Abstract
Objective:
To evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing removal of an epiretinal membrane (ERM) with good starting visual acuity.
Design:
Retrospective chart review.
Participants:
Forty eyes of 40 patients seen at a tertiary, referral-based private practice.
Methods:
All patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with removal of an ERM by a single surgeon (G.K.S.) from the years 2012 to 2014 were evaluated. Patients who were phakic, had a baseline visual acuity of 20/50 or worse, and those who had surgery less than 6 months prior to data collection were excluded.
Results:
Of the 40 patients included, only 2 (5%) developed a serious postoperative complication. One had a vitreous hemorrhage that cleared without further surgical intervention, and another developed a macula on retinal detachment that required 1 additional procedure. Nineteen (47.5%) had improved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), 10 (25%) maintained their initial BCVA, 7 (17.5%) lost 1 to 2 lines, and 4 (10%) lost 3 lines or greater at their last follow-up visit. When looking only at idiopathic ERMs in the group, the results were similar with 48% with improved vision, 29% maintained the initial BCVA, 16% lost 1 to 2 lines, and 6% lost 3 lines or greater.
Discussion:
Surgery to remove an ERM is a reasonable option for those with significant metamorphopsia and highly symptomatic blurring of central vision, even with good baseline visual acuity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
