This paper explores the relations of materiality, identity formation and everyday politics in the governance of geothermal resource in contemporary China. Drawing on ethnographic data, we found that the materiality of geothermal water in its lively and dynamic forms plays agentic roles in discourse constructions, embodied experiences and material practices, shaping the socio-natural politics. The social relations, contestations and conflicts are rooted in the ontological differences of geothermal water as understood by the competing actors. The study of geothermal water contributes to recent debates on the agency of materials in urban political ecology studies as well as exploring everyday politics by highlighting the multiplicity and heterogeneity of actors and the ways in which identity formations are mobilized in everyday governance. This paper sheds light on the heterogeneous configurations of urbanization processes and resource governance.
BakkerKBridgeG (2006) Material worlds? Resource geographies and the matter of ‘nature’. Progress in Human Geography30(1): 5–27.
3.
BalmacedaMHogseliusPJohnsonC, et al. (2019) Energy materiality: a conceptual review of multi-disciplinary approaches. Energy Research & Social Science56: 101220.
4.
BennettJ (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
BraunB (2000) Producing vertical territory: geology and governmentality in late Victorian Canada. Ecumene7(1): 7–46.
6.
CederlöfG (2021) Out of steam: energy, materiality, and political ecology. Progress in Human Geography45(1): 70–87.
7.
ChenJF (2020) Displacement, emplacement and the lifestyles of Chinese ‘snowbirds’ and local residents in tropical Sanya. Social & Cultural Geography21(5): 629–650.
8.
ChenJFWangBY (2020) “Unattended” retirement: lifestyle migration and precarity of the Houniao. Population, Space and Place26: e2369.
9.
CooleDFrostS (2010) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10.
CorneaN (2020) Territorialising control in urban West Bengal: social clubs and everyday governance in the spaces between state and party. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space38(2): 312–328.
11.
CorneaNVéronRZimmerA (2017) Everyday governance and urban environments: towards a more interdisciplinary urban political ecology. Geography Compass11(4): e12310.
12.
CorneaNZimmerAVéronR (2016) Ponds, power and institutions: the everyday governance of accessing urban water bodies in a small Bengali city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40(2): 395–409.
13.
CoutardOFlorentinD (2022) Resource ecologies, urban metabolisms, and the provision of essential services. Journal of Urban Technology29(1): 49–58.
14.
CowardM (2012) Between us in the city: materiality, subjectivity, and community in the era of global urbanization. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space30(3): 468–481.
15.
DanC (2003) The significance of nature worship in the belief system of the Chinese. The Journal of Zhejiang Social Science3: 122–129. [单纯 (2003) 自然崇拜在中国人信仰体系中的意义.浙江社会科学3:122-129.].
16.
De RijkeKMunroPMelo ZuritaM (2016) The Great Artesian Basin: a contested resource environment of subterranean water and coal seam gas in Australia. Society & Natural Resources29(6): 696–710.
17.
DemariaFSchindlerS (2016) Contesting urban metabolism: struggles over waste-to-energy in Delhi, India. Antipode48(2): 293–313.
18.
DemerittD (2001) Scientific forest conservation and the statistical picturing of nature’s limits in the progressive-era United States. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19(4): 431–459.
19.
DuplanKCranstonS (2023) Towards geographies of privileged migration: an intersectional perspective. Progress in Human Geography47(2): 333–347.
20.
FengDBreitungW (2018) What makes you feel at home? Constructing senses of home in two border cities. Population, Space and Place24(3): e2116.
21.
FengDBreitungWZhuH (2014) Creating and defending concepts of home in suburban Guangzhou. Eurasian Geography and Economics55(4): 381–403.
22.
FengDLiP (2019) Claiming geothermal water: critical legal geography and the scalar politic of hot spring development in China. The Geographical Journal185(2): 209–221.
23.
FengDZhuH (2022) Migrant resettlement in rural China: homemaking and sense of belonging after domicide. Journal of Rural Studies93: 301–308.
24.
Flood ChavezDINiewiadomskiP (2022) The urban political ecology of fog oases in Lima, Peru. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences129: 1–12.
25.
ForgetMBosV (2022) Harvesting lithium and sun in the Andes: exploring energy justice and the new materialities of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science87: 102477.
GroveK (2009) Rethinking the nature of urban environmental politics: security, subjectivity, and the non-human. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences40(2): 207–216.
28.
HeynenN (2014) Urban political ecology I: the urban century. Progress in Human Geography38(4): 598–604.
29.
HommesLHoogestegerJBoelensR (2022) (Re)making hydrosocial territories: materializing and contesting imaginaries and subjectivities through hydraulic infrastructure. Political Geography97: 102698.
30.
Jiangxi Institute of Survey and Design (2020) Yichun Wentang geothermal water resources development, utilization and protection plan: 2020–2025. Report. [江西省勘察设计研究院 (2020) 宜春市温汤地热水资源开发利用与保护规划：2020–2025]
31.
KirschSMitchellD (2004) The nature of things: dead labor, nonhuman actors, and the persistence of Marxism. Antipode36(4): 687–705.
32.
KochanD (2016) Home is where I lay down my hat? The complexities and functions of home for internal migrants in contemporary China. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences71: 21–32.
33.
KochanD (2020) Spatiality, belonging and citizenship in the age of migration in contemporary China. Asia Pacific Viewpoint61(1): 147–161.
34.
KuusM (2019) Political geography I: agency. Progress in Human Geography43(1): 163–171.
35.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
LawhonM (2013) Flows, friction, and the sociomaterial metabolization of alcohol. Antipode45(3): 681–701.
37.
LawhonMErnstsonHSilverJ (2014) Provincializing urban political ecology: towards a situated UPE through African urbanism. Antipode46(2): 497–516.
38.
LawhonMNilssonDSilverJ, et al. (2018) Thinking through heterogeneous infrastructure configurations. Urban Studies55(4): 720–732.
39.
LintonJ (2010) What Is Water? The History of a Modern Abstraction. Canada: UBC Press.
40.
LiuQBrowneALIossifovaD (2021) Creating water demand: bathing practice performances in a Chinese hot spring tourist town. Journal of Sustainable Tourism30(4): 1–19.
41.
Local Chronicles of Fuzhou Hot Spring Editorial Committee (2001) Local Chronicles of Fuzhou Hot Spring. Fuzhou, Fujian: Fujian Science and Technology Press. [福州温泉志编委会 (2001) 福州温泉志. 福建福州：福建科学技术出版社].
42.
MeehanKM (2014) Tool-power: water infrastructure as wellsprings of state power. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences57: 215–224.
43.
MillerPRoseN (1990) Governance economic life. Economy and Society19(1): 1–31.
44.
Mingyue Mountain Hot Spring Scenic Spot Management Committee (2020) Local Chronicles of Mingyue Mountain. Yichun, Jiangxi: On published. [明月山温泉风景名胜区管理委员会 (2020) 明月山地方志. 江西宜春：待出版].
45.
NarayananNP (2019) The production of informality and everyday politics. City23(1): 83–96.
46.
NguyenTAJonathanRLuongTTH, et al. (2012) Becoming and being urban in Hanoi: rural–urban migration and relations in Viet Nam. Journal of Peasant Studies39(5): 1103–1131.
47.
ParnellSRobinsonJ (2012) (Re)theorizing cities from the global south: looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography33(4): 593–617.
48.
PrietoM (2022) Indigenous resurgence, identity politics, and the anticommodification of nature: the Chilean water market and the Atacameño people. Annals of the American Association of Geographers112(2): 487–504.
49.
RanganathanM (2014) Paying for pipes, claiming citizenship: political agency and water reforms at the urban periphery. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38(2): 590–608.
50.
SibleyD (1995) Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Difference in the West. London: Routledge.
51.
SultanaF (2020) Embodied intersectionalities of urban citizenship: water, infrastructure, and gender in the global south. Annals of the American Association of Geographers110(5): 1407–1424.
52.
SwyngedouwEHeynenNC (2003) Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode35(5): 898–918.
53.
TrueloveY (2019) Gray zones: the everyday practices and governance of water beyond the network. Annals of the American Association of Geographers109(6): 1758–1774.
54.
TrueloveY (2021) Who is the state? Infrastructural power and everyday water governance in Delhi. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space39(2): 282–299.
55.
TrueloveYCorneaN (2021) Rethinking urban environmental and infrastructural governance in the everyday: perspectives from and of the global South. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space39(2): 231–246.
56.
TzaninisYMandlerTKaikaM, et al. (2021) Moving urban political ecology beyond the “urbanization of nature”. Progress in Human Geography45(2): 229–252.
57.
WilsonNJInksterJ (2018) Respecting water: indigenous water governance, ontologies, and the politics of kinship on the ground. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space1(4): 516–538.
58.
XinTJ (2016) Wentang geothermal field and water resources formation machanism and utilization prospect research in Jiangxi province. Master Thesis, Nanjing University, China. [辛田军 (2016) 江西省温汤地热田地热水成因机理及开发利用前景. 硕士学位论文，南京大学, 中国]
59.
YatesJSHarrisLMWilsonNJ (2017) Multiple ontologies of water: politics, conflict and implications for governance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(5): 797–815.
60.
ZhangNN (2014) Performing identities: women in rural–urban migration in contemporary China. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences54: 17–27.
61.
ZhaoPKennedyMDorJ, et al. (2001) Noble gases constraints on the origin and evolution of geothermal fluids from the Yang ba jain geothermal field, Tibet. Acta Petrologica Sinica17(3): 497–503.
62.
ZimmerA (2010) Urban political ecology: theoretical concepts, challenges, and suggested future directions. Erdkunde64(4): 343–354.
