In this paper I conceptualise “biosecurity bordering” as the distribution of biosecurity practices throughout the spaces of everyday life. I explore biosecurity bordering through a case study of the National Animal Identification and Tracing (NAIT) scheme for tracing livestock movements in Aotearoa New Zealand. NAIT acts as a filtering technology, separating (un)healthy animal bodies and (non)compliant farmers. These practices of “firewall bordering” are spatially distributed across sites that extend inwards and outwards from the farm gate. Animal movements across these sites lead to the emergence of “grey zones”, spaces where livestock become disconnected from their digital records. Furthermore, animals become borders in the NAIT scheme: the connections between ears, tags, and data establish a biometric border that aims to secure livestock identities and control their mobilities. But this can lead to the misidentification of some animals as illegitimate border crossers, rendering them as “abject life” without value and therefore cullable. This paper contributes to an emerging area of literature that draws together critical studies of borders and biosecurity, and points to areas for further research into the intimate experiences, and visceral consequences, of biosecurity bordering.
BalibarE (2002) World borders, political borders. PMLA117(1): 68–78.
5.
BarkerK (2008) Flexible boundaries in biosecurity: Accommodating gorse in Aotearoa New Zealand. Environment and Planning A40(7): 1598–1614.
6.
BarkerK (2010) Biosecure citizenship: Politicising symbiotic associations and the construction of biological threat. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35(3): 350–363.
7.
BarkerK (2015) Biosecurity: Securing circulations from the microbe to the macrocosm. The Geographical Journal181(4): 357–365.
8.
BarkerKFrancisRA (2021) Introduction: Spatial tensions and divides in grappling with ‘invasive life’. In: BarkerKFrancisRA (eds) Routledge Handbook of Biosecurity and Invasive Species. London: Routledge, 1–11.
9.
BarkerKTaylorSLDobsonA (2013) Introduction: Interrogating bio-insecurities. In: DobsonABarkerKTaylorSL (eds) Biosecurity: The Socio-Politics of Invasive Species and Infectious Diseases. London: Routledge, 3–27.
10.
BarryK (2022) Declaring, scanning, sniffing, searching: Unpacking the mobility cultures of Australia’s biosecurity. Social & Cultural Geography23(9): 1201–1219.
11.
BidwellSThompsonL (2015) Place invaders: Identity, place attachment and possum control in the south island west coast of New Zealand. New Zealand Geographer71(2): 81–90.
12.
BiermannCAndersonRM (2017) Conservation, biopolitics, and the governance of life and death. Geography Compass11(10): e12329.
13.
BoyceCJayeCNollerG, et al. (2021) Mycoplasma bovis in New Zealand: A content analysis of media reporting. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online16(2): 335–355.
14.
ClokePCookICrangP, et al. (2004) Practising Human Geography. London: Sage.
15.
DonaldsonAWoodD (2004) Surveilling strange materialities: Categorisation in the evolving geographies of FMD biosecurity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22(3): 373–391.
16.
Doolan-NobleFNollerGJayeC, et al. (2023) Moral distress in rural veterinarians as an outcome of the Mycoplasma bovis incursion in southern New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal71(3): 116–127.
17.
EdwardsS, 2014. Doing actor-network theory: Integrating network analysis with empirical philosophy in the study of research into genetically modified organisms in New Zealand. Doctoral thesis. Lincoln University, New Zealand.
18.
EnticottG (2008) The spaces of biosecurity: Prescribing and negotiating solutions to bovine tuberculosis. Environment and Planning A40(7): 1568–1582.
19.
EnticottG (2017) Navigating veterinary borderlands: ‘heiferlumps’, epidemiological boundaries and the control of animal disease in New Zealand. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42(2): 153–165.
20.
EnticottGFranklinA (2009) Biosecurity, expertise and the institutional void: The case of bovine tuberculosis. Sociologia Ruralis49(4): 375–393.
21.
FallJJ (2020) Fenced in. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space38(5): 771–794.
22.
FleischmannL (2023) More-than-human political geographies: Abjection and sovereign power. Political Geography107: 102949.
23.
FleischmannLEvertsJ (2024) Abject lives: An introduction. Political Geography111: 103102.
24.
GinnF (2008) Extension, subversion, containment: Eco-nationalism and (post) colonial nature in aotearoa New Zealand. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers33(3): 335–353.
25.
HarawayD (1991) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 183–201.
26.
HigginsVBryantMHernández-JoverM, et al. (2018) Devolved responsibility and on-farm biosecurity: Practices of biosecure farming care in livestock production. Sociologia Ruralis58(1): 20–39.
27.
HinchliffeSAllenJLavauS, et al. (2013) Biosecurity and the topologies of infected life: From borderlines to borderlands. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers38(4): 531–543.
28.
HinchliffeSBinghamN (2008) Securing life: The emerging practices of biosecurity. Environment and Planning A40(7): 1534–1551.
29.
HinchliffeSBinghamNAllenJ, et al. (2017) Pathological Lives: Disease, Space and Biopolitics. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
30.
JayMMoradM (2006) The socioeconomic dimensions of biosecurity: The New Zealand experience. International Journal of Environmental Studies63(3): 293–302.
31.
JayeCNollerGBryanM, et al. (2022) The day I killed my cows was the day I walked away’: Mycoplasma bovis, moral economy and moral capital. Journal of Rural Studies95: 86–94.
32.
JewellCPvan AndelMVinkWD, et al. (2016) Compatibility between livestock databases used for quantitative biosecurity response in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal64(3): 158–164.
33.
JohnsonCJonesRPaasiA, et al. (2011) Interventions on rethinking ‘the border’ in border studies. Political Geography30(2): 61–69.
34.
KovrasIRobinsS (2016) Death as the border: Managing missing migrants and unidentified bodies at the EU's Mediterranean frontier. Political Geography55: 40–49.
35.
LambertSJMark-ShadboltM (2021) Indigenous Biosecurity: Past, Present and Future. Routledge Handbook of Biosecurity and Invasive Species. London: Routledge, 55–65.
36.
LawJ (2008) Culling, catastrophe and collectivity. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory9(1): 61–76.
37.
LawJAfdalGAsdalK, et al. (2014) Modes of syncretism: Notes on noncoherence. Common Knowledge20(1): 172–192.
38.
LawJMolA (2008) Globalisation in practice: On the politics of boiling pigswill. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences39(1): 133–143.
39.
MabryL (2008) Case study in social research. In: AlasuutariPBickmanLBrannenJ (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods. London: Sage publications, 214–227.
Pallister-WilkinsP (2022) Whitescapes: A posthumanist political ecology of Alpine migrant (im) mobility. Political Geography92: 102517.
58.
ParkerNVaughan-WilliamsN (2009) Lines in the sand? Towards an agenda for critical border studies. Geopolitics14(3): 582–587.
59.
ParkerNVaughan-WilliamsN (2012) Critical border studies: Broadening and deepening the ‘lines in the sand’ agenda. Geopolitics17(4): 727–733.
60.
Puig de la BellacasaM (2017) Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
61.
RobinsS (2022) The affective border: Missing migrants and the governance of migrant bodies at the EU’s southern frontier. Journal of Refugee Studies35(2): 948–967.
62.
RumfordC (2010) Global borders: An introduction to the special issue. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28(6): 951–956.
63.
RumfordC (2012) Towards a multiperspectival study of borders. Geopolitics17(4): 887–902.
64.
ShortallOBrownK (2021) Enacting and resisting biosecurity citizenship: More-than-human geographies of enrolment in a disease eradication scheme in Scotland. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space4(2): 564–584.
65.
SingletonV (2010) Good farming: Control or care? In: MolAMoserIPolsJ (eds) Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Verlag, Bielefeld: Transcript, 235–256.
66.
SingletonV (2012) When contexts meet: Feminism and accountability in UK cattle farming. Science, Technology, & Human Values37(4): 404–433.
67.
SohnC (2016) Navigating borders’ multiplicity: The critical potential of assemblage. Area48(2): 183–189.
68.
SrinivasanKKasturiranganR (2017) Conservation and invasive alien species: Violent love. In: The Palgrave International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 433–452.
69.
TsouvalisJ (2019) The post-politics of plant biosecurity: The British government's response to ash dieback in 2012. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers44(1): 195–208.
70.
Vaughan-WilliamsN (2010) The UK border security continuum: Virtual biopolitics and the simulation of the sovereign ban. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28(6): 1071–1083.
71.
WarrenA (2013) (Re) locating the border: Pre-entry tuberculosis (TB) screening of migrants to the UK. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences48: 156–164.
72.
WhiteRMMarzanoMLeahyS, et al. (2019) Are we defending the indefensible? Reflecting on policy and practice around ‘the border’ in plant biosecurity for tree health. Forests10(9): 716.
73.
WillingL (2022) Environmental education in aotearoa New Zealand: Reconfiguring possum-child mortal relations. Children's Geographies: 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2022.2114314.
