Responding to health information technology reported safety events: Insights from patient safety event reports

Abstract

Objective

We analyzed the described resolutions of patient safety event reports related to health information technology to determine how healthcare systems responded to these events, recognizing that certain types of solutions such as training and education have a limited impact.

Methods

A large database of over 1.7 million patient safety event reports was filtered to include those identified by the reporter as being related to health information technology. The resolution text was manually reviewed and coded into one or more of four categories: No Resolution, Training/Education, Policy, Information Technology-oriented solution.

Results

Most events (64%) did not include a resolution. Of those that did, Training/Education was the most commonly reported single or component of a multi-pronged solution (55%), followed by Information Technology (45%). Only 59 events (6% of resolutions) described more than one method of resolution.

Conclusion

Health information technology-related patient safety event resolutions most often described a solution that suggested additional training or education for healthcare staff, despite the recognized limitations of training and education in resolving these events. Few events suggested multiple resolution methods. Ensuring health information technology-related events are resolved and incorporate effective solutions should be a continued focus area for healthcare systems.

Keywords

Patient safety event reports health information technology safety event resolution

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Middleton

Bloomrosen

Dente

et al . Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20: e2–e8.

Institute of Medicine. Health IT and patient safety building safer systems for better care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2012.

Howe

Adams

Hettinger

et al . Electronic health record usability issues and potential contribution to patient harm. J Am Med Assoc 2018; 9: 11–13.

McAlearney

Robbins

Kowalczyk

et al . The role of cognitive and learning theories in supporting successful EHR system implementation training: a qualitative study. Med Care Res Rev 2012; 69: 294–315.

Patel

Ozok

AA.

Exploring training issues in healthcare: towards identifying barriers to increase electronic medical records adoption by healthcare professionals. Information Quality in e-Health. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2011; 7058: 657–671.

Miller

Stimely

Matheny

et al. Novice nurse preparedness to effectively use electronic health records in acute care settings: critical informatics knowledge and skill gaps. Online J Nurs Inform 2014; 18(2). Retrieved from http://www.himss.org/novice-nurse-preparedness-effectively-use-electronic-health-records-acute-care-settings-critical

Kim

Clarke

Belden

et al. Usability challenges and barriers in EHR training of primary care resident physicians. Duffy V.G. Digital Human Modeling. Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2014; 8529: 385–391.

Hettinger

Fairbanks

Hegde

et al . An evidence-based toolkit for the development of effective and sustainable root cause analysis system safety solutions. J Healthc Risk Manag 2013; 33: 11–20.

Kellogg

Hettinger

Shah

et al. Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety? BMJ Qual. Saf 2016; 26: 381-387.

10.

Clarke

JR.

How a system for reporting medical errors can and cannot improve patient safety.

Am Surg 2006; 72: 1088–291.

11.

Cullen

Bates

Small

et al . The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1995; 21: 541–548.

12.

Kellogg

Puthumana

Fong

et al. Understanding the types and effects of clinical interruptions and distractions recorded in a multi-hospital patient safety reporting system. Journal of patient safety. Epub ahead of print July 2018.

13.

Larsen

Fong

Wernz

et al. Implications of electronic health record downtime: an analysis of patient safety event reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25(2): 187–191.

14.

Milch

Salem

Pauker

et al . Voluntary electronic reporting of medical errors and adverse events. An analysis of 92,547 reports from 26 acute care hospitals. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 165–170.

15.

Chai

KEK

Anthony

Coiera

et al . Using statistical text classification to identify health information technology incidents. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20: 980–985.

16.

Fong

Adams

Gaunt

et al. Identifying health information technology related safety event reports from patient safety event report databases. J Biomed Inform 2018; 86: 135-142.

17.

Fong

Howe

Adams

et al . Using active learning to identify health information technology related patient safety events. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8: 35–46.

18.

Magrabi

Ong

M-S

Runciman

et al . Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19: 45–53.

19.

Amato

Salazar

Hickman

et al. Computerized prescriber order entry – related patient safety reports: analysis of 2522 medication errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24(2): 316-322.

20.

Adams

Howe

Fong

et al . An analysis of patient safety incident reports associated with electronic health record interoperability. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8: 593–602.

21.

AHRQ. AHRQ common formats, www.pso.ahrq.gov/common (accessed 11 January 2016).

22.

Trbovich

Shojania

KG.

Root-cause analysis: swatting at mosquitoes versus draining the swamp. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26: 350–353.