Implementation of a second victim program in the neonatal intensive care unit: An interim analysis of employee satisfaction

Abstract

Background

While research has established the negative impact of medical errors or adverse events on healthcare providers, few organizations have evaluated support programs for second victims. Thus, we examined satisfaction with a peer support program to provide lessons learned from early implementation.

Methods

Participants (N = 466) were recruited from seven neonatal intensive care units affiliated with a large, pediatric hospital. Following implementation of a peer support program, a mixed-method online survey assessed program satisfaction at 12 month follow-up (n = 250, 54%).

Results

Most participants were female (n = 243, 97%), white (n = 239, 96%), and nurses (n = 180, 72%), with an average age of 40.80 (SD = 11.89) years. Ninety-three (37%) participants observed or were directly involved in an error or adverse event during the preceding six months. Thirty-six (14%) received support from someone within the neonatal intensive care unit, and 16 (16%) had spoken with a peer supporter after the event. All users reported benefit from the interaction. However, most participants were unaware of the program or had not utilized it.

Conclusion

Findings suggested that peer support programs are likely to be viewed favorably by second victims. Healthcare providers who accessed the program felt it was a valuable resource and helped them return to work effectively after an error or adverse event. Better communication is needed during early implementation of any peer support program to increase awareness and use of this resource among healthcare providers.

Keywords

Second victim peer support care for caregiver

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Parker

Lawton

Psychological contribution to the understanding of adverse events in healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 453–457.

Kohn

Corrigan

Donaldson

MS.

To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2000.

Lindeman

Laara

Hakko

et al . A systematic review on gender-specific suicide mortality in medical doctors. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 168: 274–279.

Shanafelt

Balch

Dyrbye

et al . Suicidal ideation among American surgeons. Arch Surg 2011; 146: 54–62.

Gazoni

Amato

Malik

et al . The impact of perioperative catastrophes on anesthesiologists: results of a national survey. Anesth Analg 2012; 114: 596–603.

Scott

Hirschinger

Cox

et al . Caring for our own: deploying a systemwide second victim rapid response team. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010; 36: 233–240.

Edrees

Paine

Feroli

et al . Health care workers as second victims of medical errors. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2011; 121: 101–108.

Krzan

Merandi

Morvay

et al . Implementation of a “second victim” program in a pediatric hospital. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2015; 72: 563–567.

Lander

Connor

Shah

et al . Otolaryngologists’ responses to errors and adverse events. Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 1114–1120.

10.

Wolf

Serembus

Smetzer

et al . Responses and concerns of healthcare providers to medication errors. Clin Nurse Spec 2000; 278–290.

11.

Seys

Van Gerven

et al . Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof 2013; 36: 135–162.

12.

Fahrenkopf

Sectish

Barger

et al . Rates of medication errors among depressed and burnt out residents: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2008; 336: 488–491.

13.

Van Den Bos

Rustagi

Gray

et al . The $17.1 billion problem: the annual cost of measurable medical errors. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011; 30: 596–603.

14.

Waldman

Frank

Sanjeev

et al . The shocking cost of turnover in health care. Health Care Manage Rev 2004; 29: 2–7.

15.

AW.

Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ 2000; 320: 726–727.

16.

Burlison

Quillivan

Scott

et al . The effects of the second victim phenomenon on work-related outcomes: connecting self-reported caregiver distress to turnover intentions and absenteeism. J Patient Saf 2 November 2016. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000301.

17.

Irvine

Martin

EG.

Job satisfaction and turnover among nurses: integrating research findings across studies. Nurse Res 1995; 44(4): 246–253.

18.

Christensen

Levinson

Dunn

PM.

The heart of darkness: the impact of perceived mistakes on physicians. J Gen Intern Med 1992; 7: 424–431.

19.

Engel

Rosenthal

Sutcliffe

KM.

Residents’ responses to medical error: coping, learning, and change. Acad Med 2006; 81: 86–93.

20.

Burlison

Scott

Browne

et al. The second victim experience and support tool (SVEST): validation of an organizational resource for assessing second victim effects and the quality of support resources. J Patient Saf 2017; 13(2): 93–102.

21.

Edrees

Connors

Paine

et al . Implementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a case study. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e011708.

22.

Denham

CR.

TRUST: the 5 rights of the second victim. J Patient Saf 2007; 3: 107–119.

23.

Dukhanin

Edrees

Connors

et al . Case: a second victim support program in pediatrics: successes and challenges to implementation. J Pediatr Nurs 2018; 41: 54–59.

24.

Kaushal

Bates

Landrigan

et al . Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA 2001; 285: 2114–2120.

25.

Winning

Merandi

Lewe

et al . The emotional impact of errors or adverse events on healthcare providers in the NICU: the protective role of coworker support. J Adv Nurs 2017; 74: 172–180.

26.

Harris

Taylor

Thielke

et al . Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42: 377–381.

27.

IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows. New York: IBM Corp., 2016.

28.

Hickey

Kipping

A multi-stage approach to the coding of data from open-ended questions. Nurse Res 1996; 4: 81–91.

29.

Sirriyeh

Lawton

Gardner

et al . Coping with medical error: a systematic review of papers to assess the effects of involvement in medical errors on healthcare professionals’ psychological well-being. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19: 1–8.

30.

Merandi

Liao

Lewe

et al . Deployment of a second victim peer support program: a replication study. Pediatr Qual Saf 2017; 2: e031.