Error detection and analysis alone cannot create or sustain a culture of safe, high-quality, compassionate care for patients. Some experts have endorsed a unit-based approach to improving quality, but there are few examples and those rarely focus on reducing all preventable harms and engaging frontline clinicians, patients, and families.
Approach: We implemented a unit-based approach comprising seven building blocks for creating a comprehensive approach to detect and prevent harm at the unit level within a hospital: (1) unit quality council and stakeholder buy-in, (2) parent engagement and advisory council, (3) frontline clinician and parent quality improvement training, (4) measurement of organizational contextual factors, (5) electronic health record trigger development and synthesis of harm measures, (6) subcommittees to review harm, and (7) quality improvement teams.
Challenges and Lessons Learned: Challenges include conceptualizing triggers for a unit unfamiliar with this methodology, establishing unit resources for collecting and analyzing data, and creating processes to integrate parents in unit quality efforts. The seven essential building blocks helped overcome these challenges and could be adopted by other healthcare organizations.
Conclusion
These building blocks create a generalizable foundation for establishing a unit-based approach to detecting and preventing harm.
JamesJT.A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf2013;
9: 122–128.
2.
National Patient Safety Foundation. Free from harm: accelerating patient safety improvement fifteen years after to err is human.
Boston, MA:
Author, 2015.
3.
GiraldoPSatoLSalaMet al.
A retrospective review of medical errors adjudicated in court between 2002 and 2012 in Spain. Int J Qual Health Care2016;
28: 33–39.
4.
KällbergASGöranssonKEÖstergrenJet al.
Medical errors and complaints in emergency department care in Sweden as reported by care providers, healthcare staff, and patients – a national review. Eur J Emerg Med2013;
20: 33–38.
5.
PronovostPNeedhamDBerenholtzSet al.
An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med2006;
355: 2725–2732.
6.
WangYEldridgeNMeterskyMLet al.
National trends in patient safety for four common conditions, 2005–2011. N Engl J Med2014;
370: 341–351.
7.
LandriganCPParryGJBonesCBet al.
Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. N Engl J Med2010;
363: 2124–2134.
8.
ShojaniaKGThomasEJ.Trends in adverse events over time: why are we not improving?BMJ Qual Saf2013;
22: 273–277.
9.
BainesRLangelaanMde BruijneMet al.
How effective are patient safety initiatives? A retrospective patient record review study of changes to patient safety over time. BMJ Qual Saf2015;
24: 561–571.
10.
LevinsonDR.Adverse events in hospitals: national incidence among medicare beneficiaries.
Washington, DC:
Department of Health and Human Services, 2010, http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-06-09-00090 (accessed February 2017).
11.
ThomasEJClassenDC.Patient safety: let’s measure what matters. Ann Intern Med2014;
160: 642–643.
12.
WongBMDyalSEtchellsEEet al.
Application of a trigger tool in near real time to inform quality improvement activities: a prospective study in a general medicine ward. BMJ Qual Saf2015;
24: 272–281.
13.
RajuTNSureshGHigginsRD.Patient safety in the context of neonatal intensive care: research and educational opportunities. Pediatr Res2011;
70: 109–115.
14.
ClassenDCResarRGriffinFet al. ‘
Global trigger tool’ shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured. Health Aff (Millwood)2011;
30: 581–589.
15.
ThomasEJ.The future of measuring patient safety: prospective clinical surveillance. BMJ Qual Saf2015;
24: 244–245.
16.
MillmanEAPronovostPJMakaryMAet al.
Patient-assisted incident reporting including the patient in patient safety. J Patient Saf2011;
7: 106–108.
17.
Dixon-WoodsMBakerRCharlesKet al.
Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study. BMJ Qual Saf2014;
23: 106–115.
18.
BohmerRM.The hard work of health care transformation. N Engl J Med2016;
375: 709–711.
19.
CurtisJRCookDJWallRJet al.
Intensive care unit quality improvement: a “how-to” guide for the interdisciplinary team. Crit Care Med2006;
34: 211–218.
Gould LJ, Wachter PA, Aboumatar H, et al. Clinical communities at johns hopkins medicine: an emerging approach to quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2015; 41(9): 387, AP1.
22.
Aveling E-L, Martin G, Armstrong N, et al. Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice. J Health Org Mgt 2012; 26(2): 158–174.
Institute for Patient and Family-Centered Care. Advancing the practice of patient- and family-centered care in hospitals: how to get started, www.ipfcc.org/resources/getting_started.pdf (accessed12 February 2018).
26.
KaplanHCProvostLPet al.
The model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf2012;
21: 13–20.
27.
Tomoaia-CotiselAScammonDLWaitzmanNJet al.
Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann Fam Med2013;
11: S115–S123.
SharekPJHorbarJDMasonWet al.
Adverse events in the neonatal intensive care unit: development, testing, and findings of an NICU-focused trigger tool to identify harm in North American NICUs. Pediatrics2006;
118: 1332–1340.
30.
SammerCMillerSJonesCet al.
Developing and evaluating an automated all-cause harm trigger system. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf2017;
43: 155–165.
31.
StockwellDCBisaryaHClassenDCet al.
Development of an electronic pediatric all-cause harm measurement tool using a modified Delphi method. J Patient Saf2016;
12: 180–189.
32.
Murphy DR, Meyer AND, Vaghani V, et al. Development and validation of trigger algorithms to identify delays in diagnostic evaluation of gastroenterological cancer. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2018; 16(1): 90–98.
33.
LandriganCPStockwellDToomeySLet al.
Performance of the global assessment of pediatric patient safety (GAPPS) tool. Pediatrics2016;
137: e20154076.
