Abstract
Advancing reflective practice for teaching entrepreneurship education (EE) in higher education requires educators to adapt their teaching. This article explores how entrepreneurship educators develop systematic rationales for defining their teaching practice’s values, beliefs, and aspirations. The empirical study reveals how educators construct different categories of teaching philosophies to become context-aware and balance EE purposes. The research question is: How do entrepreneurship educators develop their teaching philosophies to foster reflective practice and improve their pedagogical approaches? I explored this by studying existing approaches to teaching philosophies from educational science and conducting an empirical investigation at a university of applied sciences. The findings identify how educator development in EE may be guided by facilitating a reflective practice, aiding the entrepreneurship educator to foster sound pedagogical and didactical reflections and choices. The study presents an empirically refined integral perspective in which the balancing of EE purposes is promoted through three distinctive categories of teaching philosophies: 1) Teaching practice didactics and vocabulary; 2) Educators as agents in an institutional context; and 3) Professional practice as context for EE. The insights highlight critical strategies for developing teaching philosophies that are adaptable, purpose-driven, and responsive to the dynamic nature of entrepreneurship and facilitating reflective practice. In doing so, I contribute an entry point to discuss teaching philosophies in EE and bring this vital topic to the forefront, henceforth discussing how to enable and advance further understanding of the crucial roles of entrepreneurship educators in higher education.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
