The present study is aimed at exploring the language undergraduates’ entrepreneurial mindset (EM) needs from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders to inform the design of the undergraduates’ EM course as an effective workplace preparation, helping them approach complex changes effectively in the era of globalization. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected in an exploratory design of a mixed methods study. Specifically, nine interviews with EM lecturers, experts and entrepreneurs, and then a survey questionnaire with 253 valid responses from language undergraduates was conducted. As a result, EM course components including expected learning outcomes, assessment and instructional plan for language undergraduates were proposed with specifications based on the learners’ needs. The findings may have led to significant implications to course designers, lecturers, researchers, and institute administrators in their common practice towards developing not just an appropriate EM course but also a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem for language undergraduates.
AdelsonR.ManolakasD.MooreD. (1985). Assessing educational needs. In AdelsonR.WatkinsF. S.CaplanR. M. (Eds.), Continuing education for the health professional: Educational and administrative methods. Aspen Systems Corporation.
2.
BaumanA.LucyC. (2019). Enhancing entrepreneurial education: Developing competencies for success. The International Journal of Management Education, 2019, Article 100293.
3.
BeugreC. D. (2017). Role of institutions of higher education: In building entrepreneurial ecosystems in SubSaharan Africa. Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BosmanL.FernhaberS. (2018). Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. Springer International Publishing AG.
5.
BuiT. H. V.NguyenT. L. T.TranM. D.NguyenT. A. T. (2020). Determinants influencing entrepreneurial intention among undergraduates in universities of Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(7), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.369
6.
CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, Inc.
7.
CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
8.
CromieS. (2000). Assessing entrepreneurial inclinations: Some approaches and empirical evidence, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9, 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943200398030
9.
DangT. H. Y. (2019). The need for academic reform in Vietnamese higher education (VHE) to align with employers’ expectations. All Theses And Dissertations.
EdeF. O.PanigrahiB.CalcichS. E. (1998). African American students’ attitudes toward entrepreneurship education. Journal of Education for Business, 73(5), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832329809601647
12.
EngerS. K.YagerR. E. (2001). Assessing student understanding in science. Corwin Press Inc.
13.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
HigginsD.RefaiD.KeitaD. (2018). Focus point: The need for alternative insight into the entrepreneurial education paradigm, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. 31(3), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1466851
16.
HubermanA. M.MilesM. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
17.
HutchinsonT.WatersA. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press.
18.
IrelandR. D.HittM. A.SirmonD. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00086-2
19.
IvanovaD. (2020). Risk management and its contribution to sustainable development of mining enterprises. Scientific and Practical Studies of Raw Material Issues.
20.
KruegerN. F. (2009). The micro-foundations of entrepreneurial learning and … education: The experiential essence of entrepreneurial cognition. Handbook of University-wide Entrepreneurship Education. Edward Elgar Publishing.
21.
LobodaV.OstrovskyiI.KaternyakI. (2019). Developing entrepreneurial mindset in university undergraduates. E-methodology5(5), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.15503/emet.v5i5.525
22.
LongM. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. Cambridge University.
23.
McTigheJ.FerraraS. (1994). Performance based assessment in the classroom. SKYLIGHT Publishing, Inc.
24.
MitchellR. K.SmithB.SeawrightK. W.MorseE. A. (2000) Cross-cultural cognitions and the venture creation decision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 974–993. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556422
25.
NguyenP. Q.DuyenL.T. H.LinhD. T. D.ThuN. T.LeL. T. T.HuyenL. T. (2019). Enhancing Vietnamese students’ entrepreneurial mindset and creativity by design thinking application. ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, 3(1), 50–60. https://ajee.utm.my/index.php/ajee/article/view/26
26.
OlorundareA. S.KayodeD. J. (2014). Entrepreneurship education in Nigerian universities: A tool for national transformation, Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 29, 155–175. https://doi.org/10.15503/emet.v5i5.525
27.
PodmetinaD.SoderquistK. E.PetraiteM.TeplovT. (2018). Developing a competency model for open innovation from the individual to the organisational level. Management Decision, 56(6), 1306–1335.
ScheerA.NoweskiC.MeinelC. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8–19. https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/1758
ZávodskáA.ŠramováV.KonečnýV. (2019). Developing entrepreneurship education: Case of the university of Žilina. In: International workshop on learning technology for education in cloud. Springer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
