This multi-authored collection of papers examines the complex realities of research on natural resource industries, including the messy entanglements of extraction, materiality, and everyday social life this research entails. Of central importance to the contributors is how scholars confront fieldwork challenges ethically, methodologically, and corporeally. The collection has two key objectives. First, it expands our understanding of extractive industry by bringing together work on resources conventionally understood as extractive (e.g. oil and minerals) alongside resource-intensive industries not typically examined through an extractive lens, for instance fisheries, agricultural monocultures, water, and tourism. As such, it considers the historical and current conditions that facilitate the extraction of resources in parallel, cyclical, and reproducing forms. Second, the collection examines scholarly positionalities, methodologies, and dilemmas that arise when studying nature-intensive industries, including the extractive dimensions associated with social research itself. Together, the pieces argue that research concerning extractive industries entails multiple scholarly positions—positions problematically inflected with colonialism and always shaped by power relations. Contributors to the section draw largely from feminist, postcolonial, anti-racist, and historical materialist insights to frame and problematize the corporeal and representational concerns arising from their scholarship on nature-intensive industries, including personal dilemmas that they have encountered in their work. Overall, the collection is driven by the realization that research, and the analyses it entails, may serve as a tool for emancipatory intervention yet also reproduce inequality. The futures of the people and ecosystems at the center of our studies impel constant reflection so that our work, and that of the next generation of scholars, may offer critical analysis that contributes to transforming—rather than reinforcing—oppressive relations associated with extractive sectors and industries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottD (2006)
Disrupting the ‘whiteness’ of fieldwork in geography. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography27(3): 326–341.
2.
AhlersRZwarteveenM (2009)
The water question in feminism: Water control and gender inequities in a neo-liberal era. Gender, Place & Culture16(4): 409–426
3.
AhmedS (2004) Cultural Politics of Emotion.
London:
Routledge.
4.
AhmedS (2017) Living a Feminist Life.
Durham, NC and London:
Duke University Press.
5.
AmadiumeI (1987) Male Daughters, Female Husbands: Gender and Sex in an African Society.
London:
Zed Books.
6.
AnthiasP (2018)
Indigenous peoples and the new extraction: From territorial rights to hydrocarbon citizenship in the Bolivian Chaco. Latin American Perspectives45: 136–153.
7.
BaglioniECamplingL (2017)
Natural resource industries as global value chains: Frontiers, fetishism, labour and the state. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space49(11): 2437–2456.
8.
BairJWernerM (2011)
Commodity chains and the uneven geographies of global capitalism: A disarticulations perspective. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space43(5): 988–997.
9.
BebbingtonABornschleglTJohnsonA (2013) Political economies of extractive industry: From documenting complexity to informing current debates. Development and Change. Introduction to virtual special issue. September 30 2013 DOI: 10.1111/dech.12057.
10.
BenedikterRKühneKBenedikterA, et al. (2016)
Keep it in the ground. The Paris Agreement and the renewal of the energy economy: Toward an alternative future for globalized resource policy?Challenge59(3): 205–222.
11.
BennettHL (2007)
Writing into a void. Representing slavery and freedom in the narrative of colonial Spanish America.Social Text 9325(4): 67–89.
12.
BestorTC (2000)
How Sushi went global. Foreign Policy121: 54–63.
13.
Bichler S and Nitzan J (2004) Dominant capital and the new wars. In: Assasi, van der Pijl and Wigan (eds) Contextualizing Global Regulation: Managing Crises After the Imperial Turn. London: Palgrave. pp.255--327.
14.
BilloEHiemstraN (2013)
Mediating messiness: Expanding ideas of flexibility, reflexivity, and embodiment in fieldwork. Gender, Place & Culture20: 313–328.
15.
BilloEMountzA (2016)
For institutional ethnography: Geographical approaches to institutions and the everyday. Progress in Human Geography40(2): 199–220.
Bittle S (2012) Still dying for a living. Vancouver: UBC Press.
18.
BraudelF (1992 [1979]) The Structures of Everyday Life: The Limits of the Possible.
Berkeley and Los Angeles:
University of California Press.
19.
BridgeG (2008)
Global production networks and the extractive sector: Governing resource-based development. Journal of Economic Geography8(3): 389–419.
20.
BridgeG (2009)
Material worlds: Natural resources, resource geography and the material economy. Geography Compass3: 1217–1244.
21.
Bobrow-StrainA (2007) Intimate Enemies: Landowners, Power, and Violence in Chiapas.
Durham, NC and London:
Duke University Press.
22.
BondiL (2002) Introduction. In: BondiLAvisHBankeyR, et al. (eds) Subjectivities, Knowledges, and Feminist Geographies: The Subjects and Ethics of Social Research.
London:
Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 1--12.
23.
BourgoisP (1989) Ethnicity at Work.
Baltimore, MD:
The Johns Hopkins UEJ.
24.
BunkerSG (1988) Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Equal Exchange and the Failure of the Modern State.
Urbana:
University of Illinois Press.
25.
BunkerSGCiccantellPS (2005) Globalization and the Race for Resources.
Baltimore, MD:
JHU Press.
26.
CahillC (2007)
Repositioning ethical commitments: Participatory action research as a relational praxis of social change. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies6(3): 360–373.
27.
CahillCSultanaFPainR (2007)
Participatory ethics: Politics, practices, institutions. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies6(3): 304–318.
28.
CameronE (2015) Far off Metal River: Inuit Lands, Settler Stories, and the Making of the Contemporary Arctic.
Vancouver:
UBC Press.
29.
CampbellLMCorsonCGrayNJ, et al. (2014)
Studying global environmental meetings to understand global environmental governance: Collaborative event ethnography at the tenth conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity. Global Environmental Politics14(3): 1–20.
30.
CarrollWKHackettRA (2006)
Democratic media activism through the lens of social movement theory.Media, Culture & Society28(1): 83–104.
31.
Hernandez CervantesA (2015)
Crítica al pluralismo jurídico neoconservador desde la epistemología feminista. Amicus Curiae12(2): 235–259.
32.
ChackoE (2004)
Positionality and praxis: Fieldwork experience in rural India. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography25(1): 51–63.
33.
CheynsE (2014)
Making “minority voices” heard in transnational roundtables: The role of local NGOs in reintroducing justice and attachments. Agriculture and Human Values31: 439–453.
34.
Ciccantell P and Smith DA (2009) Rethinking Global Commodity Chains: Integrating Extraction, Transport, and Manufacturing. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50(3--4): 361--384.
35.
CouldryN (2008)
Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New Media & Society10(3): 373–391.
36.
CoulthardGS (2014) Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
37.
CrenshawK (1989)
Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum140: 139–167.
38.
CresswellT (2010)
Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28(1): 17–31.
39.
Curley A (2020) Unsettling Indian Water Settlements: The Little Colorado River, the San Juan River, and Colonial Enclosures. Antipode. Epub ahead of print 15 April 2019. doi:10.1111/anti.12535
40.
DafnosT (2013)
Pacification and indigenous struggles in Canada. Socialist Studies/Études Socialistes9(2): 57--77.
41.
DaigleMRamírezMM (2019) Decolonial geographies. In: Antipode Editorial Collective (Eds.) Keywords in Radical Geography: Antipode at 50, pp.78–84.
42.
DaviesJSpencerD (2010) Emotions in the Field: The Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork Experience.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
43.
DavisA (1981) Women, Race, & Class.
New York andToronto: Vintage.
44.
De la CadenaM (2015) Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice Across Andean Worlds.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
45.
DeneaultAAbadieDSacherW (2008)
Noir Canada: Pillage, corruption et criminalité en Afrique. Communications2: 1.
46.
DericksonKDRoutledgeP (2015)
Resourcing scholar-activism: Collaboration, transformation, and the production of knowledge. The Professional Geographer67(1): 1–7.
47.
De Santana PinhoP (2015)
The dirty body that cleans: Representations of domestic workers in Brazilian common sense. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism13(1): 103–128.
48.
DyckI (1993)
Ethnography: A feminist method?The Canadian Geographer37(1): 52–57.
49.
EatonEKinchyA (2016)
Quiet voices in the fracking debate: Ambivalence, nonmobilization, and individual action in two extractive communities (Saskatchewan and Pennsylvania). Energy Research & Social Science20: 22–30.
50.
EllingsonL (2017) Embodiment in Qualitative Research.
London:
Taylor & Francis.
51.
EnglandK (1994)
Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer46: 80–89.
52.
EnglandK (2002) Interviewing elites: Cautionary tales about researching women managers in Canada’s banking industry. In: MossP (ed) Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods.
Oxford:
Blackwell Publishers Ltd, pp. 200--213.
53.
EnglandK (2006) Producing feminist geographies: Theory, methodologies and research strategies. In: AitkinSValentineG (eds) Approaches to Human Geography.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, pp.286–297.
54.
FabricantNGustafsonB (2015a)
Moving beyond the extractivism debate: Imagining new social economies. NACLA Report on the Americas47(4): 40–45.
55.
FabricantNGustafsonB (2015b) Revolutionary extractivism in Bolivia: Imagining alternative world orders from the ground up. North American Congress on Latin America. Available at: https://nacla.org/news/2015/03/02/revolutionary-extractivism-bolivia (accessed 23 October 2019).
56.
FariaCMollettS (2016)
Critical feminist reflexivity and the politics of whiteness in the “field”. Gender, Place and Culture23(1): 79–93.
57.
FedericiS (2004) Caliban and the Witch.
New York:
Autonomedia.
58.
FisherKT (2015)
Positionality, subjectivity, and race in transnational and transcultural geographical research. Gender, Place & Culture22(4): 456–473.
59.
Ford-Smith H (1989) Ring Ding in a Tight Corner: A Case Study of Funding and Organizational Democracy in Sistren, 1977–1988. Toronto: Women's Program, ICAE.
60.
FrankAG (1967) Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil.
New York:
Monthly Review Press.
61.
FraserN (2016)
Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Review100: 99–117.
GagoVMezzadraS (2017)
A critique of the extractive operations of capital: Toward an expanded concept of extractivism. Rethinking Marxism29(4): 574–591.
64.
GaleanoE (1997) Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent.
New York:
Monthly Review Press.
65.
Garland-Thompson R (2011) Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept. Hypatia 26(3): 591--609.
66.
GarrodJMacdonaldL (2016) Rethinking Canadian mining imperialism in Latin America. In: Mining in Latin America: Critical Approaches to the New Extraction, pp.100–115.
67.
GaudryAJ (2011)
Insurgent research. Wicazo Sa Review26(1): 113–136.
68.
GellertPK (2003)
Renegotiating a timber commodity chain: Lessons from Indonesia on the political construction of global commodity chains. Sociological Forum18(1): 53–84.
69.
GereffiGKorzeniewiczM (1994) Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism.
Westport, CT and London:
Praeger.
70.
GirvanN (2017 [1976]) Corporate Imperialism: Conflict and Expropriation. New York: Routledge.
71.
GlassRDNewmanA (2015)
Ethical and epistemic dilemmas in knowledge production: Addressing their intersection in collaborative, community-based research.Theory and Research in Education13(1): 23–37.
72.
GoldsteinDM (2003) Laughter Out of Place: Race, Class, Violence, and Sexuality in a Rio Shantytown.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
73.
GordonTWebberJR (2016) Blood of Extraction: Canadian Imperialism in Latin America.
Nova Scotia:
Fernwood Publishing.
74.
GriffinPAJaffeAMLontDH, et al. (2015)
Science and the stock market: Investors’ recognition of unburnable carbon. Energy Economics52: 1–12.
75.
Guerrón MonteroC (2014)
Multicultural tourism, demilitarization, and the process of peace building in Panama. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology19(3): 418–440.
76.
HamiltonALewisAMcCoyMA, et al. (2011) Market and Industry Dynamics in the Global Tuna Supply Chain.
Honiara:
Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency.
77.
HansonS (1997) As the world turns: New horizons in feminist geographic methodologies. In: JonesJPNastHJRobertsSM (eds) Thresholds in Feminist Geography: Difference, Methodology, Representation.
Lanham, MD and New York:
Rowan & Littlefield Publishers Inc, pp. 119--128.
78.
HarrisLM (2009)
Gender and emergent water governance: Comparative overview of neoliberalized natures and gender dimensions of privatization, devolution and marketization. Gender, Place & Culture16(4): 387–408.
79.
HartmanS (2016)
The belly of the world: A note on Black women’s labors. Souls18(1): 166–173.
80.
HaviceE (2013)
Rights-based management in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean tuna fishery: Economic and environmental change under the Vessel Day Scheme. Marine Policy42: 259–267.
81.
HaviceE (2018) Unsettled sovereignty and the sea: Mobilities and more-than-territorial configurations of state power. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1280--1297.
82.
HaviceECamplingL (2017)
Where chain governance and environmental governance meet: Interfirm strategies in the canned tuna global value chain. Economic Geography93(3): 292–313.
83.
HaviceECamplingL (2018) Corporate Dynamics in the Shelf-Stable Tuna Industry.
Honiara:
Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency.
84.
HaviceEReedK (2012)
Fishing for development? Tuna resource access and industrial change in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Agrarian Change12(2&3): 413–435.
85.
HawkinsROjedaDAsherK, et al. (2011)
A discussion.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29(2): 237–253.
86.
HimleyM (2013)
Regularizing extraction in Andean Peru: Mining and social mobilization in an age of corporate social responsibility. Antipode45: 394–416.
87.
HuberM (2013)
Fueling capitalism: Oil, the regulation approach, and the ecology of capital. Economic Geography89: 171–194.
88.
HyndmanJ (2001)
Towards a feminist geopolitics.The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien45(2): 210–242.
89.
IkanoneG, et al. (2014) Crude Business: Oil Theft Communities and Poverty in Nigeria.
Port Harcourt:
Social Action.
90.
IngoldT (2012)
Toward an ecology of materials. Annual Review of Anthropology41(1): 427–442.
91.
IretonC (2017)
“They are blacks of the caste of black Christians”: Old Christian black blood in the sixteenth and early seventeenth-century Iberian Atlantic. Hispanic American Historical Review97(4): 579–612.
92.
JohnsonA (2017)
Pudrición del Cogollo and the (post-)neoliberal ecological fix in Ecuador’s palm oil industry. Geoforum80: 13–23.
93.
JohnsonA (2019)
The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil’s national interpretation process in Ecuador: ‘Fitting’ global standards into local contexts. Journal of Rural Studies71: 125–133.
94.
JurisJS (2012)
Reflections on #occupy everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist39(2): 259–279.
95.
KamaK (2019) Resource-making controversies: Knowledge, anticipatory politics and economization of unconventional fossil fuels. Progress in Human Geography. Epub ahead of print 20 February 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0309132519829223.
96.
KaplinskyRMorrisM (2016)
Thinning and thickening: Productive sector policies in the era of global value chains. The European Journal of Development Research28(4): 625–645.
97.
KatzC (1994)
Playing the field: Questions of fieldwork in geography. The Professional Geographer46: 67–72.
98.
KatzC (2001)
Vagabond capitalism and the necessity of social reproduction. Antipode33(4): 709–728.
99.
KelleyRD (2017)
The rest of us: Rethinking settler and native. American Quarterly69(2): 267–276.
100.
Kenney-LazarM (2012)
Plantation rubber, land grabbing and social-property transformation in southern Laos. The Journal of Peasant Studies39: 1017–1037.
101.
Killoran-McKibbinSZalikA (2016) Rethinking the extractive/productive binary under neoliberalism. In: SpringerSBirchKMacLeavyJ (eds) The Handbook of Neoliberalism.
Oxon and New York:
Routledge, pp.625–636.
102.
KindonSKesbyMPainR (2009) Participatory action research. In: KitchinRThriftN (eds) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography.
London:
Elsevier, pp.90–95.
103.
KirschS (2018) Engaged Anthropology: Politics Beyond the Text.
Berkeley:
University of California.
104.
KitchinRLinehanDO’CallaghanC, et al. (2013)
The creation and circulation of public geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography3(1): 96–102.
105.
KobayashiA (1994)
Coloring the field: Gender, “race,” and the politics of fieldwork. The Professional Geographer46: 73–80.
106.
KobayashiA (2003)
GPC ten years on: Is self-reflexivity enough?Gender, Place and Culture10(4): 345–349.
107.
KoffmanERaghuramP (2015) The value of social reproduction. In: Gendered Migrations and Global Social Reproduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.180–185.
108.
KothariU (2002) Feminist and postcolonial challenges to development. In: KothariUMinogueM (eds) Development Theory and Practice: Critical Perspectives.
London:
Palgrave, pp. 35--51.
109.
KothariU (2006)
An agenda for thinking about ‘race’ in development. Progress in Development Studies6(1): 9–23.
110.
LawsonV (2007)
Geographies of care and responsibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers97(1): 1–11.
111.
LonghurstRHoEJohnstonL (2008)
Using ‘the body’ as an ‘instrument of research’: Kimch’i and Pavlova.Area40(2): 208–217.
112.
LozanoBR (2010)
El feminismo no puede ser uno porque las mujeres somos diversas: Aportes a un feminismo negro decolonial desde la experiencia de las mujeres negras del Pacífico colombiano.Revista La Manzana de la Discordia5(2): 7–24.
113.
LuFValdiviaGSilvaNL (2016) Oil, Revolution, and Indigenous Citizenship in Ecuadorian Amazonia.
New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
114.
McGladeCEkinsP (2015)
The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 [deg] C. Nature517(7533): 187–190.
115.
McGuirkPO’NeillP (2012)
Critical geographies with the state: The problem of social vulnerability and the politics of engaged research. Antipode44: 1374–1394.
116.
Marcus EG (1995) Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95--117.
117.
MarcusEG (2011) Multi-sited ethnography: Five or six things I know about it now. In: ColemanSvon HellermannP (eds) Multi-Sited Ethnography: Problems and Possibilities in the Translocation of Research Methods.
New York:
Routledge, pp. 16--32.
118.
MiesM (1986) Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour.
London:
Zed Books.
119.
MingorríaS (2018)
Violence and visibility in oil palm and sugarcane conflicts: The case of Polochic Valley, Guatemala. The Journal of Peasant Studies45: 1314–1340.
120.
MohammadR (2001) ‘Insiders’ and/or ‘outsiders’: Positionality, theory and praxis. In: LimbMDwyerC (eds) Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers: Issues and Debates.
London:
Arnold, pp.101–120.
121.
MohantyC (1991) Introduction. In: MohantyCRussoATorresL (eds) Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism.
Bloomington:
Indiana University Press, pp. 1--47.
122.
MohantyC (1997) Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In: VisvanathanNDugganLWiegersmaN, et al. (eds) The Women, Gender and Development Reader.
London:
Zed Books, pp.79–85.
123.
Mollett S (2017) Irreconcilable differences? A postcolonial intersectional reading of gender, development and Human Rights in Latin America. Gender, Place & Culture 24(1): 1--17.
124.
Mollett S (in preparation) The Making of Residential Tourism Space: Land, Servitude and Embodied Histories in Panama. Social and Cultural Geography.
125.
MollettSFariaC (2013)
Messing with gender in feminist political ecology. Geoforum45: 116–125.
126.
MooreJW (2003)
The modern world-system as environmental history? Ecology and the rise of capitalism. Theory and Society32: 307–377.
127.
MossP (2002) Taking on, thinking about, and doing feminist research in geography. In: MossP (ed) Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods.
Oxford:
Wiley Blackwell, pp.1–17.
128.
MossP (2005) A bodily notion of research: Power, difference, and specificity in feminist methodology. In: NelsonLSeagerJ (eds) A Companion to Feminist Geography.
Malden, MA:
Blackwell Publishing, pp.41–59.
129.
MossPTeghtsoonianK (2008) Contesting Illness: Processes and Practices.
Toronto:
University of Toronto Press.
130.
MountzA (2004)
Embodying the nation-state: Canada’s response to human smuggling. Political Geography23(3): 323–345.
131.
MountzA (2010) Seeking Asylum: Human Smuggling and Bureaucracy at the Border.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
132.
MullingsB (1999)
Insider or outsider, neither or both: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum30: 337–350.
133.
NagarR (2002)
Footloose researchers, “traveling” theories, and the politics of transnational feminist praxis. Gender, Place and Culture9(2): 179–186.
134.
NagarR (2014) Muddying the Waters: Coauthoring Feminisms Across Scholarship and Activism.
Urbana:
University of Illinois Press.
135.
Nagar R and Shirazi R (2019) Radical Vulnerability. Keywords in Radical Geography: Antipode at 50, pp.236--242. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119558071.ch44
136.
NairnK (1999)
Embodied fieldworkJournal of Geography98(6): 272–282.
137.
NastH (1994)
Women in the field: Critical feminist methodologies and theoretical perspectives. The Professional Geographer46(1): 54–66.
138.
NightingaleA (2006)
The nature of gender: Work, gender, and environment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24(2): 165–185.
139.
NightingaleAJ (2011)
Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum42(2): 153–162.
140.
NolinCStephensJ (2011)
“We have to protect the investors”: ‘Development’ & Canadian mining companies in Guatemala. Journal of Rural and Community Development5(3): 37--70.
141.
Osborne TM (2011) Carbon forestry and agrarian change: access and land control in a Mexican rainforest. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38(4): 859--883.
142.
Osborne T (2015) Tradeoffs in carbon commodification: A political ecology of common property forest governance. Geoforum 67: 64--77.
143.
OsborneT (2017)
Public political ecology: A community of praxis for earth stewardship. Journal of Political Ecology24(1): 843--860..
144.
PainRFinnMBouvengR, et al. (2013)
Productive tensions – Engaging geography students in participatory action research with communities. Journal of Geography in Higher Education37(1): 28–43.
145.
ParkerB (2017)
The feminist geographer as Killjoy: Excavating gendered urban power relations. The Professional Geographer69(2): 321–328.
146.
PasternakS (2015)
How capitalism will save colonialism: The privatization of reserve lands in Canada. Antipode47(1): 179–196.
147.
PearceFSniderL (1995) Regulating capitalism. In: Pearce F and Snider L (eds) Corporate Crime: Contemporary Debates. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp.19–47.
148.
PearsonZCraneN (2017)
The challenge of feminist political geography to state centrism in Latin American Geography. Journal of Latin American Geography16(1): 185–193.
149.
PerryK-K (2013) Black Women Against the Land Grab: The Fight for Racial Justice in Brazil.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
150.
Peters K, Steinberg P and Stratford E (eds) (2018) Territory Beyond Terra. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield International Ltd.
151.
PikeR (1967)
Sevillian society in the sixteenth century: Slaves and freedmen.The Hispanic American Historical Review47(3): 344–359.
152.
PulidoL (2002)
Reflections on a white discipline. The Professional Geographer54(1): 42–49.
153.
RatnamC (2019)
Listening to difficult stories: Listening as research methodology. Emotion, Space and Society31: 18–25.
154.
RegoJL (1932/1966) Menino de Engenho.
Rio de Janeiro:
Jose Olympio.
155.
RocheleauDEThomas-SlayterBPWangariE (1996) Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences. New York: Routledge.
156.
RodneyW (2018 [1972]) How Europe Underdeveloped Africa.
London:
Verso Trade.
157.
RoseG (1997)
Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography21(3): 305–20.
158.
Saldaña-PortilloMJ (2016) Indian Given: Racial Geographies across Mexico and the United States.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
159.
SawyerS (2004) Crude Chronicles: Indigenous Politics, Multinational Oil, and Neoliberalism in Ecuador.
Durham, NC and London:
Duke University Press.
160.
ScheinR (2011)
Distinguished historical geography lecture, 2011. Life, liberty and the pursuit of historical geography. Historical Geography39: 7–28.
161.
SmithLT (2013 [1999]) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples.
London and New York:
Zed Books Ltd.
162.
SpivakGC (1999) A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present.
Cambridge, MA and London:
Harvard University Press.
163.
SteinhauerE (2002)
Thoughts on an Indigenous research methodology. Canadian Journal of Native Education26(2): 69.
164.
Stoler AL (2016) Duress: Imperial durabilities in our times. Duke University Press.
165.
SuiDGoodchildM (2011)
The convergence of GIS and social media: Challenges for GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science25(11): 1737–1748.
166.
Sultana F (2007) Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 6: 374--385.
167.
Sultana F (2011) Suffering for Water, Suffering from Water: Emotional Geographies of Resource Access, Control and Conflict. Geoforum 42(2): 163--172.
168.
Sultana F (2015) Emotional Political Ecology. In: Bryant R (ed) The International Handbook of Political Ecology. London: Edward Elgar, pp 633--645.
169.
SultanaFLoftusA (2012) The Right to Water: Politics, Governance and Social Struggles.
London:
Routledge.
170.
SundbergJ (2003)
Masculinist epistemologies and the politics of fieldwork in Latin Americanist Geography. The Professional Geographer55(2): 180–190.
171.
SundbergJ (2004)
Identities in the making: Conservation, gender and race in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Gender, Place & Culture11(1): 43–66.
172.
SundbergJ (2005)
Looking for the critical geographer, or why bodies and geographies matter to the emergence of critical geographies of Latin America. Geoforum36(1): 17–28.
173.
SundbergJ (2014)
Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies21(1): 33–47.
174.
TennantJPWaldnerFJacquesDC, et al. (2016)
The academic, economic and societal impacts of open access: An evidence-based review. F1000Research5(632): 1–19.
175.
ThampyG (2013) Indigenous Contestations of Shifting Property Regimes: Land Conflicts and the Ngobe in Bocas del Toro, Panama.
Columbus:
The Ohio State University.
176.
ThiemCHRobertsonM (2010)
Behind enemy lines: Reflections on the practice and production of oppositional research. Geoforum41(1): 5–6.
177.
TijerinaS (2017)
Canadian official development aid to Latin America: The struggle over the humanitarian agenda, 1963–1977. Journal of Canadian Studies51(1): 217–243.
178.
ToddZ (2016)
An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology29(1): 4–22.
179.
TsingA (2015) The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins.
Princeton; NJ:
Princeton University Press.
180.
Valdivia G (2008) Governing relations between people and things: Citizenship, territory, and the political economy of petroleum in Ecuador. Political Geography 27(4): 456--477.
181.
ValdiviaG (2015)
The sacrificial zones of “progressive” extraction in Andean Latin America. Latin America Research Review50(3): 245–253.
182.
ValdiviaGLuF (2016) Informe de resultados preliminares: Los impactos de la extracción petrolera, políticas regulatorias y prácticas ambientales en Esmeraldas, Ecuador. Estudio NSF 1259049. Research report for EP Petroecuador, Esmeraldas.
183.
van NoorloosF (2013)
Residential tourism and multiple mobilities: Local citizenship and community fragmentation in Costa Rica. Sustainability5(2): 570–589.
184.
WadeP (2013)
Articulations of eroticism and race: Domestic service in Latin America. Feminist Theory14(2): 187–202.
185.
WarnaarsXS (2012)
Why be poor when we can be rich? Constructing responsible mining in El Pangui, Ecuador. Resources Policy37: 223–232.
186.
WestP (2012) From Modern Production to Imagined Primitive: The Social World of Coffee from Papua New Guinea.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
187.
WheatD (2016) Atlantic Africa and the Spanish Caribbean, 1570–1640.
Chapel Hill:
University of North Carolina Press.
188.
WhitsonR (2017)
Painting pictures of ourselves: Researcher subjectivity in the practice of feminist reflexivityThe Professional Geographer69(2): 299–306.
189.
Willems-BraunB (1997)
Buried epistemologies: The politics of nature in (post) colonial British Columbia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers87: 3–31.
190.
WolfD (1996) Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork.
Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
191.
WutichARagsdaleK (2008)
Water insecurity and emotional distress: Coping with supply, access, and seasonal variability of water in a Bolivian squatter settlement.Social Science & Medicine67(12): 2116–2125.
192.
Zalik A (2004) The Niger Delta:‘petro violence’ and ‘partnership development.’ Review of African Political Economy 31(101): 401--424.
193.
Zalik A (2010) Oil ‘futures’: Shell’s Scenarios and the social constitution of the global oil market. Geoforum 41(4): 553--564.
194.
Zalik A (2011) Protest as Violence in oilfields: The contested representation of profiteering in two extractive sites. In Feldman S, Geisler c and Menon G (eds.) Accumulating Insecurity: Violence and Dispossession in the Making of Everday Life. Athens: University of Georgia Press, pp. 261--284.
