Scholarship on the hydrosocial cycle has tended to overlook the atmospheric phase of the cycle. This paper identifies and conceptualises a politics of evaporation in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin. Evaporation is not a neutral hydrological concept to be understood, measured or acted on without an appreciation of the networks in which it originates, the geo-political circumstances that continue to shape its circulation, and its socio-spatial effects. The politics of evaporation is conceptualised here as a process of hydrosocial territorialisation in which atmospheric water came to be known as a force acting within a balanced hydrologic cycle, and ‘atmospheric territory’ was created. The scientific origins of evaporation show (i) how modernist hydrologic technologies and conventions that relied on containment and territorialisation to account for and control water led to the negative depiction of evaporation as a loss, and (ii) the historical depth of processes of abstraction and commensuration that are so influential in today’s regimes of water accounting and marketisation. The politics of evaporation is identified empirically in the controversy surrounding the management of the Menindee Lakes and the lower Darling River in New South Wales, where efforts to ‘save’ water according to the logic of efficiency have enrolled atmospheric water into a Basin-wide program to redistribute surface water. The lens of evaporation theorises a neglected aspect of the materiality of water that is particularly important to the dry, hot parts of the world. It challenges us to rethink the ‘cycle’ as well as the ‘hydro’, while providing further evidence of the value of thinking about territory in a material register as volumetric and not areal.
Australian Academy of Science (2019) Investigation of the Causes of Mass Fish Kills in the Menindee Region NSW over the Summer of 2018–2019. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.
BallardAGarlandNHannanG (2003)
Monitoring and accounting for water trade in the Murray-Darling Basin. Australasian Journal of Water Resources7(1): 49–56.
4.
BallesteroA (2019) A Future History of Water.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
5.
BakkerK (2012)
Water: Political, biopolitical, material. Social Studies of Science42(4): 616–623.
6.
Blackwatch Consulting (2017) Menindee Lakes Water Savings Project, phase 2 business case. Report to the NSW Department of Primary Industries, June 2017.
7.
BoelensRVosJ (2012)
The danger of naturalizing water policy concepts: Water productivity and efficiency discourses from field irrigation to virtual water trade. Agricultural Water Management108: 16–26.
8.
BoelensRCrowBHoogestegerJ, et al. (2017) Hydrosocial Territories and Water Equity.
London:
Routledge.
9.
BoelensRHoogestegerJSwyngedouwE, et al. (2016)
Hydrosocial territories: A political ecology perspective. Water International41(1): 1–14.
10.
BiswasA (1970)
Edmond Halley, F.R.S, hydrologist extraordinary. Notes and Records of the Royal Society25(1): 47–57.
11.
CohenADavidsonS (2011)
An examination of the watershed approach: Challenges, antecedents, and the transition from technical tool to governance unit. Water Alternatives4(1): 1–14.
12.
CondonLMarkovichKKelleherC, et al. (2020)
Where is the bottom of a watershed?Water Resources Research56(3): e2019WR026010.
13.
DearP (2001) Revolutionising the Sciences: European Knowledge and its Ambition, 1500–1700.
Princeton, NJ:
University of Princeton Press.
EvansRMurrihyEBastiaanssenWMolloyR (2009) Using satellite imagery to measure evaporation from storages – Solving the great unknown in water accounting. Paper presented at the Irrigation and Drainage Conference 2009, Irrigation Australia Ltd, Swan Hill, Vic, Australia, 18–21 October.
FordZ (2020) Decision-making for Menindee Lakes in the Murray-Darling Basin –Driversand consequences. Honours Thesis, UNSW, Sydney.
22.
GimenoLDominguezFNietoR, et al. (2016)
Major mechanisms of atmospheric moisture transport and their role in extreme precipitation events. Annual Review of Environment and Resources41: 117–141.
GraftonR (2019)
Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: The “do’s” and “do’nots”. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics63: 116–141.
26.
GraftonRWilliamsJ (2019)
Thirst for certainty: The urgent need for a water audit of the Murray-Darling Basin. Farm Policy Journal Winter:14–22.
27.
GreenDAliAPetrovicJ, et al. (2012) Water Resources and Management Overview: Lower Darling River Catchment. Sydney: NSW Department of Primary Industries.
28.
GuptaJPahl-WostlCZondervanR (2013) ‘
Glocal’ water governance: A multi-level challenge in the anthropocene. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability5(6): 573–580.
29.
GuzmanCVerzijlAZwarteveenM (2017)
Water footprints and ‘pozas’: Conversations about practices and knowledges of water efficiency, Water9: 16.
30.
HeffernanM (2015)
The birth of territory: A review forum. Journal of Historical Geography50: 109–188.
31.
HommesLBoelensRBleekerS, et al (2020)
Water governmentalities: The shaping of hydrosocial territories, water transfers and rural–urban subjects in Latin America.EPE: Nature and Space3(2): 399–422.
32.
HoogesterJVosJBoelensR, et al. (2017) Introduction: Interweaving water struggles, the making of territory and social justice. In: BoelensRCrowBHoogesterJ, et al. (eds) Hydrosocial Territories and Water Equity: Theory, Governance and Sites of Struggle.
Abingdon and New York:
Routledge, pp. 1–7.
33.
HortonR (1931)
The field, scope, and status of the science of hydrology. Transactions, American Geographical Union12: 189–202.
34.
HuttonM (2011) Submission from the We Want Action Group to the Murray-Darling Basin Plan. file:///C:/Users/jb/Downloads/Submission15attach1_Broken%20Hill%20Menindee%20Lakes%20(3).pdf
35.
JacksonSHeadL (2020)
Australia’s mass fish kills as a crisis of modern water: Understanding hydro-social change in the Murray Darling Basin. Geoforum109:44–56.
36.
JohnsonW (2018) Witness statement 25 July 2018 to the Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission, Adelaide: 1380–1455. file:///C:/Users/jb/Downloads/180725-mdb-rc-johnson-mallen-cooper-gen%20(1).pdf
37.
KeuneJMirallesD (2019)
A precipitation recycling network to assess freshwater vulnerability: Challenging the watershed convention.Water Resources Research55: 9947–9961.
38.
KeysP (2016) The precipitationshed: Concepts, methods, and applications. PhD Thesis, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Sweden.
39.
KeysPPorkkaMWang-ErlandssonL, et al. (2019)
Invisible water security: Moisture recycling and water resilience.Water Security8: 100046.
40.
KeysPWang-ErlandssonLGordonL (2016)
Revealing invisible water: Moisture recycling as an ecosystem service. PloS one,
11; e0151993.
41.
KeysPWang-ErlandssonLGordonL, et al. (2017)
Approaching moisture recycling governance. Global Environmental Change45: 15–23.
42.
KirschS (2013)
Cultural geography I: Materialist turns. Progress in Human Geography37: 433–441.
43.
KlemešV (1988)
A hydrological perspective. Journal of Hydrology100: 3–28.
44.
LintonJ (2008)
Is the hydrologic cycle sustainable? A historical-geographical critique of a modern concept. Annals of the Association of American Geographers98: 630–649.
45.
LintonJ (2010) What is Water? The History of a Modern Abstraction.
Vancouver:
UBC Press.
46.
LintonJ (2014)
Modern water and its discontents: A history of hydrosocial renewal. WIREs Water1: 111–120.
47.
McBrideR (2018) Witness statement 16 August 2018 to the Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission, Adelaide: 1912–1990. file:///C:/Users/jb/Downloads/180816-mdb-rc-mcbride-burge-gen.pdf
48.
McMahonTFinlaysonBPeelM (2016)
Historical developments of models for estimating evaporation using standard meteorological data. WIREs Water3: 788–818.
49.
Melo ZuritaMMunroP (2019)
Voluminous territorialisation: Historical contestations over the Yucatan Peninsula’s subterranean waterscape. Geoforum102: 38–47.
NewellF (1920) Water Resources: Present and Future Uses.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
53.
NSW Department of Industry (2018) Menindee Lakes Water Saving Project: Summary of the Phase 2 Preliminary Business Case, Concept Design. New South Wales: NSW Department of Industry.
54.
Palacios-VelezE (1994) Water use efficiency in irrigation districts. In: Garduno H and Arreguin-Cortes F (eds) Efficient Water Use. pp. 223–234. Montevideo: UNESCO/ROSTLAC.
55.
PittockJFinlaysonCHowittJ (2013)
Beguiling and risky: “Environmental works and measures” for wetland conservation under a changing climate. Hydrobiologia708: 111–131.
56.
RoderickMFarquharG (2011)
A simple framework for relating variations in runoff to variations in climatic conditions and catchment properties. Water Resources Research47(12): W00G07.
57.
RogersSWangM (2020)
Producing a Chinese hydrosocial territory: A river of clean water flows north from Danjiangkou. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space38: 1308–1327.
58.
ScottJ (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.
New Haven, USA:
Yale University Press.
59.
ShahELiebrandJVosJ, et al. (2018)
The UN World Water Development Report 2016 – Water and jobs: A critical review. Development and Change49(2): 678–691.
60.
SKM (2010) Darling River Water Saving Project Part B. Final Report to the NSW Office of Water and Australian Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage, and the Arts, New South Wales.
61.
SlatteryMCampbellR (2019) A Fish Kill Q and A: Questions, Answers and Dead Fish in the Menindee Lakes.
Canberra:
Australia Institute Discussion Paper.
Van der KooijSKuperMde FraitureC, et al. (2017) Re-allocating yet-to-be-saved water in irrigation modernization projects: The case of the Bittit irrigation system, Morocco. In: VenotJKuperMZwarteveenM (eds) Drip Irrigation for Agriculture.
London:
Routledge, pp. 68–84.
VosJHinojosaL (2016)
Virtual water trade and the contestation of hydrosocial territories. Water International41(1): 37–53.
70.
Webb, McKeown & Association (2007) State of the Darling Interim Hydrology Report. Report for the Murray Darling Basin Commission, March 2007. New South Wales: Webb, McKeown & Association.
71.
WengW (2019) Aerial river management for future water in the context of land use change in Amazonia. PhD Thesis, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin – Geographisches Institut, Germany.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
