Abstract
Category:
Ankle; Ankle Arthritis
Introduction/Purpose:
Obesity is an ongoing public health epidemic with wide-ranging implications for orthopaedic surgery. Bariatric surgery has been shown to be an effective method for weight reduction. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare rates of reoperation between patients who underwent primary ankle arthrodesis (AA) and those who underwent total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) after undergoing bariatric surgery.
Methods:
Utilizing data from PearlDiver, patients who received primary AA or TAA with prior history of bariatric surgery to a cohort without prior bariatric surgery were retrospectively analyzed for reoperations. Both cohorts were propensity-matched based on age, sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index in a 1:4 ratio. Indications for reoperation included revision, prosthetic joint infection (PJI), hardware removal, adjacent joint fusion, and local open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and hazard ratios were calculated for five years after the procedure.
Results:
Of the 801 patients with prior history of bariatric surgery, 519 (65%) underwent AA, while 282 (35%) underwent TAA. At 5 years post-operatively, patients who had undergone AA showed a higher incidence of adjacent joint fusion if they had prior history of bariatric surgery (Hazard ratio: 1.79, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.23 - 2.61, P-value < 0.001). No differences in reoperation rates were observed for PJI, hardware removal and ORIF. At 5 years, patients who had undergone TAA with history of bariatric surgery showed no difference in the incidence of revision, PJI, hardware removal, ORIF and adjacent joint fusion as compared to patients who underwent TAA with no history of bariatric surgery.
Conclusion:
Our findings suggest that patients undergoing primary TAA displayed comparable reoperation rates regardless of prior bariatric surgery history over a five-year post-procedure period. In contrast, patients undergoing primary AA exhibited an increased risk of adjacent joint fusions if they had history of bariatric surgery, although the rates of reoperation due to PJI, ORIF, and hardware removal remained comparable. Notably, our results do not position a prior history of bariatric surgery as a significant determinant in reoperation rates. These insights offer valuable guidance for orthopedic surgeons navigating the complexities of surgical interventions in the context of bariatric surgery.