Geographical scholarship has paid increasing attention to the rise of so-called green industries. To evolutionary economic geographers, the development of such green industries represents a distinctive, ‘green’ form of path creation. Although green industries can significantly reconfigure socio-ecological relations, studies of green path creation tend to shy away from examining what green means and how green matters for green industries to take off. To address this research gap, this study examines the development of a battery recycling firm in Shenzhen by integrating perspectives from evolutionary economic geography and political-industrial ecology. We unpack the creation of a green development path in the battery recycling industry as a process of bargaining and interactions among actors who view used batteries differently. By doing so, this study enriches existing scholarship on geographies of waste, green path creation, and nature-society geography.
AmundsenHHermansenEA (2021) Green transformation is a boundary object: An analysis of conceptualisation of transformation in Norwegian primary industries. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space4(3): 864–885.
2.
AndersenMSMartinsenL (2020) Environmental economic assessment of novel circular economy and bioeconomy technologies. In: BrandãoMLazarevicDFinnvedenG (eds) Handbook of the Circular Economy. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 137–146.
3.
BakkerKBridgeG (2006) Material worlds? Resource geographies and the ‘matter of nature’. Progress in Human Geography30(1): 5–27.
BarcaSBridgeG (2015) Industrialization and environmental change. In: PerreaultTABridgeGMcCarthyJ (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology.London: Routledge, pp. 366–377.
6.
BergmannL (2017) Towards economic geographies beyond the nature-society divide. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences85: 324–335.
7.
BinzCTrufferBCoenenL (2016) Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography92(2): 172–200.
8.
BoggessLNPérezDMCopeK, et al. (2014) Do medical marijuana centers behave like locally undesirable land uses? Implications for the geography of health and environmental justice. Urban Geography35(3): 315–336.
9.
BoschmaRMartinR (2007) Editorial: Constructing an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography7(5): 537–548.
10.
BrotoVCAllenARapoportE (2012) Interdisciplinary perspectives on urban metabolism. Journal of Industrial Ecology16(6): 851–861.
11.
BuckHJ (2022) Mining the air: Political ecologies of the circular carbon economy. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space5(3): 1086–1105.
12.
BulkeleyHBetsillM (2005) Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environmental Politics14(1): 42–63.
13.
CederlöfG (2021) Out of steam: Energy, materiality, and political ecology. Progress in Human Geography45(1): 70–87.
14.
ChenGFengJChenL (2023) Dharavi in Beijing? A hidden geography of waste and migrant exclusion. The Professional Geographer75(1): 187–205.
15.
ChungCKLXuJ (2021) Scalar politics of urban sustainability: Governing the Chinese city in the era of ecological civilisation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers46(3): 689–703.
16.
ChungCKLZhangFWuF (2018) Negotiating green space with landed interests: The urban political ecology of greenway in the Pearl River Delta, China. Antipode50(4): 891–909.
17.
CorneaNVéronRZimmerA (2017) Clean city politics: An urban political ecology of solid waste in West Bengal, India. Environment and Planning A49(4): 728–744.
18.
CousinsJJ (2017) Volume control: Stormwater and the politics of urban metabolism. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences85: 368–380.
19.
CousinsJJNewellJP (2015) A political–industrial ecology of water supply infrastructure for Los Angeles. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences58: 38–50.
20.
DawleyS (2014) Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography90(1): 91–112.
21.
DemariaFSchindlerS (2016) Contesting urban metabolism: Struggles over waste-to-energy in Delhi, India. Antipode48(2): 293–313.
22.
DeutzPBaxterHGibbsD, et al. (2017) Resource recovery and remediation of highly alkaline residues: A political-industrial ecology approach to building a circular economy. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences85: 336–344.
23.
EadsonWvan VeelenB (2023) Green and just regional path development. Regional Studies, Regional Science10(1): 218–233.
24.
FevrierK (2022) Informal waste recycling economies in the global south and the chimera of green capitalism. Antipode54(5): 1585–1606.
GibbsDJensenPD (2022) Chasing after the wind? Green economy strategies, path creation and transitions in the offshore wind industry. Regional Studies56(10): 1671–1682.
27.
GibbsDO’NeillK (2014) The green economy, sustainability transitions and transition regions: A case study of Boston. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography96(3): 201–216.
28.
GirardBShokrgozarSSareenS (2024) The meaning of solar energy: Political imaginaries of solar energy in contemporary India. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space8(1): 476–496.
29.
GregsonNCrangMFullerS, et al. (2015) Interrogating the circular economy: The moral economy of resource recovery in the EU. Economy and Society44(2): 218–243.
30.
GregsonNCrangM (2019) Made in China and the new world of secondary resource recovery. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space51(4): 1031–1040.
31.
GrillitschMHansenT (2019) Green industry development in different types of regions. European Planning Studies27(11): 2163–2183.
32.
GuFGuoJYaoX, et al. (2017) An investigation of the current status of recycling spent lithium-ion batteries from consumer electronics in China. Journal of Cleaner Production161: 765–780.
33.
GuibrunetLCalvetMSBrotoVC (2017) Flows, system boundaries and the politics of urban metabolism: Waste management in Mexico City and Santiago de Chile. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences85: 353–367.
34.
HanWShiYPehlkenA, et al. (2019) Reuse, recycling and recovery of end-of-life new energy vehicles in China. In: PehlkenAKalverkampMWittstockR (eds) Cascade Use in Technologies 2018. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg, pp. 64–74.
35.
HeMJinXZhangX, et al. (2023) Combined pyro-hydrometallurgical technology for recovering valuable metal elements from spent lithium-ion batteries: A review of recent developments. Green Chemistry25: 6561.
36.
HuangPLiP (2020) Politics of urban energy transitions: New energy vehicle (NEV) development in Shenzhen, China. Environmental Politics29(3): 524–545.
37.
HuberMT (2017) Hidden abodes: Industrializing political ecology. Annals of the American Association of Geographers107(1): 151–166.
38.
KaupBZ (2008) Negotiating through nature: The resistant materiality and materiality of resistance in Bolivia’s natural gas sector. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences39(5): 1734–1742.
39.
KnuthSBehrsinILevendaA, et al. (2022) New political ecologies of renewable energy. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space5(3): 997–1013.
40.
KostkaGNahmJ (2017) Central–local relations: Recentralization and environmental governance in China. The China Quarterly231: 567–582.
41.
KovacicZGarcía CasañasCArgüellesL, et al. (2024) The twin green and digital transition: High-level policy or science fiction?Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space7(6): 2251–2278.
42.
KurtzHE (2003) Scale frames and counter-scale frames: Constructing the problem of environmental injustice. Political Geography22(8): 887–916.
43.
LazarevicDBrandãoM (2020) The circular economy: A strategy to reconcile economic and environmental objectives? In: BrandãoMLazarevicDFinnvedenG (eds) Handbook of the Circular Economy. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 8–27.
44.
Lopes dos SantosK (2023) Unequal geographies of urban mining: E-waste management in London, sao paulo and Accra. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space6(3): 1874–1888.
45.
MacBrideS (2013) Recycling Reconsidered: The Present Failure and Future Promise of Environmental Action in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
MacKinnonDDawleySPikeA, et al. (2019) Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography95(2): 113–135.
47.
MartinR (2010) Roepke lecture in economic geography—rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography86(1): 1–27.
48.
MartinRSunleyP (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography6(4): 395–437.
49.
MillingtonNLawhonM (2019) Geographies of waste: Conceptual vectors from the Global South. Progress in Human Geography43(6): 1044–1063.
50.
Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China (MIIT) (2018) List of enterprises meeting the requirements of industrial specifications for comprehensive utilization of waste and used batteries for new energy vehicles (the first batch) Available at: www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2018-12/31/content_5438758.htm (accessed 9 August 2023).
51.
MooreSA (2012) Garbage matters: Concepts in new geographies of waste. Progress in Human Geography36(6): 780–799.
52.
NahmJ (2017) Exploiting the implementation gap: Policy divergence and industrial upgrading in China's wind and solar sectors. The China Quarterly231: 705–727.
53.
NewellJPCousinsJJ (2015) The boundaries of urban metabolism: Towards a political–industrial ecology. Progress in Human Geography39(6): 702–728.
54.
NewellJPCousinsJJBakaJ (2017) Political-industrial ecology: An introduction. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences85: 319–323.
55.
NilsenTNjøsR (2022) Emergence of new industries in peripheral regions: The role of narratives in delegitimation of onshore wind in the Arctic Finnmark region. Regional Studies, Regional Science9(1): 603–617.
56.
NjøsRSjøtunSGJakobsenSE, et al. (2020) Expanding analyses of path creation: Interconnections between territory and technology. Economic Geography96(3): 266–288.
57.
O’NeillKGibbsD (2016) Rethinking green entrepreneurship–fluid narratives of the green economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48(9): 1727–1749.
58.
PickrenG (2015) Making connections between global production networks for used goods and the realm of production: A case study on e-waste governance. Global Networks15(4): 403–423.
59.
RanR (2013) Perverse incentive structure and policy implementation gap in China's local environmental politics. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning15(1): 17–39.
60.
ReddyR N (2015) Reimagining e-waste circuits: calculation, mobile policies, and the move to urban mining in Global South cities. Urban Geography37(1): 57–76.
61.
SchulzYLora-WainwrightA (2019) In the name of circularity: Environmental improvement and business slowdown in a Chinese recycling hub. Worldwide Waste2(1): 1–13.
SimmieJ (2012) Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies20(5): 753–772.
68.
SneddonC (2007) Nature’s materiality and the circuitous paths of accumulation: Dispossession of freshwater fisheries in Cambodia. Antipode39(1): 167–193.
69.
SotarautaMSuvinenNJollyS, et al. (2021) The many roles of change agency in the game of green path development in the North. European Urban and Regional Studies28(2): 92–110.
SteenMHansenGH (2018) Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography94(2): 188–210.
72.
SteenMLundHBKarlsenA (2023) The role of state agency in path development: A longitudinal study of two Norwegian manufacturing regions. Regional Studies57(8): 1511–1522.
73.
SuBHeshmatiAGengY, et al. (2013) A review of the circular economy in China: Moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production42: 215–227.
74.
SunSJinCHeW, et al. (2021) Management status of waste lithium-ion batteries in China and a complete closed-circuit recycling process. Science of the Total Environment776: 145913.
75.
TaoYRahnCDArcherLA, et al. (2021) Second life and recycling: Energy and environmental sustainability perspectives for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Science Advances7(45): eabi7633.
TripplMBaumgartinger-SeiringerSFrangenheimA, et al. (2020) Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences111: 189–197.
79.
TurnerMD (2004) Political ecology and the moral dimensions of “resource conflicts”: The case of farmer–herder conflicts in the Sahel. Political Geography23(7): 863–889.
80.
UNEP (2011) Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. Nairobi: UNEP.
81.
WangKQianJHeS (2021) Contested worldings of e-waste environmental justice: Nonhuman agency and e-waste scalvaging in Guiyu, China. Annals of the American Association of Geographers111(7): 2165–2184.
82.
WangKQianJHeS (2022) Global destruction networks and hybrid e-waste economies: Practices and embeddedness in Guiyu, China. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space54(3): 533–553.
83.
WangRWijenFHeugensPP (2018) Government’s green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strategic Management Journal39(2): 403–428.
84.
WellerSBeerA (2023) State structures and the limits of agency: Governing the transformation from coal in Australia. Regional Studies57(8): 1415–1427.
85.
WernerM (2022) Geographies of production III: Global production in/through nature. Progress in Human Geography46(1): 234–244.
86.
WilliamsJ (2022) Challenges to implementing circular development–lessons from London. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development14(1): 287–303.
87.
WolsinkM (1994) Entanglement of interests and motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on facility siting. Urban Studies31(6): 851–866.
88.
XiaoSDongHGengY, et al. (2018) An overview of China’s recyclable waste recycling and recommendations for integrated solutions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling134: 112–120.
89.
XuCDaiQGainesL, et al. (2020) Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries. Communications Materials1(1): 99.
90.
XuJChungCKL (2014) Environment’ as an evolving concept in China's urban planning system. International Development Planning Review36(4): 391–412.
91.
XuJChungCKLYangH, et al. (2022a) New sectors, new spaces, and China’s evolving state–firm relations. The China Review22(4): 1–18.
92.
XuJZhangM (2023) Greening Chinese cities? Denaturalizing the ‘good’ of environmental discourses in China’s urban planning system. In: ZhangWu (eds) Handbook on China’s Urban Environmental Governance. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 201–225.
93.
XuJZouGChungCKL (2022b) (Re) shaping urban governance through state–business interaction in inland China’s emerging industries. The China Review22(4): 77–104.
94.
YuZGibbsD (2023) Green industry development and urban sustainability transitions in China’s latecomer cities: The case of Dezhou. In: ZhangFWuF (eds) Handbook on China’s Urban Environmental Governance. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 355–368.
95.
YuZHuangP (2020) Local governments’ incentives and governing practices in low-carbon transition: A comparative study of solar water heater governance in four Chinese cities. Cities96: 102477.
96.
ZhangHZhuKHangZ, et al. (2022) Waste battery-to-reutilization decisions under government subsidies: An evolutionary game approach. Energy259: 124835.
97.
ZhangMXuJChungCKL (2020) Politics of scale, bargaining power and its spatial impacts: Planning for intercity railways in the Pearl River Delta, China. The China Quarterly243: 676–700.
98.
ZhangXLiYZhouC, et al. (2023) Rescaling of the land regime in the making of city-regions: A case study of China’s Pearl River Delta. Urban Studies60(3): 483–500.
99.
ZhengSQinXChungCKL, et al. (2022) State–firm relations in knowledge sourcing for regional innovation. The China Review22(4): 19–44.
100.
ZhouZChungCKLXuJ (2023) Geographies of green industries: The interplay of firms, technologies, and the environment. Progress in Human Geography47(5): 680–698.
