The aim of this article is to explore the place that fiction writing can take in an entrepreneurship and innovation curriculum. The need to project oneself into an uncertain future, and the lack of guidelines for doing so, generally plunges students into a perplexity that leads them to be very conservative in their projects. Creativity was used to help them get out of this caution and call on their imagination to think about the needs of tomorrow’s citizens. The deviation through science fiction allowed them to produce a more radically new world and to reflect within that world on the creation of an activity that is really in line with that future.
AhmadT. (2020). Scenario based approach to re-imagining future of higher education which prepares students for the future of work. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 10(1), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-12-2018-0136
AmabileT. M.HadleyC. N.KramerS. J. (2002). Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 52–61.
4.
ArgyrisC. (2002). Double-loop learning, teaching, and research (1, pp. 206-218). Academy of Management Learning and Education.
5.
AvellaJ. R. (2016). Delphi panels: Research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 305–321. https://doi.org/10.28945/3561
6.
AwanU.SroufeR.KraslawskiA. (2019). Creativity enables sustainable development: Supplier engagement as a boundary condition for the positive effect on green innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.308
7.
BasadurM.PringleP.SperanziniG.BacotM. (2000). Collaborative problem solving through creativity in problem definition: Expanding the pie. Creativity and Innovation Management, 9(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00157
8.
BeghettoR. A. (2019). Structured uncertainty: How creativity thrives under constraints and uncertainty. Creativity under duress in education? (pp. 27–40). Springer.
9.
BlankS. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63–72.
10.
BlankS.DorfB. (2020). The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company (First edition 2012 ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
11.
BrinckmannJ.GrichnikD.KapsaD. (2010). Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning–performance relationship in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.007
BureauS. (2019). Art thinking: A method for creating the improbable with certainty. Entreprendre and Innover, 42-43(3), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.3917/entin.042.0088
14.
CederquistA.GolükeU. (2016). Teaching with scenarios: A social innovation to foster learning and social change in times of great uncertainty. European Journal of Futures Research, 4(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-016-0105-1
15.
ClarkeR. I. (2020). Design thinking. ALA Neal-Schuman.
CooperR. G. (2006). Formula for success the seven principles of the latest Stage-Gate® method add up to a streamlined, new-product idea-to-launch process. Marketing Management, 15(2), 18.
18.
CopeJ.WattsG. (2000). Learning by doing: An exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 6(3), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550010346208
19.
CornerA.RobertsO.ChiariS.VöllerS.MayrhuberE. S.MandlS.MonsonK. (2015). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. WIREs Climate Change, 6(5), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353
20.
CruzA.KaratzasS. (2020). Understanding your buyer persona. Digital and social media marketing (pp. 69–97). Routledge.
21.
DamanpourF. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.5.693
22.
DemirelP.LiQ. C.RentocchiniF.TamvadaJ. P. (2019). Born to be green: New insights into the economics and management of green entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9933-z
23.
DeweyJ. (2005). Art as experience (p. 384). Penguin.
24.
DoyleC. L. (1998). The writer tells: The creative process in the writing of literary fiction. Creativity Research Journal, 11(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1101_4
FerreiraB.SilvaW.OliveiraJr,E. A.ConteT. (2015). Designing Personas with Empathy Map. Paper presented at the 27th International Conference on Software Fall 2018 153 Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), Pittsburgh, PA , July 6–8. https://doi.org/10.18293/SEKE2015-152
27.
FischerD.BrettelM.MauerR. (2020). The three dimensions of sustainability: A delicate balancing act for entrepreneurs made more complex by stakeholder expectations. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4012-1
28.
FlorM. L.CooperS. Y.OltraM. J. (2018). External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms. European Management Journal, 36(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.08.003
29.
ForsmanH. (2009). Balancing capability building for radical and incremental innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(04), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919609002492
30.
FreemanC.PerezC. (1988). Structural crisis of adjustment. In DosiG.FreemanC.NelsonR.SilverbergG.SoeteL. (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 38–66). Pinter.
31.
FreemanR. E.DunhamL.FairchildG.ParmarB. (2015). Leveraging the creative arts in business ethics teaching. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2479-y
32.
FreireP. (1971). To the coordinator of a“ cultural circle”. Convergence, 4(1), 61.
33.
GartnerW. B.BirdB. J.StarrJ. A. (1992). Acting as if: Differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(3), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879201600302
34.
GeelsF. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8
35.
GomesS. S. (2021) An Archive on Theater and Education: problematizations in the field of invention (46). Educação and Realidade.
36.
HesjedalM. B.ÅmH.SørensenK. H.StrandR. (2020). Transforming scientists’ understanding of science–society relations. Stimulating double-loop learning when teaching RRI. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 1633–1653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00208-2
37.
HjorthD. (2005). Organizational entrepreneurship:with de Certeau on creating heterotopias (or spaces for play). Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605280225
38.
HoworthC.SmithS. M.ParkinsonC. (2012). Social learning and social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0022
39.
IvanajV.PoldnerK.ShrivastavaP. (2020). Hand/heart/head: Aesthetic practice pedagogy for deep sustainability learningThe journal of corporate citizenship (pp. 23–46). Routledge.
KakourisA.LiargovasP. (2021, Sep 2021). Introducing art in entrepreneurial teaching: A theoretical framework. Communication, Reading.
42.
KeaneJ. E. (1999). Piggy and the eternal city: Science fiction as testing ground for new management theory. Emergence, 1(4), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327000em0104_3
43.
KilgourA. M. (2006). Improving the creative process: Analysis of the effects of divergent thinking techniques and domain specific knowledge on creativity. International Journal of Business and Society, 7(2), 79–107. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/1872
44.
Komporozos-AthanasiouA.FotakiM. (2015). A theory of imagination for organization studies using the work of cornelius castoriadis. Organization Studies, 36(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614559258
45.
KuoT.-H.TienH.-K. (2022). Enhancing the effects of creativity training for business school students through art-based methods and blended learning. Education + Training, 64(5), 642–661. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-07-2021-0282
46.
LasskF. G.ShepherdC. D. (2013). Exploring the relationship between emotional intelligence and salesperson creativity. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 33(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.2753/pss0885-3134330103
MalekpourS.BrownR. R.De HaanF. J.WongT. H. F. (2017). Preparing for disruptions: A diagnostic strategic planning intervention for sustainable development. Cities, 63, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.016
MarsM. M. (2021). Analogical and metaphorical thinking, storytelling, and entrepreneurial identity and narrative development: A visual art-based learning innovation. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419890331
51.
MartensE.ProsserM. (1998). What constitutes high quality teaching and learning and how to assure it. Quality Assurance in Education, 6(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889810200368
52.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications.
OsterwalderA.PigneurY. (2002). An e-business model ontology for modeling e-business. Paper presented at the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference - e-Reality: Constructing the e-Economy, Bled, Slovenia, June 17-19.
57.
OsterwalderA.PigneurY. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley.
58.
OsterwalderA.PigneurY.BernardaG.SmithA. (2015). Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers want. John Wiley and Sons.
59.
RiesE. (2011). The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Random House LLC.
60.
RymanJ. A.PorterT. W.galbraithC. S. (2009). Disciplined imagination: Art and metaphor in the business school classroom. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 10(10), 1–26. http://www.ijea.org/v10n10/
61.
SarasvathyS. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
62.
SchumacherT.MayerS. (2018). Preparing managers for turbulent contexts: Teaching the principles of design thinking. Journal of Management Education, 42(4), 496–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917754235
63.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1934). The theory of economic development (p. 255). Harvard University Press.
ShahidM. S.ImranY.ShehryarH. (2018). Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions: An institutional embeddedness perspective. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 30(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2017.1389053
66.
SilvaS.GuentherE. (2018). Setting the research agenda for measuring sustainability performance – systematic application of the world café method. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 9(4), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-06-2017-0060
67.
SmithW.HigginsM.ParkerM.LightfootG. (2001). Science fiction and organization. Routledge.
68.
SobhaniniaS.BuckmanS. T. (2022). Revisiting and adapting the kates-pijawka disaster recovery model: A reconfigured emphasis on anticipation, equity, and resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 69, 102738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102738
69.
SolliA.HillmanT.MäkitaloÅ. (2019). Navigating the complexity of socio-scientific controversies—how students make multiple voices present in discourse. Research in Science Education, 49(6), 1595–1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9668-5
70.
Souto-ManningM.LangP. (2010) Freire, teaching, and learning: Culture circles across contexts (350). Peter Lang.
71.
TanggaardL. (2018). In between: Creative spaces and detours as part of a researcher’s lifeCultivating creativity in methodology and research (pp. 57–69). Springer.
72.
TaylorS. S.LadkinD. (2009). Understanding arts-based methods in managerial development. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2009.37012179
73.
ThomassenA. O.StentoftD. (2020). Educating students for a complex future–why integrating a problem analysis in problem-based learning has something to offer. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i2.28804
74.
TollandA.MoggR.BennettA. (2019). Using learning diaries to evaluate and improve online information literacy and academic skills provision. Journal of Information Literacy, 13(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.11645/13.1.2519
75.
WhitemanG.PhillipsN. (2008). The role of narrative fiction and semi-fiction in organizational studies (pp. 288–299). The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization.
ZahraS. A.GeorgeG. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
78.
ZinnJ. O. (2008). Heading into the unknown: Everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty. Health, Risk and Society, 10(5), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570802380891
