This paper examines the socioecological transformations of peripheral resource frontiers in Kalimantan, the Indonesian portion of Borneo Island, through the conceptual lens of planetary urbanization, with particular attention to processes of extended urbanization. It interrogates how urban-industrial capitalism reconfigures these peripheral landscapes into operational frontiers that support metropolitan economies. The paper foregrounds the role of sustainability initiatives, such as certification schemes, carbon markets, and territorially scaled governance, in reshaping industrial practices and regulatory frameworks, which drive a dual logic of ecological preservation and intensified resource exploitation in forestry and plantation agriculture. Drawing on the concept of the socioecological fix, the analysis shows how crises generated within urban-industrial systems are temporarily resolved through green economic strategies that reorganize socioecological relations without transforming their underlying drivers. Based on a critical analysis of policy documents, project reports, and related materials, the findings reveal the contradictory dynamics of green capitalism, showing how sustainability initiatives extend urban processes into resource-rich peripheries while producing uneven socio-spatial and socioecological reconfiguration. By situating these transformations within debates on planetary urbanization, the paper contributes to a relational political ecology of urbanization attentive to frontier spaces.
AbramNKMeijaardEWilsonKA, et al. (2017) Oil palm–community conflict mapping in Indonesia: A case for better community liaison in planning for development initiatives. Applied Geography78: 33–44.
2.
Aguirre-VillegasHABensonCH (2017) Case history of environmental impacts of an Indonesian coal supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production157: 47–56.
3.
AngeloHWachsmuthD (2015) Urbanizing urban political ecology: A critique of methodological cityism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39(1): 16–27.
4.
ArboledaM (2016) In the nature of the non-city: Expanded infrastructural networks and the political ecology of planetary urbanisation. Antipode48(2): 233–251.
5.
BarbierEBBockstaelNBurgessJC, et al. (1995) The linkages between the timber trade and tropical deforestation—Indonesia. World Economy18(3): 411.
6.
BoerH (2017) Welfare environmentality and REDD+ incentives in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning19(6): 795–809.
7.
BoerRDewiRGArdiansyahM, et al. (2018) Indonesia: Second Biennial Update Report Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Jakarta: Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
8.
BowenGA (2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal9(2): 27–40.
9.
BoydWPrudhamWSSchurmanRA (2001) Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature. Society and Natural Resources14(7): 555–570.
10.
BrennerN (2013) Introduction: Urban theory without an outside. In: BrennerN (ed) Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization. Berlin: JOVIS, 14–30.
11.
BrennerN (2019) New Urban Spaces: Urban Theory and the Scale Question. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
BrennerNGhoshS (2022) Between the colossal and the catastrophic: Planetary urbanization and the political ecologies of emergent infectious disease. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space54(5): 867–910.
13.
BrennerNKatsikisN (2020) Operational landscapes: Hinterlands of the Capitalocene. Architectural Design90(1): 22–31.
BrennerNSchmidC (2015) Towards a new epistemology of the urban?City19(2-3): 151–182.
16.
BuchananJDurbinJMcLaughlinD, et al. (2019) Exploring the reality jurisdictional approach as a tool to achieve sustainability commitments in palm oil and soy supply chains.
17.
BudihartaSMeijaardEErskinePD, et al. (2014) Restoring degraded tropical forests for carbon and biodiversity. Environmental Research Letters9(11): 114020.
18.
CanettieriT (2024) The dark side of planetary urbanization: Operational landscapes, crisis and the ‘peripheral condition’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research48(5): 894–914.
19.
CantorA (2021) Hydrosocial hinterlands: An urban political ecology of southern California’s hydrosocial territory. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space4(2): 451–474.
20.
CarlsonKMCurranLMAsnerGP, et al. (2012) Carbon emissions from forest conversion by Kalimantan oil palm plantations. Nature Climate Change3(3): 283–287.
21.
CattauMEMarlierMEDeFriesR (2016) Effectiveness of roundtable on sustainable palm oil (RSPO) for reducing fires on oil palm concessions in Indonesia from 2012 to 2015. Environmental Research Letters11(10): 105007.
22.
ConnollyC (2019) Urban political ecology beyond methodological cityism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research43(1): 63–75.
23.
ConnollyCAliSHKeilR (2020a) On the relationships between COVID-19 and extended urbanization. Dialogues in Human Geography10(2): 213–216.
24.
ConnollyCKeilRAliSH (2020b) Extended urbanisation and the spatialities of infectious disease: Demographic change, infrastructure and governance. Urban Studies58(2): 245–263.
25.
EilenbergM (2015) Shades of green and REDD: Local and global contestations over the value of forest versus plantation development on the Indonesian forest frontier. Asia Pacific Viewpoint56(1): 48–61.
26.
EkersMPrudhamS (2015) Towards the socio-ecological fix. Environment and Planning A47(12): 2438–2445.
27.
EkersMPrudhamS (2017) The metabolism of socioecological fixes: Capital switching, spatial fixes, and the production of nature. Annals of the American Association of Geographers107(6): 1370–1388.
28.
EnnsCBersaglioBSneydA (2019) Fixing extraction through conservation: On crises, fixes and the production of shared value and threat. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space2(4): 967–988.
29.
FatahL (2008) The impacts of coal mining on the economy and environment of south Kalimantan province, Indonesia. ASEAN Economic Bulletin25(1): 85–98.
30.
GlauberAJGunawanI (2016) The Cost of Fire: An Economic Analysis of Indonesia’s 2015 Fire Crisis. Jakarta: World Bank.
31.
GohCSPotterL (2023) Transforming Borneo: From Land Exploitation to Sustainable Development. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
32.
GuthmanJ (2015) Binging and purging: Agrofood capitalism and the body as socioecological fix. Environment and Planning A47(12): 2522–2536.
33.
HamdiEAdhigunaP (2021) Putting PLN’s Net Zero Ambition into Context: The Numbers Will Need to Add Up. Valley City, OH: Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.
34.
HarrisonMEPaoliGD (2012) Managing the risk of biodiversity leakage from prioritising REDD+ in the most carbon-rich forests: The case study of peat-Swamp forests in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Tropical Conservation Science5(4): 426–433.
35.
HarveyD (1981) The spatial fix – Hegel, Von Thunen and Marx. Antipode13(3): 1–12.
36.
HarveyD (1982) The Limits Capital. London: Verso.
37.
HarveyD (2001) Globalization and the “spatial fix”. Geographische Revue : Zeitschrift für Literatur und Diskussion3(2): 23–30.
38.
HarveyD (2003) The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
HermudanantoBelairEPHasbillahHet al. (2024) Potential reductions in carbon emissions from Indonesian forest concessions through use of reduced-impact logging practices. Forests15(12): 2198.
40.
HeynenNKaikaMSwyngedouwE (2006) Urban political ecology: Politicizing the production of urban natures. In: In the Nature of Cities. London: Routledge, 16–35.
41.
HidayatNKOffermansAGlasbergenP (2018) Sustainable palm oil as a public responsibility? On the governance capacity of Indonesian standard for sustainable palm oil (ISPO). Agriculture and Human Values35(1): 223–242.
42.
HowsonP (2018) Slippery violence in the REDD+ forests of central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Conservation and Society16(2): 136–146.
43.
HowsonP (2020) Climate crises and crypto-colonialism: Conjuring value on the blockchain frontiers of the global south. Frontiers in Blockchain3: 479673.
44.
HudalahD (2025) Planning Indonesia’s New Capital City: Behind Nusantara (1st Ed.). Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
IrawanSPasaribuKBuschJ, et al. (2024) Cost reduction for upscaling voluntary sustainability standards: The case of independent oil palm smallholders in central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change7: 1418782.
46.
IzzaKAfkarinaIWardanaS, et al. (2019) Coal mining sector contribution to environmental conditions and human development index in east Kalimantan province. Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development2(2): 192–207.
47.
JappeA (2014) Kurz, a journey into capitalism’s heart of darkness. Historical Materialism22(3-4): 395–407.
48.
JewittSLNasirDPageSE, et al. (2014) Indonesia’s contested domains. Deforestation, rehabilitation and conservation-with-development in central Kalimantan’s tropical peatlands. International Forestry Review16(4): 405–420.
49.
KaikaMSwyngedouwE (2000) Fetishizing the modern city: The phantasmagoria of urban technological networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(1): 120–138.
50.
KeilR (2003) Urban political ecology. Urban Geography24(8): 723–738.
51.
KiswantoKSetiawatiMDTsuyukiS (2021) Impact of local REDD+ intervention on greenhouse gas emissions in east Kalimantan province, Indonesia. In: KumarPSinghRKKumarM , et al. (eds) Climate Impacts on Sustainable Natural Resource Management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1–18.
52.
Koalisi Masyarakat Sipil Kalimantan Tengah (2024) Sertifikasi Berbasis Yurisdiksi Di Kabupaten Seruyan Untuk Siapa?Palangkaraya: Yayasan Masyarakat Kehutanan Lestari.
53.
KrisnawatiHImanuddinRAdinugrohoWC, et al. (2015) National Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals on Indonesia’s Forests and Peatlands. Jakarta: The Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
54.
LiTMSemediP (2021) Plantation Life: Corporate Occupation in Indonesia’s Oil Palm Zone. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
55.
MacInnesA (2020) Breaking the Heart of Borneo: A plan to plunder Borneo’s final frontier. Moreton-in-Marsh: Forest Peoples Programmes.
56.
MarkEMH (2024) Enhancing sustainable palm oil production: A roundtable on sustainable palm oil (RSPO) jurisdictional approach in Sabah and Central Kalimantan. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/181598 (accessed 10 February 2025).
57.
MarxK (1973) Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin Books.
58.
MilesWB (2021) The invisible commodity: Local experiences with forest carbon offsetting in Indonesia. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space4(2): 499–524.
59.
MitevaDALoucksCJPattanayakSK (2015) Social and environmental impacts of forest management certification in Indonesia. PLoS One10(7): e0129675.
60.
MooreJW (2015) Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. New York, NY: Verso.
61.
MorgansCLMeijaardESantikaT, et al. (2018) Evaluating the effectiveness of palm oil certification in delivering multiple sustainability objectives. Environmental Research Letters13(6): 064032.
O’ConnorJ (1991) On the two contradictions of capitalism. Capitalism Nature Socialism2(3): 107–109.
64.
PachecoPSchoneveldGCDermawanA, et al. (2017) The Public and Private Regime Complex for Governing Palm Oil Supply: What Scope for Building Connections and Enhancing Complementarities?Bogor: CIFOR.
65.
PelusoNL (1992) The political ecology of extraction and extractive reserves in east Kalimantan, Indonesia. Development and Change23(4): 49–74.
PT. Rimba Makmur Utama (2020) Katingan Peatland Restoration and Conservation Project. Jakarta: PT. Rimba Makmur Utama.
68.
RautnerMHardionoMRJA (2005) Borneo: Treasure Island at Risk. Frankfurt am Main: WWF Germany.
69.
RoyA (2016) What is urban about critical urban theory?Urban Geography37(6): 810–823.
70.
SantikaTWilsonKALawEA, et al. (2020) Impact of palm oil sustainability certification on village well-being and poverty in Indonesia. Nature Sustainability4(2): 109–119.
SmithN (2007) Nature as accumulation strategy. Socialist Register43: 16–36.
73.
SmithN (2008) Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
74.
SyaufinaL (2018) Forest and land fires in Indonesia: Assessment and mitigation. In: Integrating Disaster Science and Management: Global Case Studies in Mitigation and Recovery. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 109–121.
75.
TacconiLObidzinskiKAgungF (2004) Learning Lessons to Promote Forest Certification and Control Illegal Logging in Indonesia. Jakarta: CIFOR.
76.
TariganAKMSamsuraDAASagalaS, et al. (2017) Balikpapan: Urban planning and development in anticipation of the post-oil industry era. Cities60: 246–259.
77.
TsingAL (2003) Natural resources and capitalist frontiers. Economic and Political Weekly38(48): 5100–5106.
78.
TsingAL (2005) Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79.
TzaninisYMandlerTKaikaM, et al. (2020) Moving urban political ecology beyond the ‘urbanization of nature’. Progress in Human Geography45(2): 229–252.
80.
van PaddenburgABassiAMButerE, et al. (2012) Heart of Borneo: Investing in Nature for a Green Economy. Jakarta: WWF Heart of Borneo Global Initiative.
81.
WoodW (1989) Intermediate cities on the resource frontier: A case study from Indonesia. In: CostaFJDuttAKMaLJC (eds) Urbanization in Asia Spatial Dimensions and Policy Issues. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 191–206.
82.
ZhangFWuF (2022) Performing the ecological fix under state entrepreneurialism: A case study of taihu new town, China. Urban Studies59(5): 1068–1084.
83.
ZhangFWuFLinY (2022) The socio-ecological fix by multi-scalar states: The development of ‘greenways of paradise’ in Chengdu. Political Geography98: 102736.
