Peri-urbanization in Asia, which is driven by state-led mega-projects, has incorporated peasants on the fringes of cities into the urban fabric through land dispossession and displacement. This paper enriches ongoing debates on peasant experiences in urbanization, with a focus on the role of non-human nature. We apply an urban political ecology analysis that dialectically integrates analyses of political–economic forces and materiality, showing how they mediate peasant dispossession and post-agrarian subjectivities. Drawing on research conducted on the eastern fringe of Vientiane, Laos, where a stretch of agrarian wetland lay, we demonstrate how partial real estate enclosures transformed the ecology of the entire area. Altered flows of water engineered by state officials and project developers constrained agricultural production and peasant livelihoods. The drainage and filling of land combined with a burgeoning property market left landowners with little option but to treat their land as real estate. By engaging in land deals and micro-level property development, these former peasants actively integrated themselves into the emerging urban economy, albeit with uneven success. Our research highlights how the intersection of material nature with the forces and influences of state and capital mediates wetland enclosure, peri-urbanization, and the production of post-agrarian subjectivities.
AskewMLongCLoganW (2006) Vientiane: Transformations of a Lao Landscape. London: Routledge.
3.
Associated Press (2008) ‘Chinatown’ stirs unusual rumblings about a small neighbor’s independence. 6 April.
4.
BairdIG (2014) The global land grab meta-narrative, Asian money laundering and elite capture: Reconsidering the Cambodian context. Geopolitics19(2): 431–453.
5.
BairdIGFoxJ (2015) How land concessions affect places elsewhere: Telecoupling, political ecology, and large-scale plantations in southern Laos and northeastern Cambodia. Land4(2): 436–453.
6.
BakkerK (2010) The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’: Debating green neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography34(6): 715–735.
7.
BakkerKBridgeG (2006) Material worlds? Resource geographies and the `matter of nature’. Progress in Human Geography30(1): 5–27.
8.
BalakrishnanS (2019) Recombinant urbanization: Agrarian–urban landed property and uneven development in India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research43(4): 617–632.
9.
BarneyK (2009) Laos and the making of a ‘relational’ resource frontier. Geographical Journal175(2): 146–159.
10.
BeckwithLMarschkeM (2019) Destruction of Critical Urban Wetland Risks the End of Urban Farming and Wastewater Treatment. Singapore: TECSEA Blog, National University of Singapore.
11.
BenjaminS (2008) Occupancy urbanism: Radicalizing politics and economy beyond policy and programs. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32(3): 719–729.
12.
BennettJ (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
13.
BosoniNKenney-LazarMChenWK (2023) Lao farmers cling to a way of life that’s vanishing as developer drains marsh they rely on for water. South China Morning Post. 22 April.
14.
BraunB (2008) Environmental issues: Inventive life. Progress in Human Geography32(5): 667–679.
15.
BraunB (2019) Taking earth forces seriously. In: LutskyKSaloojeeOScottEE (eds) Viscosity–Mobilizing Materialities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota College of Design.
16.
BunnellTGohDPLaiCK, et al. (2012) Introduction: Global urban frontiers? Asian cities in theory, practice, and imagination. Urban Studies49(13): 2785–2793.
17.
CaiY (2010) Collective Resistance in China: Why Popular Protests Succeed or Fail. Sanford: Stanford University Press.
18.
CastreeN (1995) The nature of produced nature: Materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism. Antipode27: 12–48.
19.
CastreeN (2002) False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor–networks. Antipode34(1): 111–146.
20.
ChenWK (2020) Sovereign debt in the making: Financial entanglements and labor politics along the belt and road in Laos. Economic Geography96(4): 295–314.
21.
ChuangJ (2020) Beneath the China Boom: Labor, Citizenship, and the Making of a Rural Land Market. Oakland: University of California Press.
22.
CollinsE (2017) Reclamation, Displacement and Resiliency in Phnom Penh. In: Other Geographies: The Influences of Michael Watts. Hoboken NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 199–213.
23.
CowanT (2018) The urban village, agrarian transformation, and rentier capitalism in Gurgaon, India. Antipode50(5): 1244–12.
24.
CowanT (2019) The village as urban infrastructure: Social reproduction, agrarian repair and uneven urbanisation. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space4(3): 736–755.
25.
DeuskarCBakerJLMasonD (2015) East Asia’s Changing Urban Landscape: Measuring a Decade of Spatial Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
26.
DoigW (2018) High-Speed Empire: Chinese Expansion and the Future of Southeast Asia. New York: Columbia Global Reports.
27.
DwyerM (2007) Turning land into capital. A review of recent research on land concessions for investment in the Lao PDR. A report commissioned by the Land Issues Working Group, Vientiane.
28.
DwyerMB (2013) Building the politics machine: Tools for ‘resolving’ the global land grab: Building the politics machine. Development and Change44(2): 309–333.
29.
DwyerMB (2015) The formalization fix? Land titling, land concessions and the politics of spatial transparency in Cambodia. The Journal of Peasant Studies42(5): 903–928.
30.
EvansG (1995) Lao Peasants Under Socialism and Post-socialism. Chiang Mai (Thailand): Silkworm Books.
31.
EvansG (2002) A Short History of Laos. The Land In-Between. Crows Nest (Australia): Allen & Unwin.
32.
FauveaudG (2014) Mutations of real estate actors’ strategies and modes of capital appropriation in contemporary Phnom Penh. Urban Studies51(16): 3479–3494.
33.
FitzSimmonsM (1989) The matter of nature. Antipode21(2): 106–120.
34.
GabrielN (2014) Urban political ecology: Environmental imaginary, governance, and the non-human: UPE: Imaginary, governance, and the non-human. Geography Compass8(1): 38–48.
35.
GandyM (2022) Natura Urbana: Ecological Constellations in Urban Space. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
36.
GareauBJ (2005) We have never been human: Agential nature, ANT, and Marxist political ecology. Capitalism, Socialism, Nature16(4): 127–140.
37.
GerrardP (2004) Integrating Wetland Ecosystem Values into Urban Planning: The Case of That Luang Marsh, Vientiane, Lao PDR. Vientiane: IUCN—The World Conservation Union Asia Regional Environmental Economics Programme and WWF Lao Country Office.
38.
GhertnerDA (2015) Rule by Aesthetics: World-Class City Making in Delhi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
GoldmanM (2011) Speculative urbanism and the making of the next world city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35(3): 555–581.
40.
GoodmanD (2001) Ontology matters: The relational materiality of nature and agro-food studies. Sociologia ruralis41(2): 182–200.
41.
GururaniS (2020) Cities in a world of villages: Agrarian urbanism and the making of India’s urbanizing frontiers. Urban Geography41(7): 971–989.
42.
GururaniSDasguptaR (2018) Frontier urbanism: Urbanisation beyond cities in South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly53(12): 41–45.
43.
HallREdelmanMBorrasSM, et al. (2015) Resistance, acquiescene or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. The Journal of Peasant Studies42(3-4): 467–488.
44.
HarmsE (2011) Saigon’s Edge: On the Margins of Ho Chi Minh City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
45.
HarveyD (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B,Human Geography71(1): 3–17.
HendersonG (1998) Nature and fictitious capital: The historical geography of an agrarian question. Antipode30(2): 73–118.
48.
HettCNanhthavongVHanephomS, et al. (2020) Land leases and concessions in the Lao PDR: A characterization of investments in land and their impacts.
49.
HeynenN (2013) Urban political ecology I: The urban century’. Progress in Human Geography38: 598–604.
50.
HeynenNKaikaMSwyngedouwE (2006) In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. London and New York: Routledge.
51.
HsingY-T (2010) The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land and Property in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
JacobsJW (1995) Mekong committee history and lessons for river basin development. Geographical Journal161(2): 135–148.
53.
JamiesonW (2021) For granular geography. Dialogues in Human Geography11(2): 275–293.
54.
Japan International Cooperation Agency (1990) Feasibility Study on Improvement of Drainage System in Vientiane.
55.
KaikaM (2005) City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City. New York: Routledge.
56.
KanK (2020) The social politics of dispossession: Informal institutions and land expropriation in China. Urban Studies57(16): 3331–3346.
57.
KeilR (2005) Progress report—Urban political ecology. Urban Geography26(7): 640–651.
58.
Kenney-LazarM (2021) Turning land into capital? The expansion and extraction of value in Laos. Environment and Planning A 55(6): 1565–1580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211063493.
59.
Kenney-LazarMDwyerMHettC (2018) Turning land into capital: Assessing a decade of policy in practice. A report commissioned by the Land Issues Working Group, Vientiane.
60.
KeobounthamS (2019) Vientiane new world: A modern dream and its impact on Don Chan community livelihoods. Journal of Mekong Societies15(2): 18–36.
61.
KimH (2020) Corruption as infrastructure: Rendering the New Saigon global. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research44(6): 1057–1071.
62.
KyophilavongP (2008) The impact of irrigation on aquatic wetland resources—A case study of That Luang Marsh, Lao PDR. Research Report, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia.
63.
Lao Statistic Bureau (2015) Lao population and housing census 2015: Provisional report.
64.
LaveR (2015) Reassembling the structural: Political ecology and actor–network theory. In: PerreaultTABridgeGMcCarthyJ (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. London; New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 213–223.
65.
LawhonM (2013) Flows, friction and the sociomaterial metabolization of alcohol. Antipode45(3): 681–701.
66.
LeitnerHSheppardE (2018) From Kampungs to Condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(2): 437–456.
67.
LevienM (2013) The politics of dispossession: Theorizing India’s “land wars”. Politics & Society41(3): 351–394.
68.
LiTM (2014a) Land’s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Durham: Duke University Press.
69.
LiTM (2014b) What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers39(4): 589–602.
70.
LoftusA (2007) Working the socio-natural relations of the urban waterscape in South Africa. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research31(1): 41–59.
71.
LoftusA (2012) Everyday Environmentalism: Creating an Urban Political Ecology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
72.
MansfieldB (2003) From catfish to organic fish: making distinctions about nature as cultural economic practice. Geoforum34(3): 329–342.
73.
McGeeT (1991) The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis. In Ginsburge N, Koppel B and McGee T (eds) The Extended Metropolis. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1–26.
74.
McGeeT (2009) The spatiality of urbanization: the policy challenges of mega-urban and Desakota regions of Southeast Asia. UNU-IAS Working Paper No. 161.
75.
NamS (2017) Urban speculation, economic openness, and market experiments in Phnom Penh. Positions: Asia Critique25(4): 645–667.
76.
NambaM (2016) Becoming a city: Infrastructural fetishism and scattered urbanization in Vientiane, Laos. In: Infrastructures and Social Complexity. London: Routledge, 94–104.
77.
NanhthavongVEhrenspergerAEpprechtM (2021) Commercial investments in land in the Lao PDR: Enhancing wellbeing or entrenching poverty?
78.
PathammavongBKenney-LazarMSayarajEV (2019) Financing the 450 year road: Land expropriation and politics ‘all the way down’ in Vientiane. Development and Change48(6): 1417–1438.
79.
PathammavongBKenney-LazarMSayarajEV (2017) Financing the 450 year road: Land expropriation and politics ‘all the way down’ in vientiane. Development and Change48(6): 1417–1438.
80.
PerkinsHA (2007) Ecologies of actor–networks and (non)social labor within the urban political economies of nature. Geoforum38(6): 1152–1162.
81.
PerreaultT (2013) Dispossession by accumulation? Mining, water and the nature of enclosure on the Bolivian Altiplano. Antipode45(5): 1050–1069.
82.
PrudhamWS (2005) Knock on Wood: Nature as Commodity in Douglas Fir Country. New York: Routledge.
83.
RanganathanM (2015) Storm drains as assemblages: The political ecology of flood risk in post-colonial Bangalore. Antipode47(5): 1300–1320.
84.
RanganathanMDoshiS (2018) Political ecologies of dispossession and anticorruption. In: HenrickEErikS (eds) Urban Political Ecology in the Anthropo-obscene: Interruptions and Possibilities. London: Routledge, 91–110.
85.
RenX (2017) Green as urban spectacle in China. In: Sustainable Cities in Asia. New York: Routledge, 77–85.
86.
RobbinsP (2007) Lawn People: How Grasses, Weeds, and Chemicals Make Us Who We Are. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
87.
RoyA (2011) Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35(2): 223–238.
88.
RoyA (2016) What is urban about critical urban theory?Urban Geography37(6): 810–823.
89.
RoyAOngA (eds) (2011) Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
90.
SchillerJMChanphengxayBLinquistB, et al. (2006) Rice in Laos. Los Baños (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute.
91.
SharifiAChibaYOkamotoK, et al. (2014) Can master planning control and regulate urban growth in Vientiane, Laos?Landscape and Urban Planning131: 1–13.
92.
ShatkinG (2016) The real estate turn in policy and planning: Land monetization and the political economy of peri-urbanization in Asia. Cities53: 141–149.
93.
ShatkinG (2019) Futures of crisis, futures of urban political theory: Flooding in Asian coastal megacities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research43(2): 207–226.
94.
SneddonC (2007) Nature’s materiality and the circuitous paths of accumulation: Dispossession of freshwater fisheries in Cambodia. Antipode39(1): 167–193.
95.
SuhardimanDDiCarloJKeovilignavongO, et al. (2021) (Re) constructing state power and livelihoods through the Laos-China railway project. Geoforum124: 79–88.
96.
SuhardimanDGiordanoMKeovilignavongO, et al. (2015) Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss. Land Use Policy49: 195–202.
97.
SundbergJ (2011) Diabolic Caminos in the desert and cat fights on the Río: A posthumanist political ecology of boundary enforcement in the United States–Mexico Borderlands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers101(2): 318–336.
98.
SwyngedouwE (1996) The city as a hybrid: On nature, society and cyborg urbanization. Capitalism Nature Socialism7(2): 65–80.
99.
UpadhyaC (2020) Assembling Amaravati: Speculative accumulation in a new Indian city. Economy and Society49(1): 141–169.
100.
UpadhyaCRaoDM (2023) Dispossession without displacement: Producing property through slum redevelopment in Bengaluru, India. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space55(2): 428–444.
101.
Vientiane Times (2007) That Luang marsh slated for development. 12 October.
102.
Vientiane Times (2011) Chinese firm to spend US$1.5bn to develop That Luang marsh. 29 December.
103.
VongpraseuthTChoiCG (2015) Globalization, foreign direct investment, and urban growth management: Policies and conflicts in Vientiane, Laos. Land Use Policy42: 790–799.
104.
WalshJAmponstiraF (2013) Infrastructure development and the repositioning of power in three Mekong region capital cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(3): 879–893.
105.
WhatmoreS (2006) Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cultural Geographies13(4): 600–609.
106.
World Bank (2020) Transforming Lao PDR from a Land-locked to a Land-linked Economy: Unlocking the Potential of Lao–China Rail Connectivity. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
YangJ (2024) Uneven climate change adaptation and the materiality of waste in urban slums of Jakarta. PhD Thesis. Singapore: National University of Singapore.
109.
YapJ (2018) Special/specific economic zones: Laos’ top incubator of economic growth. The Laotian Times.
110.
ZhanY (2021) Suspension 2.0: Segregated development, financial speculation, and waiting among resettled peasants in urban China. Pacific Affairs94(2): 347–369.
111.
ZhangMHeS (2020) Informal property rights as relational and functional: Unravelling the relational contract in China's informal housing market. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research44(6): 967–988.
112.
ZimmerA (2010) Urban political ecology: Theoretical concepts, challenges, and suggested future directions’. Erdkunde64: 343–354.
