AagaardLKMadsenLV (2022) Technological fascination and reluctance: Gendered practices in the smart home. Buildings and Cities3(1): 677–691.
2.
AndersonK (1997) A walk on the wild side: A critical geography of domestication. Progress in Human Geography21(4): 463–485.
3.
ArgüellesLMarchH (2022) Weeds in action: Vegetal political ecology of unwanted plants. Progress in Human Geography46(1): 44–66.
4.
BissellD (2021) Encountering automation: Redefining bodies through stories of technological change. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space39(2): 366–384.
5.
BluntADowlingR (2022) Home, Second edition London: Routledge.
6.
CookNTKerrS-M (2024) Assembling high-rise: The uneven agencies of air in suburban densification in the anthropocene. Urban Studies61(7): 1308–1326.
7.
CowanRS (1983) More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic.
8.
CugurulloFCaprottiFCookM, et al. (2023) Artificial Intelligence and the City: Urbanistic Perspectives on AI. London: Routledge.
9.
DahlgrenKPinkSStrengersY, et al. (2021) Personalization and the smart home: Questioning techno-hedonist imaginaries. Convergence27(5): 1155–1169.
10.
DarlySMcClintockN (2017) Introduction to urban agriculture in the neoliberal city: Critical European perspectives. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies16(2): 224–231.
11.
DaviesWDuttaSJTaylorN (2024) Stay home: Mapping the new domestic regime. Economy and Society53(3): 400–423.
Del RioDDSovacoolBKMartiskainenM (2021) Controllable, frightening, or fun? Exploring the gendered dynamics of smart home technology preferences in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science77: 102105.
14.
HeadLMuirP (2006) Suburban life and the boundaries of nature: Resilience and rupture in Australian backyard gardens. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers31(4): 505–524.
15.
HitchingsR (2021) The Unsettling Outdoors: Environmental Estrangement in Everyday Life. London: John Wiley & Sons.
16.
HorstMMcClintockNHoeyL (2017) The intersection of planning, urban agriculture, and food justice: A review of the literature. Journal of the American Planning Association83(3): 277–295.
17.
JackmanABrickellK (2022) Everyday droning’: Towards feminist geopolitics of the drone-home. Progress in Human Geography46(1): 156–178.
KlerkxLJakkuELabartheP (2019) A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences90: 100315.
20.
LeszczynskiA (2020) Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space38(2): 189–208.
21.
LeszczynskiAElwoodS (2022) Glitch epistemologies for computational cities. Dialogues in Human Geography12(3): 361–378.
22.
LockhartAMarvinS (2020) Microclimates of urban reproduction: The limits of automating environmental control. Antipode52(3): 637–659.
23.
MaalsenS (2022) The hack: What it is and why it matters to urban studies. Urban Studies59(2): 453–465.
24.
MaalsenS (2024) Home in cybersymbiosis: Making home with digital oddkin. Information, Communication & Society27(9): 1759–1775.
MacrorieRMarvinSWhileA (2021) Robotics and automation in the city: A research agenda. Urban Geography42(2): 197–217.
27.
MarvinSRickardsLRutherfordJ (2024) The urbanisation of controlled environment agriculture: Why does it matter for urban studies?Urban Studies61(8): 1430–1450.
28.
MarvinSRutherfordJ (2018) Controlled environments: An urban research agenda on microclimatic enclosure. Urban Studies55(6): 1143–1162.
29.
McLeanJ (2020) Framing the more-than-real in the anthropocene. In: Changing Digital Geographies. Cham.: Palgrave Macmillan, 23–46.
30.
McLeanJ (2024) Responsibility, care and repair in/of AI: Extinction threats and more-than-real worlds. Environment and Planning F3(1-2): 3–16.
31.
McNeillD (2022) Botanic urbanism: The technopolitics of controlled environments in Singapore's gardens by the bay. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research46(2): 220–234.
32.
MemoryT (2022) The Smart Veggie Patch. Macmillan: Australia.
33.
MillsE (2012) The carbon footprint of indoor Cannabis production. Energy Policy46: 58–67.
NichollsLStrengersYSadowskiJ (2020) Social impacts and control in the smart home. Nature Energy5(3): 180–182.
36.
ParkTHuTHuhJ (2016) Plant-Based games for anxiety reduction. In: In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY ‘16). Austin, Texas, USA: ACM, 199–204.
37.
PenzenstadlerBPlojoJSanchezM, et al. (2018) The affordable DIY resilient smart garden kit. In: EasterbrookSNardiBChenJEasterbrookSMNardiBA (eds) Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Computing Within Limits: 2018. Toronto, Canada: LIMITS ‘18. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–10.
38.
PinkSStrengersYMartinR, et al. (2022) Smart home masculinities. Australian Feminist Studies37(112): 117–133.
39.
PowerE (2005) Human–nature relations in suburban gardens. Australian Geographer36(1): 39–53.
40.
PowerE (2008) Furry families: Making a human–dog family through home. Social & Cultural Geography9(5): 535–555.
41.
RodgersSPlodererBBreretonM (2019) HCI In the garden: Current trends and future directions. In OZCHI’19: Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human Computer-Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), United States of America: 381–386.
42.
RooJSGervaisRHachetM (2016) Inner garden: An augmented sandbox designed for self-reflection. In: In Proceedings of the TEI ‘16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ‘16). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 570–576.
43.
SadowskiJStrengersYKennedyJ (2021) More work for Big Mother: Revaluing care and control in smart homes. Environment and Planning A56(1): 330–345.
44.
SchuurmanN (2024) Multispecies homescapes. Progress in Human Geography48(5): 655–668.
45.
SearleATurnbullJHartman DaviesO, et al. (2023) Glitches in the technonatural present. Dialogues in Human Geography14(2): 342–346.
46.
SiriarayaPAngCS (2014) Recreating living experiences from past memories through virtual worlds for people with dementia. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘14). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 3977–3986.
47.
SlocumR (2004) Polar bears and energy-efficient lightbulbs: Strategies to bring climate change home. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22(3): 413–438.
48.
SoroABreretonMDemaT, et al. (2018) The ambient birdhouse: An iot device to discover birds and engage with nature. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘18). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 397.
StrengersY (2013) Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia?London: Palgrave MacMillan.
51.
StrengersYKennedyJ (2020) The Smart Wife: Why Alexa, Google Home and Other Smart Home Devices Need a Feminist Reboot. MIT Press.
52.
StrengersYMoloneySMallerC, et al. (2014) Beyond Behaviour Change. Social Practices, Intervention and Sustainability: Beyond Behaviour Change. London, New York: Routledge, 63–77.
53.
StrengersYNichollsL (2018) Aesthetic pleasures and gendered tech-work in the 21st-century smart home. Media International Australia166(1): 70–80.
54.
TornaghiC (2014) Critical geography of urban agriculture. Progress in Human Geography38(4): 551–567.