct1999; 10: 683–689.
92.
DorrerC and ZuegelJD.Optical testing using the transport-of-intensity equation. Opt Exp2007; 15: 7165.
93.
KumarM, KumarA, AlokA, . Magnetorheological method applied to optics polishing: A review. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2020; 804. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/804/1/012012
