Educational escape rooms (EERs) are increasingly used in education as learning innovations for non-digital and game-based learning (GBL) since EERs positively influence student motivation. They are common in educational fields where skills developments are vital such as STEM subjects and healthcare. However, EERs are marginally implemented in entrepreneurship education (EE) because there is a lack of evaluated design elements to guide the creation of EER in this context, which hampers their wider adoption. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated design elements for EERs in EE. We are particularly concerned with experiential EE since EERs are well suited for experiential learning. We used a research-through-design approach and created an EER based on 11 design elements derived from the literature on social cognitive theory, entrepreneurship competence, and gamification. We created and evaluated the EER in two cycles with two diverse groups of students at a university of applied sciences in the Netherlands. We contribute to the literature and practice of experiential EE by presenting evaluated design elements for EERs. We show which design elements work well and which do not. We also present a comprehensively designed EER that educational professionals can implement in their experiential EE programs.
Amagir, A., Groot, W., Maassen van den Brink, H., & Wilschut, A. (2018). A review of financial-literacy education programs for children and adolescents. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 17(1), 56–80.
2.
AntoncicB.HisrichR. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00054-3
3.
AntoncicB.HisrichR. D. (2003). Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000310461187
4.
BacigalupoM.KampylisP.PunieY.Van den BrandeG. (2016). EntreComp: The entrepreneurship competence framework. Publication Office of the European Union.
5.
BakerT.NelsonR. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
BaxterP.JackS. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
11.
BayulgenO. (2008). Muhammad Yunus, Grameen Bank and the Nobel Peace Prize: What political science can contribute to and learn from the study of microcredit. International Studies Review, 10(3), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00803.x
12.
BéchardJ.GrégoireD. (2007). Archetypes of pedagogical innovation for entrepreneurship in higher education: model and illustrations. In FayolleA.(Ed.), Handbook of research in entrepreneurship education: A general perspective (Vol. 1, pp. 261–284), Chetelham, UK: Edward Elgar.
13.
BellottiF.BertaR.De GloriaA.LavagninoE.AntonaciA.DagninoF., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., Lavagnino, E., Antonaci, A., Dagnino, F., Ott, M., Romero, M., Usart, M., & Mayer, I. S.MayerI. S. (2014). Serious games and the development of an entrepreneurial mindset in higher education engineering students. Entertainment Computing, 5(4), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2014.07.003
14.
BellottiF.KapralosB.LeeK.Moreno-GerP.BertaR. (2013). Assessment in and of serious games: An overview. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2013, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/136864
15.
BoyceC.NealeP. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder International.
16.
BryantP. (2006). Improving entrepreneurial education through self-regulatory skills. Proceedings of the NCIIA 2006 annual meeting (pp. 279–289). National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance.
17.
ClarkeS. J.PeelD. J.ArnabS.MoriniL.KeeganH.WoodO. (2017). EscapED: A framework for creating educational escape rooms and interactive games to for higher/further education. International Journal of Serious Games, 4(3), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v4i3.180
18.
CohenB.WinnM. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001
DavidssonP. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002
22.
DeterdingS.DixonD.KhaledR.NackeL. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, MindTrek 2011 (pp. 9–15). https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
23.
DiemerG.JaffeR.PapanagnouD.ZhangX. C.ZavodnickJ. (2019). Patient safety escape room: A graduate medical education simulation for event reporting. MedEdPORTAL, 15(1), 10868. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10868
24.
DilorioC.Hockenberry-EatonM.MaibachE.RiveroT. (1994). Focus groups: An interview method for nursing research. The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing : Journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, 26, 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1097/01376517-199406000-00013
25.
DimovD. (2016). Toward a design science of entrepreneurship. In J. A. Katz & A. C. Corbett (Ed.), Models of Start-up Thinking and Action: Theoretical, Empirical and Pedagogical Approaches (Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol. 18, pp. 1–31). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-754020160000018001
EngelY.KaandorpM.ElfringT. (2017). Toward a dynamic process model of entrepreneurial networking under uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.001
28.
EricssonK. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 988–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00227.x
29.
FellnhoferK. (2015). Changing entrepreneurial intention and behaviour: A digital game-based learning environment dedicated to entrepreneurship education. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 8(4), 378–404.
30.
FotarisP.MastorasT. (2019). Escape rooms for learning: A systematic review. In L. Elbaek, G. Majgaard, A. Valente, & S. Khalid (Eds.), ECGBL 2019 13th European conference on game-based learning (Vol. 235, pp. 235–243). Odense, Denmark: Dechema e.V.
31.
FoxJ.PittawayL.UzuegbunamI. (2018). Simulations in entrepreneurship education: Serious games and learning through play. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737285
32.
FrancoP. F.DeLucaD. A. (2019). Learning through action: Creating and implementing a strategy game to foster innovative thinking in higher education. Simulation & Gaming, 50(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118820892
33.
GartnerW. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of New Venture Creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279094
34.
GöksenS.MartinaR. A.SormaniE. (2019). Exploring the design elements for developing educational escape rooms for experiential entrepreneurship education. In BaakenT.BułaP.KurzhalsK.LyszczarzH.(Eds.), Management sciences and future challenges. Festschrift anlässlich des 30jährigen Jubiläums der Kooperation der Wirtschaftsuniversität Krakau und der Fachhochschule Münster (pp. 161–173). Cracow-Munster.
35.
HäggG.KurczewskaA. (2016). Connecting the dots: A discussion on key concepts in contemporary entrepreneurship education. Education and Training, 58(7–8), 700–714. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2015-0115
36.
Hogescholen, V. (2017a). Kennisbasis tweedegraadslerarenopleiding Economie. The Hague [Knowledge base second-degree teacher training in Economics. The Hague].
JambhekarK.PahlsR. P.DeloneyL. A. (2019). Benefits of an escape room as a novel educational activity for radiology residents. Academic Radiology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.04.021
39.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1981). Effects of cooperative and individualistic learning experiences on interethnic interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 444–449.
KellerJ. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
42.
La GuardiaD.GentileM.Dal GrandeV.OttavianoS.AllegraM. (2014). A game based learning model for entrepreneurship education. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.034
43.
LockeK. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. SAGE.
44.
Lopez-PernasS.GordilloA.BarraE.QuemadaJ. (2019). Examining the use of an educational escape room for teaching programming in a higher education setting. IEEE Access, 7, 31723–31737. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902976
45.
MarkmanG. D.BaronR. A.BalkinD. B. (2003). The role of regretful thinking, perseverance, and self-efficacy. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 6, 73–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7540(03)06004-5
McMullenJ. S.ShepherdD. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.19379628
48.
NewmanA.ObschonkaM.SchwarzS.CohenM.NielsenI. (2019, February 1). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations, measurement, antecedents, and outcomes, and an agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.012
MichelacciC. (2003). Low returns in R&D due to the lack of entrepreneurial skills. The Economic Journal, 113(484), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00095
51.
MillikenF. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1987.4306502
52.
MitchelmoreS.RowleyJ. (2010). Entrepreneurial competencies: A literature review and development agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16(2), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551011026995
53.
MorrisM. H.WebbJ. W.FuJ.SinghalS. (2013). A competency-based perspective on entrepreneurship education: Conceptual and empirical insights. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12023
54.
NahF. F.-H.ZengQ.TelaproluV. R.AyyappaA. P.EschenbrennerB. (2014). Gamification of education: A review of literature. In: Nah F.FH. (Ed.), HCI in Business. HCIB 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8527. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07293-7_39
55.
NeckH. M.CorbettA. C. (2018). The scholarship of teaching and learning entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 8–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737286
O’DonovanS.GainJ.MaraisP. (2013). A case study in the gamification of a university-level games development course. SAICSIT ‘13: Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference, pp. 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07293-7_39
61.
RezaeiZadehM.HoganM.O’ReillyJ.CunninghamJ.MurphyE. (2017). Core entrepreneurial competencies and their interdependencies: Insights from a study of Irish and Iranian entrepreneurs, university students and academics. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(1), 35–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0390-y
62.
RomeroM.OttM.EarpJ. (2012). Learning through playing for or against each other? Promoting collaborative learning in digital game based learning. ECIS 2012 Proceedings, Paper 93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235969273
63.
RommeA. G. L.ReymenI. M. M. J. (2018). Entrepreneurship at the interface of design and science: Toward an inclusive framework. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 10, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00094
64.
RosenkrantzO.JensenT. W.SarmasogluS.MadsenS.EberhardK.ErsbøllA. K.DieckmannP. (2019). Priming healthcare students on the importance of non-technical skills in healthcare: How to set up a medical escape room game experience.Medical Teacher, 41(11), 1285–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1636953
65.
SalenK.TekinbasK. S.ZimmermanE. (2003). Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press.
66.
SarasvathyS. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4378020
SarasvathyS. D.DewN. (2005). New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(5), 533–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-005-0264-x
69.
SarasvathyS. D.DewN.VelamuriS. R.VenkataramanS. (2010). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In AcsZ. J.AudretschD. B. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 77–96). Springer.
ShaneS.VenkataramanS. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.2791611
73.
ShortJ. C.KetchenD. J.CombsJ. G.IrelandR. D. (2010). Research methods in entrepreneurship. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109342448
74.
SmithW. L.SchallenkampK.EichholzD. E. (2007). Entrepreneurial skills assessment: An exploratory study. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 4(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMED.2007.011791
75.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE.
76.
TownsendD. M.HuntR. A.McMullenJ. S.SarasvathyS. D. (2018). Uncertainty, knowledge problems, and entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 659–687. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0109
77.
van AkenJ. E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x
78.
VeldkampA.van de GrintL.KnippelsM.van JoolingenW. (2020). Escape education: A systematic review on escape rooms in education. Preprints, 2020030182, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202003.0182.v1
VogelJ. J.VogelD. S.Cannon-BowersJ.BowersC. A.MuseK.WrightM. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.2190/FLHV-K4WA-WPVQ-H0YM
81.
Von GlasersfeldE. (1987). Learning as a constructive activity. In ClaudeJ. (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (1st ed.) (pp. 3–17). Lawrence Erlbaum.
82.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In Mind in Society (pp. 79–91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
WigginsB. E. (2016). An overview and study on the use of games, simulations, and gamification in higher education. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 6(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2016010102
87.
WilliamsP. (2018). Using escape room-like puzzles to teach undergraduate students effective and efficient group process skills. In 2018 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (pp. 254–257). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2018.8340495
88.
WinklerC. (2013). Toward a dynamic understanding of entrepreneurship education research across the campus—Social cognition and action research. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 4(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2013-0039
89.
WoutersP.van NimwegenC.van OostendorpH.van der SpekE. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265.
90.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
