Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Diagnostic excellence is an emerging construct that could be further operationalized by capturing relevant domains of experiences and outcomes reported by patients and care partners. Characterization of when, where, and how these domains can be assessed while considering populations most vulnerable to diagnostic disparities, is critical.

Objective

We aimed to devise a framework for patient-reported measurement opportunities to center patients and health equity in diagnostic excellence.

Methods

Adapting an existing set of patient diagnostic error journeys, we used human-centered design to illustrate additional journeys and identify opportunities for patient reporting on their experiences and outcomes throughout. We mapped previously identified diagnostically relevant patient-reported domains into the journeys exploring specifications of these domains from diagnostic error to diagnostic excellence. We relied on internal expert consultations and a five-session international expert convening.

Results

We grouped patient journeys into seven pairs of diagnostic error and counterfactual excellence scenarios including journeys of those who are “invisible” to the health system. We organized the journeys into a taxonomy based on their timing, setting, and diagnostic care utilization. The domains were specified under diagnostic excellence and aggregated into a 21-domain map. We identified up to four measurement opportunities throughout diagnostic journeys: Pre-encounter, within-encounter, immediate post-encounter, and subsequent cross-sectional. We synthesized the taxonomy, domain map, and measurement opportunities into a multi-part framework for patient-reported measurement of diagnostic excellence.

Conclusions

The presented framework informs patient-reported measurement for the emerging construct of diagnostic excellence and anticipates needs for a suite of patient-reported measures for various settings and timings.

Keywords

Diagnostic excellence patient reporting disparities measurement framework

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Institute of Medicine (and Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care). Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2015, p.1.

Burstin

Cosby

. Measuring performance of the diagnostic process. JAMA 2022; 328: 143–144.

Yang

Fineberg

Cosby

. Diagnostic excellence. JAMA 2021; 329: 1905–1906.

Verhagen

de Vos

Sujan

, et al. The problem with making safety-II work in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2022; 31: 402–408.

Sujan

Lounsbury

Pickup

, et al. What kinds of insights do safety-I and safety-II approaches provide? A critical reflection on the use of SHERPA and FRAM in healthcare. Saf Sci 2024; 173: 106450. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106450

Schlesinger

Grob

Gleason

, et al. Patient Experience as a Source for Understanding the Origins, Impact, and Remediation of Diagnostic Errors. Volume 1: Why Patient Narratives Matter. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2023. AHRQ Publication No. 23-0040-2-EF.

Schlesinger

Grob

Shaller

. Using patient-Reported information to improve clinical practice. Health Serv Res 2015; 50: 2116–2154.

McDonald

Bryce

Graber

. The patient is in: patient involvement strategies for diagnostic error mitigation. BMJ Qual Saf 2013; 22: ii33–ii39.

Berwick

. Diagnostic excellence through the lens of patient-Centeredness. JAMA 2021; 326: 2127–2128.

10.

Dukhanin

Sharma

, et al. Patient and family engagement in patient safety practices: A making healthcare safer rapid response review. J Patient Safety Risk Manage 2024; 29: 135–147.

11.

Dukhanin

Gamper

Gleason

, et al. Patient-reported outcome and experience domains for diagnostic excellence: a scoping review to inform future measure development. Qual Life Res 2024; 33: 2883–2897.

12.

McDonald

. Achieving equity in diagnostic excellence. JAMA 2022; 327: 1955–1956.

13.

Giardina

Woodard

Singh

. Advancing diagnostic equity through clinician engagement, community partnerships, and connected care. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38: 1293–1295.

14.

National Quality Forum. Improving diagnostic quality and safety/reducing diagnostic error: Measurement considerations. Final report, 2020.

15.

Vagal

Wahab

Lecky

, et al. Optimizing patient experience using human-centered design. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17: 668–672.

16.

Vechakul

Shrimali

Sandhu

. Human-Centered design as an approach for place-Based innovation in public health: A case study from Oakland, California. Matern Child Health J 2015; 19: 2552–2559.

17.

Göttgens

Oertelt-Prigione

. The application of human-Centered design approaches in health research and innovation: A narrative review of current practices. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021; 9: e28102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2196/28102

18.

Bazzano

Martin

Hicks

, et al. Human-centred design in global health: A scoping review of applications and contexts. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0186744. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186744

19.

Buchanan

. Human dignity and human rights: Thoughts on the principles of human-centered design. Design Issues 2001; 17: 35–39.

20.

Addario

Geissler

Horn

, et al. Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials. Health Expect 2020; 23: 41–51.

21.

Calvert

Thwaites

Kyte

, et al. Putting patient-reported outcomes on the ‘Big data road map’. J R Soc Med 2015; 108(8): 299–303.

22.

Canadian Institute for Health Information. Patient-centred measurement and reporting in Canada launching the discussion toward a future state. 2017.

23.

Franklin

Chenok

Lavalee

, et al. Framework to guide the collection and use of patient-reported outcome measures in the learning healthcare system. EGEMS (Wash DC), 2017.

24.

Galper

Shamai-Rosler

Stanger

, et al. PRO (Patient reported outcomes) implementation: From vision to reality. Stud Health Technol Inform 2019; 264: 1839–1840.

25.

Øvretveit

Zubkoff

Nelson

, et al. Using patient-reported outcome measurement to improve patient care. Int J Qual Health Care 2017; 29: 874–879.

26.

Williams

Thompson

. Patient-reported outcome measures: Stakeholder interviews. 2018. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/ default/files/migrated/PROMs-stakeholder-interviews-report-2018.pdf .

27.

McDonald

Gleason

Jajodia

, et al. Achieving diagnostic excellence: Roadmaps to develop and use patient-Reported measures with an equity lens. Int J Health Policy Manag 2024; 13: 8048. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8048

28.

Lewis

Langhinrichsen-Rohling

Selwyn

, et al. Once BITTEN, twice shy: An applied trauma-informed healthcarE model. Nurs Sci Q 2019; 32: 291–298.

29.

Williams-Bader

McDonald

Drye

. Advancing measurement of diagnostic excellence for better healthcare. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2025; 51: 386–387.

30.

Dukhanin

McDonald

Gonzalez

, et al. Patient reasoning: Patients’ and care Partners’ perceptions of diagnostic accuracy in emergency care. Med Decis Making 2024; 44: 102–111.

31.

Papieva

McDonald

, et al. Getting the diagnosis right: World patient safety day 2024. J Patient Safety Risk Manage 2024; 29: 174–177.

32.

Hannawa

. Shared decision-making in an era of silo-based care (or what it takes to tango). J Patient Safety Risk Manage 2024; 29: 131–134.

33.

. Patient reports of patient safety: An underused technology. J Patient Safety Risk Manage 2024; 29: 72–73.

34.

Bell

Bourgeois

DesRoches

, et al. Filling a gap in safety metrics: development of a patient-centred framework to identify and categorise patient-reported breakdowns related to the diagnostic process in ambulatory care. BMJ Qual Saf 2022; 31: 526–540.

35.

Giardina

Choi

Upadhyay

, et al. Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29: 1091–1100.

36.

Gleason

Peterson

Dennison Himmelfarb

, et al. Feasibility of patient-reported diagnostic errors following emergency department discharge: a pilot study. Diagnosis (Berl) 2020; 8: 187–192.

37.

Gleason

McDonald

. In response to ledford and colleagues toward a model of shared meaningful diagnosis: How to capture a shared, meaningful diagnosis? Patient Educ Couns 2020; S0738-3991: 30461–30464.

38.

Epstein

Street

Jr . Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. NIH Publication No. 07-6225 ed. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2007.

39.

Hannawa

. “SACCIA safe communication”: Five core competencies for safe and high-quality care. J Patient Safety Risk Manage 2018; 23: 99–107.

40.

Conijn

Santema

TBK

Bipat

, et al. Clinimetric evaluation of the vascular quality of life questionnaire in patients with lower limb Ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 53: 412–418.

41.

Carrozzino

Christensen

Cosci

. Construct and criterion validity of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for depression: A clinimetric comparison. J Affect Disord 2021; 283: 30–35.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

7.85 MB

Patient-reported measurement opportunities of diagnostic excellence: From whom,what,when,and where

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material