In Khmer, the word prek designates a connection between things. In Kandal province in Cambodia, preks crisscross the landscape, connecting rivers with floodplains, supporting rich ecologies and a variety of livelihoods. Drawing on science and technology studies (STS) and critical water research, this paper explores prek(s) as a multiplicity. Rather than taking the prek as a passive object around which various practices occur, we examine how prek(s) are enacted as ontologically different: as irrigation infrastructure, as pathway to rice intensification, as device for Cambodian state-making, and as climate-friendly agricultural development. After analyzing interference patterns between enactments and their scale-making effects in- and outside the Mekong floodplains, we make explicit our own ontological politics. Focused on sustaining multiple uses and ecosystems, “our” prek is a socionatural mosaic landscape where many human and more-than-human actors and practices can coexist. This ontological politics, we suggest, has implications for planetary environmental knowledges and delta management far beyond Kandal’s landscape.
BakkerK (2002)
From state to market? Water mercantilización in Spain. Environment and Planning A34(5): 767–790.
2.
BakkerKBridgeG (2006)
Material worlds? Resource geographies and the ‘matter of nature’. Progress in Human Geography30(1): 1–23.
3.
BallesterosA (2019) A Future History of Water.
Durham, NC and London:
Duke University Press.
4.
BarnesJAlatoutS (2012)
Water worlds: Introduction to the special issue of Social Studies of Science. Social Studies of Science42(4): 483–488.
5.
BarthelemyR (1915) Premières études des colmatages du Mékong. Archives Nationales du Cambodge, résidence supérieure, Phnom Penh.
6.
BiggsD (2010) Quagmire: Nation-Building and Nature in the Mekong Delta.
Seattle, WA:
University of Washington Press.
7.
BlakeDJH (2019)
Recalling hydraulic despotism: Hun Sen’s Cambodia and the return of strict authoritarianism. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies12(1): 69–89.
8.
BoldingAMollingaPPStraatenKV (1995)
Modules for modernisation: Colonial irrigation in India and the technological dimension of agrarian change.The Journal of Development Studies31(6): 805–844.
9.
CallonMLatourB (1981) Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them do so. In: Knorr Cetina K and Cicourel A (eds) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro Sociologies.
London:
Routledge and Keagan Paul, pp.277–303.
10.
CanguilhemG (1994) A Vital Rationalist: Selected Writings from Georges Canguilhem.
New York:
Zone Books.
11.
CarseA (2012)
Nature as infrastructure: Making and managing the Panama Canal watershed. Social Studies of Science42(4): 539–563.
12.
CarseA (2017)
An infrastructural event: Making sense of Panama’s drought. Water Alternatives10(3): 888–909.
13.
ChoiYR (2020) Slippery ontologies of tidal flats. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. Epub ahead of print 22 December 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2514848620979312.
14.
ClarkeAMontiniT (1993)
The many faces of RU486: Tales of situated knowledges and technological contestations. Science, Technology and Human Values18(1): 43–78.
15.
DamonteGBoelensR (2019)
Hydrosocial territories, agroexport and water scarcity: Capitalist territorial transformations and water governance in Peru’s coastal valleys. Water International44(2): 206–223.
16.
de LaetMMolA (2000)
The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science30(2): 225–263.
17.
DeligneA (2013) Réseaux sociotechniques et politiques de gestion des systèmes irrigués au Cambodge. PhD Thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
18.
GadCJensenCBWinthereikBR (2015)
Practical ontology: Worlds in STS and anthropology.NatureCulture3: 67–86.
19.
GhiottiS (2018) Analyser et comprendre les territoires hydro-sociaux en Méditerranée et ailleurs-Application au complexe lagunaire et aux zones humides de l’étang de l’Or (Hérault, France). Mémoire d’Habilitation à Diriger les Recherches – Volume 3. Ecole Normale de Lyon.
20.
GoldmanMJNadasdyPTurnerMD (2011) Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies.
Chicago and London:
The University of Chicago Press.
21.
GötzJMiddletonC (2020)
Ontological politics of hydrosocial territories in the Salween River Basin, Myanmar/Burma. Political Geography78: 102115.
22.
HarrisLMAlatoutS (2010)
Negotiating hydro-scales, forging states: Comparison of the Upper Tigris/Euphrates and Jordan River Basins. Political Geography29: 148–156.
23.
HarveyPJensenCBMoritaA (eds) (2016). Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion.
London and New York:
Routledge.
24.
Hydroconseil and Agriate (2019) Evaluation rétrospective des interventions de l’AFD dans le secteur de l’irrigation.
Paris:
AFD.
25.
IvarsBVenotJP (2018)
Entre politiques publiques et matérialité: Associations d’usagers et infrastructures d’irrigation au Cambodge. Nature, Sciences, Sociétés26(4): 383–394.
26.
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (1998) The Agricultural Development Study of the Mekong Flooded Area in Cambodia-Final Report. Japan: Sanyu Consultant.
27.
JensenCB (2007)
Infrastructural fractals: Revisiting the micro-macro distinction in social theory. Environment and Planning D35(5): 832–850.
JensenCBMoritaA (2020)
Deltas in crisis: From systems to sophisticated conjunctions. Sustainability12(4): 1322.
30.
KohlerR (1994) Lords of the Fly: Drosophila, Genetics and the Experimental Life.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
31.
LatourB (1986) The powers of association. In: Law J (ed) Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?
London:
Routledge and Keagan Paul, pp.264–280.
32.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
33.
LintonJ (2010) What is Water? The History of a Modern Abstraction.
Vancouver:
UBC Press.
34.
LintonJBuddsJ (2014).
The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum57: 170–180.
35.
LongN (ed) (1989) Encounters at the Interface: A Perspective on Social Discontinuities in Rural Development.
Wageningen:
Agricultural University of Wageningen.
36.
LongN (2001) Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives.
London and New York:
Routledge.
37.
MAFF (2018) Annual Report for Agricultural Forestry and Fisheries(2017)–(2018) and Direction (2018)–(2019). Phnom Penh: MAFF.
38.
MassuelSRiauxJMolleF, et al. (2018)
Inspiring a broader socio-hydrological negotiation approach with interdisciplinary field-based experience. Water Resources Research54: 1–13.
39.
MDP (2013) Mekong Delta Plan. Hanoi, Vietnam: The Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
40.
MolA (1998)
Lived reality and the multiplicity of norms: A critical tribute to Georges Canguilhem. Economy and Society27(2/3): 274–285.
41.
MolA (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
42.
MollingaPP (2014)
Canal irrigation and the hydrosocial cycle: The morphogenesis of contested water control in the Tungabhadra Left Bank Canal, South India. Geoforum57: 192–204.
43.
MosseD (2005) Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice.
London:
Pluto Press.
44.
ObertreisJMossTMollingaP, et al. (2016)
Water, infrastructure and political rule: Introduction to the special issue. Water Alternatives9(2): 168–181.
45.
PickeringA (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
46.
PovinelliEA (2001)
Radical worlds: The anthropology of incommensurability and inconceivability. Annual Review of Anthropology30: 319–334.
47.
RossRChangH (2020)
Socio-hydrology with hydrosocial theory: Two sides of the same coin?Hydrological Sciences Journal 65: 1443–1457.
48.
ScottJC (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.
New Haven, CT and London:
Yale University Press.
49.
SivapalanMSavenijeHHGBloschlG (2012)
Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes26(8): 1270–1276
50.
Socialist Republic of Vietnam (2017) Resolution on Sustainable and Climate-Resilient Development of the Mekong Delta. Prime Minister Resolution 120.
Hanoi, Vietnam:
Prime Minister Office.
51.
SOFRECO (2018) Project Review Report. Water & Agriculture Sector Programme (WASP) – Package 2. Technical Assistance for the Implementation of Preks of Kandal Component (TA-Preks).
Phnom Penh, Cambodia:
SOFRECO.
52.
SrinivasanVSandersonMGarciaM, et al. (2017)
Prediction in a socio-hydrological world. Hydrological Sciences Journal62(3): 338–345.
53.
StarSLGriesemerJR (1989)
Institutional ecology. “Translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science19(3): 387–420.
54.
SwyngedouwE (2004) Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
55.
SwyngedouwE (2009)
The political economy and political ecology of the hydrosocial cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education142(1): 56–60.
56.
Transparency International (2008) Global Corruption Report 2008: Corruption in the Water Sector.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.
57.
UNESCO and UN-Water (2018) The United Nations World Water Development Report (2018): Nature-Based Solutions for Water.
Paris:
UNESCO.
58.
UNESCO and UN-Water (2020) United Nations World Water Development Report (2020): Water and Climate Change.
Paris:
UNESCO.
59.
VenotJPFontenelleJP (2016) Politique de l’irrigation au Cambodge: Articulations et enjeux des interventions de l’AFD.
Paris:
COSTEA.
60.
VerranH (2002) “
Transferring” strategies of land management: The knowledge practices of indigenous landowners and environmental scientistsKnowledge and Society13: 155–183.
61.
VincentLF (1997) Irrigation as a Technology, Irrigation as a Resource. A Sociotechnical Approach to Irrigation. Inaugural Lecture.
Wageningen:
Wageningen Agricultural University.
62.
VosJBoelensRVenotJP, et al. (2020)
Rooted water collectives: Towards an analytical framework. Ecological Economics173(2020): 106651.
63.
WanvoekeJVenotJPDe FraitureC, et al. (2016)
Smallholder drip irrigation in Burkina Faso: The role of development brokers. The Journal of Development Studies52(7): 1019–1033.
64.
WesselinkAKooyMWarnerJ (2016)
Socio-hydrology and hydrosocial analysis: Towards dialogues across disciplines. WIREs Water4: e1196.
65.
WesselinkAWarnerJFAbu SyedMd, et al. (2015)
Trends in flood risk management in deltas around the world: Are we going ‘soft’?International Journal of Water Governance3(4): 25–46.
WilsonNJInksterJ (2018)
Respecting water: Indigenous water governance, ontologies, and the politics of kinship on the ground. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space1(4): 516–538.
68.
World Bank (2006a) Water Management in Agriculture. Ten Years of World Bank Assistance, 1994–2004.
Washington, DC:
The World Bank.
69.
World Bank (2006b) Reengaging in Agricultural Water Management: Challenges and Options.
Washington, DC:
World Bank.
70.
World Bank (2007) World Development Report. Agriculture for Development.
Washington, DC:
The World Bank.
71.
YatesJSHarrisLMWilsonNJ (2017)
Multiple ontologies of water: Politics, conflict, and implications for governance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(5): 797–815.
