In this mixed-methods study, we examined student and administrator perceptions concerning student-created intellectual property (IP) ownership in the higher education setting. Survey results showed students had low levels of IP-related knowledge and worried that the university might claim ownership of their ideas or class projects. Students also reported inadequate communication from the university concerning IP policy rules and technology transfer processes. Interviews with campus IP administrators about student survey results led us to assert that communication inadequacies are perpetuating misunderstanding between students and university IP ownership intentions. Recommendations include implementation of several proactive communication activities and an IP training program for faculty.
AgrawalA. (2001) University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews3(4): 285–302.
2.
Association of University Technology Managers. (2012). AUTM announces new data on student entrepreneurialism [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.autm.net.
3.
BarrS. H.BakerT. E. D.MarkhamS. K.KingonA. I. (2009) Bridging the valley of death: Lessons learned from 14 years of commercialization of technology education. Academy of Management Learning & Education8(3): 370–388.
4.
BernardH. R. (2000) Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
BohW. F.De-HannU.StromR. (2016) University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: Faculty and students in spinoffs. Journal of Technology Transfer41: 661–669.
6.
ColyvasJ.CrowM.GelijnsA.MazzoleniR.NelsonR. R.RosenbergN.SampatB. N. (2002) How do university inventions get into practice?. Management Science48: 61–72.
DaiY.PoppD.BretschneiderS. (2005) Institutions and intellectual property: The influence of institutional forces on university patenting. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management24(3): 579–598.
Geiger, R. L., & Sa, C. M. (2008). Tapping the riches of science: Universities and the promise of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
13.
JelinekM.MarkhamS. (2007) Industry-university IP relations: Integrating perspectives and policy solutions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management54(2): 257–267.
14.
JohnsonR. R. (2009) Using expectancy theory to explain officer security check activity. International Journal of Police Science & Management11(3): 274–284.
LunsfordA. A.FishmanJ.WarrneM. L. (2013, May) College writing, identification, and the production of intellectual property: Voices from the Stanford study of writing. College English75(5): 470–492.
19.
MalakoffD. (2013, February 15) The many ways of making academic research pay off. Science339: 750–753.
20.
Morris, M. H., & Liguori, E. (2016). Preface: Teaching reason and the unreasonable. Annals of entrepreneurship education and pedagogy—2016. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781784719166.00006.
21.
MoweryD.ZiedonisA. (2002) Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy31: 399–418.
22.
PatelS. (1995) Graduate students' ownership and attribution rights in intellectual property. Indiana Law Journal71: 482–512. Retrieved from heinenonline.org.
23.
RaffertyM. (2007) The Bayh–Dole Act and university research and development. Research Policy37(1): 29–40.
24.
RahnD.SchakettC. T.TomczykD. (2016) Building intellectual property and equity ownership policy for entrepreneurship programs: Three different approaches. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education19(1): 51–67.
25.
SampatB. N. (2006) Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: The world before and after Bayh-Dole. Research Policy35(6): 772–789.
26.
SilvaA.HenriquesE.CarvalhoA. (2009) Creativity enhancement in a product development course through entrepreneurship learning and intellectual property awareness. European Journal of Engineering Education34(1): 63–75.
27.
SohnS. Y.HanE. J. (2019) Engineering graduate students' views on the effective ownership of academic patents. Journal of Technology Transfer44: 132–154.
28.
StarkeyL.CorbettS.BondyA.DavidsonS. (2009) Intellectual property: What do students and teachers know?. International Journal of Technology and Design Education20: 333–344.
29.
ThibeaultM. D. (2012) From compliance to creative rights in music education: Rethinking intellectual property in the age of new media. Music Education Research14(1): 103–117.
30.
ThursbyJ.KempS. (2002) Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy31: 109–124.
31.
VroomV. H. (1964) Work and motivation, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
WrightS.KatzJ. (2016) Protecting student intellectual property in the classroom. Journal of Management Education40(2): 152–169.
