ShahSJDevon-SandAMaSP, et al.Ambient artificial intelligence scribes: physician burnout and perspectives on usability and documentation burden. J Am Med Inform Assoc2025; 32: 375–380.
7.
GichoyaJWThomasKCeliLA, et al.AI pitfalls and what not to do: mitigating bias in AI. Br J Radiol2023; 96: 20230023.
8.
FerrerXvan NuenenTSuchJM, et al.Bias and discrimination in AI: a cross-disciplinary perspective. IEEE Technol Soc Mag2021; 40: 72–80.
9.
HaiderSABornaSGomez-CabelloCA, et al.The algorithmic divide: A systematic review on AI-driven racial disparities in healthcare. J Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. Epub ahead of print 18 December 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02237-0
10.
MalekiNPadmanabhanBDuttaK. AI Hallucinations: a misnomer worth clarifying. In: 2024 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI), pp.133–138.
JoshiGJainAAraveetiSR, et al.FDA-approved artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-enabled medical devices: an updated landscape. Electronics (Basel)2024; 13: 498.
13.
Seyyed-KalantariLZhangHMcDermottMBA, et al.Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations. Nat Med2021; 27: 2176–2182.
14.
TripathiSGabrielKDheerS, et al.Understanding biases and disparities in radiology AI datasets: a review. J Am Coll Radiol2023; 20: 836–841.
15.
WongAOtlesEDonnellyJP, et al.External validation of a widely implemented proprietary sepsis prediction model in hospitalized patients. JAMA Intern Med2021; 181: 1065–1070.
16.
VelaDSharpAZhangR, et al.Temporal quality degradation in AI models. Sci Rep2022; 12: 11654.
17.
CarlJRMillerCBHenryAL, et al.Efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for moderate-to-severe symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Depress Anxiety2020; 37: 1168–1178.
ArmeniPPolatIDe RossiLM, et al.Exploring the potential of digital therapeutics: an assessment of progress and promise. DIGITAL HEALTH2024; 10: 20552076241277441.
ArjantoPSendukFFWNahdiyahU, et al.AI and ethics in mental health: exploring the controversy over the use of ChatGPT. J Public Health (Oxf)2024; 46: e340–e341.
22.
ChengSWChangCWChangWJ, et al.The now and future of ChatGPT and GPT in psychiatry. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci2023; 77: 592–596.
23.
DergaaIFekih-RomdhaneFHallitS, et al.ChatGPT is not ready yet for use in providing mental health assessment and interventions. Front Psychiatry2024; 14: 1277756. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1277756.
NongPAdler-MilsteinJApathyNC, et al.Current use and evaluation of artificial intelligence and predictive models in US hospitals. Health Aff2025; 44: 90–98.
28.
LawrenceKKuramVSLevineDL, et al.Informed consent for ambient documentation using generative AI in ambulatory care. JAMA Netw Open2025; 8: e2522400.
29.
SchiffDBorensteinJ. How should clinicians communicate with patients about the roles of artificially intelligent team members?AMA J Ethics2019; 21: E138–E145.
30.
HurleyMELangBHKostick-QuenetKM, et al.Patient consent and the right to notice and explanation of AI systems used in health care. Am J Bioeth2025; 25: 102–114.
31.
MurphyJWMilesCIA. The introduction of AI into OpenNotes and the prospects for dialogue. Health Policy Technol2025; 14: 101059.
32.
WalkerJLeveilleSBellS, et al.Opennotes after 7 years: patient experiences with ongoing access to their clinicians’ outpatient visit notes. J Med Internet Res2019; 21: e13876.