The idea of the Anthropocene presents a paradox for conservation: to restore and protect wild species and ecosystems, greater human intervention is required through efforts such as artificial propagation. This paradox is evident in efforts to conserve Pacific salmon. Salmon hatcheries produce millions of salmon to augment wild populations and sustain fishing industries, but emerging knowledge about salmon genomics has called into question the “wildness” of hatchery salmon. This article examines how the scientific uncertainties regarding wild species are contested by a range of stakeholders and how particular frames become concretized in policy frameworks. Despite the significance of laws and policies to the governance of such hybrid species, they have received limited attention. Drawing on archival documents, legislation, policies, government reports, and media sources, we conduct a cross-national comparative analysis of how wildness is framed in policy debates in Canada and the United States. We find that hatchery-born salmon occupy a position at the threshold of scientific and cultural definitions of wildness and this ambiguity facilitates political contests among groups with divergent interests in conservation and views of the human–nature relationship. As a result, hatchery salmon have been regulated differently across time and geographic and jurisdictional space. These findings contribute to an expanding literature on conservation in the Anthropocene and managing wild species.
AllendorfFWLearyRFSpruellP, et al. (2001)
The problems with hybrids: Setting conservation guidelines. Trends in Ecology & Evolution16(11): 613–22.
2.
Alsea Valley Alliance v. Evans (2001) 161 F. Supp. 2d 1154, D. Or.
3.
ArakiHCooperBBlouinMS (2007)
Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid cumulative fitness decline in the wild.Science318(5847): 100–103.
4.
ArakiHSchmidC (2010)
Is hatchery stocking a help or harm?: Evidence limitations and future directions in ecological and genetic surveys. Aquaculture308: S2—S11.
5.
ArnoldDF (2009) The Fishermen's Frontier: People and Salmon in Southeast Alaska.
Seattle:
University of Washington Press.
6.
ArnoldML (1997) Natural Hybridization and Evolution.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
7.
AtleoC (2010) Nuu-chah-nulth economic development and the changing nature of our relationships within the Ha’hoolthlii of our Ha’wiih. Thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria.
8.
AtleoR (2011) Principles of Tsawalk: An Indigenous Approach to Global Crisis.
Vancouver:
UBC Press.
9.
BarnardJ (2001) Judge throws out threatened species listing for Coho salmon along Oregon coast.
Associated Press, 14 September, 2.
10.
BarnoskyADMatzkeNTomiyaS, et al. (2011)
Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?Nature471(7336): 51–57.
11.
BenfordRDSnowDA (2000)
Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology26(1): 611–639.
12.
BerkesF (2017) Sacred Ecology.
New York:
Routledge.
13.
BravermanI (2014)
Conservation without nature: The trouble with in situ versus ex situ conservation. Geoforum51: 47–57.
14.
BravermanI (2015) Wild Life: The Institution of Nature.
Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
15.
British Columbia Sport Fishing Regulations (1996) (Canada).
16.
BuijsAEArtsBJMElandsBHM, et al. (2011)
Beyond environmental frames: The social representation and cultural resonance of nature in conflicts over a Dutch woodland, Geoforum42(3): 329–341.
17.
Canada Wildlife Act (1985) (Canada).
18.
CantrellBMartinLJEllisEC (2017)
Designing autonomy: Opportunities for new wildness in the Anthropocene.Trends in Ecology & Evolution32(3): 156–166.
19.
ChittendenCMBiagiCADavidsenJG, et al. (2010)
Genetic versus rearing-environment effects on phenotype: Hatchery and natural rearing effects on hatchery- and wild-born Coho salmon. PLoS One5(8): 1–11.
20.
ChittendenCMSuraSButterworthKG, et al. (2008)
Riverine estuarine and marine migratory behaviour and physiology of wild and hatchery‐reared Coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch (Walbaum) smolts descending the Campbell River BC Canada. Journal of Fish Biology72(3): 614–628.
21.
ChristieMRFordMJBlouinMS (2014)
On the reproductive success of early‐generation hatchery fish in the wild.Evolutionary Applications7(8): 883–896.
22.
ChristieMRMarineMLFoxSE, et al. (2016)
A single generation of domestication heritably alters the expression of hundreds of genes. Nature Communications7: 1–6.
23.
ColombiBJ (2012).
Salmon and the adaptive capacity of Nimiipuu (Nez Perce) culture to cope with change. American Indian Quarterly36(1): 75–97.
CordingleyJESundaresanSRFischhoffIR, et al. (2009)
Is the endangered Grevy’s zebra threatened by hybridization?Animal Conservation12(6): 505–513.
26.
CoyneJOrrHA (2004) Speciation.
Sunderland:
Sinauer Associates Inc.
27.
CraftonRE (2018) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: An overview. Report, Congressional Research Service.
28.
CrononW (1996)
The trouble with wilderness. Environmental History1(1): 20–25.
29.
CrowDALawlorA (2016)
Media in the policy process: Using framing and narratives to understand policy influences. Review of Policy Research33(5): 472–491.
30.
CrowleySLHinchliffeSMcDonaldRA (2017)
Nonhuman citizens on trial: The ecological politics of a beaver reintroduction. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,
49(8): 1846–1866.
DanielsMJCorbettL (2003)
Redefining introgressed protected mammals: When is a wildcat a wild cat and a dingo a wild dog?Wildlife Research30(3): 213–218.
33.
DewulfA (2013)
Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change4(4): 321–330.
34.
DoakDFBakkerVJGoldsteinBE, et al. (2015) What is the future of conservation? In: WuerthnerGCristEButlerT (eds) Protecting the Wild.
Washington:
Island Press, pp.27–35.
35.
DoremusH (2010)
The Endangered Species Act: Static law meets dynamic world. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy32(1/7): 175–235.
36.
Dovetail Consulting Inc., Judith Cullington & Associates and Devon Knight Events (2000a) Final report on consultations for the Wild Salmon Policy Discussion Paper and the Salmonid Enhancement Program. Report for the Fisheries and Oceans Canada WSP-SEP Steering Committee, November.
37.
Dovetail Consulting Inc., Judith Cullington & Associates and Devon Knight Events (2000b) Final report on consultations for the Wild Salmon Policy Discussion Paper and the Salmonid Enhancement Program: Appendices. Report for the Fisheries and Oceans Canada WSP-SEP Steering Committee, November.
38.
DudleyN (2011) Authenticity in Nature: Making Choices about the Naturalness of Ecosystems.
London:
Routledge.
39.
Endangered Species Act (1973).
40.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) (2005) Wild Salmon Policy.
Vancouver:
Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
41.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) (1998) A new direction for Canada's Pacific Salmon fisheries. Vancouver: Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
42.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) (2017) What We Heard: Report on Consultation and Response. Vancouver: Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
43.
FoleyPHébertK (2013)
Alternative regimes of transnational environmental certification: Governance, marketization, and place in Alaska’s salmon fisheries. Environment and Planning A45(11): 2734–2751.
44.
FoucaultM (2005) The Order of Things.
New York:
Routledge.
45.
FredricksonRJHedrickPW (2006)
Dynamics of hybridization and introgression in red wolves and coyotes. Conservation Biology20(4):1271–1283.
46.
FrieseC (2013) Cloning Wild Life: Zoos, Captivity, and the Future of Endangered Animals.
New York:
NYU Press.
47.
Fredriksen A (2016) Of wildcats and wild cats: Troubling species-based conservation in the Anthropocene. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(4): 689–705.
48.
FünfgeldHMcEvoyD (2014)
Frame divergence in climate change adaptation policy: Insights from Australian local government planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32(4): 603–622.
GroveK (2009)
Rethinking the nature of urban environmental politics: Security, subjectivity, and the non-human. Geoforum40: 207–216.
51.
GutierrezRJCodyMCourtneyS, et al. (2007)
The invasion of barred owls and its potential effect on the spotted owl: A conservation conundrum. Biological Invasions9: 181–196.
52.
HarawayD (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science.
London:
Routledge.
53.
HawkinsBHoldenC (2013)
Framing the alcohol policy debate: Industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market. Critical Policy Studies7(1): 53–71.
54.
HébertK (2010)
In pursuit of singular salmon: Paradoxes of sustainability and the quality commodity. Science as Culture19(4): 553–581.
55.
HenryN (2004) Scientists criticize hatchery listing decision for undermining fish recovery efforts. Greenwire, 13 May, 3.
56.
HessMARabeCDVogelJL, et al. (2012)
Supportive breeding boosts natural population abundance with minimal negative impacts on fitness of a wild population of Chinook salmon.Molecular Ecology21(21): 5236–5250.
57.
HilsonC (2015)
Framing fracking: Which frames are heard in English planning and environmental policy and practice?Journal of Environmental Law27(2): 177–202.
58.
HunterMLJrRedfordKHLindenmayerDB (2014)
The complementary niches of anthropocentric and biocentric conservationists.Conservation Biology28(3): 641–645.
59.
IrvineJRO’NeillMGodboutL, et al. (2013)
Effects of smolt release timing and size on the survival of hatchery-origin Coho salmon in the Strait of Georgia. Progress in Oceanography115: 111–118.
60.
Irvine J (2009) The successful completion of scientific public policy: Lessons learned while developing Canada’s Wild Salmon Policy. Environmental Science & Policy 12(2): 140–148.
61.
JohnsonBMKempBMThorgaardGH (2018)
Increased mitochondrial DNA diversity in ancient Columbia River basin Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. PLoS One13(1): 1–26.
KareivaPWattsSMcDonaldR, et al. (2007)
Domesticated nature: Shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare.Science316(5833): 1866–1869.
64.
KnappGAmericaTNRoheimCA, et al. (2007) The Great Salmon Run: Competition between Wild and Farmed Salmon.
Washington:
World Wildlife Fund.
65.
LaikreLSchwartzMKWaplesRS, et al. (2010)
Compromising genetic diversity in the wild: Unmonitored large-scale release of plants and animals.Trends in Ecology & Evolution25(9): 520–529.
66.
LatourB (2004) Politics of Nature.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
67.
LichatowichJ (1999) Salmon Without Rivers: A History of the Pacific Salmon Crisis.
Washington:
Island Press.
68.
LichatowichJ (2013) Salmon, People, and Place: A Biologist’s Search for Salmon Recovery.
Corvallis:
Oregon State University Press.
69.
LienMELawJ (2011) ‘
Emergent aliens’: On salmon, nature, and their enactment. Ethnos76(1): 65–87.
70.
LisAStankiewiczP (2017)
Framing shale gas for policy-making in Poland. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning19(1): 53–71.
71.
LorimerJ (2015) Wildlife in the Anthropocene: Conservation after Nature.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
72.
McDonaldJMcCormackPFlemingA, et al. (2016)
Rethinking legal objectives for climate-adaptive conservation. Ecology and Society21(2): 1–10.
73.
McKibbenB (1989) The End of Nature.
New York:
Random House Inc.
Nash R (2014) Wilderness and the American mind. London: Yale University Press.
85.
Nelson MP and Callicott JB (2008) (eds) The Wilderness Debate Rages On: Continuing the Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
86.
NMFS (1991)
Evolutionarily Significant Unit Policy. Federal Register56(224): 58491–58634.
87.
NMFS (1993)
Interim Policy on Artificial Propagation of Pacific Salmon under the Endangered Species Act (“Interim Hatchery Listing Policy”). Federal Register17(573): 17573–17576.
88.
NMFS (2004)
Policy on the Consideration of Hatchery-Origin Fish in Endangered Species Act Listing Determinations for Pacific Salmon and Steelhead (“Final Hatchery Listing Policy”). Federal Register70(123): 37204–32716.
89.
NMFS (2005) Policy on the Consideration of Hatchery-Origin Fish in Endangered Species Act Listing Determinations for Pacific Salmon and Steelhead. Federal Register 70: 37204--37216.
90.
NoakesDJBeamishRJSweetingR, et al. (2000) Changing the balance: Interactions between hatchery and wild Pacific Coho salmon in the presence of regime shifts. Report, North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission Bulletin 2, pp.155–163.
91.
NoakesDJFangLHipelKW, et al. (2005)
The Pacific salmon treaty: A century of debate and an uncertain future. Group Decision and Negotiation14(6): 501–522.
NPAFC (2018) NPAFC statistics: Pacific salmonid catch and hatchery release data. Available at: https://npafc.org/statistics/ (accessed 9 December 2019).
94.
PfennigKSKellyALPierceAA (2016)
Hybridization as a facilitator of species range expansion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences283(1839): 1–9.
95.
ReinMSchönD (1996)
Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowledge and Policy9(1): 85–104.
96.
ReisenbichlerRRRubinSWetzelL, et al. (2004) Natural selection after release from a hatchery leads to domestication in steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss. In: Leber M, Kitada S, Blankenship HL and Svåsand T (eds) Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp.371–384.
97.
RobinsonE (2001) Ruling on hatchery fish classification draws strong reactions. The Columbian, 4 October, 4.
98.
RockströmJSteffenWNooneK, et al. (2009)
A safe operating space for humanity.Nature461(7263): 472–475.
99.
RuggeroneGTIrvineJR (2018)
Numbers and biomass of natural‐and hatchery‐origin pink salmon, chum salmon, and sockeye salmon in the north Pacific Ocean, 1925–2015. Marine and Coastal Fisheries10(2): 152–168.
100.
RuggeroneGTPetermanRMDornerB, et al. (2010)
Magnitude and trends in abundance of hatchery and wild pink salmon, chum salmon, and sockeye salmon in the North Pacific Ocean. Marine and Coastal Fisheries2(1): 306–328.
101.
RutherfordS (2018).
The Anthropocene’s animal? Coywolves as feral cotravelers. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space1(1–2): 206–223.
102.
ScovilleC (2019)
Hydraulic society and a “stupid little fish”: Toward a historical ontology of endangerment. Theory and Society48(1): 1–37.
103.
SelinH (ed.) (2003) Nature across Cultures: Views of Nature and the Environment in Non-Western Cultures.
Vol. 4.
Manchester:
Springer Science + Business Media.
104.
ShivaV (2017) Cultivating the wild. In: Van Horn G and Hausdoerffer J (eds) Wildness: Relations of People and Place. Washington: Island Press, pp.228–232.
105.
ShmueliDF (2008)
Framing in geographical analysis of environmental conflicts: Theory, methodology and three case studies. Geoforum39(6): 2048–2061.
106.
SnowDABenfordRD (1988)
Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research1(1): 197–217.
107.
SouléM (2014)
Also seeking common ground in conservation. Conservation Biology28(3): 637–638.
108.
Species at Risk Act (2002) (Canada).
109.
SuchetS (2002) ‘
Totally Wild’? Colonising discourses, indigenous knowledges and managing wildlife. Australian Geographer33(2): 141–157.
110.
SundbergJ (2011)
Diabolic Caminos in the desert and cat fights on the Río: A posthumanist political ecology of boundary enforcement in the United States–Mexico borderlands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers101(2): 318–336.
111.
TaylorJEIII (2009) Making Salmon: An Environmental History of the Northwest Fisheries Crisis.
Seattle:
University of Washington Press.
Trout Unlimited v. Lohn (2009) 559 F.3d 946, 9th Cir.
116.
UNEP (2019) Global Environmental Outlook GEO-66: Healthy Planet, Healthy People.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
117.
US Fish and Wildlife Service (no date, a) What is the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service doing about salmon? Available at: https://www.fws.gov/salmonofthewest/fws.htm (accessed 18 December 2019).
US Newswire (2004)
PLF calls speculation over Bush Administration policy on salmon nothing but a political ploy in an election year. US Newswire, 30 April, 2.
120.
U.S. v. Oregon (1969) 302 F. Supp. 899, 905, D.Or.
121.
U.S. v. Washington (1975) 384 F. Supp. 312, 9th Cir.
122.
Van HornGHausdoerfferJ (2017) Wildness: Relations of People and Place.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
123.
VanniniPVanniniA (2016) Wilderness.
New York:
Routledge.
124.
VanniniPVanniniAS (2019)
Wildness as vitality: A relational approach. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space2(2): 252–273.
125.
WadewitzLK (2012) The Nature of Borders: Salmon, Boundaries, and Bandits on the Salish Sea.
Seattle:
University of Washington Press.
126.
WapnerP (2014)
The changing nature of nature: Environmental politics in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Politics14(4): 36–54.
127.
Warren DR and McClure MM (2012) Quantifying Salmon-Derived Nutrient Loads from the Mortality of Hatchery-Origin Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Snake River Basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141: 1287–1294.
128.
WatsonI (2014)
Re-centring First Nations knowledge and places in a terra nullius space. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples10(5): 508–520.
WilliamsonKSMurdochARPearsonsTN, et al. (2010)
Factors influencing the relative fitness of hatchery and wild spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Wenatchee River, Washington, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences67(11): 1840–1851.
131.
WuerthnerG (2014) Keeping the Wild: Against the Domestication of Earth.
Washington:
Island Press.
132.
Young N and Matthews R (2011) The aquaculture controversy in Canada: Activism, policy, and contested science. Vancouver: UBC Press.
