Militaries are increasingly recognized as significant climate actors. As military operations and warfare are climatically destructive, and militarized responses to climate crisis perpetuate the violence of global racial capitalism, elements of the climate movement are calling for demilitarization as a central pillar of climate justice. I ground calls for demilitarization in an examination of the military-industrial complex in specific place – Massachusetts, USA – by drawing together the frameworks of geopolitical ecology and climate apartheid. Climate apartheid names the intensified coproduction of security and precarity under capitalism on a warming planet. Geopolitical ecology examines the role of large-scale geopolitical actors driving environmental change across scales. Through these approaches I situate the Massachusetts military-industrial complex (MA-MIC) in the current geopolitical-ecological conjuncture defined by US “domination without hegemony,” wherein the US is increasingly reliant on fossil fueled, militarized imperialism to maintain dominance. I then briefly detail the history of the MA-MIC – from war research at universities to defense-tech start-ups – and turn to specific MA military installations producing militarized climate apartheid: air bases aiding Israel's genocidal bombardment of Gaza, new F-35 jet procurements, heat training for the US Army, climate monitoring at Raytheon (RTX), and construction firms building climate resilience for the US Navy and the infrastructure of the carceral state. I conclude by drawing material and conceptual connections with abolition geography. Thinking with Ruth Wilson Gilmore's framework of military and prison abolition, the exploration of everyday, often hidden processes of militarization can reveal new connections and strategies for centering demilitarization in abolitionist climate justice.
ArrighiG (2005) Hegemony unravelling. New Left Review32: 23–80.
5.
ArrighiG (2010) The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.
6.
BarnesTJ (2008) Geography’s underworld: The military–industrial complex, mathematical modelling and the quantitative revolution. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences39(1): 3–16.
7.
BelcherOBiggerPNeimarkB, et al. (2020) Hidden carbon costs of the “everywhere war”: Logistics, geopolitical ecology, and the carbon boot-print of the US military. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers45(1): 65–80.
8.
BestemanC (2019) Militarized global apartheid. Current Anthropology60(S19): 26–38.
9.
BickfordA (2019) “Kill-Proofing” the soldier: Environmental threats, anticipation, and US military biomedical armor programs. Current Anthropology60(S19): S39–S48.
10.
BielerAMortonAD (2024) Reframing the geopolitics of global capitalism. Socialist Register60.
11.
BiggerPNeimarkBD (2017) Weaponizing nature: The geopolitical ecology of the US Navy’s biofuel program. Political Geography60: 13–22.
12.
BiggerPPearceNRogalyK, et al. (2023). Less war, less warming: A reparative approach to US and UK military ecological damages. Common Wealth and the Climate and Community Project.
CoveriACozzaCGuarascioD (2024) Blurring boundaries: An analysis of the digital platforms-military nexus. Review of Political Economy37(4): 1632–1663.
23.
CrawfordNC (2022) The Pentagon, Climate Change, and War: Charting the Rise and Fall of US Military Emissions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
24.
DalbyS (2000) Geopolitics and ecology: Rethinking the contexts of environmental security. In: Environment and Security: Discourses and Practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 84–100.
25.
DalbyS (2020) Anthropocene Geopolitics: Globalization, Security, Sustainability. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
26.
DavisAY (2011) Abolition Democracy: Beyond Empire, Prisons, and Torture. New York: Seven Stories Press.
GordonCCramENa’putiTR (2024) Powermapping “Stop Cop City”: Abolition ecology for possibilities beyond enclosure. Quarterly Journal of Speech110(4): 576–602.
33.
Graddy-LovelaceGRanganathanM (2024) Geopolitical ecology for our times. Political Geography112: 103034.
34.
GrittenDFoulkesI (2025) Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, UN commission of inquiry says. BBC. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8641wv0n4go (accessed 15 January 2016).
KushiSToftMD (2023) Introducing the military intervention project: A new dataset on US military interventions, 1776–2019. Journal of Conflict Resolution67(4): 752–779.
LehmannT (2019) Honourable spoils? The Iraq War and the American hegemonic system’s eternal and perpetual interest in oil. The Extractive Industries and Society6(2): 428–442.
51.
LeslieSW (1993) The Cold War and American Science: The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford. New York: Columbia University Press.
LovelandRGoodmanMHooverM, et al. (2007) The Massachusetts Defense Industry: Characteristics and Economic Impact. University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute.
56.
LutzC (2009) The Bases of Empire: The Global Struggle Against US Military Posts. New York: NYU Press.
57.
MarkusenAHallPCampbellS, et al. (1991) The Rise of the Gunbelt: The Military Remapping of Industrial America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
MasséFLunstrumEHoltermanD (2018) Linking green militarization and critical military studies. Critical Military Studies4(2): 201–221.
59.
MasséFMarguliesJD (2020) The geopolitical ecology of conservation: The emergence of illegal wildlife trade as national security interest and the re-shaping of US foreign conservation assistance. World Development132: 104958.
MillerB (1997) Political action and the geography of defense investment: Geographical scale and the representation of the Massachusetts Miracle. Political Geography16(2): 171–185.
66.
MillsCW (1956) The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67.
MitchellT (2011) Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso Books.
68.
MoranDSDeGrootDWPotterAW, et al. (2023) Beating the heat: Military training and operations in the era of global warming. Journal of Applied Physiology135(1): 60–67.
NeimarkBOtu-LarbiFLarbiR, et al. (2025) War on the climate: A multitemporal study of greenhouse gas emissions of the Israel-Gaza conflict. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5274707 (accessed 16 August 2025).
71.
NeocleousM (2008) Critique of Security. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
72.
NeocleousM (2014) War Power, Police Power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
PalleyT (2025) The military-industrial complex as a variety of capitalism and threat to democracy: Rethinking the political economy of guns versus butter. In: The Political Economy of War, Peace, and the Military–Industrial Complex. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 34–73.
PayneCRSilverBJ (2022) Domination without hegemony and the limits of US world power. In: Trump and the Deeper Crisis. Vol. 39Leeds, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, 159–177.
77.
PellowDN (2021) Struggles for environmental justice in US prisons and jails. Antipode53(1): 56–73.
PrinsSJStoryB (2020) Connecting the dots between mass incarceration, health inequity, and climate change. American Journal of Public Health110(S1): S35–S36.
RiceJLongJLevendaA (2022) Against climate apartheid: Confronting the persistent legacies of expendability for climate justice. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space5(2): 625–645.
84.
RolandA (2021) Delta of Power: The Military-Industrial Complex. Baltimore: JHU Press.
85.
SaxenianA (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
86.
SchindlerSAlamiIDiCarloJ, et al. (2024) The second cold war: US-China competition for centrality in infrastructure, digital, production, and finance networks. Geopolitics29(4): 1083–1120.
87.
SchraderS (2019) Badges Without Borders: How Global Counterinsurgency Transformed American Policing. Oakland: University of California Press.
SultanaF (2022) The unbearable heaviness of climate coloniality. Political Geography99: 102638.
96.
SurpriseK (2020) Geopolitical ecology of solar geoengineering: From a ‘logic of multilateralism’ to logics of militarization. Journal of Political Ecology27(1): 213–235.
97.
SzeJ (2021) Abolitionist climate justice, or ICE will melt. American Studies60(3): 43–62.
Tricontinental Institute (2024) Hyper-Imperialism: A Dangerous Decadent New Stage. Buenos Aires: The Tricontinental Institute.
104.
UMass (2021) Next: Frontiers in Aerospace, Defense, Undersea Technologies, and Remote Sensing. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
105.
UMass Donahue Institute (2012) An Economic Contribution Analysis and Overview of Massachusetts Military Installations. Hadley, MA: University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute.
106.
U.S. Army (2011) U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development & Engineering Center testing facilities and equipment. Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA546865.pdf (accessed 2 June 2025).
107.
VineD (2015) Base Nation: How US Military Bases Abroad Harm America and the World. New York: Metropolitan Books.
108.
WainwrightJMannG (2018) Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future. London: Verso Books.
109.
WaliaH (2021) Border and Rule: Global Migration, Capitalism, and the Rise of Racist Nationalism. Chicago: Haymarket books.
110.
WeberBD (2023) American Purgatory: Prison Imperialism and the Rise of Mass Incarceration. New York: The New Press.
111.
WoodwardR (2014) Military landscapes: Agendas and approaches for future research. Progress in Human Geography38(1): 40–61.
