Abstract
Purpose:
To compare published self-reported practice patterns among retina specialists with published claims data representing actual practice patterns for the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the United States.
Methods:
We compared physician self-reported preference for anti-VEGF medications to treat AMD in the American Society of Retina Specialists’ Preferences and Trends (PAT) survey with a previously published study using claims data from 2006 to 2015 from OptumLabs Data Warehouse as a data source. A Pearson χ2 test compared the relative proportions of drug use between the 2 groups, with <.05 indicating statistical significance.
Results:
From 2006 to 2015, the PAT surveys had approximately 3548 respondents to questions on which anti-VEGF medication was used for the treatment of AMD. Over the study period, 62.3% (2211/3548) of respondents preferred bevacizumab, 30.4% (1078/3548) ranibizumab, and 7.3% (259/3548) aflibercept in the treatment of AMD. Claims data on anti-VEGF use for AMD noted 59.7% (359 267/601 917) of injections were for bevacizumab, 23.8% (143 200/601 917) were for ranibizumab, and 16.5% (99 450/601 917) were for aflibercept. The difference in the relative use of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept use was not significant between the data sets (P = .1991).
Conclusions:
The PAT survey responses appear to reflect actual physician practices based upon claims data and demonstrate the prevalence of bevacizumab as the prevailing treatment for AMD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.