This research seeks to link labour studies with political ecology by studying how the subsumption of nature affects labour agencies in fisheries and aquaculture in Aysén, Chile. For this purpose, the time-space-form approach is used to compare their impact on the distribution of union power resources between these sectors. The findings indicate that the labour agency is impacted by natural materiality and the environment unequally according to the strategy of appropriation and commodification of nature. This relationship between labour and nature is mediated by the organisation of the labour process, because bio-geographical conditions set the process of resource appropriation and commodification and, consequently, shape the relationship between capital and labour.
SERNAPESCA (2017) Anuario Estadístico de Pesca y Acuicultura.
2.
AlfordMatthewBarrientosStephanieVisserMargareet (2017) Multi-scalar Labour Agency in Global Production Networks: Contestation and Crisis in the South African Fruit Sector. Development and Change48(4): 721–745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.2017.48.issue-4.
3.
AltvaterE (1990) The foundations of life (nature) and the maintenance of life (work): The relation between ecology and economics in the crisis. International Journal of Political Economy20(1): 10–34.
4.
AyalaJ (2019). Leyes de pesca, bienes comunes y extractivismo. El movimiento de Pescadores artesanales en Chile (1988–2013)[Magíster en Historia]. Universidad de Santiago de Chile.
5.
AyalaJ (2022) Pautas de desarrollo pesquero, agentes socioeconómicas y experiencias laborales en la región del Bio-bio de Chile. Trabajo y Sociedad23(38): 69–95.
6.
BaglioniECamplingL (2017) Natural resource industries as global value chains: Frontiers, fetishism, labour and the state. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space49(11): 2437–2456.
7.
BanoubDBridgeGBustosB, et al. (2021) Industrial dynamics on the commodity frontier: Managing time, space and form in mining, tree plantations and intensive aquaculture. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space4(4): 1533–1559.
8.
BartonJRFløysandA (2010) The political ecology of Chilean salmon aquaculture, 1982–2010: A trajectory from economic development to global sustainability. Global Environmental Change20(4): 739–752.
9.
BoydWPrudhamS (2017) On the themed collection, “the formal and real subsumption of nature”. Society & Natural Resources30(7): 877–884.
10.
BoydWPrudhamWSSchurmanRA (2001) Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature. Society & Natural Resources14(7): 555–570.
11.
BridgeG (2000) The social regulation of resource access and environmental impact: Production, nature and contradiction in the US copper industry. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences31(2): 237–256.
12.
BridgeG (2009) Material worlds: Natural resources, resource geography and the material economy: Material worlds. Geography Compass3(3): 1217–1244.
13.
BridgeG (2013) Territory, now in 3D!. Political Geography34: 55–57.
14.
BrookesMarissa (2018) Power Resources in Theory and Practice: Where to Go from Here. Global Labour Journal9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v9i2.3571.
15.
Bustos-GallardoBIrarrázavalF (2022) From crisis to stability and back again: The fragility of environmental governance in the Chilean salmon industry. Area Development and Policy7(1): 22–41.
16.
Bustos-GallardoBPrietoM (2019) Nuevas aproximaciones teóricas a las regiones-commodity desde la ecología política. EURE (Santiago)45(135): 153–176.
17.
CamplingLColásA (2017) Capitalism and the sea: Sovereignty, territory and appropriation in the global ocean. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space36(4): 776–794.
18.
CamplingLHaviceEMcCall HowardP (2012) The political economy and ecology of capture fisheries: Market dynamics, resource access and relations of exploitation and resistance. Journal of Agrarian Change12(2-3): 177–203.
19.
CárdenasJCMelillancaPDíazI (2019) Salmones de sangre del sur del mundo. Santiago: Centro Ecocéanos.
20.
CartonWAnderssonE (2017) Where forest carbon meets its maker: Forestry-based offsetting as the subsumption of nature. Society & Natural Resources30(7): 829–843.
21.
CoeNMJordhus-LierDC (2011) Constrained agency? Re-evaluating the geographies of labour. Progress in Human Geography35(2): 211–233.
22.
Consejo del Salmón (2021) Reporte de empleo en la salmonicultura. Trimestre Octubre-Diciembre (N.o 2; p. 10). Consejo del Salmón Chile. www.consejodelsalmon.cl
23.
DusselE (1988) Hacia un Marx desconocido. Un comentario de los Manuscritos del 61-63. México DF: Siglo XXI Editores.
24.
EkersMPrudhamS (2017b) The metabolism of socioecological fixes: Capital switching, spatial fixes, and the production of nature. Annals of the American Association of Geographers107(6): 1370–1388.
25.
EkersMPrudhamS (2017a) The socioecological fix: Fixed capital, metabolism, and hegemony. Annals of the American Association of Geographers108(1): 17–34.
26.
FAO (2005) Guía de administración pesquero. Medidas de ordenación y su aplicación. División de recursos pesqueros, FAO.
27.
FløysandABartonJRRománÁ (2010) La doble jerarquía del desarrollo económico y gobierno local en Chile: El caso de la salmonicultura y los municipios chilotes. EURE (Santiago)36(108): 123–148.
28.
Fox-HodessKRebolledoCS (2020) The social foundations of structural power: Strategic position, worker unity and external alliances in the making of the Chilean dockworker movement. Global Labour Journal11(3): 222–238.
29.
GLOBEFISH (2022) Trade Statistics—Salmon Q1 2022. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), pp. 1–385.
30.
HosonoAIizukaMKatzJ (2016) Chile’s Salmon Industry (Vol. 10). Japan: Springer.
31.
HsiehH-FShannonSE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research15(9): 1277–1288.
32.
IrarrázavalFBustosB (2020) ¿ Peces Gordos y Peces pequeños?: Los empresarios salmoneros, cambio institucional y conflicto sectorial en Chile. Polis. Revista Latinoamericana19(56): 103–118.
33.
KimDKimMVillegasC (2020) Organized labor strikes and social spending in Latin America: The synchronizing effect of mass protest. Latin American Politics and Society62(2): 99–109.
34.
LévesqueCMurrayG (2010) Understanding union power: Resources and capabilities for renewing union capacity. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research16(3): 333–350.
35.
MasseyD (1979) In what sense a regional problem?Regional Studies13(2): 233–243.
36.
MillerBA (2000) Geography and Social Movements: Comparing Antinuclear Activism in the Boston Area. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
MooreJ (2015) Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso Books.
38.
O’ConnorJR, ed. (1998) Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford Press.
39.
OsorioSVelásquezD (2022) El poder sindical en el “Estallido social” chileno. La huelga general de noviembre de 2019. Revista Española de Sociología31(1): 1–21.
40.
PrudhamWS (2005) Knock on Wood: Nature as Commodity in Douglas-fir Country. New York and London: Routledge.
41.
RaginCC (2014) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. California: University of California Press.
42.
RainnieAHerodAMcGrath-ChampS (2011) Review and positions: Global production networks and labour. Competition & Change15(2): 155–169.
43.
RojasI (2007) Las reformas laborales al modelo normativo de negociación colectiva del plan laboral. Ius et Praxis13(2): 195–221.
44.
RománABartonJ (2017) Una ecología política de las transformacionesterritoriales en Chile: Poder y gobernanza en los sectores forestal ysalmoneros. In: BustosBPrietoMBartonJ (eds) Ecología política enChile. Naturaleza, propiedad, conocimiento y poder. Santiago: EditorialUniversitaria, pp. 237–264.
45.
SaguinnK (2014) Biographies of fish for the city: Urban metabolism of Laguna lake aquaculture. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences54: 28–38.
46.
SchmalzSLudwigCWebsterE (2018) The power resources approach: developments and challenges. Global Labour Journal9(2). https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v9i2.3569.
47.
SchönsteinerJCarmonaCAriasF, et al. (2021) Normativa aplicable a la industria del salmón en Chile: Brechas con los estándares internacionales en materia ambiental. laboral y de Derechos Humanos. Santiago: Centro de Derechos Humanos UDP, p. 358.
48.
SchurmanRA (1993) Economic Development and Class Formation in an Extractive Economy: The Fragile Nature of the Chilean Fishing Industry, 1973-1990. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
49.
SchurmanRA (1996) Snails, southern hake and sustainability: Neoliberalism and natural resource exports in Chile. World Development24(11): 1695–1709.
50.
SeawrightJGerringJ (2008) Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly61(2): 294–308.
51.
SERNAPESCA (2020) Anuario Estadistico del SERNAPESCA. Santiago: Subsecretaria de Pesca.
52.
SilverB (2003) Forces o f Labor. Workers’ Movements and Globalization since 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
SkocpolTSomersM (1980) The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History22(2): 174–197.
54.
SmithN (2007) Nature as accumulation strategy. Socialist Register43: 21.
55.
SmithN (2008) Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space (3rd ed)Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
56.
ThompsonP (1989) The Nature of Work: An Introduction to Debates on the Labour Process. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
57.
UzzellDRäthzelN (2013) Mending the breach between labour and nature: A new research field. En Trade Unions in the Green Economy: Working for the Environment. New York: Earthscan/Routledge, pp. 1–12.
58.
VandergeestP (2018) Law and lawlessness in industrial fishing: Frontiers in regulating labour relations in Asia. International Social Science Journal68(229–230): 325–341.
59.
WomackJ (2008) Posición estratégica y fuerza obrera: Hacia una nueva historia de los movimientos obreros. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
60.
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future: Brundtland Report. Ottawa: United Nations.
61.
WrightEO (2000) Working-class power, capitalist-class interests, and class compromise. American Sociological Review105(4): 957–1002.
