How will instructors effectively manage the use of artificial intelligence (AI) with generative capabilities in entrepreneurship education? This paper introduces a framework to help instructors understand the different roles played by AI and learners as they move through different phases of a learning task. We describe the Artificial Intelligence in Entrepreneurship Education (AIEE) framework to outline the roles and relationships that instructors, students, and AI systems may play as part of a learning task in the classroom. We articulate key takeaways for instructors to recognize the responsibilities that are associated with different roles at different phases of a learning task.
AlaM.RobinM.RasulT.WegnerD. (2022). Understanding the possibilities and conditions for instructor-AI collaboration in entrepreneurship education. In Technology and entrepreneurship education (pp. 159–185). Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
AskellA.BaiY.ChenA.DrainD.GanguliD.HenighanT.JonesA.JosephN.MannB.DasSarmaN.ElhageN.Hatfield-DoddsZ.HernandezD.KernionJ.NdousseK.OlssonC.AmodeiD.BrownT.ClarkJ.KaplanJ. (2021). A general language assistant as a laboratory for alignment. arXiv.
3.
BelbinR. M. (2012). Beyond the team. Routledge.
4.
BellR.BellH. (2023). Entrepreneurship education in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Entrepreneurship Education, 6(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-023-00099-x
5.
BommasaniR.HudsonD. A.AdeliE.AltmanR.AroraS.von ArxS.BernsteinM. S.BohgJ.BosselutA.BrunskillE.BrynjolfssonE.BuchS.CardD.CastellonR.ChatterjiN.ChenA.CreelK.DavisJ. Q.DemszkyD.LiangP. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv.
6.
CarliniN.TramerF.WallaceE.JagielskiM.Herbert-VossA.LeeK.RobertsA.BrownT.SongD.ErlingssonU.OpreaA.RaffelC. (2021). Extracting training data from large language models. In 30th USENIX security symposium (USENIX security 21) (pp. 2633–2650). {USENIX} Association.
7.
CavanaghA.FreemanS.KalfadellisP.HerbertK. (2017). Assigned versus assumed: Towards a contemporary, detailed understanding of subsidiary autonomy. International Business Review, 26(6), 1168–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.04.007
ChoudhuryP.StarrE.AgarwalR. (2020). Machine learning and human capital complementarities: Experimental evidence on bias mitigation. Strategic Management Journal, 41(8), 1381–1411. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3152
10.
CirulliF.EliaG.LorenzoG.MargheritaA.SolazzoG. (2016). The use of MOOCs to support personalized learning: An application in the technology entrepreneurship field. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 8(1), 109.
11.
DillenbourgP.JermannP. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In New science of learning: Cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 525–552). Springer Science & Business Media.
12.
FayolleA. (2018). Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. In A research agenda for entrepreneurship education (pp. 127–138). Edward Elgar Publishing.
13.
FlodenR. E.BuchmannM. (1993). Between routines and anarchy: Preparing teachers for uncertainty. Oxford Review of Education, 19(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498930190308
14.
FoxJ. (2024). Reporting on artificial intelligence use in entrepreneurship research: Using a model card. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503241238691
15.
FoxJ.PittawayL.UzuegbunamI. (2018). Simulations in entrepreneurship education: Serious games and learning through play. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737285
16.
GalitskyB. A. (2023). Truth-O-Meter: Collaborating with LLM in fighting its hallucinations.
17.
GuH.DegachiC.GençU.ChandrasegaranS.VermaH. (2023). On the effectiveness of creating conversational agent personalities through prompting. arXiv.
18.
HwangG. J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments-a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0004-5
19.
HwangG. J.XieH.WahB. W.GaševićD. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1(13), Article 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
20.
KaddourJ.HarrisJ.MozesM.BradleyH.RaileanuR.McHardyR. (2023). Challenges and applications of large language models. arXiv.
21.
KapoorS.NarayananA. (2022). Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in ML-based science. arXiv.
22.
LebovitzS.Lifshitz-AssafH.LevinaN. (2023). The no. 1 question to ask when evaluating AI tools. MIT Sloan Management Review, 64(3), 27–30.
23.
LengfeldJ.ZalewskiT.ShugarL. (2024). Shared mental models as the framework for team role development: A grounded model of dynamics in student new venture teams. Current Issues in Entrepreneurship Research, 6, 1.
24.
MitchellM.KrakauerD. C. (2023). The debate over understanding in AI’s large language models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(13), Article e2215907120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215907120
25.
MitchellM.WuS.ZaldivarA.BarnesP.VassermanL.HutchinsonB.SpitzerE.RajiI. D.GebruT. (2019, January). Model cards for model reporting. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 220–229). Association for Computing Machinery.
26.
MollickE.MollickL. (2023). Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts. arXiv.
NwanaH. S. (1990). Intelligent tutoring systems: An overview. Artificial Intelligence Review, 4(4), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00168958
29.
PittawayL.EdwardsC. (2012). Assessment: Examining practice in entrepreneurship education. Education + Training, 54(8/9), 778–800. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211274882
30.
PittawayL.HuxtableL.HannonP. (2018). Entrepreneurial learning and educational practice. In BlackburnR.De ClercqD.HeinonenJ. (Eds.), Sage handbook for entrepreneurship and small business. Sage.
31.
PittawayL.ThorpeR. (2012). A framework for entrepreneurial learning: A tribute to jason cope. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(9–10), 837–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.694268
32.
PolitisD.GabrielssonJ. (2009). Entrepreneurs' attitudes towards failure: An experiential learning approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 15(4), 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550910967921
33.
RospigliosiP. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in teaching and learning: What questions should we ask of ChatGPT?Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2180191
34.
SiemonD. (2022). Elaborating team roles for artificial intelligence-based teammates in human-AI collaboration. Group Decision and Negotiation, 31(5), 871–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-022-09792-z
35.
TerwieschC. (2023). Would chat GPT get a Wharton MBA. A prediction based on its performance in the operations management course. Wharton: Mack Institute for Innovation Management/University of Pennsylvania/School Wharton.
36.
TownsendD. M.HuntR. A.RadyJ.ManochaP.JinJ. H. (2023). Are the futures computable? Knightian uncertainty and artificial intelligence. Academy of Management Review.
37.
WangB.LiuH.AnP.LiQ.LiK.ChenL.ZhangQ.ZhangX.GuS. (2018). Artificial intelligence and education. In JinD. (Ed.), Reconstructing our orders (pp. 129–161). Springer.
38.
WinklerC.HammodaB.NoyesE.Van GelderenM. (2023). Entrepreneurship education at the dawn of generative artificial intelligence. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 6(4), 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274231198799
39.
YangK. B.EcheverriaV.LuZ.MaoH.HolsteinK.RummelN.AlevenV. (2023, April). Pair-up: Prototyping human-AI co-orchestration of dynamic transitions between individual and collaborative learning in the classroom. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–17). Association for Computing Machinery.
